School Health Services
Conditions
Keywords
Children, Student, Questionnaires, Screening, Health check, School health services
Brief summary
The aims of the study are 1) to evaluate the potential benefits or harm of school doctors' routine health checks and 2) to explore whether part of the school doctors' routine health checks can be omitted using study questionnaires which address the parents', school nurses' and teachers' concerns regarding each child.
Detailed description
The aim is to include 4 cities, 21 schools, 14 doctors and 1050 children from Southern Finland. From each doctor the aim is to get 25 children from both grades 1 and 5 (at ages 7 and 11) from 1-2 schools. Before the school doctor's check-up, the parents, nurses and teachers fill a questionnaire to identify any potential concerns about each child. The questions were partly chosen from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Additional questions concerning the child's growth, physical well-being, learning, school absenteeism and the well-being of the whole family are included. The doctor is blinded to the answers of the questionnaires. After the health check the doctors fill an electronic report including any instructions given, significant discussions and follow-up plans and their estimate of the potential benefit or harm of the medical appointment. The child and the parent fill patient-reported experience measure (PREM) forms where they evaluate the benefit or harm of the health check. The researchers compare the need for a doctor's appointment to the benefit gained. At one year after the check-up, the implementations of the follow-up plans are analyzed. A data balance sheet has been prepared. The coordinating ethics committee of the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS) has approved the study protocol. Permissions for the study from the Department of Social Services and Healthcare and the Department of Education from all participating cities have been obtained. Informed consent will be obtained from all participating children, parents, doctors, nurses and teachers.
Interventions
OTHERStudy questionnaires
filled by parents, school nurse and teacher
Sponsors
Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation, Finland
City of Helsinki
Finnish Foundation for General Practice
General Practitioners in Finland
Network of Academic Health Centres, Finland
Foundation for Paediatric Research, Finland
Pediatric Research Center, University of Helsinki
University of Helsinki
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Grade 1 and grade 5 children
Exclusion criteria
Children studying mainly in special education groups or the need of an interpreter
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The need for a school doctor's health check | Baseline | The need for a school doctor's health check according to the study questionnaires filled by parents, nurse and teacher. Areas of concern in study questionnaires: growth, physical symptom, hearing, school absenteeism, learning, concentration, behavior, emotions, getting on with others, eating, sleeping, wellbeing of family, free description of concern, wish to talk about concerns with the school doctor The responses will be categorized into three groups: 1) Needs doctor's health check 2) No need for doctor's health check and 3) Consultation of the nurse or doctor may be sufficient. |
| The benefit/harm of school doctors' routine health checks | Baseline | A seven point likert scale that is based on: 1. Measures from the doctor's electronic report: instruction, other significant discussion, referral to laboratory test/physiotherapist/speech therapist/nutritionist/secondary care, guidance to or contact of a specialised worker or other unit: teacher/special education teacher/school psychologist/school social worker/health center/family guidance center/home service/child welfare, prescription, medical imaging, individual follow-up plan 2. School doctor's evaluation of benefit/harm 3. Patient reported experience measures (PREM) of benefit/harm by child and parent |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Interventions and plans arising from school doctors' routine health checks | Baseline | Measures from the doctor's electronic report: instruction, other significant discussion, referral to laboratory test/physiotherapist/speech therapist/nutritionist/secondary care, guidance to or contact of a specialised worker or other unit: teacher/special education teacher/school psychologist/school social worker/health center/family guidance center/home service/child welfare, prescription, medical imaging, individual follow-up plan |
| The implementations of the school doctors' follow-up plans | 12 months | The implementations of measures from the doctor's electronic report (yes, no, information not accessible): instruction, referral to laboratory test/physiotherapist/speech therapist/nutritionist/secondary care, guidance to or contact of a specialised worker or other unit: teacher/special education teacher/school psychologist/school social worker/health center/family guidance center/home service/child welfare, prescription, medical imaging, individual follow-up plan |
Countries
Finland
Outcome results
None listed