Skip to content

Clinical Performance and Safety Comparison of Stay Safe Link® With Stay Safe® in Patient on CAPD (CAPD-3)

A Randomised, Open-label, Parallel Group, Multi-centre Controlled Study to Evaluate the Clinical Performance and Safety of Stay Safe Link® Compared With Stay Safe® in Patients With End-stage Kidney Disease on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03177031
Acronym
CAPD-3
Enrollment
472
Registered
2017-06-06
Start date
2017-06-13
Completion date
2019-06-26
Last updated
2019-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Brief summary

This post-marketing study is undertaken to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of two continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis produced by Fresenius Medical Care (FMC), i.e. Stay Safe® (STS) that is produced by a plant in Germany and Stay Safe Link® (SSL) that is produced in Malaysia. The study is an open labelled, randomised controlled trial where 434 patients in total will be randomised to either STS or SSL in a 1:1 ratio.

Interventions

DEVICEStay Safe Link (SSL)

CAPD system produced in Malaysia by Fresenius Medical Care

DEVICEStay Safe (STS)

CAPD system produce in Germany by Fresenius Medical Care

Sponsors

Penang Hospital, Malaysia
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 years of age or above 2. End stage kidney failure receiving Stay Safe® PD system for at least 4 weeks 3. Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Requirement for 2.5L exchanges 2. Requirement for Stay Safe Balance® 3. PD-related infection (peritonitis, exit site or tunnel tract infection) in the preceding 8 weeks or during conversion 4. Malfunctioning of PD catheter 5. Planned transfer to automated peritoneal dialysis, haemodialysis or transplant within 90 days 6. Pregnancy 7. Any condition that compromises the integrity of the abdominal wall, abdominal surface, or intra-abdominal cavity, such as documented loss of peritoneal function 8. History of active alcohol or substance abuse in the previous 6 months 9. Other medical condition which, in the investigator's judgement, may be associated with increased risk to the subject or may interfere with study assessments or outcomes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Peritonitis Rate of Stay Safe Link system1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dialysis dose delivered1 yearweekly Kt/V
Ultrafiltration volume1 yearPost-PD bodyweight (kg) minus Pre-PD bodyweight (kg)
Product deficiencies of the PD system1 yearDefect or leakages of PD bags, tubing or organiser (number of defects or leakages detected)
Safety Assessment of the PD system1 yearTechnique failure, defined as the transfer to hemodialysis for more than 30 days (number of technique failure detected)

Countries

Malaysia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026