Skip to content

Prognostic Value of the SGA and NUTRIC in the ICU

Combining Two Commonly Adopted Nutrition Instruments in the Critical Care Setting is Superior to Administering Either One Alone

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03176602
Enrollment
503
Registered
2017-06-05
Start date
2015-08-01
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2017-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness, Malnutrition

Keywords

Subjective Global Assessment, Nutrition Risk in Critically ill Score, Critical Illness

Brief summary

There are two nutrition assessment tools that are commonly used in the ICU, namely the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill Score (mNUTRIC). It has been proposed that both assessments should be performed in the ICU but their combined prognostic ability has not been adequately assessed. This study aimed to: 1) determine the agreement between SGA and mNUTRIC scores, and 2) quantify their utility in discriminating and quantifying hospital mortality risk both independently and in combination.

Detailed description

This prospective observational study will be conducted in a 35-bed mixed ICU in Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, and all the intensivists and nurses will be blinded to the objectives of the study. All patients admitted to the ICU will be consecutively included in the study. For patients readmitted to the ICU during the same hospitalisation, only data from the first admission will be collected. As per routine care, all patients will have their nutritional status assessed by the dietitian within 48 hours of ICU admission. Information required for the nutritional assessment (SGA) will be obtained from the patients or their main care givers, and nutritional status will be dichotomized into well-nourished and malnourished. The electronic medical records automatically and prospectively collects all data required to calculate the mNUTRIC. At the end of the study, the mNUTRIC will be retrospectively calculated. Patients with values of 0-4 will be classified as low-mNUTRIC and 5-9 as high-mNUTRIC. The primary outcome will be hospital mortality and all patients will be followed until discharge or death, for up to one year after admission to the ICU. Agreement and mortality discriminative value (i.e. discrimination) of the 2-category classification of mNUTRIC (Low- and high-mNUTRIC) and SGA (SGA-A and SGA-B/C) will be assessed by Kappa statistics and C-statistics respectively. A multivariate logistic regression will be used to generate the adjusted odds ratios that quantify the association between high-mNUTRIC, malnutrition, and their combination (mNUTRIC ≥ 5 and SGA-B/C) with hospital mortality.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Flinders University
CollaboratorOTHER
National University of Singapore
CollaboratorOTHER
JurongHealth
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* ≥ 18 years old who had ≥ 24 hours length of stay in the ICU * received a nutrition assessment (SGA) from a dietitian within 48 hours of admission to the ICU

Exclusion criteria

* Nil

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital mortalityUp to one year after admission to the ICUAll patients will be followed until discharge or death

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026