Skip to content

Predicting the Outcomes of Labor Induction

Comparing the Accuracy of Manipal Cervical Scoring System and Modified Bishop Score in Predicting Successful Induction of Labor

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03175406
Enrollment
105
Registered
2017-06-05
Start date
2016-04-01
Completion date
2017-04-01
Last updated
2017-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn

Brief summary

Pre induction assessment using bishop scoring system and Manipal cervical scoring system performed on 105 pregnant females

Detailed description

preinduction cervical assessment using The Burnett modification of Bishop score with 1. Cervical dilatation in centimeters will be given a score of zero if dilatation less than 1cm, a score of 1 if 1-2 cm dilated, a score of 2 if more than 2 cm dilataion. 2. Length of the cervix will be given a score of zero if more than 2 cm, a score of 1 if 1-2 cm, a score of 2 if less than 1 cm. 3. Station of fetal head will be given a score of zero if -2 or higher , a score of 1 if -1, a score of 2 if zero or lower. 4. Consistency of the cervix will be given a score of zero if firm, a score of 1 if soft and a score of 2 if soft and stretchable. 5. Position of the cervix will be given a score of zero if posterior, a score of 1 if mid position and a score of 2 if anterior. So, a total score (sum of all scores) of zero at a minimum to 10 at a maximum can be estimated. and also preinduction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound and Manipal system where: 1. Length of the cervix will be given a score of zero if more than 3 cm, a score of 1 if 2-3 cm, a score of 2 if less than 2 cm. 2. Length of the funnel will be given a score of zero if absent, a score of 1 if ≤ 0.5 cm, a score of 2 if more than 0.5 cm. 3. width of the funnel will be given a score of zero if absent, a score of 1 if ≤ 0.5 cm, a score of 2 if more than 0.5 cm. 4. cervical position and shape will be given a score of zero if curved, a score of 2 if straight 5. Distance of presenting part to external os will be given a score of zero if more than 3 cm, a score of 1 if 2-3 cm, a score of 2 if less than 2 cm

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTManipal cervical scoring system

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Singleton gestation at 37 completed weeks or greater . 2. Cephalic presentation. 3. Longitudinal lie. 4. Living fetus. 5. Intact membrane

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous cesarean delivery or rupture uterus. 2. Antepartum hemorrhage including (abruptio placenta, placenta previa or vasa previa). 3. Abnormal fetal lie or presentation. 4. Pervious uterine surgery as myomectomy. 5. Category II, III non stress test. 6. Pelvic structural deformity. 7. Intrautrine growth retardation or macrosomia (estimated fetal weight ˃ than 4kg). 8. Patients who received any pre induction ripening. 9. Active genital herpes. 10. Invasive cervical carcinoma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the occurrence of active laborwithin one day of labor inductionsuccessful labor induction(IOL)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The interval from onset of induction to active labor24 hoursduration of induction
Successful vaginal delivery48 hours
The need for cesarean delivery (CS)24 hoursindication of CS (fetal distress ,failed induction,...)
maternal and fetal complication associated with IOLduring induction ,labor, and 24 hours postpartumtachy systole, postpartum hemorrhage, fetal distress

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026