RTT, Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction
Conditions
Brief summary
Sepsis continues to be a major global cause of both mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in sepsis increases the risk of unfavorable outcomes. Besides source control, fluid resuscitation and the use of antibiotics, application of extracorporeal renal replacement therapies (RRT) is the predominant treatment for sepsis-associated AKI (SAKI). However, the timing of initiation of RRT remains controversial. It is reported that a correlation was observed between the concentrations of circulating inflammatory cytokines and mortality in patients with septic shock. Therefore, it is hypothesis that adequate removal of inflammatory mediators from the circulation may provide a potential therapy for this devastating condition. Indeed, data from meta-analyses, observational studies and randomized controlled trial (RCT) suggests that initiating RRT in critical ill patients (including patients with sepsis and non-sepsis) at early stage may be beneficial. But in some studies, initiating RRT at early stage do not shown to improve survival compared with initiating RRT at late stage. At present, large-scale prospective RCT about the timing for initiating RRT in SAKI was still lack.The decision when to start RRT is not merely academic but may impact on outcomes. Therefore, in our study, 460 patients with SAKI at KDIGO 2 from multicenter in China will be recruited. And then the patients will be divided into early group and delayed group randomly. In the early group, continuous RRT (CRRT) was started immediately after randomization. In the delay group, CRRT was initiated if at least one of the following criteria was met: KDIGO 3, severe hyperkalemia, pulmonary edema, blood urea nitrogen level higher than 112 mg per deciliter after randomization. Overall survival at day 90 will be observed in order to understand whether different CRRT strategy would affect the outcomes of SAKI. This clinical study will be a large-scale, multi center, prospective, randomized trial about SAKI. It will help clinician choose appropriate timing to initiate CRRT and improve outcomes of SAKI.
Detailed description
In our study, 460 patients with SAKI at KDIGO 2 from multicenter in China will be recruited. And then the patients will be divided into early group and delayed group randomly. In the early group, CRRT was started immediately after randomization. In the delay group, CRRT was initiated if at least one of the following criteria was met: KDIGO 3, severe hyperkalemia, pulmonary edema, blood urea nitrogen level higher than 112 mg per deciliter after randomization. Overall survival at day 90 will be observed in order to understand whether different CRRT strategy would affect the outcomes of SAKI.
Interventions
PROCEDUREcontinuous renal replacement therapies
The choice of the method of continuous renal replacement therapy (device setting and anticoagulation method) is left to the discretion of each study site and was prescribed and monitored according to national guidelines.
Sponsors
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Age between 18 and 90 years. 2. Patients admitted into ICU with Sepsis (sepsis-3) compatible with the diagnosis of AKI at stage 2 of KDIGO classification. 3. Informed consent provided by the patient or person with decisional responsibility.
Exclusion criteria
1\. Presence of one of the emergent CRRT conditions before randomization: 1. Hyperkalemia \> 6.0 mmol/L or \> 5.5 mmol/L persisting despite medical treatment. 2. Acute pulmonary edema due to fluid overload responsible for severe hypoxemia requiring oxygen flow rate \> 5 L/min to maintain a percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2) \> 95% or a fraction of inspiration oxygen (FiO2) \> 50% in patients already on invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation and despite diuretic therapy. 3. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) \> 112 mg/dl (40 mmol/L). 2. Pre-existing severe chronic renal failure \[estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 30 ml/min\]. 3\. Previous renal replacement therapy. 4. Prior kidney t
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| overall mortality | 90 days | overall survival measured from randomization to death or day 90 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| organ dysfunction | 90 days | the frequency of occurrence at least one organ dysfunction besides the kidney |
| length of ICU stay and in-hospital stay | 90 days | average length of ICU stay and in-hospital stay will be compared |
| the percentage of receipt of CRRT at least once in the delayed group | 90 days | the percentage of receipt of CRRT at least once in the delayed group |
| recovery rate of renal function | 90 days | the recovery rate of renal function will be compared between groups |
| difference of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score | 28 days | difference of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (0\ 24) at day 0, 1, 3, 7, 14 and day 28 between groups. Higher score means more illness. |
| the rate of complications potentially related to CRRT | 90 days | the rate of complications potentially related to CRRT |
| the number of days alive without CRRT, mechanical ventilation and vasopressor | 90 days | the numbers of CRRT-free days, mechanical ventilation-free days and vasopressor-free days, between D0 and up to D90 |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactXu-ming Xiong
Backup ContactWei-yan Chen, MD
Outcome results
None listed