Skip to content

HYPOCHLOROUS ACID SUBSTANTIVITY AS ANTIPLAQUE AGENT (HOCl-SAP)

EVALUATION OF THE HYPOCHLOROUS ACID SUBSTANTIVITY AS ANTI-PLAQUE AGENT. A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03174756
Acronym
HOCl-SAP
Enrollment
75
Registered
2017-06-02
Start date
2015-01-15
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2017-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypochlorous Acid, Mouthwashes

Keywords

Hypochlorous Acid, Chlorhexidine, Antiplaque agents, Substantivity

Brief summary

Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) in a non-antibiotic antimicrobial agent used in clinical medicine. Nevertheless, its antiplaque oral effect has not been evaluated. Chlorhexidine (CHX) is the gold standard as an antiplaque agent for its high substantivity in plaque and saliva. There are no published studies evaluating the substantivity of hypochlorous acid compared to CHX. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of mouthwashes of HOCl in substantivity evaluated by reduction of bacterial viability in saliva during 7 hours compared to CHX rinses and a placebo.

Detailed description

Materials and Methods: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial with 75 participants was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned using block randomization in five groups: HOCl 0.025% and 0.05%, CHX 0.12 and 0.2% and sterile water as placebo. Participants were instructed to use each rinse with 10 ml of each solution for 30 seconds after dental prophylaxis. Samples of saliva were taken at baseline and after 30 seconds, 1, 3.5 and 7 hours to assess substantivity establishing the bacterial viability by the fluorescence method with the SYTO 9/propidium iodide dual staining. All participants were assessed with the Turesky visible plaque index at baseline and at 7 hours and adverse events were assessed. For the comparisons of the viability of the different rinses between times, the statistical test of generalized linear mixed model \[GT1\] adjusted to treatment, time and treatment-time interaction was used.

Interventions

Mouthwashes of antiplaque agents

DRUGChlorhexidine

A disinfectant and topical anti-infective agent used also as mouthwash to prevent oral plaque.

OTHERPlacebo

Sterile water as placebo

Sponsors

Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The treatment codes of the study were not accessible to the investigators and to the examiner until the data were analyzed

Intervention model description

A double-blind randomized controlled trial with 75 participants was conducted. Participants were assigned using block randomization in five groups: HOCl 0.025% and 0.05%, CHX 0.12% and 0.2% and sterile water as placebo. Participants were instructed to use each rinse solution for 30 seconds after dental prophylaxis. Samples of saliva were taken at baseline and after 30 seconds, 1, 3.5 and 7 hours to assess substantivity establishing the bacterial viability by the fluorescence method.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Dentate young men with minimum 22 teeth were considered eligible for the study. Participants should have good dental and gingival status (DMFT index ≤ 3, median of Lobene gingival index ≤ 1) and detectable levels of dental plaque at 7 hours of brushing during the selection process.

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SubstantivityBaseline, 30 Seconds, 1, 3, 5 and 7 hoursViability reduction (VR) was calculated for each saliva sample by the difference in the percentage of viable bacteria between two times.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plaque IndexBaseline and 7 hoursVisible plaque was evaluated by Turesky Index 1970

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse effect24 hoursA survey was applied to each of the patients in order to record if any adverse effects occurred after the use of each of the interventions as burning and pain in the oral mucosa and was investigated by the taste of substances and sensation of dryness. An examiner evaluated the buccal, labial, lingual, pharyngeal and teeth tissues to establish changes and alterations visible to the clinical examination and the presence of candidiasis.

Countries

Colombia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026