Hypochlorous Acid, Mouthwashes
Conditions
Keywords
Hypochlorous Acid, Chlorhexidine, Antiplaque agents, Substantivity
Brief summary
Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) in a non-antibiotic antimicrobial agent used in clinical medicine. Nevertheless, its antiplaque oral effect has not been evaluated. Chlorhexidine (CHX) is the gold standard as an antiplaque agent for its high substantivity in plaque and saliva. There are no published studies evaluating the substantivity of hypochlorous acid compared to CHX. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of mouthwashes of HOCl in substantivity evaluated by reduction of bacterial viability in saliva during 7 hours compared to CHX rinses and a placebo.
Detailed description
Materials and Methods: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial with 75 participants was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned using block randomization in five groups: HOCl 0.025% and 0.05%, CHX 0.12 and 0.2% and sterile water as placebo. Participants were instructed to use each rinse with 10 ml of each solution for 30 seconds after dental prophylaxis. Samples of saliva were taken at baseline and after 30 seconds, 1, 3.5 and 7 hours to assess substantivity establishing the bacterial viability by the fluorescence method with the SYTO 9/propidium iodide dual staining. All participants were assessed with the Turesky visible plaque index at baseline and at 7 hours and adverse events were assessed. For the comparisons of the viability of the different rinses between times, the statistical test of generalized linear mixed model \[GT1\] adjusted to treatment, time and treatment-time interaction was used.
Interventions
Mouthwashes of antiplaque agents
A disinfectant and topical anti-infective agent used also as mouthwash to prevent oral plaque.
Sterile water as placebo
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
The treatment codes of the study were not accessible to the investigators and to the examiner until the data were analyzed
Intervention model description
A double-blind randomized controlled trial with 75 participants was conducted. Participants were assigned using block randomization in five groups: HOCl 0.025% and 0.05%, CHX 0.12% and 0.2% and sterile water as placebo. Participants were instructed to use each rinse solution for 30 seconds after dental prophylaxis. Samples of saliva were taken at baseline and after 30 seconds, 1, 3.5 and 7 hours to assess substantivity establishing the bacterial viability by the fluorescence method.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Dentate young men with minimum 22 teeth were considered eligible for the study. Participants should have good dental and gingival status (DMFT index ≤ 3, median of Lobene gingival index ≤ 1) and detectable levels of dental plaque at 7 hours of brushing during the selection process.
Exclusion criteria
*
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Substantivity | Baseline, 30 Seconds, 1, 3, 5 and 7 hours | Viability reduction (VR) was calculated for each saliva sample by the difference in the percentage of viable bacteria between two times. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Plaque Index | Baseline and 7 hours | Visible plaque was evaluated by Turesky Index 1970 |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adverse effect | 24 hours | A survey was applied to each of the patients in order to record if any adverse effects occurred after the use of each of the interventions as burning and pain in the oral mucosa and was investigated by the taste of substances and sensation of dryness. An examiner evaluated the buccal, labial, lingual, pharyngeal and teeth tissues to establish changes and alterations visible to the clinical examination and the presence of candidiasis. |
Countries
Colombia