Skip to content

Feasibility and Efficacy of Assisstive Tactile and Auditory Communicating Devices

Feasibility and Efficacy of the VIS4ION Platform and Assistive Tactile and Auditory Communicating Devices in Low Vision Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03174314
Acronym
VIS4ION
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-06-02
Start date
2017-07-26
Completion date
2024-07-23
Last updated
2025-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Visual Impairment

Keywords

Visual Impairment

Brief summary

This pilot study will integrate multi-sensor fusion techniques (software) to effectively combine information obtained from the newly embedded infrared, ultrasound, and stereo-camera-based sensor systems (hardware) that are implemented into the VIS4ION platform. The core of this technology is based on 4 components: (1) a wearable vest with several distinct range and image sensors embedded. These sensors extract pertinent information about obstacles and the environment, which are conveyed to (2) a haptic interface (belt) that communicates this spatial information to the end-user in real-time via an intuitive, ergonomic and personalized vibrotactile re-display along the torso. (3) A smartphone serves as a connectivity gateway and coordinates the core components through WiFi, bluetooth, and/or 4G LTE, (4) a headset that contains both binaural, open-ear, bone conduction speakers (leaving the ear canal patent for ambient sounds) and a microphone for oral communication-based voice recognition during use of a virtual personal assistant (VPA). Blindfolded-sighted, and blind subjects in a real-world, combined obstacle avoidance / navigation task will serve as an independent measure of overall improvements in the system as well as a roadmap for future avenues to enhance performance. Further, a prospective, randomized crossover, controlled, non-blinded phase will be conducted in Thailand as part of this study to compare and evaluate effectiveness of the wearable vest for increasing navigation and quality of life.

Detailed description

Investigators will try to develop algorithms that will recognize multiple objects and persons in real-time (enhanced scene interpretation for multi-object identification). And based on that, human-centered simulation trials and experiments for feasibility and efficacy of the platform's tactile and auditory 'communication' outputs will be conducted. Finally auditory and tactile 'prompts' (system output) based on the end user's immediate needs based on initial testing results, will be integrated into the platform. Additional activities will occur at the Thailand site. In the second phase, an improved system will be tested in an extended-use experiment, detecting for health-related changes in our participants (increased mobility and QoL). The study team will further test the generalizability of the new mapping technology in a more challenging environment, testing system performance using metrics, comparing results between current and previous systems.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALStandard object battery and training sequence

Used to examine human localization and identification performance. Object battery will include: trip hazards ('pucks' with various height/width combinations to represent children's toys, street debris, rocks, pets, etc.), furniture (chairs, desks, couches, benches), people, walls, and corridors. Objects will be recorded by placing them to the right or left on the path-of-travel. Raw sensor outputs for single obstacles and walls in isolation (trip-hazard pucks with 8 heights, chair, desk, person, wall) and the same set of single obstacles against a wall. This set of 23 raw sensor traces can be used in various combinations (e.g., encountering a curb and then a person, or a chair) to create a training sequence that will help experimentally naïve subjects to understand the correspondence between tactile stimulation and the real-world scenario it is intended to depict.

DEVICEVIS4ION System

When in Assistive Mode, participants will navigate campus while receiving navigation assistance (acquiring data and simultaneously providing assistance/audio feedback). When in Passive Mode, participants will navigate campus wearing the backpack without receiving navigation assistant.

Sponsors

NYU Langone Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* People with visual impairments of all different levels and etiologies.

Exclusion criteria

* Significant cognitive dysfunction (score \<24 on Folsteins' Mini Mental Status Examination) * Previous neurological illness, complicated medical condition; * Significant mobility restrictions; people using walkers and wheelchairs * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Correct Responses by Feedback DevicesMonth 6Assessment of ability of the feedback devices (vibrating belt- wrist band/haptic interface and audio output/open-ear headset) to provide correct responses on alternative force choice tasks during simulation experiments.
Total Time to Complete Activities of Daily LivingMonth 6Such activities can include navigation, shopping and cooking.
Path LengthMonth 6Total length of the path taken when participants perform navigation task.
Success RateMonth 6Percentage of participants who achieve the destination and/or target in the navigation task.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF ScoreBaseline, Month 6WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item questionnaire assessing how patients have felt about their quality of life and health over the past 4 weeks. Each item is rated on a scale from 1-5. The raw score is the sum of responses and is rescaled to a total score of 0-100; higher scores indicate greater health states.
Change in Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) ScoreBaseline, Month 625-item assessment of how participants feel about their vision or vision condition. Each item is rated on a scale from 1-6. The raw score is the sum of responses and is converted to a 0-100 scale for the total score; higher scores indicate greater visual functioning.
Change in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) ScoreBaseline, Month 67-item questionnaire assessing the types and intensity of physical activity and sitting time that people do as part of their daily lives; the total score is total physical activity, which is quantified in metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes per week.

Countries

Thailand, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026