Skip to content

Medicines Reconciliation at an Intensive Care Unit

Medicines Reconciliation at an Intensive Care Unit

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03173690
Enrollment
50
Registered
2017-06-02
Start date
2017-02-06
Completion date
2017-10-31
Last updated
2017-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intensive Care Unit, Medicines Reconciliation

Brief summary

This study evaluates the effect of performing medicines reconciliation on patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Half of the patients will receive a medicines reconciliation at the intensive care unit. The other half will not. All included patients will receive medicines reconciliation after transfer to the ward.

Detailed description

Transfer of patients from one level of care to another is known to increase the risk of medication errors. Medication reconciliation is an accepted intervention to increase the knowledge on the patients medication use, thus reducing the risk of avoidable medication errors. For patients in the intensive care unit treatment of the imminent threat is obviously the most important. Nevertheless, knowledge about previous medications are important.

Interventions

OTHERMedication reconciliation at the ICU

Medication reconciliation performed according to Integrated Medicines Management model

OTHERMedication Reconciliation at the Ward

Medication reconciliation performed according to Integrated Medicines Management model

Sponsors

Hospital Pharmacy Enterprise, South Eastern Norway
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Akershus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Masking description

The care provider performing medicines reconciliation at ward is semimasked. The masking might be broken if the patients tells if he/she has been interviewed earlier in the study

Intervention model description

The included patients are randomized to either intervention or control group. The intervention group receives medicines reconciliation at the intensive care unit. The control group receive standard pharmaceutical care, which now does not include medicines reconciliation. After the patients are transferred to care at the ward, medicines reconciliation is performed for all patients.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* belonging to the hospitals intake area * written informed concent by the patient or his/her next to kin

Exclusion criteria

* Patients without next to kin * Not Norwegian speaking, in need of a translator * medication reconciliation performed earlier * Patients with Guillain-Barre or Myasthenia Gravis, due to long expectancy of stay * Short life expectancy, decided in cooperation with the physician

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients with at least one discrepancy between medications listed on hospital chart and medications used at home before hospital admittanceMedicines reconciliation is performed at randomisation and within 48 hours after transmission to the ward, assessed up to 28 days after randomisationMedications listed on the medication chart were recorded on a predefined form, this included information on dosage form, strength, dosage and administration time for each drug. The pharmacist performed medicines reconciliation either by interviewing the patient or by gathering information from other sources as the patient's general practitioner, next-to-kin or if relevant nursing home. Any deviations between the information from the medication chart and information obtained during medicines reconciliation was defined as a discrepancy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retrospective evaluation on the clinical relevance of the observed medical discrepanciesRetrospectively, based on the information gathered from the day of randomisation up until 28 days after randomisationOne clinical pharmacist and one senior geriatrician retrospectively asses the potential clinical relevance of the registered discrepancies. The expert panel use the following information for each patient when assessing the clinical relevance: medication list before and after reconciliation, age, gender, reason for hospitalisation, former and current diseases and the level of care before admission

Countries

Norway

Contacts

Primary ContactSilje E Oernes, phD
silje.engdal.ornes@sykehusapotekene.no004767960302

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026