Class III Malocclusion
Conditions
Keywords
Class III treatment, orthodontic removable traction appliance, RCT
Brief summary
This experimental study aims to evaluate the efficiency of the orthodontic removable traction appliance in the treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion. The study sample will consist of 44 patients with skeletal class III malocclusion. The sample will be allocated randomly into two groups: experimental group and control group. The dentoskeletal changes will be assessed by using lateral cephalometric radiographs before treatment and after obtaining 3mm positive overjet.
Detailed description
Treatment of class III malocclusion is a major challenge in orthodontic contemporary practice, Several appliance have suggested for the treatment of class III malocclusion, such as the facial mask and chin cup. Despite of the efficiency of this extraoral appliance, its external appearance and its big size reduce patients' cooperation which decrease its clinical effects. Another Class III treatment modality is the Orthodontic Removable Traction Appliance (ORTA). It is a removable appliance that can be used in conjunction with rapid palatal expansion or fixed appliances, It was developed in the 1980's by Dr. David Musich who developed this appliance in order to overcome issues of compliance that Dr. Musich experienced with use of the protraction facemask. There is only one study that evaluated this appliance which is a retrospective study compared the treatment effects of the ORTA and protraction facemask in treatment of Class III malocclusions. However, this study has a lot of limitations which made it difficult to accurately evaluate the efficiency of this device. The aim of this study is studying the dentoskeletal changes that result from treatment by this device, by comparing them to the changes in matched untreated group,by studying the cephalometric x-rays.
Interventions
DEVICEVacuum plate
Vacuum plate with two hooks between lateral incisor and canine in each side will be applied on the lower arch.
DEVICERapid maxillary expander
Rapid maxillary expander will be applied in the maxilla to disarticulate maxillary sutures to allow more efficient forward protraction of the maxilla.
DEVICEClass III elastics
Class III elastic traction from upper first molar to the hook in both side will be applied.
Sponsors
Damascus University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Masking description
No masking could be applied
Intervention model description
The patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups, case or control.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients in early mixed dentation (8-10 years old). * Skeletal class III caused by maxillary deficiency with or without mandibular prognathism judged clinically and confirmed radiographically(ANB≤1). * Anterior crossbite on two teeth or more or an edge-to-edge bite. * Normal inclination of the lower incisors with the mandibular plane.
Exclusion criteria
* Poor oral hygiene. * Previous orthodontic treatment. * Patients with syndromes, clefts, or craniofacial abnormalities. * Severe skeletal class III primarily resulting from mandibular prognathism (ANB less than - 4) * Patients with facial asymmetry. * Patients with vertical growth pattern.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The change of the ANB angle | Assessment will be done before treatment (T0) and after obtaining 3-mm positive overjet which will be approximately obtained after 6 months (T1). | The change of the ANB angle before and after using the Orthodontic Removable Traction Appliance compared with this of the control group will be evaluated using lateral cephalometric radiographs. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The change of the SNA angle | Assessment will be done before treatment (T0) and after obtaining 3-mm positive overjet which will be approximately obtained after 6 months (T1). | The change of the SNA angle before and after using the Orthodontic Removable Traction Appliance compared with this of the control group will be evaluated using lateral cephalometric radiographs. |
| The change of the SNB angle | Assessment will be done before treatment (T0) and after obtaining 3-mm positive overjet which will be approximately obtained after 6 months (T1). | The change of the SNB angle before and after using the Orthodontic Removable Traction Appliance compared with this of the control group will be evaluated using lateral cephalometric radiographs. |
| Levels of pain | A questionnaire will be given to the patients four times during treatment; after 1day, after 1 week, after 1 month and after 3 months of the application of the appliance. | The level of Pain caused by using the Orthodontic Removable Traction Appliance will be assessed using a questionnaire with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). |
| Levels of discomfort | A questionnaire will be given to the patients four times during treatment; after 1day, after 1 week, after 1 month and after 3 months of the application of the appliance. | The level of discomfort caused by using the Orthodontic Removable Traction Appliance will be assessed using a questionnaire with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). |
| Levels of acceptance | A questionnaire will be given to the patients four times during treatment; after 1day, after 1 week, after 1 month and after 3 months of the application of the appliance. | The level of acceptance of using the Orthodontic Removable Traction Appliance will be assessed using a questionnaire with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). |
Countries
Syria
Outcome results
None listed