Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) With Oxaliplatin In Patients With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Gastric Cancer, Unresectable Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Oxaliplatin, Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, Nivolumab

PIPAC is a procedure that involves the administration of intraperitoneal chemotherapy using an innovative concept that enhances the efficacy by taking advantage of the physical properties of gas and pressure. The chemotherapy drugs will be delivered in aerosolised form. This results in a superior distribution and depth of penetration of the drug. This research study serves to determine the safety profile and tolerability of PIPAC with oxaliplatin. It may offer a novel and effective option of treatment for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, who, at present have limited options involving the use of systemic chemotherapy and who suffer from poor life expectancy and poor quality of life. To date, most trials have used PIPAC cisplatin with doxorubicin, or oxaliplatin alone, and more studies are on-going globally. Intravenous (IV) nivolumab has been approved for the treatment of progressive gastric cancer after conventional chemotherapy. PIPAC in combination with nivolumab may have the potential to improve immune activation and response to immune checkpoint inhibition for patients with peritoneal disease. Hence we propose an amendment to our trial protocol for the addition of a second cohort (Cohort 2) to investigate the safety and tolerability of the combination of PIPAC oxaliplatin and IV nivolumab.

Gastric cancer is the 5th most common cancer (1 million incidences per year) and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide (740,000 deaths per year). Unresectable gastric cancer is associated with a poor 5-year survival rate (\< 30%) because of its late presentation with approximately 50% of the patients diagnosed at advanced stage with a median survival of about 12 months. The treatment for advanced gastric cancer patients relies mainly on doublet or triplet chemotherapy, but results are often limited by severe side effects of the aggressive regimens. Novel efficacious treatments with reduced adverse effects are highly desirable to improve the clinical outcome. Peritoneal disease is notoriously difficult to treat. In patients with histologically proven unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer limited to the peritoneum and/or cancer cells in peritoneal cytology, the combination of intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel with systemic chemotherapy seems promising. However, a phase III trial (PHOENIX-GC trial) comparing IP regimen with systemic chemotherapy versus systemic therapy alone in Japan did not show any superiority of the IP regimen. PIPAC is an innovative intraperitoneal chemotherapy concept that enhances the efficacy by taking advantage of the physical properties of gas and pressure. This results in a superior distribution and depth of penetration of the drug. A recent systematic review of 45 clinical studies on 1810 PIPAC procedures showed response rates of 50-91% for gastric cancer (median survival of 8 to 15 months), 71-86% for colorectal cancer (median survival of 16 months). To date, most phase II trials utilising PIPAC involve the use of cisplatin and doxorubicin or oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin is an approved drug for systemic chemotherapy, with well documented use intraperitoneally via hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as well. This makes is a favourable agent for PIPAC in early phase studies. The dose of oxaliplatin utilised for PIPAC in the literature has thus far been arbitrarily set at 92 mg/m2, which is approximately 80% of the drug concentration used in HIPEC. Furthermore, these studies were performed on patients with a recent or concurrent administration of systemic chemotherapy, which may make interpretation of the side effects and safety profile difficult to interpret. In Cohort 1 of this study, we intend to determine the safety profile and tolerability of PIPAC with oxaliplatin by assessment of dose limiting toxicities and the adverse event profile. Cancer immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitor has demonstrated clinical activities and survival benefits as a monotherapy and in combination with other immunotherapies or conventional chemotherapies in multiple cancer types. Nivolumab has been showed to have overall survival benefit over placebo in the third line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer with a response rate of 11%. In the CheckMate032 trial, nivolumab, with or without ipilumumab, demonstrated durable responses and long-term survival. Nivolumab alone, dosed at 3mg/kg, had a response rate of 12%. It is hypothesized that the delivery of PIPAC deep into the peritoneal tissue is likely to affect the tumor microenvironment and potentially release neoantigens which would improve clinical outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibition. Hence we propose an amendment to our trial protocol for the addition of a second cohort (Cohort 2) to combine this Phase I proof-of-concept study with nivolumab. The aim is to determine the determine the safety profile and tolerability of PIPAC oxaliplatin by assessment of dose limiting toxicities and the adverse event profile. With Cohort 2, the co-primary endpoints are the safety and efficacy of the combination of PIPAC oxaliplatin and IV nivolumab. Safety will be evaluated in terms of adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuation of treatment due to toxicity. Efficacy will be evaluated in terms of the percentage of patients with 6 months of time-to-treatment failure (TTF). TTF is defined as the interval from treatment initiation to treatment discontinuation for disease progression, treatment toxicity, and death. The secondary objective is to evaluate the clinical and pathological response of PIPAC oxaliplatin as well as to identify the pharmacokinetic profile of oxaliplatin administered via PIPAC. The clinical and pathological response to combination treatment will also be determined. Quality of life will be evaluated.

Belgium, Singapore