Skip to content

Clinical and Functional Outcomes at 2 Years of 4-strand Versus 5-strand Hamstring Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcomes at 2 Years of 4-strand Versus 5-strand Hamstring Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03171532
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-05-31
Start date
2015-12-01
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2017-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical Activity

Keywords

ACL

Brief summary

This study aims to study differences in clinical and functional outcomes at 2 years based on hamstring graft size after single bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction using either 4-strand or 5-strand hamstring grafts. We also propose to study the characteristics of hamstring graft in our subset of patients in Asian population context.

Detailed description

This will be a prospective, randomized interventional study conducted at the National University Hospital under University Orthopaedics and Hand surgery Cluster during the period of December 2015 to December 2018. Study participants: The study will include 80 patients with complete Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) tear undergoing primary arthroscopic reconstruction with ipsilateral hamstring autograft after written informed consent to participate in the study. The subjects will be divided into two groups A) 4-strand hamstring or B) 5-strand hamstring group by block randomization using an online randomization generator (http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs). All the subjects will undergo the procedure by otherwise identical technique performed by single surgeon. At 1 and 2 years functional and subjective outcomes will be assessed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREStrands of Hamstring Autograft in ACL reconstruction

The femoral and tibial ends will be tubularised and the final graft diameter will be recorded after passing through sizing cylinders graduated in 0.5mm increments. The femoral and tibial tunnels will be drilled as per standard technique for single bundle ACL reconstruction via trans-portal or trans-tibial route and both ends fixed by interference screw with additional post on the tibial end.

Sponsors

National University Hospital, Singapore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age above 18 years 2. Clinical and MRI confirmed complete ACL tear 3. Ipsilateral hamstring autograft 4. Concomitant meniscus injury requiring either meniscus repair or partial menisectomy 5. Concomitant chondral injury Grade 0,1,2 (International Cartilage Repair Society) 6. Regular scheduled follow up with adherence to prescribed rehab protocol

Exclusion criteria

1. Non consent 2. Paediatric patient; age less than 18 years 3. Partial or incomplete ACL tear 4. Revision ACL surgery 5. Hamstring allograft 6. Multi-ligament injury of the knee (ACL and/or Posterior Cruciate Ligament, Medial Collateral Ligament, Lateral Collateral Ligament, Postero Lateral Corner) 7. Past history of knee surgery 8. Contra-lateral ACL injury or other ligament injury 9. Chondral injury Grade 3,4 (International Cartilage Repair Society) 10. Intra-articular fracture (past or current) 11. Radiologically evident osteoarthritis changes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Sport/Rec Score (Function in Sport and Recreation) change from baselineBaseline, 1 year and 2 years post opPatient reported outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Grade change from baselineBaseline, 1 year and 2 years post opPatient reported outcome
KOOS Pain change from baselineBaseline, 1 year and 2 years post opPatient reported outcome
Tegner-Lysholm Score change from baselineBaseline, 1 year and 2 years post opPatient reported outcome
KOOS Function in daily living (KOOS ADL) change from baselineBaseline, 1 year and 2 years post opPatient reported outcome
KOOS Knee-related Quality of Life (KOOS QOL) change from baselineBaseline, 1 year and 2 years post opPatient reported outcome
KOOS Symptoms change from baselineBaseline, 1 year and 2 years post opPatient reported outcome

Countries

Singapore

Contacts

Primary ContactLingaraj Krishna, FRCS (Orth)
lingaraj_krishna@nuhs.edu.sg+6567795555
Backup ContactAmritpal Singh, MBBS
amritpal_singh@nuhs.edu.sg+6567795555

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026