Skip to content

The Effect of AposTherapy on Knee Pain

The Effect of AposTherapy on Pain and Function in Knee Osteoarthritis Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03171168
Acronym
AposKnee
Enrollment
54
Registered
2017-05-31
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2019-12-30
Last updated
2022-12-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Pain

Keywords

Gait Analysis, WOMAC, SF-36 (Short Form 36)

Brief summary

AposTherapy is a home based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal activity that may significantly improve function in patients with knee osteoarthritis since patients with knee osteoarthritis have altered mechanics of motion contributing or due to the presence of the conditions. Capitalizing on the reported excellent adherence and clinical benefit of ApostTherapy in patients with significant knee OA, the investigators propose to evaluate this as a conservative treatment that may supplant/supplement traditional pain medications and physical therapy in an at-risk urban inner city population.

Detailed description

AposTherapy is a home-based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal daily activity that may significantly improve function in patients with knee pain in general, and specifically knee osteoarthritis (OA). Capitalizing on the reported excellent adherence and clinical benefit of Apos Therapy in patients with significant lower limb arthritis, the investigators propose to evaluate this as a conservative treatment that may supplant/supplement traditional pain medications and physical therapy in knee OA population. A potential use of AposTherapy as a replacement for traditional physical therapy may yield a less costly, more effective therapy with better adherence. Problems with traditional therapy include poor patient adherence (patients often do not complete the sessions and have very poor adherence (about 50-60%) to home therapy programs), added cost of travel (which may be more than $100 per session for ambulette or access-a-ride for eligible patients), and the lack of continuation in an ongoing exercise program, leading to relapse and need for retreatment. Additionally, access to physical therapy is limited for many patients since there are not enough available outpatient therapy services to meet the needs of all patients. Finding an alternative exercise program that will increase adherence, decrease total therapy visits, and improve patient's outcomes with decreased dependence on pain medications is a high priority from both patient care and cost management perspectives. AposTherapy potentially overcomes many of these issues with improving/modifying abnormal biomechanics (therefore decreasing pain), and a home-based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal activity by promoting perturbation. This biomechanical approach may significantly reduce pain and improve function in patients with knee OA. Capitalizing on the reported excellent adherence and clinical benefit of AposTherapy in patients with significant knee OA, the investigators propose to evaluate the biomechanical exercise (wearing an appropriately calibrated shoe at home for a prescribed amount of time each day) as a conservative treatment that may supplement or supplant traditional pain medications, interventional pain procedures and physical therapy in an at-risk urban inner city population with knee OA.

Interventions

AposTherapy is a home-based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal daily activity that may significantly improve function in patients with knee pain in general, and specifically knee osteoarthritis (OA).

OTHERTraditional Physical Therapy

Up to 20 sessions of traditional physical therapy

Sponsors

Apos Medical and Sports Technology Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Montefiore Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcomes assessor is the only one masked in the study. Assessor is independent of the randomization, trial coordination, and care providers.

Intervention model description

Single blinded (evaluator), single-center, randomized controlled trial. Interventional and Control group with option for Control group to Cross over.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients suffering from symptomatic knee OA (uni/bi lateral) for at least six months, fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) clinical criteria for OA of the knee, and having radiographically assessed OA of the knee according to the Kellgren and Lawrence scale. * Patients with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score of ≥3cm (measured at baseline). * Males and females between the ages of 40-75. * 17\<BMI\<40 * Ambulatory and active patients that can participate in a rehabilitation program that includes daily walking * Stable medical regimen (no recent changes to the pain medication within a month) * Able to walk at least 50 meters and scored positive on the STEADI test * Able to understand, read and sign the informed consent form * English or Spanish speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Patients suffering from acute septic arthritis. * Patients suffering from inflammatory joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis. * Patients with diagnosis of avascular necrosis of the knee. * Patients with diagnosis of neuromuscular disease. * Patients with more than 3 falls in the last 12 months, OR any fall with an injury in the last 12 months. * Patients exhibiting a lack of physical or mental ability to perform or comply with the study procedure. * Patients with a history of pathological osteoporotic fracture * Patients with referred pain in the knees from back or hip joint symptoms. * Patients with severe back pain, ≥ 4 cm in visual analogue scale (0-10) \[1\] or radiating leg pain * Patients with generalized body pain (both upper and lower extremities, such as fibromyalgia * No major surgery to the affected limb and contralateral limb (e.g. no joint replacements or surgical fracture repair) * No major cardiovascular comorbidities (able to enroll in an active exercise program) * Patient started on lipid lowering medication in last 3 months * Any change in blood pressure medications * No recent physical therapy (no more recent than 6 months) on the affected limb * No active heart disease (ischemia or heart failure admissions within 6 months) and no active Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (exacerbation within 6 months) * No active malignancies on ongoing treatment * Patient with neurological gait pattern * Patient requiring assistive device during gait analysis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee Pain and Function24 weeksImprovement in Pain and Function as assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scale. The WOMAC, a self-administered instrument, is 1 of 3 subscales comprising the WOMAC Index. As a standalone measure, the WOMAC pain scale contains 5 items that address the following person-level activities: walking, using stairs, in bed, sitting or lying down, and standing upright. The stem of the scale asks the patient to focus on the extent of pain experienced in the involved knee during each of these activities which are reported on a 0-4 Likert scale: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4), with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain. Higher scores on the WOMAC are associated with worse knee pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life by RAND SF-36 (RAND Corporation Short Form 36)24 weeksHealth-related Quality of Life (QoL) as assessed using the RAND SF-36 (Short Form Health Survey). The RAND SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported questionnaire that covers eight health domains: physical functioning (10 items), bodily pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items), role limitations due to personal or emotional problems (4 items), emotional well-being (5 items), social functioning (2 items), energy/fatigue (4 items), and general health perceptions (5 items). Composite scoring range is 0 to 100 across the 8 domains identified with a higher overall score defining a more favorable health state.
PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pain Interference and Physical Function24 weeksPain and Function measured through PROMIS short forms. PROMIS measures specific domains of Physical Health (e.g., physical function, pain intensity, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance); Mental Health (depressive symptoms, anxiety, anger); and Social Health (ability to participate in social roles and activities). PROMIS measures are scored on the T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. PROMIS domains use different terms to describe score ranges. For example, some domains use mild/moderate/severe whereas others use very high to very low. Cut points for assessment can also vary. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (e.g., more Fatigue, more Physical Function). Thus a score of 60 is one SD above the average referenced population. This could be a desirable or undesirable outcome.
Gait Assessment24 weeksObjective assessment of the patients' gait assessed with gait analysis equipment. Equipment was used to measure the patients' cadence, or walking rate, in number of steps per minute (steps/min).
6-min Walk Test24 weeksobjective assessment using maximum distance comfortably walked in 6 minutes on a 100 foot closed course

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Traditional Physical Therapy
Participants will have traditional physical therapy up to 20 sessions, up to two sessions per week. This will involve exercise and modalities as decided by the therapists and medical providers. Participants will have a home exercise program for the remainder of the year. Traditional Physical Therapy: Up to 20 sessions of traditional physical therapy
17
AposTherapy
Participants will have AposTherapy instead of traditional physical therapy over the course of one year. This will include 7 sessions of gait assessment and re-calibration with daily at home exercise with the device over the year. AposTherapy: AposTherapy is a home-based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal daily activity that may significantly improve function in patients with knee pain in general, and specifically knee osteoarthritis (OA).
37
Total54

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAposTherapyTotalTraditional Physical Therapy
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants18 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants36 Participants13 Participants
Age, Continuous61.83 years61.01 years59.24 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
16 Participants25 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
15 Participants22 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants5 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
37 participants54 participants17 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants45 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants9 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 37
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 1710 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Knee Pain and Function

Improvement in Pain and Function as assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scale. The WOMAC, a self-administered instrument, is 1 of 3 subscales comprising the WOMAC Index. As a standalone measure, the WOMAC pain scale contains 5 items that address the following person-level activities: walking, using stairs, in bed, sitting or lying down, and standing upright. The stem of the scale asks the patient to focus on the extent of pain experienced in the involved knee during each of these activities which are reported on a 0-4 Likert scale: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4), with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain. Higher scores on the WOMAC are associated with worse knee pain.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: STUDY DISCONTINUED, statistical analysis was not performed due to study closure, not enough participants to conduct meaningful statistical analyses. The framework initially placed in the Statistical Analysis section has been removed. Analysis of individuals complete at 24 weeks. Only subjects with 24 week data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Traditional Physical TherapyKnee Pain and Function5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
AposTherapyKnee Pain and Function3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

6-min Walk Test

objective assessment using maximum distance comfortably walked in 6 minutes on a 100 foot closed course

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: STUDY DISCONTINUED, statistical analysis was not performed due to study closure, not enough participants to conduct meaningful statistical analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Traditional Physical Therapy6-min Walk Test1292 FeetStandard Deviation 229
AposTherapy6-min Walk Test1453 FeetStandard Deviation 228
Secondary

Gait Assessment

Objective assessment of the patients' gait assessed with gait analysis equipment. Equipment was used to measure the patients' cadence, or walking rate, in number of steps per minute (steps/min).

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: STUDY DISCONTINUED, statistical analysis was not performed due to study closure, not enough participants to conduct meaningful statistical analyses. Data presented is for patients who completed 24 weeks of the study. Data reported is only on those who entered the study and not outcomes data. Cadence is in steps per minute as entered below. As an example, typical marching is at 120 steps per minute.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Traditional Physical TherapyGait Assessment93.7 Cadence (steps/minute)Standard Deviation 20.1
AposTherapyGait Assessment109.7 Cadence (steps/minute)Standard Deviation 18.3
Secondary

PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pain Interference and Physical Function

Pain and Function measured through PROMIS short forms. PROMIS measures specific domains of Physical Health (e.g., physical function, pain intensity, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance); Mental Health (depressive symptoms, anxiety, anger); and Social Health (ability to participate in social roles and activities). PROMIS measures are scored on the T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. PROMIS domains use different terms to describe score ranges. For example, some domains use mild/moderate/severe whereas others use very high to very low. Cut points for assessment can also vary. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (e.g., more Fatigue, more Physical Function). Thus a score of 60 is one SD above the average referenced population. This could be a desirable or undesirable outcome.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: STUDY DISCONTINUED, statistical analysis was not performed due to study closure, not enough participants to conduct meaningful statistical analyses. The framework initially placed in the Statistical Analysis section has been removed. Analysis of individuals complete at 24 weeks. Only subjects with 24 week data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Traditional Physical TherapyPROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pain Interference and Physical Function20.7 T-scoreStandard Deviation 33.9
AposTherapyPROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pain Interference and Physical Function19.1 T-scoreStandard Deviation 41.9
Secondary

Quality of Life by RAND SF-36 (RAND Corporation Short Form 36)

Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as assessed using the RAND SF-36 (Short Form Health Survey). The RAND SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported questionnaire that covers eight health domains: physical functioning (10 items), bodily pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items), role limitations due to personal or emotional problems (4 items), emotional well-being (5 items), social functioning (2 items), energy/fatigue (4 items), and general health perceptions (5 items). Composite scoring range is 0 to 100 across the 8 domains identified with a higher overall score defining a more favorable health state.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: STUDY DISCONTINUED, statistical analysis was not performed due to study closure, not enough participants to conduct meaningful statistical analyses. The framework initially placed in the Statistical Analysis section has been removed. Analysis of individuals complete at 24 weeks. Only subjects with 24 week data were analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Traditional Physical TherapyQuality of Life by RAND SF-36 (RAND Corporation Short Form 36)48.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.06
AposTherapyQuality of Life by RAND SF-36 (RAND Corporation Short Form 36)64.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026