Skip to content

Extension Study of NS-065/NCNP-01 in Boys With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)

A Phase II, Open-Label, Extension Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of NS-065/NCNP-01 in Boys With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03167255
Enrollment
16
Registered
2017-05-25
Start date
2017-07-06
Completion date
2021-11-15
Last updated
2022-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Brief summary

This is an open-label, extension study of NS-065/NCNP-01 administered intravenously once weekly for an additional 192 weeks to boys with DMD who complete Study NS-065/NCNP-01-201.

Detailed description

This is a Phase II, multicenter, open-label, extension study of NS-065/NCNP-01 administered intravenously once weekly for an additional 192 weeks to boys with DMD who complete Study NS-065/NCNP-01-201. This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy of NS-065/NCNP-01 at dose levels of up to 80 mg/kg/week administered by weekly IV infusion over an additional treatment period of 192 weeks or until enrollment in a separate long-term follow up program of NS-065/NCNP-01, whichever is earlier. Patients who complete the Phase II Dose-finding Study NS-065/NCNP-01-201 are eligible to enroll.

Interventions

Received during weekly intravenous infusions

Sponsors

Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group
CollaboratorNETWORK
Therapeutic Research in Neuromuscular Disorders Solutions
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
NS Pharma, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Low Dose cohort of 40 mg/kg and High Dose cohort of 80 mg/kg

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
4 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Completed Study NS-065/NCNP-01-201 through Week 25. 2. Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, investigational product administration plan, and study procedures. 3. Stable dose of glucocorticoid (GC), and is expected to remain on the stable dose for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Serious or severe adverse event in Study NS-065/NCNP-01-201 that precludes safe use of NS-065/NCNP-01. 2. Patient had a treatment which was made for the purpose of dystrophin or its related protein induction after completion of Study NS-065/NCNP-01-201. 3. Patient took any other investigational drugs after completion of Study NS-065/NCNP-01-201. 4. Patient was judged by the investigator and/or the Sponsor that it was not appropriate to participate in the extension study for other reasons.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsBaseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202A primary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Time to Stand (TTSTAND)
Change From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsBaseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202A primary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity
Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Up to 192 weeks of treatmentFor adverse events (AEs) starting in study 201 (NCT02740972) which are not resolved at the time of enrollment into this study 202, any change in outcome or relatedness were reported in study 201. For AEs starting in study 201 which increase in severity or becomes serious after enrollment in this study 202, a new AE was reported in this study. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized by dose level. Coding was done by system organ class and preferred term (using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA)). Level of severity was assessed using the CTCAE grading system.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsBaseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Time to Run/Walk 10 meters test (TTRW)
Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsBaseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Time to Climb 4 stairs (TTCLIMB)
Change From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsBaseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Time to Run/Walk 10 meters test (TTRW) Velocity. The results were converted into velocity (meter/time).
Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsBaseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Time to Climb 4 stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity. The results were converted into velocity (meter/time).
Change From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsBaseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157 in Study 202A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) score The NSAA is a functional scale devised for use in ambulant children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). It consists of 17 activities graded 0 (unable to perform), 1 (performs with modifications), 2 (normal movement). It assesses abilities necessary to remain ambulant that have been found to progressively deteriorate in untreated DMD patients, as well as in other muscular dystrophies such as Becker Muscular Dystrophy. NSAA Total Score ranges from 0 to 34, with a score of 34 implying normal function.
Change From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsBaseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157 in Study 202A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsBaseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip For QMT tests, the higher of each of the bilateral scores recorded for each muscle group at each visit were analyzed. QMT tests were analyzed by dominant/non-dominant side. QMT is a well-established method for measuring muscle weakness in neuromuscular disease. Patients will be placed on an examination table with a back-support system to eliminate the need for manual back stabilization. Following a single practice administration, each patient will complete a scored QMT evaluation (perform 2 tests; with the higher of the 2 values used for data analysis). QMT will be performed by recording force in pounds through a direct computer interface with a strain gauge.
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsBaseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors For QMT tests, the higher of each of the bilateral scores recorded for each muscle group at each visit were analyzed. QMT tests were analyzed by dominant/non-dominant side. QMT is a well-established method for measuring muscle weakness in neuromuscular disease. Patients will be placed on an examination table with a back-support system to eliminate the need for manual back stabilization. Following a single practice administration, each patient will complete a scored QMT evaluation (perform 2 tests; with the higher of the 2 values used for data analysis). QMT will be performed by recording force in pounds through a direct computer interface with a strain gauge.
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsBaseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors For QMT tests, the higher of each of the bilateral scores recorded for each muscle group at each visit were analyzed. QMT tests were analyzed by dominant/non-dominant side. QMT is a well-established method for measuring muscle weakness in neuromuscular disease. Patients will be placed on an examination table with a back-support system to eliminate the need for manual back stabilization. Following a single practice administration, each patient will complete a scored QMT evaluation (perform 2 tests; with the higher of the 2 values used for data analysis). QMT will be performed by recording force in pounds through a direct computer interface with a strain gauge.
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsBaseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors For QMT tests, the higher of each of the bilateral scores recorded for each muscle group at each visit were analyzed. QMT tests were analyzed by dominant/non-dominant side. QMT is a well-established method for measuring muscle weakness in neuromuscular disease. Patients will be placed on an examination table with a back-support system to eliminate the need for manual back stabilization. Following a single practice administration, each patient will complete a scored QMT evaluation (perform 2 tests; with the higher of the 2 values used for data analysis). QMT will be performed by recording force in pounds through a direct computer interface with a strain gauge.
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsBaseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors For QMT tests, the higher of each of the bilateral scores recorded for each muscle group at each visit were analyzed. QMT tests were analyzed by dominant/non-dominant side. QMT is a well-established method for measuring muscle weakness in neuromuscular disease. Patients will be placed on an examination table with a back-support system to eliminate the need for manual back stabilization. Following a single practice administration, each patient will complete a scored QMT evaluation (perform 2 tests; with the higher of the 2 values used for data analysis). QMT will be performed by recording force in pounds through a direct computer interface with a strain gauge.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled in the study at 6 sites in the United States and Canada from July 6, 2017 and August 25, 2018.

Pre-assignment details

Participants who completed study: NS-065/NCNP-01-201 (NCT02740972) were eligible to enroll in this long-term extension study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kg
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kg dose once a week for up to 192 weeks. Baseline of Study NS-065/NCNP-01-202: Defined as the measurement taken on Study NS-065/NCNP-01-201 Week 25.
8
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kg
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kg dose once a week for up to 192 weeks. Baseline of Study NS-065/NCNP-01-202: Defined as the measurement taken on Study NS-065/NCNP-01-201 Week 25.
8
Total16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgNS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgTotal
Age, Continuous8.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.75
7.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.11
7.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.88
Body Mass Index(BMI)18.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.17
17.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.54
17.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.39
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Height115.9 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.54
115.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.96
115.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.54
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Weight25.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.95
23.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.72
24.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.79

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 80 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 88 / 816 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 82 / 83 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical Controls

A primary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity

Time frame: Baseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 370.03 rise/sStandard Error 0.03
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.03 rise/sStandard Error 0.03
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.03 rise/sStandard Error 0.03
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1090.04 rise/sStandard Error 0.03
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1570.02 rise/sStandard Error 0.04
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 205-0.02 rise/sStandard Error 0.03
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 205-0.07 rise/sStandard Error 0.03
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 370.04 rise/sStandard Error 0.03
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1090.04 rise/sStandard Error 0.03
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 157-0.05 rise/sStandard Error 0.03
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.04 rise/sStandard Error 0.03
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.50 rise/sStandard Error 0.03
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.04 rise/sStandard Error 0.02
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.04 rise/sStandard Error 0.02
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 205-0.04 rise/sStandard Error 0.02
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1090.04 rise/sStandard Error 0.02
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 370.04 rise/sStandard Error 0.02
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 157-0.01 rise/sStandard Error 0.02
Primary

Change From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical Controls

A primary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Time to Stand (TTSTAND)

Time frame: Baseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 370.17 secondsStandard Error 1.6
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.69 secondsStandard Error 1.6
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.55 secondsStandard Error 1.63
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1090.77 secondsStandard Error 1.68
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1571.32 secondsStandard Error 1.8
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 2051.62 secondsStandard Error 1.82
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 2053.58 secondsStandard Error 1.7
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 37-0.38 secondsStandard Error 1.59
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1090.30 secondsStandard Error 1.67
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1571.45 secondsStandard Error 1.72
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 49-0.60 secondsStandard Error 1.61
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.03 secondsStandard Error 1.62
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.07 secondsStandard Error 1.13
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.29 secondsStandard Error 1.14
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 2052.71 secondsStandard Error 1.24
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1090.54 secondsStandard Error 1.18
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 37-0.11 secondsStandard Error 1.12
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Stand (TTSTAND) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1571.44 secondsStandard Error 1.23
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.

For adverse events (AEs) starting in study 201 (NCT02740972) which are not resolved at the time of enrollment into this study 202, any change in outcome or relatedness were reported in study 201. For AEs starting in study 201 which increase in severity or becomes serious after enrollment in this study 202, a new AE was reported in this study. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized by dose level. Coding was done by system organ class and preferred term (using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA)). Level of severity was assessed using the CTCAE grading system.

Time frame: Up to 192 weeks of treatment

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with TEAEs leading to discontinuation0 Participants
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with TEAE8 Participants
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Death0 Participants
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with drug-related TEAE0 Participants
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with CTCAE ≥ Grade 30 Participants
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with serious TEAE1 Participants
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with serious TEAE2 Participants
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with TEAEs leading to discontinuation0 Participants
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with CTCAE ≥ Grade 32 Participants
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with drug-related TEAE1 Participants
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Death0 Participants
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with TEAE8 Participants
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Death0 Participants
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with serious TEAE3 Participants
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with TEAE16 Participants
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with CTCAE ≥ Grade 32 Participants
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with TEAEs leading to discontinuation0 Participants
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0.Participants with drug-related TEAE1 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical Controls

A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) score The NSAA is a functional scale devised for use in ambulant children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). It consists of 17 activities graded 0 (unable to perform), 1 (performs with modifications), 2 (normal movement). It assesses abilities necessary to remain ambulant that have been found to progressively deteriorate in untreated DMD patients, as well as in other muscular dystrophies such as Becker Muscular Dystrophy. NSAA Total Score ranges from 0 to 34, with a score of 34 implying normal function.

Time frame: Baseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157 in Study 202

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.83
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 157-1.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.85
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 372.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.83
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 491.91 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.83
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1090.91 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.83
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 37-0.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.83
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.85
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 731.23 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.83
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1570.35 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.85
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1091.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.83
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.83 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.29
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 371.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.29
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1091.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.29
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 157-0.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Score Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 491.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.29
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical Controls

A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors For QMT tests, the higher of each of the bilateral scores recorded for each muscle group at each visit were analyzed. QMT tests were analyzed by dominant/non-dominant side. QMT is a well-established method for measuring muscle weakness in neuromuscular disease. Patients will be placed on an examination table with a back-support system to eliminate the need for manual back stabilization. Following a single practice administration, each patient will complete a scored QMT evaluation (perform 2 tests; with the higher of the 2 values used for data analysis). QMT will be performed by recording force in pounds through a direct computer interface with a strain gauge.

Time frame: Baseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 370.55 lbStandard Error 0.73
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 1571.56 lbStandard Error 0.91
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 490.65 lbStandard Error 0.63
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 731.18 lbStandard Error 0.66
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 490.48 lbStandard Error 0.73
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 1091.84 lbStandard Error 0.63
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 205-0.06 lbStandard Error 1.01
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 1572.27 lbStandard Error 0.81
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 2050.74 lbStandard Error 0.91
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 370.68 lbStandard Error 0.76
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 490.54 lbStandard Error 0.76
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 730.27 lbStandard Error 0.76
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 73-1.02 lbStandard Error 0.79
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 1091.04 lbStandard Error 0.76
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 1091.23 lbStandard Error 0.73
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 1570.78 lbStandard Error 0.93
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 205-0.11 lbStandard Error 1.02
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 370.48 lbStandard Error 0.63
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 1570.22 lbStandard Error 0.89
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 370.78 lbStandard Error 0.67
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 371.21 lbStandard Error 0.82
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 370.88 lbStandard Error 0.78
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 491.19 lbStandard Error 0.67
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 157-0.01 lbStandard Error 0.86
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 109-0.07 lbStandard Error 0.82
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 730.74 lbStandard Error 0.7
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 490.53 lbStandard Error 0.82
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 109-0.05 lbStandard Error 0.78
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 109-0.22 lbStandard Error 0.67
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 2050.54 lbStandard Error 0.95
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 731.08 lbStandard Error 0.85
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 157-0.01 lbStandard Error 0.75
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 2050.07 lbStandard Error 0.92
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 730.96 lbStandard Error 0.81
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 205-0.39 lbStandard Error 0.81
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 490.93 lbStandard Error 0.78
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 2050.17 lbStandard Error 0.61
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 370.70 lbStandard Error 0.53
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 490.68 lbStandard Error 0.53
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 1090.63 lbStandard Error 0.53
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 1570.70 lbStandard Error 0.62
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 2050.06 lbStandard Error 0.67
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 370.92 lbStandard Error 0.55
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 490.53 lbStandard Error 0.55
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 73-0.05 lbStandard Error 0.57
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 1090.52 lbStandard Error 0.55
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 1570.43 lbStandard Error 0.64
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 2050.25 lbStandard Error 0.69
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 370.61 lbStandard Error 0.46
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 490.90 lbStandard Error 0.46
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 730.99 lbStandard Error 0.48
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 1090.87 lbStandard Error 0.46
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Extensors, Week 1571.05 lbStandard Error 0.55
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Extensors, Week 730.60 lbStandard Error 0.55
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical Controls

A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors For QMT tests, the higher of each of the bilateral scores recorded for each muscle group at each visit were analyzed. QMT tests were analyzed by dominant/non-dominant side. QMT is a well-established method for measuring muscle weakness in neuromuscular disease. Patients will be placed on an examination table with a back-support system to eliminate the need for manual back stabilization. Following a single practice administration, each patient will complete a scored QMT evaluation (perform 2 tests; with the higher of the 2 values used for data analysis). QMT will be performed by recording force in pounds through a direct computer interface with a strain gauge.

Time frame: Baseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 490.44 lbStandard Error 0.68
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 490.57 lbStandard Error 0.72
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 73-0.70 lbStandard Error 0.75
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 1090.53 lbStandard Error 0.72
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 157-0.24 lbStandard Error 0.89
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 1090.71 lbStandard Error 0.77
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 157-0.15 lbStandard Error 0.85
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 2050.74 lbStandard Error 0.98
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 37-0.01 lbStandard Error 0.77
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 490.48 lbStandard Error 0.77
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 73-0.53 lbStandard Error 0.8
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 1570.00 lbStandard Error 0.94
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 2050.77 lbStandard Error 1.04
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 370.42 lbStandard Error 0.68
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 37-0.11 lbStandard Error 0.72
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 73-0.45 lbStandard Error 0.71
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 1090.65 lbStandard Error 0.68
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 2050.47 lbStandard Error 0.95
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 491.02 lbStandard Error 0.73
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 2050.07 lbStandard Error 0.91
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 730.60 lbStandard Error 0.76
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 730.97 lbStandard Error 0.86
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 1090.14 lbStandard Error 0.83
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 205-0.45 lbStandard Error 0.87
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 1570.31 lbStandard Error 0.91
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 109-0.21 lbStandard Error 0.73
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 370.57 lbStandard Error 0.78
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 490.63 lbStandard Error 0.78
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 730.82 lbStandard Error 0.81
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 370.84 lbStandard Error 0.73
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 1090.30 lbStandard Error 0.78
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 1571.05 lbStandard Error 0.85
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 370.39 lbStandard Error 0.83
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 49-0.38 lbStandard Error 0.83
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 2050.20 lbStandard Error 0.97
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 1571.52 lbStandard Error 0.81
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 1570.80 lbStandard Error 0.59
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 1090.42 lbStandard Error 0.53
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 1570.49 lbStandard Error 0.61
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 490.71 lbStandard Error 0.5
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 730.00 lbStandard Error 0.55
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 2050.34 lbStandard Error 0.66
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 205-0.07 lbStandard Error 0.64
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 370.18 lbStandard Error 0.56
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 370.21 lbStandard Error 0.53
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 490.08 lbStandard Error 0.56
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 730.02 lbStandard Error 0.52
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 2050.46 lbStandard Error 0.7
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 730.16 lbStandard Error 0.58
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 370.61 lbStandard Error 0.5
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 1090.44 lbStandard Error 0.56
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsElbow Flexors, Week 490.60 lbStandard Error 0.53
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 1090.25 lbStandard Error 0.5
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Elbow Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Elbow Flexors, Week 1570.20 lbStandard Error 0.65
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical Controls

A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip For QMT tests, the higher of each of the bilateral scores recorded for each muscle group at each visit were analyzed. QMT tests were analyzed by dominant/non-dominant side. QMT is a well-established method for measuring muscle weakness in neuromuscular disease. Patients will be placed on an examination table with a back-support system to eliminate the need for manual back stabilization. Following a single practice administration, each patient will complete a scored QMT evaluation (perform 2 tests; with the higher of the 2 values used for data analysis). QMT will be performed by recording force in pounds through a direct computer interface with a strain gauge.

Time frame: Baseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 370.56 lbStandard Error 1.28
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 731.85 lbStandard Error 1.32
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 2057.34 lbStandard Error 2.61
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 733.38 lbStandard Error 1.24
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 1574.67 lbStandard Error 1.47
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 2053.92 lbStandard Error 2.53
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 491.63 lbStandard Error 1.28
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 1092.22 lbStandard Error 1.28
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 1572.94 lbStandard Error 1.55
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 370.22 lbStandard Error 1.28
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 491.17 lbStandard Error 1.28
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 730.99 lbStandard Error 1.33
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 1091.86 lbStandard Error 1.28
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 1572.41 lbStandard Error 1.57
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 2057.37 lbStandard Error 2.68
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 371.45 lbStandard Error 1.2
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 491.95 lbStandard Error 1.2
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 1093.02 lbStandard Error 1.2
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 491.99 lbStandard Error 1.27
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 730.58 lbStandard Error 1.33
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 2054.48 lbStandard Error 1.65
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 371.86 lbStandard Error 1.42
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 492.34 lbStandard Error 1.37
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 1573.10 lbStandard Error 1.59
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 372.19 lbStandard Error 1.32
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 372.17 lbStandard Error 1.42
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 492.70 lbStandard Error 1.37
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 730.83 lbStandard Error 1.42
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 1092.00 lbStandard Error 1.42
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 1092.93 lbStandard Error 1.33
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 2054.05 lbStandard Error 1.74
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 731.26 lbStandard Error 1.43
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 1091.61 lbStandard Error 1.43
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 1572.66 lbStandard Error 1.61
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 2054.36 lbStandard Error 1.76
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 1573.01 lbStandard Error 1.5
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 2055.00 lbStandard Error 1.39
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 1573.29 lbStandard Error 1.14
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 491.88 lbStandard Error 0.93
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 731.13 lbStandard Error 0.96
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 2052.94 lbStandard Error 1.38
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 2055.17 lbStandard Error 1.42
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 371.09 lbStandard Error 0.94
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 1572.56 lbStandard Error 1.11
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 1092.12 lbStandard Error 0.94
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 491.96 lbStandard Error 0.93
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 731.39 lbStandard Error 0.96
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 732.05 lbStandard Error 0.98
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 1093.08 lbStandard Error 0.97
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsHandgrip, Week 1573.06 lbStandard Error 1.1
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 1091.76 lbStandard Error 0.95
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 491.97 lbStandard Error 0.96
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Handgrip, Week 371.03 lbStandard Error 0.95
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Handgrip Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Handgrip, Week 371.79 lbStandard Error 0.96
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical Controls

A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors For QMT tests, the higher of each of the bilateral scores recorded for each muscle group at each visit were analyzed. QMT tests were analyzed by dominant/non-dominant side. QMT is a well-established method for measuring muscle weakness in neuromuscular disease. Patients will be placed on an examination table with a back-support system to eliminate the need for manual back stabilization. Following a single practice administration, each patient will complete a scored QMT evaluation (perform 2 tests; with the higher of the 2 values used for data analysis). QMT will be performed by recording force in pounds through a direct computer interface with a strain gauge.

Time frame: Baseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 371.72 lbStandard Error 1.73
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 371.25 lbStandard Error 1.93
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 2050.63 lbStandard Error 2.59
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 490.33 lbStandard Error 1.82
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 1572.97 lbStandard Error 2.1
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 1571.00 lbStandard Error 2.1
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 73-1.45 lbStandard Error 1.85
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 73-1.00 lbStandard Error 1.96
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 1091.19 lbStandard Error 1.82
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 2050.82 lbStandard Error 2.57
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 1090.89 lbStandard Error 1.93
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 37-0.81 lbStandard Error 1.82
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 109-0.39 lbStandard Error 1.73
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 73-0.51 lbStandard Error 1.78
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 1573.01 lbStandard Error 2.21
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 490.46 lbStandard Error 1.73
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 2051.16 lbStandard Error 2.71
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 490.04 lbStandard Error 1.93
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 1091.14 lbStandard Error 1.92
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 1570.88 lbStandard Error 2.02
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 371.10 lbStandard Error 1.97
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 491.11 lbStandard Error 1.96
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 732.57 lbStandard Error 1.95
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 205-0.59 lbStandard Error 2.15
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 371.87 lbStandard Error 1.86
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 492.14 lbStandard Error 1.88
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 731.11 lbStandard Error 1.85
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 1090.73 lbStandard Error 1.81
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 1571.28 lbStandard Error 1.91
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 2051.35 lbStandard Error 2.04
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 37-0.12 lbStandard Error 1.86
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 490.20 lbStandard Error 1.86
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 731.03 lbStandard Error 1.91
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 1091.99 lbStandard Error 1.86
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 1570.42 lbStandard Error 2.01
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 205-1.67 lbStandard Error 2.08
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 205-0.11 lbStandard Error 1.62
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 490.52 lbStandard Error 1.37
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 370.86 lbStandard Error 1.23
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 1571.76 lbStandard Error 1.55
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 205-0.58 lbStandard Error 1.53
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 490.34 lbStandard Error 1.23
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 1091.03 lbStandard Error 1.36
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 1571.23 lbStandard Error 1.46
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 730.18 lbStandard Error 1.27
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 73-0.07 lbStandard Error 1.3
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 730.87 lbStandard Error 1.38
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 1090.99 lbStandard Error 1.28
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 491.16 lbStandard Error 1.3
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Extensors, Week 371.15 lbStandard Error 1.38
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 1571.51 lbStandard Error 1.47
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 370.44 lbStandard Error 1.3
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 1090.72 lbStandard Error 1.23
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Extensors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Extensors, Week 2050.45 lbStandard Error 1.55
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical Controls

A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors For QMT tests, the higher of each of the bilateral scores recorded for each muscle group at each visit were analyzed. QMT tests were analyzed by dominant/non-dominant side. QMT is a well-established method for measuring muscle weakness in neuromuscular disease. Patients will be placed on an examination table with a back-support system to eliminate the need for manual back stabilization. Following a single practice administration, each patient will complete a scored QMT evaluation (perform 2 tests; with the higher of the 2 values used for data analysis). QMT will be performed by recording force in pounds through a direct computer interface with a strain gauge.

Time frame: Baseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 1572.43 lbStandard Error 1.7
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 490.77 lbStandard Error 1.48
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 731.04 lbStandard Error 1.5
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 1092.04 lbStandard Error 1.48
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 37-0.35 lbStandard Error 1.48
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 2052.21 lbStandard Error 2.09
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 37-0.69 lbStandard Error 1.46
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 490.06 lbStandard Error 1.46
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 73-0.23 lbStandard Error 1.51
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 1091.87 lbStandard Error 1.46
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 1573.00 lbStandard Error 1.76
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 2052.34 lbStandard Error 1.93
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 37-0.78 lbStandard Error 1.25
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 491.04 lbStandard Error 1.25
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 730.93 lbStandard Error 1.28
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 1091.71 lbStandard Error 1.25
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 1571.35 lbStandard Error 1.5
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 2052.40 lbStandard Error 1.84
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 2052.22 lbStandard Error 1.49
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 372.04 lbStandard Error 1.56
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 1092.63 lbStandard Error 1.54
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 372.40 lbStandard Error 1.33
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 491.20 lbStandard Error 1.56
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 731.81 lbStandard Error 1.37
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 1092.17 lbStandard Error 1.33
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 732.33 lbStandard Error 1.6
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 1572.26 lbStandard Error 1.68
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 1572.29 lbStandard Error 1.44
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 1092.73 lbStandard Error 1.56
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 731.99 lbStandard Error 1.6
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 491.05 lbStandard Error 1.33
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 1572.68 lbStandard Error 1.66
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 491.77 lbStandard Error 1.6
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 2052.78 lbStandard Error 1.79
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 2052.87 lbStandard Error 1.7
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 372.06 lbStandard Error 1.54
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 2052.24 lbStandard Error 1.3
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 370.60 lbStandard Error 1.07
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 490.84 lbStandard Error 1.09
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 731.26 lbStandard Error 0.95
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 730.80 lbStandard Error 1.11
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 2051.86 lbStandard Error 1.14
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 1092.24 lbStandard Error 1.07
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 1572.51 lbStandard Error 1.22
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 1091.90 lbStandard Error 0.92
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsDominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 2052.47 lbStandard Error 1.31
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 370.82 lbStandard Error 1.1
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 491.03 lbStandard Error 1.1
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 370.67 lbStandard Error 0.92
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 731.64 lbStandard Error 1.12
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 1092.42 lbStandard Error 1.1
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsKnee Flexors, Week 1573.02 lbStandard Error 1.26
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 491.02 lbStandard Error 0.92
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) for Knee Flexors Versus Matched Historical ControlsNon-Dominant Side Knee Flexors, Week 1572.20 lbStandard Error 1.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical Controls

A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

Time frame: Baseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157 in Study 202

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 3715.15 mStandard Error 26.84
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 499.90 mStandard Error 26.84
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 73-0.73 mStandard Error 26.84
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 109-16.35 mStandard Error 26.84
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 157-41.61 mStandard Error 28.08
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 4916.94 mStandard Error 29.7
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 7318.14 mStandard Error 26.89
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 157-27.76 mStandard Error 29.71
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 3713.03 mStandard Error 28.15
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 10918.51 mStandard Error 26.89
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 3714.30 mStandard Error 19.29
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 4913.32 mStandard Error 19.75
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1091.10 mStandard Error 18.87
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 157-34.86 mStandard Error 20.28
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 738.72 mStandard Error 18.87
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical Controls

A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Time to Climb 4 stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity. The results were converted into velocity (meter/time).

Time frame: Baseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 370.04 m/sStandard Error 0.04
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.05 m/sStandard Error 0.04
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.06 m/sStandard Error 0.04
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1090.03 m/sStandard Error 0.04
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1570.04 m/sStandard Error 0.04
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 2050.05 m/sStandard Error 0.05
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 205-0.07 m/sStandard Error 0.04
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 370.01 m/sStandard Error 0.04
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 109-0.02 m/sStandard Error 0.04
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 157-0.07 m/sStandard Error 0.04
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.01 m/sStandard Error 0.04
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.03 m/sStandard Error 0.04
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.03 m/sStandard Error 0.03
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.05 m/sStandard Error 0.03
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 205-0.01 m/sStandard Error 0.03
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1090.00 m/sStandard Error 0.03
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 370.02 m/sStandard Error 0.03
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 157-0.01 m/sStandard Error 0.03
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical Controls

A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Time to Climb 4 stairs (TTCLIMB)

Time frame: Baseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1574.28 secondsStandard Error 1.55
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 49-0.26 secondsStandard Error 1.54
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1091.02 secondsStandard Error 1.54
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 2053.00 secondsStandard Error 1.66
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 73-0.08 secondsStandard Error 1.54
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 37-0.37 secondsStandard Error 1.54
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.44 secondsStandard Error 1.54
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1091.08 secondsStandard Error 1.54
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 370.38 secondsStandard Error 1.54
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1572.95 secondsStandard Error 1.55
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 2053.18 secondsStandard Error 1.58
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.28 secondsStandard Error 1.56
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.02 secondsStandard Error 1.09
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 2053.16 secondsStandard Error 1.14
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 370.01 secondsStandard Error 1.09
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1573.61 secondsStandard Error 1.09
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.18 secondsStandard Error 1.09
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs (TTCLIMB) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1091.05 secondsStandard Error 1.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical Controls

A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Time to Run/Walk 10 meters test (TTRW) Velocity. The results were converted into velocity (meter/time).

Time frame: Baseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 370.15 m/sStandard Error 0.17
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.35 m/sStandard Error 0.17
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.44 m/sStandard Error 0.17
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1090.33 m/sStandard Error 0.17
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1570.24 m/sStandard Error 0.18
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 2050.14 m/sStandard Error 0.18
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 205-0.23 m/sStandard Error 0.17
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 370.53 m/sStandard Error 0.17
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1090.12 m/sStandard Error 0.17
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 157-0.02 m/sStandard Error 0.17
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.28 m/sStandard Error 0.17
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.28 m/sStandard Error 0.17
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 490.32 m/sStandard Error 0.12
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 730.36 m/sStandard Error 0.12
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 205-0.06 m/sStandard Error 0.13
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1090.23 m/sStandard Error 0.12
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 370.34 m/sStandard Error 0.12
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Velocity Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1570.11 m/sStandard Error 0.12
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical Controls

A secondary efficacy endpoint was compared to Baseline of Study 201 (NCT02740972): Time to Run/Walk 10 meters test (TTRW)

Time frame: Baseline 201, Weeks 37, 49, 73, 109, 157, 205 in Study 202

Population: The analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug. Number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 2050.89 secondsStandard Error 1.1
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 73-1.15 secondsStandard Error 1.06
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 109-0.67 secondsStandard Error 1.06
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1570.13 secondsStandard Error 1.07
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 49-0.87 secondsStandard Error 1.06
NS-065/NCNP-01 40mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 37-0.41 secondsStandard Error 1.06
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 49-0.74 secondsStandard Error 1.06
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 73-0.68 secondsStandard Error 1.05
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 109-0.25 secondsStandard Error 1.05
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 2052.84 secondsStandard Error 1.05
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 37-1.35 secondsStandard Error 1.05
NS-065/NCNP-01 80mg/kgChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1570.56 secondsStandard Error 1.06
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 2052.00 secondsStandard Error 0.76
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 109-0.46 secondsStandard Error 0.75
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 1570.35 secondsStandard Error 0.75
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 37-0.88 secondsStandard Error 0.75
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 49-0.82 secondsStandard Error 0.75
Total NS-065/NCNP-01 GroupChange From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters Test (TTRW) Versus Matched Historical ControlsWeek 73-0.91 secondsStandard Error 0.75

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026