Skip to content

Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC Injectable Gel for Correction of Temple Hollowing

A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Controlled Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® XC Injectable Gel for Correction of Temple Hollowing

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03166618
Enrollment
1
Registered
2017-05-25
Start date
2017-04-24
Completion date
2017-07-21
Last updated
2018-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Temple Hollowing

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of JUVÉDERM VOLUMA XC injectable gel in adult participants seeking correction of temple hollowing.

Interventions

Juvéderm® VOLUMA XC hyaluronic acid injectable gel

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Has temple hollowing and is seeking restoration in the temple area.

Exclusion criteria

* Has temple hollowing due to due to trauma, congenital malformations, or lipodystrophy * Has received permanent facial implants in the face or neck * Has undergone fat injections * Has tattoos, piercings, facial hair or scars that would interfere with visual assessment of the temple * Has undergone semipermanent dermal filler treatment in the temple or mid-face within the past 36 months * Has undergone dermal filler injections above the subnasale within the past 24 months * Has temporal arteritis or history of temporal arteritis * Has temporomandibular joint dysfunction * Has eye inflammation or infection * Has a history of detached retina, retinal vascular occlusion, narrow angle glaucoma, or neovascular eye disease * Has ever received a facelift, browlift, or facial reconstructive surgery * Has undergone mesotherapy or cosmetic treatment (laser, photomodulation, intense pulsed light, radio frequency, dermabrasion, moderate or greater depth chemical peel, liposuction, lipolysis, or other ablative procedures) anywhere in the face or neck or botulinum toxin injections within the past 6 months * Has experienced trauma to the temple within the past 6 months or has residual deficiencies, deformities, or scarring * Has a tendency to develop hypertrophic scarring * Has a history of anaphylaxis or allergy to lidocaine (or any amide-based anesthetics), hyaluronic acid products, or Streptococcal protein * Has porphyria or untreated epilepsy * Has active autoimmune disease * Has current cutaneous or mucosal inflammatory or infectious processes * Is on a lidocaine, anticoagulation therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-Point Improvement (Decrease) in Both Temples as Assessed by the Evaluating Investigator Using the Allergan Temple Hollowing Scale (ATHS)Change from Baseline to Month 3The Evaluating Investigator will assess the participant's temple hollowing using the ATHS 5-point scale where: 0=convex, rounded temple to 4=severe, deeply recessed, sunken appearance. A 1-point decrease from Baseline indicates improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Improved or Much Improved as Assessed by the Evaluating Investigator Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)Month 3The Evaluating Investigator will assess the participant's temple area using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=much improved, 1=improved, 0=no change, -1=worse and -2=much worse. The percentage of participants who the Evaluating Investigator assesses as 2=much improved or 1=improved will be reported.
Percentage of Participants Improved or Much Improved as Assessed by the Participant Using the GAISMonth 3The participant will assess their temple area using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=much improved, 1=improved, 0=no change, -1=worse and -2=much worse. The percentage of participants who assess themselves as 2=much improved or 1=improved will be reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Up to 189 subjects were planned; 1 subject was enrolled but did not receive treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
VOLUMA® XC Treatment
Participants will be treated with JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® XC injectable gel in both temples (area above the eye). Participants are eligible for touch-up treatment 30 days later.
0
Control_No Treatment
No treatment is administered.
0
Total0

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyStudy was Terminated01

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-Point Improvement (Decrease) in Both Temples as Assessed by the Evaluating Investigator Using the Allergan Temple Hollowing Scale (ATHS)

The Evaluating Investigator will assess the participant's temple hollowing using the ATHS 5-point scale where: 0=convex, rounded temple to 4=severe, deeply recessed, sunken appearance. A 1-point decrease from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to Month 3

Population: Up to 189 subjects were planned; 1 subject was enrolled in the control\_No Treatment arm. Terminated study; no treatment was administered and no analyses were conducted.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants Improved or Much Improved as Assessed by the Evaluating Investigator Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)

The Evaluating Investigator will assess the participant's temple area using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=much improved, 1=improved, 0=no change, -1=worse and -2=much worse. The percentage of participants who the Evaluating Investigator assesses as 2=much improved or 1=improved will be reported.

Time frame: Month 3

Population: Up to 189 subjects were planned; 1 subject was enrolled in the control\_No Treatment arm. Terminated study; no treatment was administered and no analyses were conducted.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants Improved or Much Improved as Assessed by the Participant Using the GAIS

The participant will assess their temple area using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=much improved, 1=improved, 0=no change, -1=worse and -2=much worse. The percentage of participants who assess themselves as 2=much improved or 1=improved will be reported.

Time frame: Month 3

Population: Up to 189 subjects were planned; 1 subject was enrolled in the control\_No Treatment arm. Terminated study; no treatment was administered and no analyses were conducted.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026