Skip to content

Mobile Application for Prescription Drug-Abuse Education (MAPDE)

Mobile Application for Prescription Drug-Abuse Education (MAPDE)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03165175
Acronym
MAPDE
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-05-24
Start date
2017-05-22
Completion date
2018-10-17
Last updated
2019-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prescription Drug Abuse (Not Dependent)

Keywords

prescription drug abuse, prescription drug misuse, risk reduction, education, military, mobile application, substance misuse, substance abuse

Brief summary

The aims of this pilot study are: (1) to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a mobile application to educate military members about the risks of prescription drug misuse; (2) to determine if there is evidence that the mobile application plus treatment as usual reduces the risk of prescription drug misuse and shows differences in related measures compared to treatment as usual among military medical clinic patients currently taking prescription medication; and (3) if evidence of reduced risk is found, to estimate effect sizes for a future effectiveness trial. The pilot study will use a randomized controlled design with two groups. The control group will be provided with treatment as usual (TAU), and the experimental group will be provided with the prescription drug-abuse educational smartphone application in addition to treatment as usual (app + TAU). Self-reported measures of risk of misuse and related attitudes and knowledge will be administered to all participants at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. The mobile app is a brief intervention designed to help military members to assess their risk for medication misuse and provide individualized feedback on risk level with recommendations for reducing risk. The app also contains other features, including sections in which to store information on current medications and look up drug interactions and provides resources for help.

Detailed description

Subjects: Eighty active duty participants will be initially recruited for this study. With attrition, the final sample size is expected to be 60. Potential participants will be patients of the pain clinic, deployment health clinic or other clinics, or pharmacy patrons of the Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD) who have currently been prescribed a medication(s) with the potential for misuse. The participants will likely reflect the demographics of the overall Navy population. The sample is also expected to include a variety of racial groups and ranks. A list of prescription medications with the potential for misuse will be used for the medication criterion. The list was developed based on information from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, Commonly Abused Drugs Charts-prescription drugs; the Drug Enforcement Agency; and consultations with Navy pain clinic physicians and a Navy pharmacist. Methods and Informed Consent Plan: Study design. The study consists of a randomized controlled design with two groups. The control group will be provided with treatment as usual, and the experimental group will be provided with the prescription drug-abuse education smartphone application in addition to treatment as usual. Repeated measures will be administered to all participants at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. This study does not propose any modification of, change to or interference with the physician's treatment plan, and the app is not considered a medical device under section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). Study results will also be used to determine estimates of intervention effect sizes to be used in a later effectiveness trial. In addition, the study will determine the feasibility and acceptability of the mobile app. Recruitment. Participants will be recruited from patient waiting rooms and medical offices of the NMCSD and pharmacy waiting areas using two approaches. The first approach is using flyers about the study opportunity that will be posted in the waiting areas, clinics, and pharmacy. The flyer will instruct potential participants to contact the Principal Investigator (PI) to learn more about the study. The second approach is an in-person approach to tell potential participants about the study opportunity. This will occur by having a research team member onsite in the pharmacy waiting room area handing out flyers and asking potential participants if they would be interested in the study. The research team member can explain more about the study, go over the inclusion criteria, and answer any questions. Similarly, when a clinic staff member or provider sees a clinic patient, he or she will hand them a flyer. When the potential participant contacts the PI about the study, the PI will verbally confirm if the participant meets the inclusion criteria. The PI will also emphasize that participation is voluntary. If they meet the criteria, the PI will then ask for their non-Department of Defense (DoD) email address to communicate with the participant during the study, and to link their surveys over time. Non-DoD email addresses are less likely to contain a person's full name compared to DoD email addresses. However, in the case that the potential participant is uncomfortable using their current non-DoD (personal) email address, the investigators will provide instructions for setting up a new personal email account on Gmail if they would like to create a new email address for the study to further ensure their anonymity. The PI will send an email to the participant with the: (1) consent form in an attachment for their review; (2) a web link to access the survey website; and (3) instructions for creating a new personal email address for the study with a request to send that to the PI. The PI or study staff will randomly assign the participant to a study condition, which will indicate which survey link or path, specific to the study condition that they will receive, and then the participant will be sent an email. Each email path will have identical consent documentation; however, this method enables the study team to tailor the follow up messaging more easily. The PI will maintain a list of participant emails and their study group assignment for the purpose of sending survey and intervention reminders. Informed consent plan. The participant will have received a copy of the consent form in the email from the PI. Also, once the participant accesses the web link (for either survey path-intervention group or control group), the first page they will see will be the consent page. If the participant has any questions, the form encourages the participant to contact the PI and ask questions about the research. If the participant consents to participate, they will indicate this on the web-based consent form by clicking the appropriate box (I consent or I do NOT consent). If I do NOT consent is selected, a screen that thanks them for visiting the site will appear along with the standard instruction to close their browser. The participant must also check a box indicating that they attest that their participation is during off-duty, liberty or leave status to continue to the survey. Procedures. After the subject consents to participate, the website will also present them with a statement that requires the participant to agree, by checking a box, that their participation will only take place during their off-duty time. (The consent form also clearly instructs participants to complete the survey during their off-duty time.) The surveys will be web-based and the website will be hosted on a Qualtrics server that uses a high-end firewall system, transport layer security, passwords, and encryption. Participants will be asked to enter their non-DoD email address as a way to link their surveys over time. Then, they will enter their responses online; their data will automatically be saved to a data file. Measures will be taken to protect the email addresses and survey data collected. After submitting the baseline survey, participants in the intervention group will get instructions for downloading the app. They will be asked to download the app from the app store (e.g., iOS or Google app store), and they will be given a unique key number to access the app once downloaded. The user will also be required to set up a separate self-selected 4-digit PIN and re-enter it each time they open the app, to further enhance security. Neither the participant's phone number nor any identification that can be used to identify the phone or its user will ever be stored in the app developer's server. While the intervention participants will see the above described download instructions prior to this step, control group participants will be directed to the gift code page immediately after completing their baseline survey. At this gift code page all participants will be presented with instructions on how to get their electronic gift code as a thank-you for their time. The baseline survey and the 2 follow-up surveys will take about 40 minutes each to complete. The subject will be notified via email about when to complete the baseline, 1-month, and 3-month surveys. There will be an initial request to complete each survey, followed by 2 reminders. Measures. The data collected for this study will be self-reported survey data collected at baseline, 1 month and 3 months after baseline. The main outcome measure is the Current Opioid Misuse Measure as an indicator of the risk of opioid misuse. The secondary outcome measures are: the Pain Medication Questionnaire (also an indicator of risk of prescription drug misuse), prescription drug attitudes, knowledge related to prescription drug misuse and preparedness to talk about misuse. All outcomes will be measured as the change from baseline to the follow-up surveys (at 1 and 3 months). These are listed in the Outcomes Measures section of this record; however, additional scale information is described here: Risk of opioid misuse. The Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) (Butler et al., 2007) was used to measure risk for opioid prescription drug misuse. It measures 17 misuse behaviors over the past 30 days for those currently taking medications. Risk of misuse. Risk for prescription drug misuse was measured using a 5-item scale that was adapted from a brief scale previously used by Morasco and Dobscha (2008), which is actually a subset of the Pain Medication Questionnaire (PMQ) scale (Adams et al., 2004). The original scale was created to screen for prescription drug misuse among chronic pain patients undergoing opioid therapy, and the shortened scale was created for use among a military veteran population. The present scale includes items such as, I get pain medication from more than one doctor in order to have enough medication for my pain and at times I need to take medication more often than it is prescribed in order to relieve my pain. Attitudes. Attitudes were assessed in 2 ways. First, the 8-item Prescription Drug Attitudes Questionnaire (PDAQ) (Bodenlos et al., 2014) was adapted by the investigators for the military for this study. Second, the investigators developed 22 prescription drug misuse-related attitude items that specifically aligned with the app's main messages. Knowledge. Twenty-three multiple choice knowledge items will assess the participant's level of knowledge of the definition of misuse and related educational points. Preparedness to talk about misuse. Two investigator-developed items were used to assess the level of preparedness to talk to others (i.e., chain of command, doctor) about concerns related to one's own possible prescription drug misuse, In addition, two other investigator-developed items were used to assess the level of preparedness to talk to others about their (e.g., fellow service member, spouse) possible misuse. Additional measures include: medication use and pain; mental well-being (using the PC-PTSD (Prins et al., 2003) based on the PTSD Checklist (Weathers, Litz, Herman, Huska, & Keane, 1993); PHQ-4 (Kroenke, Spitzer, Williams, & Lowe, 2009); and the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center TBI screening tool (Schwab, Baker, Ivins, et al., 2006)); and participant's demographics. In addition, experimental group participants only will receive 21 items about their experience with the app in the 1-month and 3-month surveys. These items will assess time spent using the app, ease of use, overall satisfaction with the app, usefulness of particular sections, relevance of the content, etc. Also, aggregated data on app page views and navigation patterns will be assessed. This aggregated usage information is collected securely and anonymously for research purposes. Statistical analysis plan: Results will be analyzed using a 2 x 3 (group: experimental/control, by time: baseline/1-month/3-month), repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) to examine the potential effectiveness of the program over the 3-month study period. Categorical outcomes will be analyzed using generalized linear mixed models for binary outcomes. Group by time interactions will be examined for any evidence of improvement where greater positive changes in risk for misuse and related outcomes for the experimental group compared to the control group are observed. In addition, descriptive statistics will be used to assess the sample and to examine experimental group participants' satisfaction with and use of the app. Attrition analyses using independent t-tests and Chi-square tests will be carried out among the total sample, as well as by group to examine differences in participant characteristics among attriters and non-attriters. An alpha level of 5% will be assumed in all statistical tests. All analyses will be conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALprescription drug-abuse education smartphone application

As a patient-centered prevention effort, this brief intervention in a mobile phone app format focuses on helping military members reduce their risk for prescription drug misuse. It contains modules to: (1) assess risk for misuse and related behavioral health concerns; (2) provide individualized feedback on risk level; (3) store information on current medications and look up drug interaction and related information; (4) enhance communication and decision-making skills within healthcare and other interpersonal contexts by providing interactive scenarios; (5) teach about the risks of prescription drug misuse; and (6) provide available resources for help with prescription drug misuse.

Sponsors

Intelligent Automation, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Naval Health Research Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 or older (up to 55 years old) * On active-duty status * In the Navy or Marine Corps * Currently prescribed a medication with the potential for misuse * Owns a smartphone

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM)Baseline and 1 monthMean COMM scale score as an indicator of risk for opioid prescription drug misuse. It measures 17 misuse behaviors over the past 30 days for those currently taking medications. Scores can range from 0-4 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Medication Questionnaire (PMQ) Shortened ScaleBaseline and 1 monthMean PMQ scale score as an indicator of prescription drug misuse. This 5-item scale was adapted from a brief scale previously used by Morasco and Dobscha (2008), which is actually a subset of the Pain Medication Questionnaire (PMQ) scale (Adams et al., 2004). The original scale was created to screen for prescription drug misuse among chronic pain patients undergoing opioid therapy, and the shortened scale was created for use among a military veteran population. Scale ranges from 1-5 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Prescription Drug Misuse-related AttitudesBaseline and 1 monthA scale score for items from the 8-item Prescription Drug Attitudes Questionnaire (PDAQ; Bodenlos et al., 2014), which were adapted by the investigators for the military. The scores range from 1-5 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Prescription Drug Misuse-related KnowledgeBaseline and 1 monthMean number of correct knowledge items. Twenty-three multiple choice knowledge items assessed the participant's level of knowledge of the definition of misuse and related educational points. Possible range is 0-23 with higher scores reflecting higher knowledge levels.
Preparedness to Talk About MisuseBaseline and 1 monthTwo investigator-developed items were used to assess the level of preparedness to talk to others (i.e., chain of command, doctor) about concerns related to one's own possible prescription drug misuse. The scale ranged from 1-5 with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
App + Treatment as Usual
The experimental group will be provided with the prescription drug-abuse education smartphone application in addition to treatment as usual. This educational mobile phone app focuses on helping military members reduce their risk for prescription drug misuse. As a patient-centered prevention effort, this brief intervention in a mobile phone app format focuses on helping military members reduce their risk for prescription drug misuse. It contains modules to: (1) assess risk for misuse and related behavioral health concerns; (2) provide individualized feedback on risk level; (3) store information on current medications and look up drug interaction and related information; (4) enhance communication and decision-making skills within healthcare and other interpersonal contexts by providing interactive scenarios; (5) teach about the risks of prescription drug misuse; and (6) provide available resources for help with prescription drug misuse.
41
Treatment as Usual
The control group will be provided with treatment as usual, and will also receive a list of resources for help with prescription drug and other substance abuse issues.
39
Total80

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicApp + Treatment as UsualTreatment as UsualTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
41 Participants39 Participants80 Participants
Branch of Service
Marine Corps
10 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Branch of Service
Navy
31 Participants35 Participants66 Participants
Deployment History
Ever Deployed
31 Participants24 Participants55 Participants
Deployment History
Never Deployed
10 Participants15 Participants25 Participants
Education
Finished high school
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Education
Finished high school and some college
36 Participants33 Participants69 Participants
Education
less than high school
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants35 Participants64 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants9 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants21 Participants40 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
41 participants39 participants80 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants13 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants26 Participants50 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 410 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 410 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 410 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM)

Mean COMM scale score as an indicator of risk for opioid prescription drug misuse. It measures 17 misuse behaviors over the past 30 days for those currently taking medications. Scores can range from 0-4 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
App + Treatment as UsualCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM)Baseline mean.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
App + Treatment as UsualCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM)1 month mean.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
Treatment as UsualCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM)Baseline mean.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Treatment as UsualCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM)1 month mean.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
p-value: 0.72ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Medication Questionnaire (PMQ) Shortened Scale

Mean PMQ scale score as an indicator of prescription drug misuse. This 5-item scale was adapted from a brief scale previously used by Morasco and Dobscha (2008), which is actually a subset of the Pain Medication Questionnaire (PMQ) scale (Adams et al., 2004). The original scale was created to screen for prescription drug misuse among chronic pain patients undergoing opioid therapy, and the shortened scale was created for use among a military veteran population. Scale ranges from 1-5 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
App + Treatment as UsualPain Medication Questionnaire (PMQ) Shortened ScaleBaseline PMQ Mean1.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
App + Treatment as UsualPain Medication Questionnaire (PMQ) Shortened Scale1 month PMQ Mean1.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Treatment as UsualPain Medication Questionnaire (PMQ) Shortened ScaleBaseline PMQ Mean1.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Treatment as UsualPain Medication Questionnaire (PMQ) Shortened Scale1 month PMQ Mean1.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
p-value: 0.598ANOVA
Secondary

Preparedness to Talk About Misuse

Two investigator-developed items were used to assess the level of preparedness to talk to others (i.e., chain of command, doctor) about concerns related to one's own possible prescription drug misuse. The scale ranged from 1-5 with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
App + Treatment as UsualPreparedness to Talk About MisuseBaseline preparedness mean3.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
App + Treatment as UsualPreparedness to Talk About Misuse1 month preparedness mean3.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Treatment as UsualPreparedness to Talk About MisuseBaseline preparedness mean3.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Treatment as UsualPreparedness to Talk About Misuse1 month preparedness mean3.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
p-value: 0.022ANOVA
Secondary

Prescription Drug Misuse-related Attitudes

A scale score for items from the 8-item Prescription Drug Attitudes Questionnaire (PDAQ; Bodenlos et al., 2014), which were adapted by the investigators for the military. The scores range from 1-5 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
App + Treatment as UsualPrescription Drug Misuse-related AttitudesBaseline PDAQ mean1.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
App + Treatment as UsualPrescription Drug Misuse-related Attitudes1 month PDAQ mean1.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Treatment as UsualPrescription Drug Misuse-related AttitudesBaseline PDAQ mean1.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Treatment as UsualPrescription Drug Misuse-related Attitudes1 month PDAQ mean1.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
p-value: 0.954ANOVA
Secondary

Prescription Drug Misuse-related Knowledge

Mean number of correct knowledge items. Twenty-three multiple choice knowledge items assessed the participant's level of knowledge of the definition of misuse and related educational points. Possible range is 0-23 with higher scores reflecting higher knowledge levels.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
App + Treatment as UsualPrescription Drug Misuse-related KnowledgeBaseline knoweldge mean14.09 correct itemsStandard Deviation 1.84
App + Treatment as UsualPrescription Drug Misuse-related Knowledge1 month knowledge mean13.69 correct itemsStandard Deviation 2.05
Treatment as UsualPrescription Drug Misuse-related KnowledgeBaseline knoweldge mean13.26 correct itemsStandard Deviation 2.52
Treatment as UsualPrescription Drug Misuse-related Knowledge1 month knowledge mean13.44 correct itemsStandard Deviation 2.27
p-value: 0.167ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026