Non Small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLC
Conditions
Keywords
NSCLC, Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), Durvalumab, Tremelimumab, Progression-free survival (PFS), Overall survival (OS)
Brief summary
This is a randomized, open-label, multi-center, global, Phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of durvalumab + tremelimumab combination therapy + Standard of care (SoC) chemotherapy or durvalumab monotherapy + SoC chemotherapy versus SoC chemotherapy alone as first line treatment in patients with metastatic non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tumors that lack activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions.
Detailed description
Adult patients with a histologically or cytologically documented metastatic NSCLC, with tumors that lack activating EGFR mutations and ALK fusions, are eligible for enrollment. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive treatment with durvalumab + tremelimumab combination therapy + SoC chemotherapy, durvalumab monotherapy + SoC chemotherapy, or SoC chemotherapy alone. Tumor evaluation scans will be performed until objective disease progression as efficacy assessment. All patients will be followed for survival until the end of the study. An independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) composed of independent experts will be convened to confirm the safety and tolerability of the proposed dose and schedule.
Interventions
IV infusions every 3 weeks for 12 weeks (4 cycles) and every 4 weeks thereafter until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria
IV infusions every 3 weeks for 12 weeks (4 cycles). An additional dose of tremelimumab will be administered in the week 16.
Standard of care chemotherapy (squamous and non-squamous patients): Abraxane 100 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin Area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) 5 or 6 via IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles (ie, 4 cycles for Treatment Arms 1 and 2 and 4 to 6 cycles for Treatment Arm 3).
Standard of care chemotherapy (squamous patients only): Gemcitabine 1000 or 1250 mg/m2 via IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle + cisplatin 75 mg/m2 via IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, for 4 to 6 cycles (ie, 4 cycles for Treatment Arms 1 and 2 and 4 to 6 cycles for Treatment Arm 3).
Standard of care chemotherapy (squamous patients only): Gemcitabine 1000 or 1250 mg/m2 via IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle + carboplatin AUC 5 or 6 via IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles (ie, 4 cycles for Treatment Arms 1 and 2 and 4 to 6 cycles for Treatment Arm 3).
Standard of care chemotherapy (non-squamous patients only): Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 5 or 6 via IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles (ie, 4 cycles for Treatment Arms 1 and 2 and 4 to 6 cycles for Treatment Arm 3); then continue pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 maintenance \[i.e., q4w for Treatment Arms 1 and 2. For Treatment Arm 3, Pemetrexed maintenance therapy can be given either q3w or q4w (dependent on Investigator decision and local standards)\] until objective disease progression.
Standard of care chemotherapy (non-squamous patients only): Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 via IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, for 4 to 6 cycles (ie, 4 cycles for Treatment Arms 1 and 2 and 4 to 6 cycles for Treatment Arm 3); then continue pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 maintenance \[i.e., q4w for Treatment Arms 1 and 2. For Treatment Arm 3, Pemetrexed maintenance therapy can be given either q3w or q4w (dependent on Investigator decision and local standards)\] until objective disease progression.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
For inclusion in the study, patients should fulfill the following criteria: 1. Aged at least 18 years. 2. Histologically or cytologically documented Stage IV NSCLC. 3. Confirmed tumor PD-L1 status prior to randomization. 4. Patients must have tumors that lack activating EGFR mutations and ALK fusions. 5. No prior chemotherapy or any other systemic therapy for metastatic NSCLC. 6. World Health Organization (WHO)/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. 7. No prior exposure to immunemediated therapy, excluding therapeutic anticancer vaccines.
Exclusion criteria
Patients should not enter the study if any of the following
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS); D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone | Tumor scans performed at baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and then every 8 weeks relative to date of randomization until radiological progression. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 24 July 2019 (maximum of approximately 25 months). | PFS (per RECIST version 1.1 \[RECIST 1.1\] using Blinded Independent Central Review \[BICR\] assessments) was defined as time from date of randomization until date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of progression), regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. The final analysis of PFS in the global cohort was pre-specified after approximately 497 BICR PFS events occurred across the D + SoC and SoC alone treatment arms (75% maturity). |
| Overall Survival (OS); D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone | From baseline until death due to any cause. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021 (maximum of approximately 45 months). | OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any patient not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. The final analysis of OS in the global cohort was pre-specified after approximately 532 OS events occurred across the D + SoC and SoC alone treatment arms (80% maturity). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PFS; T + D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone and T + D + SoC Compared With D + SoC | Tumor scans performed at baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and then every 8 weeks relative to date of randomization until radiological progression. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 24 July 2019 (maximum of approximately 25 months. | PFS (per RECIST 1.1 using BICR assessments) was defined as time from date of randomization until date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of progression), regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. |
| OS; T + D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone and T + D + SoC Compared With D + SoC | From baseline until death due to any cause. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021 (maximum of approximately 45 months). | OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any patient not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Tumor scans performed at baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and then every 8 weeks relative to date of randomization until radiological progression. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 24 July 2019 (maximum of approximately 25 months). | ORR (per RECIST 1.1 using BICR assessments) was defined as the percentage of patients with at least one visit response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Results are presented for the pre-specified ORR analysis using unconfirmed responses based on BICR. |
| Best Objective Response (BoR) | Tumor scans performed at baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and then every 8 weeks relative to date of randomization until radiological progression. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 24 July 2019 (maximum of approximately 25 months). | The BoR was calculated based on the overall visit responses from each RECIST 1.1 assessment. BOR was defined as the best response a patient had following randomization, but prior to starting any subsequent cancer therapy and up to and including RECIST 1.1 progression or the last evaluable assessment in the absence of RECIST 1.1 progression, as determined by BICR. Categorization of BoR was based on RECIST using the following 'response' categories: CR and PR and the following 'non-response' categories: stable disease (SD) ≥6 weeks, progression (ie, PD) and not evaluable (NE). Results are presented for number (%) of patients in each specified category. |
| Duration of Response (DoR) | Tumor scans performed at baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and then every 8 weeks relative to date of randomization until radiological progression. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 24 July 2019 (maximum of approximately 25 months). | DoR (per RECIST 1.1 using BICR assessments) was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression. The end of response coincided with the date of progression or death from any cause used for the RECIST 1.1 PFS endpoint. The time of the initial response was defined as the latest of the dates contributing towards the first visit of PR or CR. Results are presented for the pre-specified DoR analysis using unconfirmed responses based on BICR. |
| Time From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2) | Tumor scans performed at baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and then every 8 weeks relative to date of randomization until radiological progression. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 24 July 2019 (maximum of approximately 25 months). | PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression event (subsequent to that used for the primary variable PFS) or death. The date of second progression was recorded by the Investigator and defined according to local standard clinical practice and could involve any of: objective radiological imaging, symptomatic progression or death. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Samples were collected post-dose on Day 1 (Week 0), pre-dose on Weeks 3 and 12 and at follow-up (3 months after the last valid dose). Assessed at the global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021. | To evaluate PK, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and peak and trough serum concentrations of durvalumab were determined. Peak concentration on Week 0 is the post-infusion concentration of Week 0 (collected within 10 minutes of the end of infusion). Trough concentrations on Weeks 3 and 12 are the pre-infusion concentrations of Weeks 3 and 12, respectively. |
| PK of Tremelimumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Samples were collected post-dose on Day 1 (Week 0), pre-dose on Weeks 3 and 12 and at follow-up (3 months after the last valid dose). Assessed at the global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021. | To evaluate PK, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and peak and trough serum concentrations of tremelimumab were determined. Peak concentration on Week 0 is the post-infusion concentration of Week 0 (collected within 10 minutes of the end of infusion). Trough concentrations on Weeks 3 and 12 are the pre-infusion concentrations of Weeks 3 and 12, respectively. |
| Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 12 and at 3 months after the last dose of study treatment (ie, durvalumab). | Blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and number of patients who developed detectable ADAs against durvalumab was determined. ADA prevalence is defined as percentage of patients with positive ADA result at any time, baseline or post-baseline. Treatment-emergent ADA is defined as either treatment-induced ADA or treatment-boosted ADA. ADA incidence is percentage of patients who were treatment-emergent ADA-positive. Treatment-boosted ADA is defined as baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted by ≥4-fold during the study period. Persistently positive is defined as having ≥2 post-baseline ADA positive measurements with ≥16 weeks (112 days) between the first and last positive, or an ADA positive result at the last available assessment. Transiently positive is defined as having ≥1 post-baseline ADA positive measurement and not fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive. Presence of neutralizing antibody (nAb) was tested for all ADA positive samples. |
| Number of Patients With ADA Response to Tremelimumab | Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 12 and at 3 months after the last dose of study treatment (ie, tremelimumab). | Blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and number of patients who developed detectable ADAs against tremelimumab was determined. ADA prevalence is defined as percentage of patients with positive ADA result at any time, baseline or post-baseline. Treatment-emergent ADA is defined as either treatment-induced ADA or treatment-boosted ADA. ADA incidence is percentage of patients who were treatment-emergent ADA-positive. Treatment-boosted ADA is defined as baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted by ≥4-fold during the study period. Persistently positive is defined as having ≥2 post-baseline ADA positive measurements with ≥16 weeks (112 days) between the first and last positive, or an ADA positive result at the last available assessment. Transiently positive is defined as having ≥1 post-baseline ADA positive measurement and not fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive. Presence of nAb was tested for all ADA positive samples. |
| Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | At baseline, Weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 16 and 20, then Q4W until PD, on Day 28 and 2 months post-PD, then every 8 weeks until second progression/death (whichever came first). Assessed until global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021 (maximum of approximately 45 months). | The EORTC QLQ-Core 30 version 3 (QLQ-C30 v3) was included for assessing HRQoL. It assesses HRQoL/health status through 9 multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), and a global health and QoL scale. 6 single-item symptom measures are also included: dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties. Scores from 0 to 100 were derived for each of the 15 domains, with higher scores representing greater functioning, greater HRQoL, or greater level of symptoms. Time to deterioration was defined as time from randomization until the date of first clinically meaningful deterioration that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or death (by any cause) in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration. |
| Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | At baseline, Weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 16 and 20, then Q4W until PD, on Day 28 and 2 months post-PD, then every 8 weeks until second progression/death (whichever came first). Assessed until global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021 (maximum of approximately 45 months). | The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a disease-specific 13-item self-administered questionnaire for lung cancer, to be used in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30. It comprises both multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer-associated symptoms (ie, coughing, hemoptysis, dyspnea, and pain) and treatment-related symptoms from conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy (ie, hair loss, neuropathy, sore mouth, and dysphagia). Scores from 0 to 100 were derived for each symptom item, with higher scores representing greater level of symptoms. Time to deterioration was defined as time from randomization until the date of first clinically meaningful deterioration that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or death (by any cause) in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration. |
Countries
Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam
Contacts
One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Study was conducted in 142 study centers across 18 countries in North and Latin America, Europe, Asia Pacific and Africa. First patient randomized: 27 June 2017. Results are presented for the global cohort at final analysis data cut-offs (DCOs) of 24 July 2019 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\]-based endpoints) and 12 March 2021 (all other data). Once global enrollment was complete, enrollment was started in mainland China. Results for the China cohort will be reported later.
Pre-assignment details
Patients were randomized in a stratified manner as per programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor expression status (PD-L1 tumor cells \[TC\] ≥50% versus \[vs\] \<50%), disease stage (IVA vs IVB), and histology (non-squamous vs squamous) in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive treatment with tremelimumab + durvalumab combination therapy + standard of care (SoC) chemotherapy (also referred to as T+ D + SoC), durvalumab monotherapy + SoC chemotherapy (also referred to as D + SoC), or SoC chemotherapy alone.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| T + D + SoC During chemotherapy (combination) stage:
Patients received tremelimumab 75 mg + durvalumab 1500 mg combination therapy + SoC chemotherapy via IV infusion Q3W for 4 doses/cycles (Weeks 0, 3, 6 and 9).
The SoC chemotherapy was the Investigator's choice of one of the following regimens: abraxane + carboplatin (squamous and non-squamous patients), pemetrexed + cisplatin or carboplatin (non-squamous patients only), or gemcitabine + cisplatin or carboplatin (squamous patients only).
Post-chemotherapy (maintenance) stage:
Patients then continued to receive durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg IV infusion Q4W from Week 12 until PD, unless there was unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another discontinuation criterion was met. Patients also received an additional dose of tremelimumab 75 mg (in combination with durvalumab) at Week 16 post-chemotherapy.
Non-squamous patients who received pemetrexed + carboplatin/cisplatin during chemotherapy stage could receive pemetrexed maintenance therapy, given Q4W from Week 12 until PD, unless contraindicated per the Investigator. | 338 |
| D + SoC During chemotherapy (combination) stage:
Patients received durvalumab 1500 mg monotherapy + SoC chemotherapy via IV infusion Q3W for 4 doses/cycles (Weeks 0, 3, 6 and 9).
The SoC chemotherapy was the Investigator's choice of one of the following regimens: abraxane + carboplatin (squamous and non-squamous patients), pemetrexed + cisplatin or carboplatin (non-squamous patients only), or gemcitabine + cisplatin or carboplatin (squamous patients only).
Post-chemotherapy (maintenance) stage:
Patients then continued to receive durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg IV infusion Q4W from Week 12 until PD, unless there was unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another discontinuation criterion was met.
Non-squamous patients who received pemetrexed + carboplatin/cisplatin during chemotherapy stage could receive pemetrexed maintenance therapy, given Q4W from Week 12 until PD, unless contraindicated per the Investigator. | 338 |
| SoC Alone During chemotherapy (combination) stage:
Patients received SoC chemotherapy alone via IV infusion Q3W for 4 doses/cycles (Weeks 0, 3, 6 and 9). Patients could also receive SoC chemotherapy for an additional 2 cycles Q3W on Weeks 12 and 15 if clinically indicated and at the Investigator's discretion before the patient entered follow-up.
The SoC chemotherapy was the Investigator's choice of one of the following regimens: abraxane + carboplatin (squamous and non-squamous patients), pemetrexed + cisplatin or carboplatin (non-squamous patients only), or gemcitabine + cisplatin or carboplatin (squamous patients only).
Post-chemotherapy (maintenance) stage:
Non-squamous patients who received pemetrexed + carboplatin/cisplatin during chemotherapy stage could receive pemetrexed maintenance therapy, given Q3W or Q4W (dependent on Investigator decision and local standards) from Week 12 until PD, unless contraindicated per the Investigator. | 337 |
| Total | 1,013 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | T + D + SoC | D + SoC | SoC Alone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Categorical ≥18 to <50 | 86 Participants | 29 Participants | 27 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Age Categorical ≥50 to <65 | 450 Participants | 162 Participants | 142 Participants | 146 Participants |
| Age Categorical ≥65 to <75 | 363 Participants | 112 Participants | 130 Participants | 121 Participants |
| Age Categorical ≥75 | 114 Participants | 35 Participants | 39 Participants | 40 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 63.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.47 | 62.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.43 | 63.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 | 63.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.87 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 38 Participants | 12 Participants | 17 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 350 Participants | 99 Participants | 123 Participants | 128 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 20 Participants | 8 Participants | 4 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic or Latino | 160 Participants | 51 Participants | 54 Participants | 55 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Not Hispanic or Latino | 853 Participants | 287 Participants | 284 Participants | 282 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 37 Participants | 12 Participants | 12 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 566 Participants | 205 Participants | 182 Participants | 179 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 243 Participants | 69 Participants | 85 Participants | 89 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 770 Participants | 269 Participants | 253 Participants | 248 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 251 / 338 | 265 / 338 | 285 / 337 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 309 / 330 | 302 / 334 | 301 / 333 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 146 / 330 | 134 / 334 | 117 / 333 |
Outcome results
Overall Survival (OS); D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any patient not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. The final analysis of OS in the global cohort was pre-specified after approximately 532 OS events occurred across the D + SoC and SoC alone treatment arms (80% maturity).
Time frame: From baseline until death due to any cause. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021 (maximum of approximately 45 months).
Population: Global cohort: The FAS included all randomized patients. Analysis of OS was assessed as a primary outcome measure for comparison of the D + SoC vs SoC alone treatment arms only. The alternative treatment arm comparisons were assessed as a secondary outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | Overall Survival (OS); D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone | 13.3 months |
| SoC Alone | Overall Survival (OS); D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone | 11.7 months |
Progression-Free Survival (PFS); D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone
PFS (per RECIST version 1.1 \[RECIST 1.1\] using Blinded Independent Central Review \[BICR\] assessments) was defined as time from date of randomization until date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of progression), regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. The final analysis of PFS in the global cohort was pre-specified after approximately 497 BICR PFS events occurred across the D + SoC and SoC alone treatment arms (75% maturity).
Time frame: Tumor scans performed at baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and then every 8 weeks relative to date of randomization until radiological progression. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 24 July 2019 (maximum of approximately 25 months).
Population: Global cohort: The FAS included all randomized patients. Analysis of PFS was assessed as a primary outcome measure for comparison of the D + SoC vs SoC alone treatment arms only. The alternative treatment arm comparisons were assessed as a secondary outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | Progression-Free Survival (PFS); D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone | 5.5 months |
| SoC Alone | Progression-Free Survival (PFS); D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone | 4.8 months |
Best Objective Response (BoR)
The BoR was calculated based on the overall visit responses from each RECIST 1.1 assessment. BOR was defined as the best response a patient had following randomization, but prior to starting any subsequent cancer therapy and up to and including RECIST 1.1 progression or the last evaluable assessment in the absence of RECIST 1.1 progression, as determined by BICR. Categorization of BoR was based on RECIST using the following 'response' categories: CR and PR and the following 'non-response' categories: stable disease (SD) ≥6 weeks, progression (ie, PD) and not evaluable (NE). Results are presented for number (%) of patients in each specified category.
Time frame: Tumor scans performed at baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and then every 8 weeks relative to date of randomization until radiological progression. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 24 July 2019 (maximum of approximately 25 months).
Population: Global cohort: The FAS included all randomized patients. The denominator was a subset of the FAS who had measurable disease at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | Best Objective Response (BoR) | PD | 48 Participants |
| D + SoC | Best Objective Response (BoR) | SD ≥6 weeks | 120 Participants |
| D + SoC | Best Objective Response (BoR) | CR | 2 Participants |
| D + SoC | Best Objective Response (BoR) | PR | 153 Participants |
| D + SoC | Best Objective Response (BoR) | NE | 12 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Best Objective Response (BoR) | SD ≥6 weeks | 107 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Best Objective Response (BoR) | CR | 3 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Best Objective Response (BoR) | PR | 157 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Best Objective Response (BoR) | PD | 60 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Best Objective Response (BoR) | NE | 3 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Best Objective Response (BoR) | NE | 10 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Best Objective Response (BoR) | PD | 61 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Best Objective Response (BoR) | CR | 0 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Best Objective Response (BoR) | SD ≥6 weeks | 150 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Best Objective Response (BoR) | PR | 111 Participants |
Duration of Response (DoR)
DoR (per RECIST 1.1 using BICR assessments) was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression. The end of response coincided with the date of progression or death from any cause used for the RECIST 1.1 PFS endpoint. The time of the initial response was defined as the latest of the dates contributing towards the first visit of PR or CR. Results are presented for the pre-specified DoR analysis using unconfirmed responses based on BICR.
Time frame: Tumor scans performed at baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and then every 8 weeks relative to date of randomization until radiological progression. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 24 July 2019 (maximum of approximately 25 months).
Population: Global cohort: The FAS included all randomized patients. Only patients with an objective response were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | Duration of Response (DoR) | 7.4 months |
| SoC Alone | Duration of Response (DoR) | 6.0 months |
| SoC Alone | Duration of Response (DoR) | 4.2 months |
Number of Patients With ADA Response to Tremelimumab
Blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and number of patients who developed detectable ADAs against tremelimumab was determined. ADA prevalence is defined as percentage of patients with positive ADA result at any time, baseline or post-baseline. Treatment-emergent ADA is defined as either treatment-induced ADA or treatment-boosted ADA. ADA incidence is percentage of patients who were treatment-emergent ADA-positive. Treatment-boosted ADA is defined as baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted by ≥4-fold during the study period. Persistently positive is defined as having ≥2 post-baseline ADA positive measurements with ≥16 weeks (112 days) between the first and last positive, or an ADA positive result at the last available assessment. Transiently positive is defined as having ≥1 post-baseline ADA positive measurement and not fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive. Presence of nAb was tested for all ADA positive samples.
Time frame: Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 12 and at 3 months after the last dose of study treatment (ie, tremelimumab).
Population: Global cohort: The ADA evaluable patients included those in the safety analysis set with non-missing baseline ADA sample and at least 1 post-baseline ADA sample. ADA for tremelimumab was performed for the T + D + SoC treatment arm only. The denominator was tremelimumab ADA evaluable patients.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With ADA Response to Tremelimumab | ADA positive at any visit (ADA prevalence) | 44 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With ADA Response to Tremelimumab | Treatment-emergent ADA positive (ADA incidence) | 38 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With ADA Response to Tremelimumab | Treatment-boosted ADA | 3 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With ADA Response to Tremelimumab | Treatment-induced ADA (ADA positive post-baseline only) | 35 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With ADA Response to Tremelimumab | ADA positive at baseline only | 4 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With ADA Response to Tremelimumab | ADA positive post-baseline and positive at baseline | 5 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With ADA Response to Tremelimumab | Persistently positive | 22 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With ADA Response to Tremelimumab | Transiently positive | 18 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With ADA Response to Tremelimumab | nAb positive at any visit | 31 Participants |
Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab
Blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and number of patients who developed detectable ADAs against durvalumab was determined. ADA prevalence is defined as percentage of patients with positive ADA result at any time, baseline or post-baseline. Treatment-emergent ADA is defined as either treatment-induced ADA or treatment-boosted ADA. ADA incidence is percentage of patients who were treatment-emergent ADA-positive. Treatment-boosted ADA is defined as baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted by ≥4-fold during the study period. Persistently positive is defined as having ≥2 post-baseline ADA positive measurements with ≥16 weeks (112 days) between the first and last positive, or an ADA positive result at the last available assessment. Transiently positive is defined as having ≥1 post-baseline ADA positive measurement and not fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive. Presence of neutralizing antibody (nAb) was tested for all ADA positive samples.
Time frame: Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 12 and at 3 months after the last dose of study treatment (ie, durvalumab).
Population: Global cohort: The ADA evaluable patients included those in the safety analysis set with non-missing baseline ADA sample and at least 1 post-baseline ADA sample. ADA for durvalumab was performed for the T + D + SoC and D + SoC treatment arms only. The denominator was durvalumab ADA evaluable patients.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | Treatment-emergent ADA positive (ADA incidence) | 29 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | ADA positive post-baseline and positive at baseline | 7 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | Treatment-induced ADA (ADA positive post-baseline only) | 27 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | Persistently positive | 8 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | Treatment-boosted ADA | 2 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | Transiently positive | 26 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | ADA positive at baseline only | 8 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | nAb positive at any visit | 3 Participants |
| D + SoC | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | ADA positive at any visit (ADA prevalence) | 42 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | nAb positive at any visit | 3 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | ADA positive at any visit (ADA prevalence) | 33 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | Treatment-emergent ADA positive (ADA incidence) | 19 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | Treatment-boosted ADA | 1 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | Treatment-induced ADA (ADA positive post-baseline only) | 18 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | ADA positive at baseline only | 13 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | ADA positive post-baseline and positive at baseline | 2 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | Persistently positive | 7 Participants |
| SoC Alone | Number of Patients With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab | Transiently positive | 13 Participants |
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR (per RECIST 1.1 using BICR assessments) was defined as the percentage of patients with at least one visit response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Results are presented for the pre-specified ORR analysis using unconfirmed responses based on BICR.
Time frame: Tumor scans performed at baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and then every 8 weeks relative to date of randomization until radiological progression. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 24 July 2019 (maximum of approximately 25 months).
Population: Global cohort: The FAS included all randomized patients. The denominator was a subset of the FAS who had measurable disease at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 46.3 percentage of patients |
| SoC Alone | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 48.5 percentage of patients |
| SoC Alone | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 33.4 percentage of patients |
OS; T + D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone and T + D + SoC Compared With D + SoC
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any patient not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Time frame: From baseline until death due to any cause. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021 (maximum of approximately 45 months).
Population: Global cohort: The FAS included all randomized patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | OS; T + D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone and T + D + SoC Compared With D + SoC | 14.0 months |
| SoC Alone | OS; T + D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone and T + D + SoC Compared With D + SoC | 13.3 months |
| SoC Alone | OS; T + D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone and T + D + SoC Compared With D + SoC | 11.7 months |
PFS; T + D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone and T + D + SoC Compared With D + SoC
PFS (per RECIST 1.1 using BICR assessments) was defined as time from date of randomization until date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of progression), regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Time frame: Tumor scans performed at baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and then every 8 weeks relative to date of randomization until radiological progression. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 24 July 2019 (maximum of approximately 25 months.
Population: Global cohort: The FAS included all randomized patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | PFS; T + D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone and T + D + SoC Compared With D + SoC | 6.2 months |
| SoC Alone | PFS; T + D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone and T + D + SoC Compared With D + SoC | 5.5 months |
| SoC Alone | PFS; T + D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone and T + D + SoC Compared With D + SoC | 4.8 months |
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations
To evaluate PK, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and peak and trough serum concentrations of durvalumab were determined. Peak concentration on Week 0 is the post-infusion concentration of Week 0 (collected within 10 minutes of the end of infusion). Trough concentrations on Weeks 3 and 12 are the pre-infusion concentrations of Weeks 3 and 12, respectively.
Time frame: Samples were collected post-dose on Day 1 (Week 0), pre-dose on Weeks 3 and 12 and at follow-up (3 months after the last valid dose). Assessed at the global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021.
Population: Global cohort: The PK analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of durvalumab or tremelimumab per the protocol for whom any post-dose PK data were available and without any protocol deviations that would significantly affect the PK analyses. PK for durvalumab was performed for the T + D + SoC and D + SoC treatment arms only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Week 0 | 418.80 micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 164.2 |
| D + SoC | Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Week 3 | 82.08 micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 84.38 |
| D + SoC | Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Week 12 | 195.62 micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 58.65 |
| D + SoC | Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Follow-up (3 months) | 13.42 micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 166.36 |
| SoC Alone | Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Follow-up (3 months) | 16.06 micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 249.88 |
| SoC Alone | Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Week 0 | 505.01 micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 48.76 |
| SoC Alone | Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Week 12 | 212.11 micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 60.37 |
| SoC Alone | Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Week 3 | 91.53 micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 100.58 |
PK of Tremelimumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations
To evaluate PK, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and peak and trough serum concentrations of tremelimumab were determined. Peak concentration on Week 0 is the post-infusion concentration of Week 0 (collected within 10 minutes of the end of infusion). Trough concentrations on Weeks 3 and 12 are the pre-infusion concentrations of Weeks 3 and 12, respectively.
Time frame: Samples were collected post-dose on Day 1 (Week 0), pre-dose on Weeks 3 and 12 and at follow-up (3 months after the last valid dose). Assessed at the global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021.
Population: Global cohort: The PK analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of durvalumab or tremelimumab per the protocol for whom any post-dose PK data were available and without any protocol deviations that would significantly affect the PK analyses. PK for tremelimumab was performed for the T + D + SoC treatment arm only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | PK of Tremelimumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Week 0 | 23.17 μg/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 65.62 |
| D + SoC | PK of Tremelimumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Follow-up (3 months) | 0.86 μg/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 87.65 |
| D + SoC | PK of Tremelimumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Week 3 | 4.16 μg/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80.83 |
| D + SoC | PK of Tremelimumab; Peak and Trough Serum Concentrations | Week 12 | 7.82 μg/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 75.68 |
Time From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2)
PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression event (subsequent to that used for the primary variable PFS) or death. The date of second progression was recorded by the Investigator and defined according to local standard clinical practice and could involve any of: objective radiological imaging, symptomatic progression or death.
Time frame: Tumor scans performed at baseline, Week 6, Week 12 and then every 8 weeks relative to date of randomization until radiological progression. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 24 July 2019 (maximum of approximately 25 months).
Population: Global cohort: The FAS included all randomized patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | Time From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2) | 10.4 months |
| SoC Alone | Time From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2) | 10.2 months |
| SoC Alone | Time From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2) | 9.4 months |
Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)
The EORTC QLQ-Core 30 version 3 (QLQ-C30 v3) was included for assessing HRQoL. It assesses HRQoL/health status through 9 multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), and a global health and QoL scale. 6 single-item symptom measures are also included: dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties. Scores from 0 to 100 were derived for each of the 15 domains, with higher scores representing greater functioning, greater HRQoL, or greater level of symptoms. Time to deterioration was defined as time from randomization until the date of first clinically meaningful deterioration that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or death (by any cause) in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration.
Time frame: At baseline, Weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 16 and 20, then Q4W until PD, on Day 28 and 2 months post-PD, then every 8 weeks until second progression/death (whichever came first). Assessed until global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021 (maximum of approximately 45 months).
Population: Global cohort: The FAS included all randomized patients. For QLQ-C30 function scales and global health status/HRQoL, only patients with baseline scores ≥10 (and with data available) were included in the analysis. For QLQ-C30 symptom scales/items, only patients with baseline scores ≤90 (and with data available) were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Insomnia | 8.3 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Social Functioning | 6.4 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Role Functioning | 6.6 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Dyspnea | 7.9 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Fatigue | 3.7 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning | 7.7 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Nausea / Vomiting | 7.8 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Pain | 8.9 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss | 7.2 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning | 7.6 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Diarrhea | 11.0 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / HRQoL | 8.3 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning | 8.5 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Constipation | 9.2 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Insomnia | 7.4 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / HRQoL | 7.8 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning | 8.3 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Role Functioning | 7.4 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning | 7.4 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning | 9.5 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Social Functioning | 7.1 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Fatigue | 3.8 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Pain | 6.5 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Nausea / Vomiting | 5.6 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Dyspnea | 6.9 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss | 7.2 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Constipation | 8.7 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Diarrhea | 9.8 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Constipation | 6.1 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Dyspnea | 6.7 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning | 7.5 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning | 5.8 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Insomnia | 5.8 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Role Functioning | 4.8 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / HRQoL | 5.6 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss | 7.0 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning | 5.3 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Pain | 5.7 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Fatigue | 2.8 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Diarrhea | 10.8 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Nausea / Vomiting | 5.6 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of Global Health Status / Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptoms, Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) | QLQ-C30 Social Functioning | 5.7 months |
Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13)
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a disease-specific 13-item self-administered questionnaire for lung cancer, to be used in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30. It comprises both multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer-associated symptoms (ie, coughing, hemoptysis, dyspnea, and pain) and treatment-related symptoms from conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy (ie, hair loss, neuropathy, sore mouth, and dysphagia). Scores from 0 to 100 were derived for each symptom item, with higher scores representing greater level of symptoms. Time to deterioration was defined as time from randomization until the date of first clinically meaningful deterioration that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or death (by any cause) in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration.
Time frame: At baseline, Weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 16 and 20, then Q4W until PD, on Day 28 and 2 months post-PD, then every 8 weeks until second progression/death (whichever came first). Assessed until global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021 (maximum of approximately 45 months).
Population: Global cohort: The FAS included all randomized patients. For QLQ-LC13 symptom scales/items, only patients with baseline scores ≤90 (and with data available) were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Cough | 9.7 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Hemoptysis | 17.8 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Dyspnea | 5.4 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Pain in Chest | 10.0 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Pain in Arm or Shoulder | 8.9 months |
| D + SoC | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Pain in Other Parts | 9.7 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Pain in Other Parts | 8.9 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Cough | 11.0 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Pain in Chest | 9.5 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Pain in Arm or Shoulder | 8.9 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Hemoptysis | 14.0 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Dyspnea | 5.0 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Hemoptysis | 11.4 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Dyspnea | 3.6 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Pain in Other Parts | 5.8 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Pain in Chest | 8.6 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Cough | 8.8 months |
| SoC Alone | Time to Deterioration of PRO Symptoms, Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) | QLQ-LC13 Pain in Arm or Shoulder | 8.8 months |