Skip to content

Electrolysis Technique vs Manual Therapy in Pelvic Pain

Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis Technique vs. Manual Therapy in Women With Dyspareunia and Pelvic Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03163160
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-05-22
Start date
2017-06-20
Completion date
2019-03-27
Last updated
2019-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dyspareunia, Musculoskeletal Pain, Pelvic Floor Disorders, Pelvic Pain, Perineal Tear

Keywords

pelvic floor muscles, pelvic floor myalgia, manual therapy, electrolysis, galvanic

Brief summary

Pelvic floor muscle physical therapy is recommended in clinical guidelines for women dyspareunia and pelvic pain. This study compare pelvic floor manual therapy and intratissue percutaneous electrolysis (EPI) technique in the treatment of pelvic pain in women with dyspareunia. Half of participants will receive pelvic floor manual therapy while the other half will receive intratissue percutaneous electrolysis technique.

Detailed description

Dyspareunia is painful sexual intercourse and causes could be related to musculoskeletal pelvic floor muscles disorders (tenderness, trigger points, scars). There is evidence that manual therapy and intratissue percutaneous electrolysis can be effective for musculoskeletal pain disorders affecting muscles, tendons and fascias of the extremities but they have not been evaluated in pelvic floor muscle pain syndrome. The aim of this study is to compare manual therapy and EPI in the treatment of pelvic pain in women with dyspareunia. Pelvic floor manual therapy is a clinical approach utilizing specifics hands-on mobilizing techniques to treat soft tissues. Pelvic floor mobilization is a slow controlled process of soft-tissue (myofascial) stretching intended to improve bio-mechanical elasticity. EPI technique consists in an ultrasound-guided application of a galvanic electrolytic current that causes a controlled local inflammatory process in the target tissue. This allows for phagocytosis and the subsequent regeneration of the affected tissue.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPelvic floor manual therapy group

Soft-tissue (myofascial) stretching techniques on pelvic floor muscles through external and internal (intra-vaginal) mobilizations. One weekly session for four weeks.

PROCEDUREPelvic floor electrolysis group

An ultrasound-guided application of a galvanic electrolytic current with an acupuncture needle in the soft tissue of pelvic floor. EPI technique was applied using a specifically device (EPI-X Omega Advanced Medicine, Barcelona, Spain) which produces modulated galvanic electricity. This is applied using a modified electrosurgical scalpel that incorporates acupuncture needles (0.3 mm in diameter) of different lengths. The intensity can be adjusted by changing either the duration of stimulation or the output current (mA) of the device. One weekly session for four weeks.

Sponsors

Quirón Madrid University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* women with pain in the perineal area at an average intensity of 5 or more on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) during penetration or during pelvic examination, which is indicative of moderate to severe pain * At least three months postpartum or any gynecology surgery

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * active urinary or vaginal infection * pelvic pathology associated with a lower genital pain problem (e.g. deep dyspareunia) and constant, spontaneous vulvar pain * younger than 18 or older than 65 years * previous interventions with steroid injections * fibromyalgia syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity before and after the interventionSeven days after weekly sessionChanges in pain intensity before and after the intervention. A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of perineal pain during the external and intra-vaginal examination.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Female sexual function indexSeven days after the last session and three months laterSexual function measure by the six-item Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026