Skip to content

Patient Outcomes Using an Expandable Spacer

Post-market Surveillance Study of Altera™ Minimally Invasive Articulating Expandable Spacer in a TLIF Interbody Fusion Device

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03162666
Enrollment
0
Registered
2017-05-22
Start date
2017-02-28
Completion date
2020-11-06
Last updated
2021-08-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Disc Disease

Brief summary

This study is a post-market clinical follow-up study. The data collected from this study will serve the purpose of confirming safety and performance of the ALTERA™ Expandable implant.

Detailed description

The evaluation is based on the following elements. 1. Safety as measured by the rate of serious operative and post-operative complications. 2. Subjects quality of life, measured by health-related quality of life questionnaires and Subject-reported outcome measures up to 24 months following the procedure, as compared to Subject's preoperative baseline. 3. Global and segmental lumbar lordosis (LL) Patients will be followed upto 24 months post-operative

Interventions

DEVICEALTERA

degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. with up to grade 1 spondylolisthesis

Sponsors

Globus Medical Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult (18-70 y/o) * Male or Female * With the following conditions of the lumbar spine as confirmed by advanced imaging (CT or MRI), who is a candidate for primary spinal fusion procedure according to acceptable criteria for such medical conditions: * Degenerative disc disease with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis * Spondylolisthesis * Failure of at least 6-months conservative treatment * BMI \< 40 * Subject to approve no pregnancy during the 24 months of study and no participation in other studies in parallel to this one * Ability to read, understand, and sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Infection, local to the operative site * Signs of local inflammation * Fever or leukocytosis * Pregnancy * Significant mental disorder or condition that could compromise the Subject's ability to remember and comply with preoperative and postoperative instructions (e.g. current treatment for a psychiatric/psychosocial disorder, senile dementia, Alzheimer's disease, traumatic head injury) * Prior surgical procedure (with the exception of decompression only procedure) at the index level(s) using the desired operative approach * Prior fusion procedure at an adjacent level * Any other condition which would preclude the potential benefit of spinal implant surgery, such as the presence of tumors or congenital abnormalities, fracture local to the operating site, elevation of segmentation rate unexplained by other diseases, elevation of white blood count (WBC), or a marked left shift in the WBC differential count * Neuromuscular disorder that would engender unacceptable risk of instability, implant fixation failure, or complications in postoperative care * Active local infection in or near the operative region * Active systemic infection and/or disease * Severe osteoporosis or insufficient bone density, which in the medical opinion of the physician precludes surgery or contraindicates instrumentation * Endocrine or metabolic disorders known to affect osteogenesis (e.g. Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, hypothyroidism) * Systemic disease that requires the chronic administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory or steroidal drugs * Suspected or documented allergy or intolerance to implant's materials * Symptomatic cardiac disease * Subject unwilling to cooperate with postoperative instructions. * Any case where the implant components selected for use would be too large or too small to achieve a successful result. * Subject having inadequate tissue coverage over the operative site or inadequate bone stock or quality. * Any Subject in which implant utilization would interfere with anatomical structures or expected physiological performance. * Prior fusion at the level to be treated. * Back VAS \< 4/10

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Radiographic AnalysisPre-Op, 6weeks, 12 weeks, 6months, 12 months, 24 monthsGlobal and Segmental Lumbar Lordosis in degrees

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes as a number scorePre-Op, 6weeks, 12 weeks, 6months, 12 months, 24 monthsVisual Analog Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form 12, PROMIS
Peri operative clinical parametersIntra-OperativeEstimated Blood Loss in cc
Clinical parameters in daysImmediate Post-operativeLength of Hospital Stay
ComplicationsIntra-operative, any time post-op upto 24 monthsSurgical or device related complications
Intra-Operative clinical parameters in minutesIntra-OperativeOperative Time
Changes in Radiographic Analysis in percentage6weeks, 12 weeks, 6months, 12 months, 24 monthsFusion Rates
Peri operative clinical parameters in mgsImmediate Post-operativeNarcotic Consumption

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026