Head and Neck Cancer, Human Papilloma Virus
Conditions
Keywords
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Oropharyngeal Cancer, HPV, Human Papilloma Virus, Cancer Immunotherapy, Check point inhibitors, PD-L1 inhibitor, Recurrent or Metastatic Cancer, Durvalumab, MEDI0457, Antineoplastic agents, Neoplasms
Brief summary
This is a Phase 1b/2a, open-label, multi-center study to evaluate the safety and tolerability, anti-tumor activity, and immunogenicity of MEDI0457 (also known as INO 3112) a HPV Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) vaccine in combination with durvalumab (also known as MEDI4736) which is a human monoclonal antibody directed against Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1), which blocks the interaction of PD-L1 with PD-1 and Cluster of differentiation 80 (CD80). An initial three to 12 participants (Safety Analysis Run-in participants) will be enrolled and assessed for safety before additional participants are enrolled. The initial safety analysis run-in participants along with an approximate total of 50 participants with human papilloma virus associated recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) will be enrolled in this study and evaluated also for anti-tumor efficacy to MEDI0457 in combination with durvalumab.
Interventions
MEDI0457 7 mg will be administered intramuscularly followed by electroporation (EP) using CELLECTRA®5P device.
MEDI0457 7 mg will be administered intramuscularly followed by EP using CELLECTRA®5P device.
Durvalumab will be administered intravenously at a dose of 1500 mg every 4 weeks.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Male and female participants 18 years and older 2. Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of HNSCC associated with HPV by a p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay or HPV-16 or HPV-18 positive by nucleic acid testing. 3. Recurrent or metastatic disease that has been treated with at least one platinum-containing regimen and lacking a curative treatment option. 4. Participants who are platinum ineligible may be enrolled if they have received and failed an approved treatment and lack a treatment option with curative potential.
Exclusion criteria
1. Any concurrent chemotherapy, immune-mediated therapy or biologic or hormonal therapy for cancer treatment Active or prior documented autoimmune disease with some exceptions. 2. Current or prior use of immunosuppressive medication within 14 days prior to first study dose, with the exception of intranasal and inhaled corticosteroids or systemic corticosteroids at doses not to exceed 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent. Steroids as premedication for hypersensitivity reactions due to radiographic contrast agents are allowed. 3. No prior exposure to immune-mediated therapy defined as prior exposure to T-cell and natural killer cell directed therapy (e.g., anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CD137, and anti-CTLA4, etc).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | Day 1 through 90 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 45 months) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug. There will be no updated results for this outcome measures at the time of end of study. |
| Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Day 1 through 90 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 45 months) | Any laboratory abnormality during analysis of hematology, clinical chemistry, thyroid function tests, and urinalysis that was new in onset or worsened in severity or frequency from the baseline condition and required therapeutic intervention or diagnostic tests, led to discontinuation of study treatment, had accompanying or inducing symptoms or signs, or judged by the Investigator as clinically significant was recorded as AE. Participants with abnormal laboratory parameters reported as TEAEs are reported. |
| Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Day 1 through 90 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 45 months) | Participants with ECG abnormalities reported as TEAEs are reported. |
| Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Day 1 through 90 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 45 months) | Vital sign assessment included body temperature, respiration rate, pulse oximetry, blood pressure, heart rate, and weight. Participants with abnormal vital sign and/or abnormal physical examination reported as TEAEs are reported. |
| Number of Participants Who Received Any Concomitant Medications During the Study | Day 1 through 90 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 45 months) | Participants who received concomitant medications which were ongoing at the start of treatment or started after the study treatment are included. |
| Number of Participants With Shift >=3 Changed From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Day 1 through 90 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 45 months) | Participants with shift \>=3 changed from baseline in ECOG status are reported. ECOG performance status is used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living activities of the participant and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. The scores are: 0 = Fully Active, able to carry out all pre-disease performance without restrictions; 1 = Restricted activity but ambulatory and able to carry out light work or work of a sedentary nature; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of self-care but unable to carry out work activities; 3 = Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = Completely Disabled, unable to carry out any self-care and totally confined to bed or chair; 5 = Dead. |
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 in Response-evaluable Population | Day 1 through end of study (approximately 45 months) | The objective response is defined as confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) guidelines. The CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. The PR is defined as \>= 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions compared to baseline and no new non-target lesion. A confirmed CR or PR is defined as 2 CRs or 2 PRs that were separated by at least 4 weeks with no evidence of progression or not evaluable response in-between. Percentage of participants with objective response is reported. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Durvalumab | Pre-dose (up to 60 minutes prior to durvalumab administration) on Week 4, Week 8, and Week 16 | Number of participants with positive ADA titer to durvalumab are reported. ADA prevalence is defined as ADA positive at any point (baseline and post-baseline); persistent positive is defined as ADA positive at Week 16, and transient positive is defined as positive at Week 8 but not at Week 16, regardless of baseline positivity. |
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by RECIST Version 1.1 in As-treated Population | Day 1 through end of study (approximately 45 months) | The objective response is defined as confirmed CR or confirmed PR based on RECIST v1.1 guidelines. The CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. The PR is defined as \>= 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions compared to baseline and no new non-target lesion. A confirmed CR or PR is defined as 2 CRs or 2 PRs that were separated by at least 4 weeks with no evidence of progression or not evaluable response in-between. Percentage of participants with objective response is reported. |
| Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab | Pre-dose (up to 60 minutes prior to durvalumab administration) on Week 4, Week 8, and Week 16 | Serum concentrations of durvalumab is reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by Immune-related RECIST (irRECIST) in Response-evaluable Population | Day 1 through end of study (approximately 45 months) | The objective response is defined as confirmed CR or confirmed PR based on irRECIST v1.1 guidelines. The irCR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. The irPR is defined as \>= 50% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions compared to baseline and no new non-target lesion. A confirmed irCR or irPR is defined as 2 irCRs or 2 irPRs that were separated by at least 4 weeks with no evidence of progression or not evaluable response in-between. Percentage of participants with objective response is reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by irRECIST in As-treated Population | Day 1 through end of study (approximately 45 months) | The objective response is defined as confirmed CR or confirmed PR based on irRECIST v1.1 guidelines. The irCR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. The irPR is defined as \>= 50% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions compared to baseline and no new non-target lesion. A confirmed irCR or irPR is defined as 2 irCRs or 2 irPRs that were separated by at least 4 weeks with no evidence of progression or not evaluable response in-between. Percentage of participants with objective response is reported. |
| Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Week 16 by RECIST Version 1.1 in Response-evaluable Population | Week 16 | The DCR is defined percentage of participants with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) at 16 weeks based on RECIST v1.1 guidelines. A CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. A PR is defined as \>= 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to baseline and no new non-target lesion. The SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the study treatment started, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) or / and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. |
| DCR at Week 16 by RECIST Version 1.1 in As-treated Population | Week 16 | The DCR is defined percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD at 16 weeks based on RECIST v1.1 guidelines. A CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. A PR is defined as \>= 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to baseline and no new non-target lesion. The SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the study treatment started, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) or / and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. |
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) | Day 1 through end of study (approximately 45 months) | The PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of study treatment until the documentation of disease progression based on RECIST version 1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The progressive disease is defined at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started, the appearance of one or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants who were not progressed or died at the time of the analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST version 1.1 assessment. The PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | Day 1 through end of study (approximately 45 months) | Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of start of study treatment until death due to any cause. Any participant not died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. The OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
The data are reported per the data cut-off (DCO) date of 19Mar2021 and the data after DCO will not be entered into the clinical study database and hence, will not be analyzed.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory Participants with recurrent or metastatic disease and were non-refractory to neoadjuvant/adjuvant platinum based chemotherapy, received MEDI0457 7 mg intramuscularly followed by electroporation on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 7, 12, and then Q8W and durvalumab 1500 mg intravenously on Day 1 of Week 4 and then Q4W until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first. | 15 |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory Participants with R/M disease and were refractory to neoadjuvant/adjuvant platinum based chemotherapy, received MEDI0457 7 mg intramuscularly followed by electroporation on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 7, 12, and then Q8W and durvalumab 1500 mg intravenously on Day 1 of Week 4 and then Q4W until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first. | 9 |
| 2L+R/M Participants with R/M disease and were treated with 1 or more lines of platinum based chemotherapy, received MEDI0457 7 mg intramuscularly followed by electroporation on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 7, 12, and then Q8W and durvalumab 1500 mg intravenously on Day 1 of Week 4 and then Q4W until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first. | 11 |
| Total | 35 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Other | 6 | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Total | 2L+R/M | 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 57.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.98 | 61.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.77 | 60.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.28 | 63.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 9 Participants | 35 Participants | 11 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 7 Participants | 33 Participants | 11 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 8 Participants | 34 Participants | 11 Participants | 15 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 4 / 15 | 5 / 9 | 8 / 11 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 15 / 15 | 9 / 9 | 11 / 11 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 4 / 15 | 4 / 9 | 6 / 11 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants Who Received Any Concomitant Medications During the Study
Participants who received concomitant medications which were ongoing at the start of treatment or started after the study treatment are included.
Time frame: Day 1 through 90 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 45 months)
Population: As-treated population included all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants Who Received Any Concomitant Medications During the Study | 15 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants Who Received Any Concomitant Medications During the Study | 9 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants Who Received Any Concomitant Medications During the Study | 11 Participants |
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs
Participants with ECG abnormalities reported as TEAEs are reported.
Time frame: Day 1 through 90 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 45 months)
Population: As-treated population included all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Sinus bradycardia | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Bradycardia | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Left ventricular hypertrophy | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Cardiac failure | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Sinus tachycardia | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Atrial fibrillation | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Pericardial effusion | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Supraventricular tachycardia | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Myocarditis | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Cardiac failure | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Atrial fibrillation | 2 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Bradycardia | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Sinus tachycardia | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Sinus bradycardia | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Left ventricular hypertrophy | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Myocarditis | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Pericardial effusion | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Supraventricular tachycardia | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Sinus tachycardia | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Atrial fibrillation | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Myocarditis | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Bradycardia | 3 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Supraventricular tachycardia | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Cardiac failure | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Sinus bradycardia | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Pericardial effusion | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs | Left ventricular hypertrophy | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs
Any laboratory abnormality during analysis of hematology, clinical chemistry, thyroid function tests, and urinalysis that was new in onset or worsened in severity or frequency from the baseline condition and required therapeutic intervention or diagnostic tests, led to discontinuation of study treatment, had accompanying or inducing symptoms or signs, or judged by the Investigator as clinically significant was recorded as AE. Participants with abnormal laboratory parameters reported as TEAEs are reported.
Time frame: Day 1 through 90 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 45 months)
Population: As-treated population included all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hyperthyroidism | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypoalbuminaemia | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Neutrophil count decreased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypokalaemia | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood bilirubin increased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Neutropenia | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hyperglycaemia | 3 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypothyroidism | 3 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hyponatraemia | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Red blood cell count decreased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Platelet count decreased | 2 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | White blood cell count increased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Tri-iodothyronine decreased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Alanine aminotransferase increased | 2 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Troponin T increased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypophosphataemia | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | White blood cell count decreased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypoglycaemia | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood creatinine increased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Anaemia | 3 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Lymphocyte count decreased | 2 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood thyroid stimulating hormone increased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Lipase increased | 2 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypocalcaemia | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood urea increased | 2 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Lymphopenia | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypomagnesaemia | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Amylase increased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypocalcaemia | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Lymphocyte count decreased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Alanine aminotransferase increased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Lipase increased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Neutrophil count decreased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Platelet count decreased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | White blood cell count decreased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood creatinine increased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood thyroid stimulating hormone increased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood urea increased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Amylase increased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood bilirubin increased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Red blood cell count decreased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Tri-iodothyronine decreased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Troponin T increased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | White blood cell count increased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hyponatraemia | 3 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hyperglycaemia | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypokalaemia | 3 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypoalbuminaemia | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypomagnesaemia | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypoglycaemia | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypophosphataemia | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypothyroidism | 2 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hyperthyroidism | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Anaemia | 5 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Neutropenia | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Lymphopenia | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypokalaemia | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Amylase increased | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Alanine aminotransferase increased | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypoalbuminaemia | 2 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood urea increased | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Lymphocyte count decreased | 3 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypomagnesaemia | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood thyroid stimulating hormone increased | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood creatinine increased | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypocalcaemia | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | White blood cell count decreased | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Anaemia | 4 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypoglycaemia | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Platelet count decreased | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 3 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypophosphataemia | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Neutrophil count decreased | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Tri-iodothyronine decreased | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Lymphopenia | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Troponin T increased | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Red blood cell count decreased | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hypothyroidism | 2 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | White blood cell count increased | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Lipase increased | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hyponatraemia | 2 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood bilirubin increased | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Neutropenia | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hyperglycaemia | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs | Hyperthyroidism | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs
Vital sign assessment included body temperature, respiration rate, pulse oximetry, blood pressure, heart rate, and weight. Participants with abnormal vital sign and/or abnormal physical examination reported as TEAEs are reported.
Time frame: Day 1 through 90 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 45 months)
Population: As-treated population included all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Pyrexia | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Weight decreased | 4 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Weight increased | 2 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Breath sounds abnormal | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Dyspnoea | 4 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Hypertension | 5 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Hypotension | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Blood pressure increased | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Weight increased | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Hypotension | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Breath sounds abnormal | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Dyspnoea | 4 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Hypertension | 1 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Pyrexia | 4 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Weight decreased | 2 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Blood pressure increased | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Weight increased | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Weight decreased | 2 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Pyrexia | 2 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Breath sounds abnormal | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Hypotension | 2 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Hypertension | 4 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Dyspnoea | 3 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs and/or Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs | Blood pressure increased | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Shift >=3 Changed From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status
Participants with shift \>=3 changed from baseline in ECOG status are reported. ECOG performance status is used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living activities of the participant and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. The scores are: 0 = Fully Active, able to carry out all pre-disease performance without restrictions; 1 = Restricted activity but ambulatory and able to carry out light work or work of a sedentary nature; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of self-care but unable to carry out work activities; 3 = Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = Completely Disabled, unable to carry out any self-care and totally confined to bed or chair; 5 = Dead.
Time frame: Day 1 through 90 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 45 months)
Population: As-treated population included all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Shift >=3 Changed From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Shift >=3 Changed From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Shift >=3 Changed From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug. There will be no updated results for this outcome measures at the time of end of study.
Time frame: Day 1 through 90 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 45 months)
Population: As-treated population included all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | Any TEAE | 15 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | Any TESAE | 4 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | Any TEAE | 9 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | Any TESAE | 4 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | Any TEAE | 11 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | Any TESAE | 6 Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 in Response-evaluable Population
The objective response is defined as confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) guidelines. The CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. The PR is defined as \>= 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions compared to baseline and no new non-target lesion. A confirmed CR or PR is defined as 2 CRs or 2 PRs that were separated by at least 4 weeks with no evidence of progression or not evaluable response in-between. Percentage of participants with objective response is reported.
Time frame: Day 1 through end of study (approximately 45 months)
Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants with confirmed human papilloma virus Type 16 (HPV-16) or HPV-18 associated disease, who received one dose of both study drugs, had a baseline scan (Days -28 to -1) with measurable disease at baseline, and at least one follow-up scan with the opportunity to be followed for \>= 16 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 in Response-evaluable Population | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 in Response-evaluable Population | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
| 2L+R/M | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 in Response-evaluable Population | 20.0 Percentage of participants |
DCR at Week 16 by RECIST Version 1.1 in As-treated Population
The DCR is defined percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD at 16 weeks based on RECIST v1.1 guidelines. A CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. A PR is defined as \>= 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to baseline and no new non-target lesion. The SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the study treatment started, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) or / and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: As-treated population included all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | DCR at Week 16 by RECIST Version 1.1 in As-treated Population | 53.3 Percentage of participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | DCR at Week 16 by RECIST Version 1.1 in As-treated Population | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| 2L+R/M | DCR at Week 16 by RECIST Version 1.1 in As-treated Population | 45.5 Percentage of participants |
Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Week 16 by RECIST Version 1.1 in Response-evaluable Population
The DCR is defined percentage of participants with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) at 16 weeks based on RECIST v1.1 guidelines. A CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. A PR is defined as \>= 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to baseline and no new non-target lesion. The SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the study treatment started, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) or / and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants with confirmed HPV-16 or HPV-18 associated disease, who received one dose of both study drugs, had a baseline scan (Days -28 to -1) with measurable disease at baseline, and at least one follow-up scan with the opportunity to be followed for \>= 16 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Week 16 by RECIST Version 1.1 in Response-evaluable Population | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Week 16 by RECIST Version 1.1 in Response-evaluable Population | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
| 2L+R/M | Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Week 16 by RECIST Version 1.1 in Response-evaluable Population | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Durvalumab
Number of participants with positive ADA titer to durvalumab are reported. ADA prevalence is defined as ADA positive at any point (baseline and post-baseline); persistent positive is defined as ADA positive at Week 16, and transient positive is defined as positive at Week 8 but not at Week 16, regardless of baseline positivity.
Time frame: Pre-dose (up to 60 minutes prior to durvalumab administration) on Week 4, Week 8, and Week 16
Population: The ADA evaluable population included all participants who had non-missing baseline ADAs (on Day 1) and at least one non-missing post-baseline ADA result.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Durvalumab | Persistent positive ADA | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Durvalumab | ADA prevalence | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Durvalumab | Transient positive ADA | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Durvalumab | Persistent positive ADA | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Durvalumab | ADA prevalence | 0 Participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Durvalumab | Transient positive ADA | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Durvalumab | ADA prevalence | 1 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Durvalumab | Transient positive ADA | 0 Participants |
| 2L+R/M | Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to Durvalumab | Persistent positive ADA | 0 Participants |
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of start of study treatment until death due to any cause. Any participant not died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. The OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Day 1 through end of study (approximately 45 months)
Population: As-treated population included all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Overall Survival (OS) | NA Months |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Overall Survival (OS) | 29.2 Months |
| 2L+R/M | Overall Survival (OS) | 19.2 Months |
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by Immune-related RECIST (irRECIST) in Response-evaluable Population
The objective response is defined as confirmed CR or confirmed PR based on irRECIST v1.1 guidelines. The irCR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. The irPR is defined as \>= 50% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions compared to baseline and no new non-target lesion. A confirmed irCR or irPR is defined as 2 irCRs or 2 irPRs that were separated by at least 4 weeks with no evidence of progression or not evaluable response in-between. Percentage of participants with objective response is reported.
Time frame: Day 1 through end of study (approximately 45 months)
Population: Response-evaluable population included all participants with confirmed HPV-16 or HPV-18 associated disease, who received one dose of both study drugs, had a baseline scan (Days -28 to -1) with measurable disease at baseline, and at least one follow-up scan with the opportunity to be followed for \>= 16 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by Immune-related RECIST (irRECIST) in Response-evaluable Population | 41.7 Percentage of participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by Immune-related RECIST (irRECIST) in Response-evaluable Population | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
| 2L+R/M | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by Immune-related RECIST (irRECIST) in Response-evaluable Population | 20.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by irRECIST in As-treated Population
The objective response is defined as confirmed CR or confirmed PR based on irRECIST v1.1 guidelines. The irCR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. The irPR is defined as \>= 50% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions compared to baseline and no new non-target lesion. A confirmed irCR or irPR is defined as 2 irCRs or 2 irPRs that were separated by at least 4 weeks with no evidence of progression or not evaluable response in-between. Percentage of participants with objective response is reported.
Time frame: Day 1 through end of study (approximately 45 months)
Population: As-treated population included all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by irRECIST in As-treated Population | 40.0 Percentage of participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by irRECIST in As-treated Population | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
| 2L+R/M | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by irRECIST in As-treated Population | 18.2 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by RECIST Version 1.1 in As-treated Population
The objective response is defined as confirmed CR or confirmed PR based on RECIST v1.1 guidelines. The CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. The PR is defined as \>= 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions compared to baseline and no new non-target lesion. A confirmed CR or PR is defined as 2 CRs or 2 PRs that were separated by at least 4 weeks with no evidence of progression or not evaluable response in-between. Percentage of participants with objective response is reported.
Time frame: Day 1 through end of study (approximately 45 months)
Population: As-treated population included all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by RECIST Version 1.1 in As-treated Population | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by RECIST Version 1.1 in As-treated Population | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
| 2L+R/M | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response by RECIST Version 1.1 in As-treated Population | 18.2 Percentage of participants |
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
The PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of study treatment until the documentation of disease progression based on RECIST version 1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The progressive disease is defined at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started, the appearance of one or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants who were not progressed or died at the time of the analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST version 1.1 assessment. The PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Day 1 through end of study (approximately 45 months)
Population: As-treated population included all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 9.5 Months |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 2.3 Months |
| 2L+R/M | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 3.8 Months |
Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab
Serum concentrations of durvalumab is reported.
Time frame: Pre-dose (up to 60 minutes prior to durvalumab administration) on Week 4, Week 8, and Week 16
Population: Pharmacokinetics population included all participants who received at least one dose of durvalumab and had at least one evaluable post-dose serum concentration measurement of durvalumab. 'Number analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for the specified time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab | Week 4 pre-dose | 0.767 mg/L | — |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab | Week 8 pre-dose | 92.163 mg/L | Standard Deviation 37.823 |
| 1L R/M Platinum Non-refractory | Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab | Week 16 pre-dose | 190.061 mg/L | Standard Deviation 94.466 |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab | Week 16 pre-dose | 127.269 mg/L | Standard Deviation 56.927 |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab | Week 8 pre-dose | 89.094 mg/L | Standard Deviation 69.586 |
| 1L R/M Platinum Refractory | Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab | Week 4 pre-dose | 1.505 mg/L | — |
| 2L+R/M | Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab | Week 16 pre-dose | 121.728 mg/L | Standard Deviation 79.189 |
| 2L+R/M | Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab | Week 8 pre-dose | 94.665 mg/L | Standard Deviation 50.546 |