Skip to content

The Efficacy of Different Types of Stretching on Range of Motion, Pain and Function in Elbow Limitation

The Efficacy of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching and Static Stretching on Range of Motion, Pain and Function in Elbow Limitation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03161782
Enrollment
40
Registered
2017-05-22
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2017-07-25
Last updated
2018-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain, Elbow Fracture, Stiffness of Elbow, Not Elsewhere Classified

Keywords

pain, exercise, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching, static stretching

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) stretching and static stretching on range of motion (ROM), pain and function in elbow limitation.

Detailed description

To compare the efficacy of PNF stretching and static stretching on ROM, pain and function in elbow limitation, forty voluntary patients with elbow limitation, aged between 18-55 years will be randomly divided into two groups: PNF Stretching group and Static Stretching group. PNF stretching will be combined with exercise and cold application in PNF Stretching group, static stretching will be combined with exercise and cold application in Static Stretching group, will be applied for 12 sessions. The patients will be assessed before and after six-week treatment. The pain on activity, at rest and at night will be assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). ROM will be assesed with universal goniometer. The functional status will be evaluated by Disabilities Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). Kinesiophobia and quality of life will be assessed with Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and Short Form-12, respectively. The Global Rating of Change will be used to evaluate patient satisfaction.

Interventions

For hold-relax stretching, each subject in PNF Stretching group will be comfortably positioned in a supine lying position, and patient will move the joint to the end of the passive or pain-free ROM. The therapist will ask for an isometric contraction of the restricting muscle or pattern (antagonists) with emphasis on rotation. The patients will be asked to perform submaximal isometric contractions of the target muscle for 10 seconds. After the contraction, the patients will be instructed to relax for 5 seconds. The joint will be repositioned actively to the new limit of range, and then therapist will passively control the new ROM. The procedure will be repeated 10 times with 10 seconds of rest between two successive trials. Patients will be treated 2 times per week for 6 weeks.

OTHERStatic Stretching

For static stretching, each subject in Static Stretching group will be comfortably positioned in a supine lying position, and the stretching of target muscle will be maintained for 20 seconds followed by 10 seconds of rest. The procedure will be repeated 10 times with 10 seconds of rest between two successive trials. Patients will be treated 2 times per week for 6 weeks.

OTHERExercise

Shoulder, elbow and wrist AROM exercises. Elbow flexion and extansion self-stretching exercises Elbow and wrist strengthening exercises Proprioception exercises for elbow. Grip strengthening exercises.

Cold therapy will be applied over the elbow for 15 minutes in the form of cold pack after stretching and exercise protocol.

Sponsors

Istanbul University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjectswill be included with * Aged between 18 and 65 years * Elbow fracture in the six months before the study * Elbow limitation in flexion or extension * Being volunteer to participate * Fractures should be managed with conservatively or surgically

Exclusion criteria

* Malunion or Nonunion Fracture * Occurrence of complex regional pain syndrome, peripheric nerve injury, heterotopic ossification, myositis ossification or post-traumatic ankylosing * Non-healing wound or infection * Previously received physiotherapy for elbow limitation * Having any cardiovascular diseases, neurological disorders, rheumatic diseases or psychiatric diseases * Could not adjust to treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional StatusAfter the six-week interventionThe functional status of the patients will be evaluated by The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional StatusBaselineThe functional status of the patients will be evaluated by The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH).
Pain IntensityBaselinePain intensity of the patients at rest, during activity, and at night will be assessed by Visual Analog Scale.
Active Range of Motion (AROM) AssessmentBaselineThe elbow's and forearm's AROM, including flexion, extansion, supination, pronation will be measured described by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) using a universal goniometer. The process will be repeated three times in each direction, with the the average value recorded.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fear of movement (kinesiophobia)BaselineKinesiophobia of the patients will be assessed by Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale.
Patient SatisfactionAfter the six-week interventionPatient Satisfaction will be assessed with Global Rating of Change Scale.
Quality of LifeBaselineQuality of life of the patients will be assessed by Short Form-12.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026