Skip to content

Investigation on the Bidirectional Cortical Neuroprosthetic System

Investigation on the Bidirectional Cortical Neuroprosthetic System

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03161067
Acronym
BiCNS
Enrollment
5
Registered
2017-05-19
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
2030-12-31
Last updated
2026-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Quadriplegia, Tetraplegia

Keywords

Tetraplegia, Rehabilitation, Brain Computer Interface, Intracortical Microstimulation, Upper extremity prosthetics, Cervical spinal cord injury, Bilateral, Quadriplegia

Brief summary

The Bidirectional Cortical Neuroprosthetic System (BiCNS) consists of NeuroPort Microelectrode Array Systems and NeuroPort Electrodes (Sputtered Iridium Oxide Film), Patient Pedestals, the NeuroPort BioPotential Signal Processing System, and the CereStim C96 Programmable Stimulator. The goals of this early feasibility study consist of safety and efficacy evaluations of this device.

Detailed description

This proposed early feasibility, investigator-initiated study is led by Dr. Nathan E. Crone, M.D. at Johns Hopkins Medicine (JHM). The Bidirectional Cortical Neuroprosthetic System (BiCNS) consists of modified versions of 510(k) cleared NeuroPort Electrode Array Systems (Blackrock Microsystems, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) as well as a neurostimulator module (CereStim R96) for long term neural recording and intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of the brain. The BiCNS is termed bidirectional because it permits both the recording of information from the brain for controlling an end effector device, as well as enabling information regarding that end effector to be returned to the brain in the form of ICMS. "End effector" in this sense is used to mean a physical or virtual device designed to interact with its (physical or virtual) environment. Electrode arrays will be implanted in the brain in pairs, with a pair comprising a recording array and a stimulating array. A total of six NeuroPort arrays, consisting of three array pairs, will be implanted in each study participant. Each pair will consist of an array implanted in primary motor cortex (M1) for recording and an array implanted in primary sensory cortex (S1) for stimulation and/or recording; both arrays in each pair will be connected to a single percutaneous pedestal as an external interface. In each participant, two such array pairs will be implanted in the hand/arm area of M1 and S1 in the dominant brain hemisphere (e.g., the left hemisphere for a right-handed individual). A third pair will be implanted in the hand/arm area of M1 and S1 in non-dominant hemisphere (e.g. right hemisphere for a right handed-individual). The recording arrays implanted in M1 are the NeuroPort microelectrode arrays with platinum (Pt) tips (K070272), whereas the ICMS arrays implanted in S1 are NeuroPort microelectrode arrays with Sputtered Iridium-Oxide Film (SIROF) tips (K110010). The study has Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) approval from FDA to implant these devices for 52 weeks (plus/minus 2 weeks).

Interventions

DEVICEBiCNS

Surgical implantation

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants must meet all inclusion criteria, verified by medical evaluation, psychological evaluation, and review of medical history. Inclusion criteria include: * Participants with C4-C6 tetraplegia from any etiology except neurodegenerative disease (e.g. amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) or active cancer. * Complete or incomplete spinal cord injury classified by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) as A or B or C if fewer than three muscle groups in the leg and foot (as identified in the ASIA Impairment Scale) can be contracted * Injury more than one year prior to enrollment * Participant has a life expectancy of greater than 5 years * Meeting surgical safety criteria, including surgical clearance by the participant's primary healthcare provider, study physicians, and any necessary consultants * Willingness and ability to provide informed consent * Screened by rehabilitation psychologist with a result showing that the participant has a stable psychosocial support system with caregiver capable of monitoring participant throughout the study * Ability and willingness to travel to up to fifty miles to study location up to three days per week for the duration of the study * Ability to understand and comply with study session instructions * Pain well controlled without narcotic medications * No other neurological, orthopedic conditions beyond the spinal cord injury * Participant consents to the study and still wishes to participate at the time of the study

Exclusion criteria

All interested participants will be reviewed for the presence of

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety of BiCNS: The device is not explanted during 52-week study52 weeksThis outcome will be considered successful if the device is not explanted during the 52-week period. Explantation of the device prior to the 52-week study period implies that the device is putting the subject at risk (e.g. through a serious infection at implantation site) and therefore must be removed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of BiCNS: Control of one end-effector using neural signals acquired by the BiCNS52 weeksOne or more participants demonstrate successful control of an assistive device using the action research arm test (ARAT). The ARAT's is a 19 item measure divided into 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from: 3\) Performs test normally 2) Completes test, but takes abnormally long or has great difficulty 1\) Performs test partially 0) Can perform no part of test
Sensory feedback: the participants can perceive environmental information through delivery of intracortical microstimulation (ICMS).52 weeksIntracortical microstimulation will be delivered to participants through the BiCNS device. The effect of ICMS will be measured based on participants' verbal reporting of what the stimuli feel like (quality of percepts) and where they appear to be coming from (location of percepts).

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTNathan E Crone, MD
ncrone@jhmi.edu4109559441
CONTACTFrancesco Tenore, PhD
francesco.tenore@jhuapl.edu4437789774
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNathan E Crone, MD

Johns Hopkins University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 22, 2026