Skip to content

Clinical Power Testing Across Human Lifetime

Optimal Manner of Measuring Power Across the Lifespan

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03160963
Enrollment
70
Registered
2017-05-19
Start date
2017-01-25
Completion date
2019-08-15
Last updated
2019-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aged

Keywords

elderly

Brief summary

We will determine when to transition from the common vertical jump to chair stand depending on age and physical activity levels.

Detailed description

Assessing individuals' power, while it is useful in measuring fitness and performance levels, often requires expensive materials. Vertical jump height has been used to assess peak power output using specific regression equations. The issue with this test, although it is often used with older persons, is that it is not practical or useful in assessing the power output in elderly adults due to possible injury risk and lack of familiarity with providing a maximal jump performance. Power is important for elderly adults; because, higher power output in elderly adults has been shown to highly correlate with overall functionality, the ability to do activities of daily living (ADL), and a reduction in fall probability. A recent study examined the capacity of a regression equation to quantify power in elderly adults using a sit-to-stand test and determined; however, the sit-to-stand lacks the difficulty and exhibits a ceiling effect in younger individuals. Therefore, this study will attempt to determine when to transition from the vertical jump to the sit-to-stand, so that the differences in chronological versus physiological age may be determined during aging, and conversely, during improvements through physical or other interventions.

Interventions

OTHERPower Testing

Chair stand, vertical jump, computerized squat

Sponsors

University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

* between 18 and 89 years old willing to commit to two days of testing

Exclusion criteria

* severe musculoskeletal impairment, * neurological impairment that would affect balance, * severe cognitive impairment (Mini-mental 19 or below), * unstable chronic disease state, * severe vestibular problems * severe orthostatic hypotension, * Simultaneous use of cardiovascular, psychotropic and antidepressant drugs. * Adults unable to consent * Prisoners * Pregnant females

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
30 second stand-up test5 minutesThe subject will alternate standing a sitting as many times as possible in the 30 second time frame. Wattage (power) will be computed using the equation by Smith et al., Clin Interventions on Aging, 2010.
Countermovement jump test5 minutesThe subject will begin in a standing position, quickly lower the body to a self-determined angle an reach as high as possible. Jump height will be determined by subtracting the height of the jump from standing reach. The power is computed using the Lewis formula.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026