Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of CK-2127107 in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Dose-Ranging, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of CK-2127107 in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03160898
Acronym
FORTITUDE-ALS
Enrollment
458
Registered
2017-05-19
Start date
2017-07-24
Completion date
2019-03-07
Last updated
2020-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Keywords

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, ALS, CK-2127107, Reldesemtiv

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of CK-2127107 (hereafter referred to as reldesemtiv) versus placebo on respiratory function and other measures of skeletal muscle function in patients with ALS.

Detailed description

This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose ranging study of reldesemtiv in patients with ALS. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive placebo or one of three doses of reldesemtiv (150, 300, or 450 mg twice daily) for 12 weeks. Randomization was stratified by riluzole concomitant use/non-use and edaravone concomitant use/non-use. Concomitant riluzole and edaravone were allowed as long as the riluzole dose had been stable for at least 30 days prior to screening and edaravone had been taken for 2 cycles prior to screening; these drugs could not be initiated during the study. A total of 7 study visits were planned: screening, Day 1 (first dosing day), Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12, and follow-up (4 weeks after the last dose of study drug). Study drug (placebo or reldesemtiv) was to be taken twice daily, approximately 12 hours (± 2 hours) apart and within 2 hours following a meal.

Interventions

Oral tablet

DRUGPlacebo

Oral tablet

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Inc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Cytokinetics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of familial or sporadic ALS ≤ 24 months prior to screening * Upright Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) ≥ 60% of predicted for age, height and sex at screening * Able to swallow tablets * A caregiver (if one is needed) * Able to perform reproducible pulmonary function tests * Pre-study clinical laboratory findings within the normal range or, if outside the normal range, deemed not clinically significant by the Investigator * Male patients who have not had a vasectomy and confirmed zero sperm count must agree after receiving the first dose of study drug until 10 weeks after the last dose to either use acceptable methods of contraception or abstain from sex * Female patients must be post-menopausal or sterilized or must not be breastfeeding, have a negative pregnancy test, have no intention to become pregnant during the study and use acceptable methods of contraception or abstain from heterosexual intercourse from Screening until 10 weeks after last dose of study drug * Patients must be either on riluzole for at least 30 days prior to screening or have not taken riluzole for at least 30 days prior to screening and not planning to start riluzole during the course of the study. * Patients on edaravone must have completed at least 2 cycles of dosing with edaravone at the time of screening or have not taken edaravone for at least 30 days prior to screening and not planning to start edaravone during the course of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* At the time of screening, any use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), e.g. continuous positive airway pressure \[CPAP\], noninvasive bi-level positive airway pressure \[NPPV\] or noninvasive volume ventilation \[NVV\] for any portion of the day, or mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy, or on any form of oxygen supplementation * Neurological impairment due to a condition other than ALS * Presence at screening of any medically significant cardiac, pulmonary, GI, musculoskeletal, or psychiatric illness that might interfere with the patient's ability to comply with study procedures or that might confound the interpretation of clinical safety or efficacy data * Has taken any investigational study drug within 30 days or five half-lives of the prior agent, whichever is longer, prior to dosing * Known to have received CK-2127107 or tirasemtiv in any previous clinical trial * Has received or is considering receiving during the course of the study any form of stem cell therapy for the treatment of ALS * Has received or is considering receiving during the course of the study any form of gene therapy for the treatment of ALS * Has received or is considering obtaining during the course of the study a diaphragmatic pacing system * History of substance abuse within the past 2 years * Use of certain medications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Baseline to Week 12Slow vital capacity was measured using a spirometer (in units of liters). Following 3 to 5 breaths at rest, patients were instructed to take as deep an inspiration as possible followed by a maximum exhalation (blowing out all the air in their lungs). Values obtained were converted to percent predicted values using the Global Lung Initiative equation (ie, the test result as a percent of predicted values for patients of similar demographic and baseline characteristics \[eg, height, age, sex\]).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total ScoreBaseline to Week 12The ALSFRS-R is used to measure the progression and severity of disability in patients with ALS. The ALSFRS-R consists of 12 questions, assessing a patient's capability and independence in functional activities relevant to ALS, categorized in the following 4 domains: gross motor tasks, fine motor tasks, bulbar functions, and respiratory function. Each question is scored from 0 (indicating incapable or dependent) to 4 (normal). The total score ranges from 0 to 48. Higher scores reflect more normal function and lower scores reflect more impaired function.
Slope of Muscle Strength Mega-score From Baseline to Week 12Baseline to Week 12A hand-held dynamometer, with a scale of 0 to 300 pounds, was used to measure muscle strength and handgrip strength (bilateral). The muscle groups tested were: elbow flexion, wrist extension, first dorsal interosseous, hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion; all muscle groups were evaluated bilaterally. For each postbaseline assessment of muscle strength, the percent change from baseline was calculated for each muscle group and handgrip strength, using the following equation: (\[postbaseline value - baseline value\] / baseline value) × 100. The muscle-strength mega-score was calculated as the average of the changes (ie, percent change from baseline) observed for each of the muscle groups as well as handgrip strength. For this endpoint, negative values indicate a decline in muscle strength.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Ireland, Netherlands, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients with familial or sporadic ALS were enrolled at 65 sites in Australia, Canada, Ireland, Netherlands, Spain, and the United States. The first patient was screened on 16 August 2017 and the last patient completed on 07 March 2019.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible patients were male or female, ≥18 - ≤80 years of age, with familial or sporadic ALS diagnosed for ≤24 months. At screening, patients were to have upright slow vial capacity (SVC) ≥60% of predicted; must have been able to swallow tablets, perform reproducible pulmonary function tests; have normal lab tests; and have a caregiver (if needed).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Patients in this group received placebo twice daily for 12 weeks
115
Reldesemtiv 150 mg Twice Daily
Patients in this group received 150 mg reldesemtiv twice daily for 12 weeks
112
Reldesemtiv 300 mg Twice Daily
Patients in this group received 300 mg reldesemtiv twice daily for 12 weeks
113
Reldesemtiv 450 mg Twice Daily
Patients in this group received 450 mg reldesemtiv twice daily for 12 weeks
117
Total457

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event48710
Overall StudyDeath1001
Overall StudyDifficulty Traveling to Clinic Visits3001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1112
Overall StudyOther2022
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1001
Overall StudyProgressive Disease4121
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1020
Overall StudySponsor Discretion2000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1321

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboReldesemtiv 150 mg Twice DailyReldesemtiv 300 mg Twice DailyReldesemtiv 450 mg Twice DailyTotal
Age, Continuous59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
57.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.91
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.17
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
58.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.72
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants2 Participants7 Participants1 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants3 Participants6 Participants0 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
107 Participants103 Participants100 Participants113 Participants423 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
5 participants4 participants4 participants7 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
24 participants22 participants27 participants27 participants100 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
2 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
4 participants2 participants1 participants4 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
8 participants9 participants10 participants11 participants38 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
72 participants73 participants71 participants68 participants284 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants41 Participants42 Participants50 Participants180 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
68 Participants71 Participants71 Participants67 Participants277 Participants
Site of symptom onset
Bulbar
22 Participants18 Participants17 Participants30 Participants87 Participants
Site of symptom onset
Lower limb
44 Participants42 Participants40 Participants43 Participants169 Participants
Site of symptom onset
Upper limb
49 Participants52 Participants56 Participants44 Participants201 Participants
Time since ALS symptom onset22.13 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.375
23.87 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.503
22.52 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.635
22.69 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.662
22.80 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.08

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 1150 / 1120 / 1131 / 117
other
Total, other adverse events
95 / 11599 / 11297 / 113107 / 117
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 1158 / 1128 / 1138 / 117

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)

Slow vital capacity was measured using a spirometer (in units of liters). Following 3 to 5 breaths at rest, patients were instructed to take as deep an inspiration as possible followed by a maximum exhalation (blowing out all the air in their lungs). Values obtained were converted to percent predicted values using the Global Lung Initiative equation (ie, the test result as a percent of predicted values for patients of similar demographic and baseline characteristics \[eg, height, age, sex\]).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: The outcome measure was analyzed for the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of all randomized patients who received any amount of study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment during double-blind treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)-6.46 percent predictedStandard Error 0.964
Reldesemtiv 150 mg Twice DailyChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)-4.97 percent predictedStandard Error 0.952
Reldesemtiv 300 mg Twice DailyChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)-4.62 percent predictedStandard Error 0.963
Reldesemtiv 450 mg Twice DailyChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)-4.58 percent predictedStandard Error 0.927
Reldesemtiv 300 mg & 450 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)-4.60 percent predictedStandard Error 0.701
Comparison: The statistical null hypothesis was as follows: there was no assumed dose-response relationship in percent predicted SVC change from baseline to Week 12 among all three active doses and placebo, expressed as:~H0: -5 x µ placebo - 1 x µ 150 mg twice daily + 3 x µ 300 mg twice daily + 3 x µ 450 mg twice daily = 0 where µ was the mean of the efficacy endpoint for the designated group.p-value: 0.109595% CI: [-0.36, 3.58]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.250195% CI: [-1.05, 4.03]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.154995% CI: [-0.7, 4.38]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.141795% CI: [-0.63, 4.38]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.096495% CI: [-0.33, 4.05]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score

The ALSFRS-R is used to measure the progression and severity of disability in patients with ALS. The ALSFRS-R consists of 12 questions, assessing a patient's capability and independence in functional activities relevant to ALS, categorized in the following 4 domains: gross motor tasks, fine motor tasks, bulbar functions, and respiratory function. Each question is scored from 0 (indicating incapable or dependent) to 4 (normal). The total score ranges from 0 to 48. Higher scores reflect more normal function and lower scores reflect more impaired function.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: The outcome measure was analyzed for the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of all randomized patients who received any amount of study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment during double-blind treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score-3.53 change in scoreStandard Error 0.313
Reldesemtiv 150 mg Twice DailyChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score-2.40 change in scoreStandard Error 0.311
Reldesemtiv 300 mg Twice DailyChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score-2.62 change in scoreStandard Error 0.317
Reldesemtiv 450 mg Twice DailyChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score-2.94 change in scoreStandard Error 0.307
Reldesemtiv 300 mg & 450 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score-2.78 change in scoreStandard Error 0.228
p-value: 0.09395% CI: [-0.09, 1.22]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.008795% CI: [0.29, 1.97]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.035195% CI: [0.06, 1.75]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.164295% CI: [-0.24, 1.43]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.043595% CI: [0.02, 1.48]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Slope of Muscle Strength Mega-score From Baseline to Week 12

A hand-held dynamometer, with a scale of 0 to 300 pounds, was used to measure muscle strength and handgrip strength (bilateral). The muscle groups tested were: elbow flexion, wrist extension, first dorsal interosseous, hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion; all muscle groups were evaluated bilaterally. For each postbaseline assessment of muscle strength, the percent change from baseline was calculated for each muscle group and handgrip strength, using the following equation: (\[postbaseline value - baseline value\] / baseline value) × 100. The muscle-strength mega-score was calculated as the average of the changes (ie, percent change from baseline) observed for each of the muscle groups as well as handgrip strength. For this endpoint, negative values indicate a decline in muscle strength.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: The outcome measure was analyzed for the Full Analysis Set, which consisted of all randomized patients who received any amount of study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment during double-blind treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSlope of Muscle Strength Mega-score From Baseline to Week 12-0.1444 change in mega-score per dayStandard Error 0.02492
Reldesemtiv 150 mg Twice DailySlope of Muscle Strength Mega-score From Baseline to Week 12-0.1198 change in mega-score per dayStandard Error 0.02463
Reldesemtiv 300 mg Twice DailySlope of Muscle Strength Mega-score From Baseline to Week 12-0.1299 change in mega-score per dayStandard Error 0.02474
Reldesemtiv 450 mg Twice DailySlope of Muscle Strength Mega-score From Baseline to Week 12-0.0956 change in mega-score per dayStandard Error 0.02421
Reldesemtiv 300 mg & 450 mgSlope of Muscle Strength Mega-score From Baseline to Week 12-0.1127 change in mega-score per dayStandard Error 0.01731
p-value: 0.313495% CI: [-0.0261, 0.0813]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.482495% CI: [-0.0442, 0.0935]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.678795% CI: [-0.0544, 0.0835]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.160495% CI: [-0.0194, 0.1171]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.296695% CI: [-0.0279, 0.0913]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026