Skip to content

Controlling Oral Malodor by ClōSYS Oral Rinse

Efficacy of ClōSYS Oral Rinse Products in Human Subjects in Controlling Oral Malodor

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03160573
Enrollment
99
Registered
2017-05-19
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2017-02-28
Last updated
2020-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Malodor

Brief summary

The purpose of this Study is to assess the efficacy of two ClōSYS Oral Rinse products in human subjects in controlling oral malodor in partial fulfillment of the requirements for recognition by the American Dental Association's (ADA) requirement for obtaining ADA Seal for malodor.

Detailed description

Study Design: The products used in this study are: ClōSYS Alcohol-Free Oral Rinse (referred here as ClōSYS Unflavored Oral Rinse) and ClōSYS justRIGHT MILD MINT Oral Rinse (referred here as ClōSYS Flavored Oral Rinse). This is an in-vivo, eight-week, a single-center, randomized, double-blind (subject/investigator), 2-waycross-overdesign clinical study. There will be two independent groups. Each subject of each group will be crossed over to the other group within a same group after the washout period. Each group will have their own control group. In the first phase, 25 subjects (50%) of each group will randomly be assigned to the active group; the other 25 subjects will be assigned to the control group. In the second phase, the participants will be crossed over of group assignment. The Study will enroll 100 subjects, aged 21 to 65 years, with a slight to strong intrinsic oral malodor, as determined by a panel of trained odor judges calibrated and standardized using a range of standard odorants sufficient to reflect the different patterns of nose receptors. Study Plan: Subjects will receive verbal and written oral hygiene instructions, and either one bottle (16 oz. each) of ClōSYS Unflavored Oral Rinse, ClōSYS Flavored Oral Rinse- or Placebo Oral Rinse each week. Subjects will also receive measuring cups for dispensing the rinse and a diary log for recording usage (the Oral Hygiene Kit) for use during the treatment. After a 2-week wash out period, each subject will receive another bottle of oral rinse according to their group assignment. The rinse bottles will be weighed prior to dispensing the product. A product log will be maintained and the weights of the bottles will be documented at each visit. Subjects will be instructed to rinse twice a day, each in the morning and in the evening, with 15 mL mouth rinse for 30 seconds. They will note in their patient's log the date and time of rinsing. Subjects will be instructed to continue with their normal oral hygiene practices, including tooth brushing and flossing but omitting any use of oral rinses or mouthwashes except for the Study materials. The subjects also will be instructed not to use other non-study related products such as breath mints, lozenge, gums, etc. as well as refraining from elective dental procedures during the study period.

Interventions

OTHERPlacebo-Flavored Oral Rinse

Flavor-matched placebo rinse

OTHERPlacebo-Unflavored Oral Rinse

Unflavored-matched placebo rinse

Sponsors

University Health Resources Group, Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER
Rowpar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject has read, signed, and received a copy of the Informed Consent prior to Study initiation. 2. Subject is able to follow verbal and/or written instructions, perform oral hygiene procedures and return to the test facility for specified Study examinations. 3. Subject is between the ages of 21 and 65 years of age, male or female. 4. Subject has normal oral interior cheek wall tissues. 5. Subject is in good general health as determined by medical history and clinical judgment that no severe or debilitating disease exists that would impede participation in the Study. 6. Subject must have an average organoleptic intensity rating of at least 2.6 but maximum 4.5 on an intensity scale of 0-5.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or nursing per subject report. 2. Diagnosis of Xerostomia, including medication induced Xerostomia. 3. Any oral or extraoral piercing that interferes with the ability to perform study procedures and/or clinical assessments in the mouth. 4. Fixed or removable oral appliance, such as orthodontic brackets or retainer, partial or complete dentures. 5. Have advanced periodontal disease or excessive gingival recession, per Investigator/Examiner discretion. 6. A known allergy or sensitivity to products planned for use in this study. 7. Unwillingness to abstain from all other oral hygiene products other than those prescribed for the duration of the study. 8. Heavy deposits of calculus, either supragingival and/or subgingival, per Investigator/Examiner discretion. 9. Have a history of severe transmittable infectious disease (hepatitis, HIV, tuberculosis). 10. Have a medical or dental condition that would be unduly affected by participation in this study, per Investigator discretion. 11. Any other condition that Principal Investigator would consider interfering with the study. 12. Smokers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreWeekly for three weeksA 6-level organoleptic score from 0 - 5 will be used. Score of 0 indicating malodor cannot be detected and score of 5 indicating very strong malodor.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

United Health Resources Group (UHRG) was responsible for recruitment using advertising and volunteers from their website. All patients were recruited at a single UHRG site (7721 S. Painter Ave, Whittier, CA 90602)

Pre-assignment details

No significant events prior to assignment to an arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Test-Unflavored Rinse Then Placebo Unflavored Rinse
CloSYS unflavored rinse containing 0.1% stabilized chlorine dioxide (sodium chlorite) in an aqueous solution ClōSYS® Unflavored Rinse: Subjects in Test group will receive ClōSYS® Unflavored Rinse then CloSYS unflavored rinse containing NO 0.1% stabilized chlorine dioxide.
23
Test-Flavored Rinse Then Placebo Flavored Rinse
CloSYS mint-flavored rinse containing 0.1% stabilized chlorine dioxide (sodium chlorite) in an aqueous solution ClōSYS® Flavored Rinse: Subjects in Test group will receive ClōSYS® Flavored Rinse then CloSYS mint flavored rinse containing NO 0.1% stabilized chlorine dioxide.
26
Flavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test-Flavored Rinse
CloSYS mint flavored rinse containing NO 0.1% stabilized chlorine dioxide Flavored Oral Rinse - Placebo: Subjects in Placebo group will receive Placebo Flavored Rinse then CloSYS mint-flavored rinse containing 0.1% stabilized chlorine dioxide (sodium chlorite) in an aqueous solution.
25
Unflavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Unflavored Oral Rinse
CloSYS unflavored rinse containing NO 0.1% stabilized chlorine dioxide Unflavored Oral Rinse - Placebo: Subjects in Placebo group will receive Placebo Unflavored Rinse then CloSYS unflavored rinse containing 0.1% stabilized chlorine dioxide (sodium chlorite) in an aqueous solution.
25
Total99

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
First Sequence (3 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject1322

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTest-Unflavored Rinse Then Placebo Unflavored RinseTest-Flavored Rinse Then Placebo Flavored RinseFlavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test-Flavored RinseUnflavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Unflavored Oral RinseTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants26 Participants25 Participants25 Participants99 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants20 Participants16 Participants16 Participants68 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants6 Participants9 Participants9 Participants31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants23 Participants23 Participants20 Participants86 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 participants26 participants25 participants25 participants99 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants20 Participants14 Participants14 Participants66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants11 Participants33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 480 / 510 / 510 / 48
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 480 / 510 / 510 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 480 / 510 / 510 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Reduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic Score

A 6-level organoleptic score from 0 - 5 will be used. Score of 0 indicating malodor cannot be detected and score of 5 indicating very strong malodor.

Time frame: Weekly for three weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test-Unflavored Rinse Then Placebo Unflavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreBaseline 13.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Test-Unflavored Rinse Then Placebo Unflavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreBaseline-23.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Test-Unflavored Rinse Then Placebo Unflavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 12.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Test-Unflavored Rinse Then Placebo Unflavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 1-23.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Test-Unflavored Rinse Then Placebo Unflavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 22.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Test-Unflavored Rinse Then Placebo Unflavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 3-22.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Test-Unflavored Rinse Then Placebo Unflavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 32.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Test-Unflavored Rinse Then Placebo Unflavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 2-22.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Test-Flavored Rinse Then Placebo Flavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreBaseline 13.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Test-Flavored Rinse Then Placebo Flavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 3-21.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
Test-Flavored Rinse Then Placebo Flavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreBaseline-23.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Test-Flavored Rinse Then Placebo Flavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 2-21.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Test-Flavored Rinse Then Placebo Flavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 21.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
Test-Flavored Rinse Then Placebo Flavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 31.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
Test-Flavored Rinse Then Placebo Flavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 1-22.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Test-Flavored Rinse Then Placebo Flavored RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 12.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
Flavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Flavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 1-22.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
Flavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Flavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 2-22.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Flavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Flavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 13.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Flavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Flavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 3-22.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Flavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Flavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 22.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Flavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Flavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreBaseline 13.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Flavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Flavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 32.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Flavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Flavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreBaseline-23.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Unflavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Unflavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 3-21.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Unflavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Unflavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreBaseline 13.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Unflavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Unflavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 12.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Unflavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Unflavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 21.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Unflavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Unflavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 31.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Unflavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Unflavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreBaseline-23.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Unflavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Unflavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 1-22.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Unflavored Oral Rinse-Placebo Then Test Unflavored Oral RinseReduction in Malodor as Measured by Organoleptic ScoreVisit 2-21.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Comparison: Test Flavored Rinse, Placebo Flavored Rinsep-value: <0.00001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Test Unflavored Rinse, Placebo Unflavored Rinsep-value: <0.00001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026