Skip to content

Domiciliary Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

Randomised Controlled Trial of Domiciliary Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03160456
Acronym
TESLA-home
Enrollment
56
Registered
2017-05-19
Start date
2018-06-18
Completion date
2023-05-05
Last updated
2023-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Keywords

upper airway, genioglossus, CPAP, electrical stimulation, sleep, sleep disordered breathing

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the pharyngeal dilator muscles in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea in the community compared to usual care, and follow the patients for three months, as well as to assess compliance of non-invasive electrical stimulation of the upper airway dilator muscles in obstructive sleep apnoea patients over time and evaluate the control of symptoms and improvement in quality of life.

Detailed description

Obstructive sleep apnoea is highly prevalent, with the obesity epidemic increasing the problem. The best treatment for uncomplicated and moderate-severe OSA remains CPAP therapy. However, long-term adherence to treatment with CPAP is poor and there are few alternatives. Electrical stimulation of the dilator muscles of the upper airway has been shown to reduce nocturnal apnoeas significantly using an invasive approach, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, as well as by non-invasive transcutaneous stimulation. Although non-invasive transcutaneous stimulation may not be as effective as CPAP therapy in many OSA patients it could be an important option to treat some of the large number of patients who fail CPAP and might also be of use in those whose OSA is not judged sufficiently severe to warrant CPAP. The investigators propose a study to use a transcutaneous electrical stimulation device in selected patients with OSA who do not tolerate CPAP therapy following assessment of the upper airway. Participants will undergo a baseline sleep study (polysomnography/home-based respiratory polygraphy). Following minimisation for gender (male/female) and OSA severity (mild/moderate-severe) they will be randomised into active treatment arm (transcutaneous electrical stimulation) or usual care (ongoing CPAP therapy). Patients will be treated over a period of 3-months in the community, re-assessed (including polysomnography/home-based respiratory polygraphy) and the results will be compared against usual care, ongoing CPAP therapy. This study will help to prepare a definitive multi-centre randomized controlled trial using the non-invasive method of upper airway stimulation in OSA. The primary aim of this study is to assess efficacy and generate an accurate sample size estimation, test the subjective willingness of patients to use and objectively determined compliance with the treatment over a long period, as well as to specify the drop-out rate. The improvement in sleep apnoea will be the primary outcome measures. The symptomatic response, feasibility of the method, including compliance, comfort, adverse events, will be the secondary outcome measure. An ad-hoc analysis will be performed in the responder group (improvement in the apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) by \>50% from baseline OR improvement in the 4% oxygen-desaturation index (ODI) \>25% from baseline OR AHI/4%ODI \<5/hour at follow up).

Interventions

DEVICETranscutaneous electrical stimulation

The device needs to be started by pressing the 'on' button. Once the device is turned on the current intensity can be increased by pushing the '+' button and lowered by pushing the '-' button. When a comfortable skin sensation is felt the patients should press the '-' button once more. At that time the device stimulates with a low current which is not felt but provides a neuromuscular tone to the muscles whilst asleep. The device is kept on all night and in the morning taken off with the hydrogel and disconnected. Once disconnected it should be turned off by pressing the 'off' button.

DEVICEContinuous positive airway pressure

CPAP will be applied according to usual clinical care, the follow up will be organised in the same way as the active intervention group.

Sponsors

King's College London
CollaboratorOTHER
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

No masking

Intervention model description

Randomised parallel group controlled clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* mild-moderate OSA (AHI 5-35/hour) * difficulties with or failed CPAP and/or withdrawn from standard care (CPAP \<4hours/night) * Body mass index (BMI) 18.5-32 kg/m2 * No significant anatomical obstruction in the upper airway (e.g. normal sized tonsils).

Exclusion criteria

* No OSA (AHI \<5/h) * Severe obstructive sleep apnoea (AHI\>35/hour) * Exclusively postural sleep apnoea * isolated Rapid-Eye-Movement (REM) sleep associated OSA * Cachexia (BMI \<18.5 kg/m2) * Obesity (BMI \>32 kg/m2) * Hypercapnic respiratory failure (pCO2\>6.5 kPa) * Features of obesity hypoventilation syndrome (elevated bicarbonate, HCO3- \>28mmol/L). * enlarged tonsils (size 3-4) * polyps and adenoids * neuromuscular disease * hypoglossal nerve palsy * abnormal pulmonary function tests * severe pulmonary hypertension * valvular heart disease * heart failure (New York Heart Association, NYHA III-IV) * myocardial infarction and significant cardiac arrhythmias * uncontrolled hypertension * active psychiatric disease * co-existing non-respiratory sleep disorder * significant metal implants or cardiac/other pacemakers. * facial hair that affects the correct placement of the hydrogel patch * endoscopically identified contraindication to upper airway stimulation (multi-level obstruction) These criteria are consistent with our experience from previous trials using transcutaneous electrical stimulation in OSA and likely to identify potential responders; these criteria are also similar to those from trials using hypoglossal nerve stimulation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Apnoea Hypopnoea Index3 monthsAHI

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Epworth Sleepiness Scale3 monthsESS (0-24 points)
Oxygen Desaturation Index3 months4%ODI (x hour-1)
Usage of treatment3 monthsUsage per night (average hours)
Compliance with treatment3 monthsPercentage of nights used (%)
Acceptance of device3 monthsVisual analogue scale (points, 0-10)
Snoring3 monthsPercentage of the night (%)
Genioglossus contraction3 monthsUltrasound (thickness, mm)
General quality of life3 monthsEQ-5D
Anatomy of upper airwayat baselineEndoscopically identified diameter (mm)
Sleep related quality of life3 monthsFOSQ

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Responder rate3 monthsReduction in AHI by more than 50% and / or to below 5/hour

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026