Skip to content

Nasal Septal Flap for Donor Site Reconstruction

Use of Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS) Graft to Aid in Nasal Septal Remucosalization and Tissue Healing in Patients Following Use of Nasoseptal Flap Elevation for Skull Base Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03159624
Enrollment
47
Registered
2017-05-19
Start date
2014-11-13
Completion date
2016-03-21
Last updated
2023-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasal Septum Perforation

Keywords

nasoseptal flap, tissue repair, wound healing, remucosalization, upper airway, granulation tissue, tissue graft

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the utility of porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) as a graft material that may aid in the natural healing process of freshly exposed bone and cartilage in the nasal cavity.

Detailed description

Patients who undergo endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery, and may require nasoseptal flap placement as part of skull base reconstruction, will be informed, consented and enrolled for participation. If the intraoperative decision is ultimately made for harvest and placement of full-length nasoseptal flap by each individual surgeon, patients will then be consecutively, sequentially randomized to use of either: * Thin Doyle silastic sheet placement alone over the resulting exposed septum cartilage/bone (20 randomly assigned patients) * 2x3 cm Biodesign™ SIS perforated mesentery graft surface placement plus overlying Doyle silastic sheet placement over the resulting exposed septum cartilage/bone. (20 randomly assigned patients) When used, Biodesign graft will be soaked in sterile saline out of the packaging, and placed as an intact single sheet over the exposed bone nasal septum bone/cartilage (without trimming). For uniformity and ease of future analysis, the bottom edge of the graft will be placed parallel to, and proximal to, the nasal floor cut edge remnant mucosal surface as possible. Except for a thin Doyle silastic sheet to cover the graft site, no additional reinforcement (suture/tissue glue) will be placed for those patients in the Biodesign graft arm. Time Points and Study Parameters: * All enrolled patients will have Doyle silastic sheeting removed only at 2 weeks post-op. * All patients will receive 250cc normal saline topical nasal rinses starting at 14 days until 120 days post-op. * No topical irrigation additives (budesonide/mupirocin) will be administered over 12 weeks. All patients will be assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks following randomization and entry into this study.

Interventions

OTHERBiodesign™ SIS graft

2x3 cm Biodesign™ SIS perforated mesentery graft

OTHERDoyle silastic sheet

Doyle silastic sheet

Sponsors

Stanford University
CollaboratorOTHER
Cook Group Incorporated
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Elective transnasal endoscopic skull base surgery where closure with a large nasoseptal flap (NSF) is anticipated (exposure of \>75% of the ipsilateral nasal septum bone/cartilage) * Patients without nutritional compromise or otherwise debilitated * Patients who are able to consent for themselves

Exclusion criteria

* Bilateral nasoseptal flap (NSF) placement in the same operative setting * Patients without significant bone/cartilage exposure to incorporate an intact 2x3 cm graft * Patients requiring 24 hour supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula * Patients who cannot consent for themselves

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Post-operative Remucosalization at the Donor Site2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeksMean change as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores from 3 independent reviewers from endoscopy videos collected at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The Visual Analogue Scale for mean change in post-operative remucosalization is a Likert scale ranging from 0% (no remucosalization) to 100% (complete remucosalization), with higher scores representing better healing.
Mean Change in Post-operative Locoregional Crusting at Donor Site2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeksMean change as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores from 3 independent reviewers from endoscopy videos collected at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The Visual Analogue Scale for mean change in post-operative crusting is a Likert scale ranging from 0 (no crusting) to 10 (complete crusting), with lower scores representing better healing.
Mean Change in Post-operative Edema at the Donor Site2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeksMean change as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores from 3 independent reviewers from endoscopy videos collected at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The Visual Analogue Scale for mean change in post-operative edema is a Likert scale ranging from 0 (no edema) to 10 (severe edema), with lower scores representing better healing.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment Group
2x3 cm Biodesign™ SIS graft placement + overlying Doyle silastic sheet placement over the resulting exposed septum cartilage/bone Biodesign™ SIS graft: 2x3 cm Biodesign™ SIS perforated mesentery graft Doyle silastic sheet: Doyle silastic sheet
21
Control Group
Thin Doyle silastic sheet placement alone over the resulting exposed septum cartilage/bone Doyle silastic sheet: Doyle silastic sheet
26
Total47

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment GroupControl GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants23 Participants39 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants7 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants10 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants15 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants11 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 210 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 218 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 210 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change in Post-operative Edema at the Donor Site

Mean change as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores from 3 independent reviewers from endoscopy videos collected at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The Visual Analogue Scale for mean change in post-operative edema is a Likert scale ranging from 0 (no edema) to 10 (severe edema), with lower scores representing better healing.

Time frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treatment GroupMean Change in Post-operative Edema at the Donor Site2 weeks3.34 score on a scale
Treatment GroupMean Change in Post-operative Edema at the Donor Site6 weeks3.25 score on a scale
Treatment GroupMean Change in Post-operative Edema at the Donor Site12 weeks2.26 score on a scale
Treatment GroupMean Change in Post-operative Edema at the Donor Siteoverall change2.95 score on a scale
Control GroupMean Change in Post-operative Edema at the Donor Siteoverall change3.11 score on a scale
Control GroupMean Change in Post-operative Edema at the Donor Site2 weeks3.52 score on a scale
Control GroupMean Change in Post-operative Edema at the Donor Site12 weeks2.65 score on a scale
Control GroupMean Change in Post-operative Edema at the Donor Site6 weeks3.15 score on a scale
Primary

Mean Change in Post-operative Locoregional Crusting at Donor Site

Mean change as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores from 3 independent reviewers from endoscopy videos collected at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The Visual Analogue Scale for mean change in post-operative crusting is a Likert scale ranging from 0 (no crusting) to 10 (complete crusting), with lower scores representing better healing.

Time frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treatment GroupMean Change in Post-operative Locoregional Crusting at Donor Site2 weeks3.50 score on a scale
Treatment GroupMean Change in Post-operative Locoregional Crusting at Donor Site6 weeks4.22 score on a scale
Treatment GroupMean Change in Post-operative Locoregional Crusting at Donor Site12 weeks2.64 score on a scale
Treatment GroupMean Change in Post-operative Locoregional Crusting at Donor Siteoverall change3.45 score on a scale
Control GroupMean Change in Post-operative Locoregional Crusting at Donor Siteoverall change4.11 score on a scale
Control GroupMean Change in Post-operative Locoregional Crusting at Donor Site2 weeks4.22 score on a scale
Control GroupMean Change in Post-operative Locoregional Crusting at Donor Site12 weeks2.92 score on a scale
Control GroupMean Change in Post-operative Locoregional Crusting at Donor Site6 weeks5.2 score on a scale
Primary

Mean Change in Post-operative Remucosalization at the Donor Site

Mean change as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores from 3 independent reviewers from endoscopy videos collected at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The Visual Analogue Scale for mean change in post-operative remucosalization is a Likert scale ranging from 0% (no remucosalization) to 100% (complete remucosalization), with higher scores representing better healing.

Time frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treatment GroupMean Change in Post-operative Remucosalization at the Donor Site2 weeks47.8 percentage of remucosalization
Treatment GroupMean Change in Post-operative Remucosalization at the Donor Site6 weeks49.7 percentage of remucosalization
Treatment GroupMean Change in Post-operative Remucosalization at the Donor Site12 weeks73.9 percentage of remucosalization
Treatment GroupMean Change in Post-operative Remucosalization at the Donor Siteoverall change57.1 percentage of remucosalization
Control GroupMean Change in Post-operative Remucosalization at the Donor Siteoverall change48.9 percentage of remucosalization
Control GroupMean Change in Post-operative Remucosalization at the Donor Site2 weeks37.8 percentage of remucosalization
Control GroupMean Change in Post-operative Remucosalization at the Donor Site12 weeks65.3 percentage of remucosalization
Control GroupMean Change in Post-operative Remucosalization at the Donor Site6 weeks43.5 percentage of remucosalization

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026