Skip to content

Transurethral Plasmakinetic Enucleation of Prostate Versus Transurethral Resection of Prostate

Transurethral Plasmakinetic Enucleation of Prostate Versus Transurethral Resection of Prostate: A Multi-center Randomized Control Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03157726
Acronym
ERP
Enrollment
294
Registered
2017-05-17
Start date
2017-10-11
Completion date
2021-06-01
Last updated
2020-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Keywords

benign prostatic hyperplasia, multicenter randomized control clinical trial, transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate, transurethral resection of prostate

Brief summary

The study is a multicentric randomized control trial with 4-year follow-up comparing perioperative and postoperative outcomes for transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate(TUKEP) and transurethral resection of prostate(TURP). The investigators recruit patient with benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) as the object of study. TURP is set as control group . Meanwhile TUKEP is set as test group. Six affiliated hospitals will participate in this study. Through analyzing the perioperative and postoperative data between TUKEP group and TURP group, The investigators purpose demonstrating superiority of safety, efficacy and economic benefit in TUKEP group.

Detailed description

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common disease of middle aged and elderly people which cause urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) , began to replace the traditional open surgery in 1930s, still is as the gold standard operation for surgical treatment of BPH. However, compared with the traditional open operation, TURP has the following flaws:(1), due to the incomplete resection , maximum flow rate(Qmax) after TURP is lower than Qmax after open surgery. (2), there are serious complications, such as water intoxication and hemorrhage. (3) TURP has limitation to large prostate. Transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate(TUKEP), an operation mode devised by Liu Chunxiao Team in southern medical university urology department, have offset the advantage of TURP. The theory of the operation is using transurethral resectoscope instead of the finger in the open operation, to find the surgical capsule of prostate and to peel the hyperplastic prostate gland visually in a antidromic way. One the one hand, TUKEP effectively solve the situation that It should repeatedly cut and stop bleeding and difficultly find the surgical capsule in TURP, which obviously reduce the rate of bleeding, prostatic capsula perforation, transurethral resection syndrome(TURS) and External sphincter injury. On the other hand, TUKEP is the minimally invasive surgery. It also achieves the effect of open surgery resolving the residual gland and reoperation post TURP. The investigators plan to setup a a multicentric randomized control trial with 4-year follow-up comparing perioperative and postoperative outcomes for TUKEP and TURP. Through analyzing the perioperative and postoperative data between TUKEP group and TURP group, The purpose demonstrating superiority of safety, efficacy and economic benefit in TUKEP group.

Interventions

PROCEDURETransurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate

Transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate(PAKEP),an operation mode devised by Liu Chunxiao Team in southern medical university urology department. The theory of the operation is using transurethral resectoscope instead of the finger in the open operation, to find the surgical capsule of prostate and to peel the hyperplastic prostate gland visually in a antidromic way.

PROCEDUREtransurethral resection of prostate

Transurethral resection of prostate(TURP), a kind of mature minimally invasive surgery of prostate , taking the place of the traditional open surgery in 1930s , still is the gold standard operation for surgical treatment of BPH.

Sponsors

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
CollaboratorOTHER
Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhujiang Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnose as BPH 2. Between 50 and 80 year-old 3. Prostate volume less than 120g 4. Meet any conditions (1). International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS),≥12 quality of life score (QOL) ≥4分 (2).Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) 15 ml/s or less (urine flow more than 150 ml) (3).Medication is not efficient (4).Repeated urinary retention (extubation failure more than one) (5).Schafer≥grade 2 5. The American association of anesthesia score (ASA) class 1 to 3 6. Sign the informed consent voluntarily and will be willing to follow-up

Exclusion criteria

1. Combined with central nervous system lesions (such as cerebrovascular accident, Parkinson, multiple sclerosis, cauda equina injury, spinal cord lesions, etc.) and neurogenic bladder; 2. The combination of advanced malignant tumor or chronic wasting disease; 3. Patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease or severe mental disorders; 4. Acute urinary tract infection, urethral stricture; 5. There is a history of prostate and bladder surgery; 6. Combined with severe coagulopathy; 7. Postoperative pathology confirmed prostate cancer; 8. Poor compliance, and can not be followed up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Qmax(Maximum urinary flow rate)4 yearsMaximum urinary flow rate was measured at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48-month postoperatively
IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score )4 yearsInternational Prostate Symptom Score was measured at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48-month postoperatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operation timeup to 24 hoursoperation time
Postoperative hospital stay1 monthPostoperative hospital stay
Indwelling catheter time1 monthThe time of indwelling catheter post-operation
Postoperative irrigation1 monthThe time of Postoperative irrigation
Decrease in Haemoglobin in 24 hours post-operation1 monthCompared with the baseline, to demonstrate the blood loss during operation
QOL(Quality of Life)4 yearsThe Quality of Life Score was measured at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48-month postoperatively
Prostate-specific antigen(PSA)4 yearsTo compare the Prostate-specific antigen between TUKEP and TURP at baseline, 1,3,6,12, 24,36 and 48-month follow-up visits.
Hospitalization expenses1 monthTotal costs for BPH treatment during Hospitalization. The cost of other diseases should be excluded
Prostate volume4 yearsProstate volume is measured by ultrasound or MRI at the baseline, 1,3,6,12, 24,36 and 48-month follow-up visits
Residual urine volume4 yearsResidual urine in the bladder after urination(via abdominal ultrasonography) is measure at the baseline, 1,3,6,12, 24,36 and 48-month follow-up visits
Claviendindo classification4 yearsIt is a grade for evaluating surgical complications at 1,3,6,12, 24,36 and 48-month follow-up visits
Retreatment rate4 yearsThe ratio of patient who need reoperation to remove urinary tract obstruction
International Index Of Erectile Function (IIEF-5)4 yearsInternational Index Of Erectile Function is a patient reporting outcomes measuring the erectile function at the baseline, 1,3,6,12, 24,36 and 48-month follow-up visits postoperatively.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactShaobo Zheng, M.D
1h1h1h864@sina.com13602888356
Backup ContactChunXiao Liu, M.D., Ph.D
liuchx888@hotmail.com13302296795

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026