Skip to content

Open-Label Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of IdeS in Anti-GBM Disease

Open-Label Phase II Study in Anti-GBM Disease (Goodpasture's Disease) With Adverse Renal Prognosis to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of IdeS - GOOD-IDES

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03157037
Acronym
GOOD-IDES-01
Enrollment
15
Registered
2017-05-17
Start date
2017-06-16
Completion date
2020-07-24
Last updated
2022-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Antibody Disease

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of IdeS in patients with severe anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease receiving standard of care consisting of pulse-methylprednisolone, oral prednisolone and intravenous cyclophosphamide combined with plasma exchange (PLEX).

Detailed description

This is an Open-Label Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of IdeS in anti-GBM disease (Goodpasture's disease, i.e. GP) with Adverse Renal Prognosis. The primary efficacy objective is to evaluate the efficacy of an IdeS based regimen to salvage independent renal function measured as no need for dialysis at 6 months after IdeS treatment. The primary safety objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IdeS in patients with severe anti-GBM disease on background of standard care consisting of pulse-methylprednisolone, oral prednisolone and intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) combined with plasma exchange (PLEX). The patients will be followed during 6 months according to the study visit plan.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALImlifidase

One dose of 0.25 mg/kg body weight imlifidase on study day 1

Sponsors

Hansa Biopharma AB
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Mårten Segelmark
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Open-Label, Single Arm study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Anti-GBM antibodies detected by ELISA above a level that is considered toxic by the investigator using local laboratory. Patients double-positive for anti-GBM and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) may be entered in the trial, but only if their level of anti-GBM antibodies fulfil the criteria listed above. 2. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<15 ml/min/1.73 m\^2 (by modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation) or if the patient is non-responsive to standard treatment, and has lost \>15 ml/min/1.73 m\^2 after start of treatment 3. Haematuria on dipstick and/or urinary sediment 4. Male or female patients aged at least 18 years; Female patients of childbearing potential may participate if highly effective contraception is used during the study, according to Clinical Trials Facilitation and Coordination Group (CTFG) guidance \[18\], see also section 4.9 (pregnancy test should be performed before inclusion). 5. Willing and able to give written Informed Consent and to comply with the requirements of the study protocol; and 6. Judged to be otherwise healthy by the Investigator, based on medical history, physical examination, and clinical laboratory assessments. Patients with clinical laboratory values that are outside of normal limits (other than those specified in the

Exclusion criteria

) and/or with other abnormal clinical findings that are judged by the Investigator not to be of clinical significance, may be entered into the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 6 Months6 months after dosingNumber of patients without need for dialysis at 6 months. A patient with independent renal function is defined as a patient without need for dialysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Renal Function at 3 and 6 Months3 and 6 months after imlifidase dosingEstimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a measure of kidney function. eGFR was calculated based on p-creatinine according to the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. eGFR for a kidney with normal function is above 90 mL/min/1.73m\^2. Reduced kidney function is characterised by a decreased eGFR value.
Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRPre-imlifidase, 1, 3 and 6 months after imlifidase dosingeGFR is a measure of kidney function. eGFR has been calculated based on p-creatinine according to the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. eGFR for a kidney with normal function is above 90 mL/min/1.73m\^2. Reduced kidney function is characterised by a decreased eGFR value. Number of patients per 4 different eGFR categories (0-15, 15-30, 30-60, ≥60 mL/min/1.73m\^2) are presented. A shift towards a higher category during the study indicates improved renal function over time.
Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study VisitsPredose up to 6 months after dosingAnti-GBM antibodies above a toxic level defined as \>20 U/mL. The level of anti-GBM antibodies was measured centrally using the Phadia ELiA(TM) anti-GBM kit. The enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELiA) is a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay.
Number of Patients With Haematuria (Blood in Urine)At 6 months after dosingHaematuria was assessed using urine dipstick. The result was presented as: Negative/Trace/+1/+2/+3/+4. In the analysis results being +2 or above are considered as relevant. Haematuria was an inclusion criterion. All 15 patients had haematuria when included in the study.
Change in Proteinuria During the StudyPre-imlifidase, 3 and 6 months after imlifidase dosingChange in proteinuria measured as u-albumin/creatinine (g/mol) in morning void during the study .
Number of PLEXs Needed Over TimePre-screening and up to Day 93 after imlifidase dosingNumber of PLEXs needed before anti-GBM antibodies are below toxic levels. PLEX was initiated at the discretion of the investigator throughout the study.
Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (Cmax)Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15Maximum observed plasma concentration of IdeS following dosing (Cmax)
Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 3 Months3 months after dosingNumber of patients without need for dialysis at 3 months. A patient with independent renal function is defined as a patient without need for dialysis.
Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (t1/2)Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15Half-life during distribution phase (Alpha-t1/2) Half-life during elimination phase (Beta-t1/2) The results refers to harmonic mean.
Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (CL)Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15Clearance (CL) is a measure of the ability of the body to clear imlifidase from plasma
Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (Vz)Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15Vz = Volume of distribution during the elimination phase
Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)Pre-dose up to 6 months after imlifidase administrationImlifidase specifically cleaves all subclasses of human IgG rapidly and efficiently. The cleaving process involves two steps: (i) intact IgG to single cleaved IgG followed by (ii) single cleaved IgG to completely cleaved IgG (one F(ab')2- and one homodimeric Fc-fragment) The electroluminescence analysis method used measures the sum of intact and single cleaved IgG in serum. The efficacy of imlifidase is evaluated as remaining concentration of intact and single cleaved IgG in serum after treatment.
Anti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA)Up to 6 months after dosingDetermination of anti-imlifidase antibody concentration
Renal HistologyBefore administration of imlifidase (0-33 days) and after administration of imlifidase (3-6 days)Kidney biopsies were classified according to the histopathologic classification for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis developed by Berden et al. 2010. This classification has previously been applied in a study of 123 anti-GBM disease patients (von Daalen et al 2018). Histopathologic class: * Focal (≤50% normal glomeruli) * Crescentic (≥50% glomeruli with cellular crescents) * Mixed (\<50% normal, \<50%crescentic, \<50% globally sclerotic glomeruli) * Sclerotic (≥50% globally sclerotic glomeruli) In addition information on the histological activity and kidney outcome was provided. Focal class is associated with favourable kidney outcome, whereas sclerotic carries a poor outcome. Crescentic/mixed class could have an intermediate outcome between focal and sclerotic. Immunofluorescence performed at the local hospitals was also used to assess linear IgG deposits which is a hallmark of anti-GBM antibody disease.
Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (AUC)Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)

Countries

Austria, Czechia, Denmark, France, Sweden

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Imlifidase
IdeS intravenous infusion 0.25 mg/kg body weight (BW) intravenous infusion HMed-IdeS: One dose of 0.25 mg/kg BW HMed-IdeS on study day 1
15
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicImlifidase
Age, Continuous61 years
Anti-GBM concentration130 U/mL
Dialysis status at baseline
Dialysis
10 Participants
Dialysis status at baseline
Not on dialysis but eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2
5 Participants
Double positive Anti-GBM and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)
No
9 Participants
Double positive Anti-GBM and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)
Yes
6 Participants
Occurrence of pulmonary symptom
No
3 Participants
Occurrence of pulmonary symptom
Not reported
3 Participants
Occurrence of pulmonary symptom
Yes
9 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
3 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
4 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants
Time since anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) diagnosis2 days
Time since first pulmonary symptom32 days
Time since first renal symptom10 days

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 6 Months

Number of patients without need for dialysis at 6 months. A patient with independent renal function is defined as a patient without need for dialysis.

Time frame: 6 months after dosing

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 6 Months5 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 6 Months5 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 6 Months10 Participants
Secondary

Anti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA)

Determination of anti-imlifidase antibody concentration

Time frame: Up to 6 months after dosing

Population: Some missing data at Day 50, Day 93 and Day 180

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineAnti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA)Day 74.32 mg/LStandard Deviation 5.29
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineAnti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA)Day 15752 mg/LStandard Deviation 728
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineAnti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA)Pre-imlifidase9.00 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.17
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineAnti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA)Day 22744 mg/LStandard Deviation 736
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineAnti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA)Day 29609 mg/LStandard Deviation 493
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineAnti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA)Day 50547 mg/LStandard Deviation 580
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineAnti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA)Day 93327 mg/LStandard Deviation 263
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineAnti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA)Day 180242 mg/LStandard Deviation 280
Secondary

Change in Proteinuria During the Study

Change in proteinuria measured as u-albumin/creatinine (g/mol) in morning void during the study .

Time frame: Pre-imlifidase, 3 and 6 months after imlifidase dosing

Population: Some patients had missing data at some visits

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineChange in Proteinuria During the Study3 months220 g/molStandard Deviation 197
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineChange in Proteinuria During the StudyPre-imlifidase1117 g/molStandard Deviation 1544
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineChange in Proteinuria During the Study6 months183 g/molStandard Deviation 231
Dialysis Independent at BaselineChange in Proteinuria During the Study3 months153 g/molStandard Deviation 172
Dialysis Independent at BaselineChange in Proteinuria During the StudyPre-imlifidase199 g/molStandard Deviation 166
Dialysis Independent at BaselineChange in Proteinuria During the Study6 months122 g/molStandard Deviation 133
All PatientsChange in Proteinuria During the StudyPre-imlifidase700 g/molStandard Deviation 1197
All PatientsChange in Proteinuria During the Study6 months161 g/molStandard Deviation 198
All PatientsChange in Proteinuria During the Study3 months190 g/molStandard Deviation 178
Secondary

Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits

Anti-GBM antibodies above a toxic level defined as \>20 U/mL. The level of anti-GBM antibodies was measured centrally using the Phadia ELiA(TM) anti-GBM kit. The enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELiA) is a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay.

Time frame: Predose up to 6 months after dosing

Population: Number of study visits with a toxic level are presented instead of number of patient days with an anti-GBM level \>20 U/mL as was the original plan.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits1 visit3 participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits5 visits2 participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits3 visits1 participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits0 visits1 participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits9 visits1 participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits6 visits1 participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits2 visits1 participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits3 visits0 participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits0 visits1 participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits1 visit4 participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits2 visits0 participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits5 visits0 participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits6 visits0 participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits9 visits0 participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits5 visits2 participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits1 visit7 participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits9 visits1 participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits6 visits1 participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits3 visits1 participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits2 visits1 participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits0 visits2 participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Haematuria (Blood in Urine)

Haematuria was assessed using urine dipstick. The result was presented as: Negative/Trace/+1/+2/+3/+4. In the analysis results being +2 or above are considered as relevant. Haematuria was an inclusion criterion. All 15 patients had haematuria when included in the study.

Time frame: At 6 months after dosing

Population: Data was missing for 5 of the 15 patients at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Haematuria (Blood in Urine)3 Patients with haematuria (+2 or above)
Secondary

Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 3 Months

Number of patients without need for dialysis at 3 months. A patient with independent renal function is defined as a patient without need for dialysis.

Time frame: 3 months after dosing

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 3 Months4 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 3 Months5 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 3 Months9 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR

eGFR is a measure of kidney function. eGFR has been calculated based on p-creatinine according to the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. eGFR for a kidney with normal function is above 90 mL/min/1.73m\^2. Reduced kidney function is characterised by a decreased eGFR value. Number of patients per 4 different eGFR categories (0-15, 15-30, 30-60, ≥60 mL/min/1.73m\^2) are presented. A shift towards a higher category during the study indicates improved renal function over time.

Time frame: Pre-imlifidase, 1, 3 and 6 months after imlifidase dosing

Population: Only patients who were alive and dialysis independent at each specific analysis time are included in this analysis because eGFR is not applicable for patients in dialysis.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 1eGFR (0-15)1 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRPre-imlifidaseeGFR (15-30)0 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRPre-imlifidaseeGFR (30-60)0 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRPre-imlifidaseeGFR (≥60)0 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRPre-imlifidaseeGFR (0-15)1 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 1eGFR (15-30)1 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 1eGFR (30-60)0 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 1eGFR (≥60)0 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 3eGFR (0-15)0 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 3eGFR (15-30)3 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 3eGFR (30-60)0 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 3eGFR (≥60)0 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 6eGFR (0-15)0 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 6eGFR (15-30)4 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 6eGFR (30-60)1 Participants
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 6eGFR (≥60)0 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 1eGFR (15-30)2 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 1eGFR (30-60)2 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 1eGFR (≥60)0 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 6eGFR (15-30)2 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 3eGFR (0-15)0 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 3eGFR (15-30)3 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 6eGFR (≥60)0 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 3eGFR (30-60)1 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRPre-imlifidaseeGFR (0-15)5 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 6eGFR (30-60)3 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRPre-imlifidaseeGFR (15-30)0 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 3eGFR (≥60)0 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRPre-imlifidaseeGFR (30-60)0 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRPre-imlifidaseeGFR (≥60)0 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 1eGFR (0-15)1 Participants
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 6eGFR (0-15)0 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 3eGFR (30-60)1 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 1eGFR (15-30)3 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 6eGFR (0-15)0 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRPre-imlifidaseeGFR (30-60)0 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 1eGFR (30-60)2 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 6eGFR (≥60)0 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRPre-imlifidaseeGFR (0-15)6 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 1eGFR (≥60)0 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 3eGFR (≥60)0 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 1eGFR (0-15)2 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 3eGFR (0-15)0 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 6eGFR (15-30)6 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRPre-imlifidaseeGFR (15-30)0 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 3eGFR (15-30)6 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRPre-imlifidaseeGFR (≥60)0 Participants
All PatientsNumber of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFRMonth 6eGFR (30-60)4 Participants
Secondary

Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time

Number of PLEXs needed before anti-GBM antibodies are below toxic levels. PLEX was initiated at the discretion of the investigator throughout the study.

Time frame: Pre-screening and up to Day 93 after imlifidase dosing

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 29 to Day 505 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 50 to Day 930 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeTotal (post-imlifidase to Day 93)70 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimePre-imlifidase to Day 30 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeTotal (pre-screening to Day 93)85 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 15 to Day 2218 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 3 to Day 78 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimePre-Screening10 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 10 to Day 1520 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 7 to Day 1014 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimePost-Screening to pre-imlifidase dose5 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 22 to Day 295 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 15 to Day 225 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 29 to Day 503 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimePost-Screening to pre-imlifidase dose0 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 10 to Day 152 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 50 to Day 931 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 7 to Day 100 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 3 to Day 70 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 22 to Day 291 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeTotal (post-imlifidase to Day 93)13 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimePre-Screening23 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeTotal (pre-screening to Day 93)36 Number of PLEX performed
Dialysis Independent at BaselineNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimePre-imlifidase to Day 31 Number of PLEX performed
All PatientsNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeTotal (pre-screening to Day 93)121 Number of PLEX performed
All PatientsNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimePre-Screening33 Number of PLEX performed
All PatientsNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimePost-Screening to pre-imlifidase dose5 Number of PLEX performed
All PatientsNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimePre-imlifidase to Day 31 Number of PLEX performed
All PatientsNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 3 to Day 78 Number of PLEX performed
All PatientsNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 7 to Day 1014 Number of PLEX performed
All PatientsNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 10 to Day 1522 Number of PLEX performed
All PatientsNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 15 to Day 2223 Number of PLEX performed
All PatientsNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 29 to Day 508 Number of PLEX performed
All PatientsNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 50 to Day 931 Number of PLEX performed
All PatientsNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeTotal (post-imlifidase to Day 93)83 Number of PLEX performed
All PatientsNumber of PLEXs Needed Over TimeDay 22 to Day 296 Number of PLEX performed
Secondary

Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)

Imlifidase specifically cleaves all subclasses of human IgG rapidly and efficiently. The cleaving process involves two steps: (i) intact IgG to single cleaved IgG followed by (ii) single cleaved IgG to completely cleaved IgG (one F(ab')2- and one homodimeric Fc-fragment) The electroluminescence analysis method used measures the sum of intact and single cleaved IgG in serum. The efficacy of imlifidase is evaluated as remaining concentration of intact and single cleaved IgG in serum after treatment.

Time frame: Pre-dose up to 6 months after imlifidase administration

Population: Some patients had missing data at some timepoints

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)Pre-dose6.66 mg/mLStandard Deviation 2.94
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)2 hours0.17 mg/mLStandard Deviation 0.12
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)6 hours0.08 mg/mLStandard Deviation 0.05
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)24 hours0.08 mg/mLStandard Deviation 0.05
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)Day 30.09 mg/mLStandard Deviation 0.05
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)Day 70.85 mg/mLStandard Deviation 1.56
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)Day 101.58 mg/mLStandard Deviation 1.69
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)Day 152.64 mg/mLStandard Deviation 2.42
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)Day 222.94 mg/mLStandard Deviation 2.34
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)Day 293.94 mg/mLStandard Deviation 2.18
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)Day 504.29 mg/mLStandard Deviation 2.05
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)Day 1806.76 mg/mLStandard Deviation 2.49
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (AUC)

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)

Time frame: Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (AUC)158 h*µg/mL
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (CL)

Clearance (CL) is a measure of the ability of the body to clear imlifidase from plasma

Time frame: Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (CL)1.6 mL/h/kg
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (Cmax)

Maximum observed plasma concentration of IdeS following dosing (Cmax)

Time frame: Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (Cmax)4.7 µg/mL
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (t1/2)

Half-life during distribution phase (Alpha-t1/2) Half-life during elimination phase (Beta-t1/2) The results refers to harmonic mean.

Time frame: Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (t1/2)Alpha-t1/22.6 h
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (t1/2)Beta-t1/253 h
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (Vz)

Vz = Volume of distribution during the elimination phase

Time frame: Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Dialysis Dependent at BaselinePharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (Vz)0.13 L/kg
Secondary

Renal Function at 3 and 6 Months

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a measure of kidney function. eGFR was calculated based on p-creatinine according to the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. eGFR for a kidney with normal function is above 90 mL/min/1.73m\^2. Reduced kidney function is characterised by a decreased eGFR value.

Time frame: 3 and 6 months after imlifidase dosing

Population: Only patients who were alive and dialysis independent at respective analysis time (3 and 6 months) were included in this analysis because assessment of eGFR is not considered meaningful for patients in dialysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineRenal Function at 3 and 6 MonthseGFR at 3 months20.3 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 4.7
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineRenal Function at 3 and 6 MonthseGFR at 6 months24.8 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 6.6
Dialysis Independent at BaselineRenal Function at 3 and 6 MonthseGFR at 3 months26.5 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 11
Dialysis Independent at BaselineRenal Function at 3 and 6 MonthseGFR at 6 months36.9 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 17.3
All PatientsRenal Function at 3 and 6 MonthseGFR at 3 months23.8 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 8.9
All PatientsRenal Function at 3 and 6 MonthseGFR at 6 months30.9 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 13.9
Secondary

Renal Histology

Kidney biopsies were classified according to the histopathologic classification for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis developed by Berden et al. 2010. This classification has previously been applied in a study of 123 anti-GBM disease patients (von Daalen et al 2018). Histopathologic class: * Focal (≤50% normal glomeruli) * Crescentic (≥50% glomeruli with cellular crescents) * Mixed (\<50% normal, \<50%crescentic, \<50% globally sclerotic glomeruli) * Sclerotic (≥50% globally sclerotic glomeruli) In addition information on the histological activity and kidney outcome was provided. Focal class is associated with favourable kidney outcome, whereas sclerotic carries a poor outcome. Crescentic/mixed class could have an intermediate outcome between focal and sclerotic. Immunofluorescence performed at the local hospitals was also used to assess linear IgG deposits which is a hallmark of anti-GBM antibody disease.

Time frame: Before administration of imlifidase (0-33 days) and after administration of imlifidase (3-6 days)

Population: During the study, 14 kidney biopsies were taken from 10 of the 15 included patients. 10 biopsies were taken before administration of imlifidase and 4 after administration of imlifidase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineRenal HistologyCrescentic9 Biopsies
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineRenal HistologyMixed4 Biopsies
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineRenal HistologySclerotic1 Biopsies
Dialysis Dependent at BaselineRenal HistologyLinear IgG deposits11 Biopsies

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026