Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Antibody Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
This study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of IdeS in patients with severe anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease receiving standard of care consisting of pulse-methylprednisolone, oral prednisolone and intravenous cyclophosphamide combined with plasma exchange (PLEX).
Detailed description
This is an Open-Label Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of IdeS in anti-GBM disease (Goodpasture's disease, i.e. GP) with Adverse Renal Prognosis. The primary efficacy objective is to evaluate the efficacy of an IdeS based regimen to salvage independent renal function measured as no need for dialysis at 6 months after IdeS treatment. The primary safety objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IdeS in patients with severe anti-GBM disease on background of standard care consisting of pulse-methylprednisolone, oral prednisolone and intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) combined with plasma exchange (PLEX). The patients will be followed during 6 months according to the study visit plan.
Interventions
One dose of 0.25 mg/kg body weight imlifidase on study day 1
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Open-Label, Single Arm study
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Anti-GBM antibodies detected by ELISA above a level that is considered toxic by the investigator using local laboratory. Patients double-positive for anti-GBM and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) may be entered in the trial, but only if their level of anti-GBM antibodies fulfil the criteria listed above. 2. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<15 ml/min/1.73 m\^2 (by modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation) or if the patient is non-responsive to standard treatment, and has lost \>15 ml/min/1.73 m\^2 after start of treatment 3. Haematuria on dipstick and/or urinary sediment 4. Male or female patients aged at least 18 years; Female patients of childbearing potential may participate if highly effective contraception is used during the study, according to Clinical Trials Facilitation and Coordination Group (CTFG) guidance \[18\], see also section 4.9 (pregnancy test should be performed before inclusion). 5. Willing and able to give written Informed Consent and to comply with the requirements of the study protocol; and 6. Judged to be otherwise healthy by the Investigator, based on medical history, physical examination, and clinical laboratory assessments. Patients with clinical laboratory values that are outside of normal limits (other than those specified in the
Exclusion criteria
) and/or with other abnormal clinical findings that are judged by the Investigator not to be of clinical significance, may be entered into the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 6 Months | 6 months after dosing | Number of patients without need for dialysis at 6 months. A patient with independent renal function is defined as a patient without need for dialysis. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Renal Function at 3 and 6 Months | 3 and 6 months after imlifidase dosing | Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a measure of kidney function. eGFR was calculated based on p-creatinine according to the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. eGFR for a kidney with normal function is above 90 mL/min/1.73m\^2. Reduced kidney function is characterised by a decreased eGFR value. |
| Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Pre-imlifidase, 1, 3 and 6 months after imlifidase dosing | eGFR is a measure of kidney function. eGFR has been calculated based on p-creatinine according to the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. eGFR for a kidney with normal function is above 90 mL/min/1.73m\^2. Reduced kidney function is characterised by a decreased eGFR value. Number of patients per 4 different eGFR categories (0-15, 15-30, 30-60, ≥60 mL/min/1.73m\^2) are presented. A shift towards a higher category during the study indicates improved renal function over time. |
| Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | Predose up to 6 months after dosing | Anti-GBM antibodies above a toxic level defined as \>20 U/mL. The level of anti-GBM antibodies was measured centrally using the Phadia ELiA(TM) anti-GBM kit. The enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELiA) is a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay. |
| Number of Patients With Haematuria (Blood in Urine) | At 6 months after dosing | Haematuria was assessed using urine dipstick. The result was presented as: Negative/Trace/+1/+2/+3/+4. In the analysis results being +2 or above are considered as relevant. Haematuria was an inclusion criterion. All 15 patients had haematuria when included in the study. |
| Change in Proteinuria During the Study | Pre-imlifidase, 3 and 6 months after imlifidase dosing | Change in proteinuria measured as u-albumin/creatinine (g/mol) in morning void during the study . |
| Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Pre-screening and up to Day 93 after imlifidase dosing | Number of PLEXs needed before anti-GBM antibodies are below toxic levels. PLEX was initiated at the discretion of the investigator throughout the study. |
| Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (Cmax) | Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15 | Maximum observed plasma concentration of IdeS following dosing (Cmax) |
| Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 3 Months | 3 months after dosing | Number of patients without need for dialysis at 3 months. A patient with independent renal function is defined as a patient without need for dialysis. |
| Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (t1/2) | Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15 | Half-life during distribution phase (Alpha-t1/2) Half-life during elimination phase (Beta-t1/2) The results refers to harmonic mean. |
| Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (CL) | Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15 | Clearance (CL) is a measure of the ability of the body to clear imlifidase from plasma |
| Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (Vz) | Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15 | Vz = Volume of distribution during the elimination phase |
| Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG) | Pre-dose up to 6 months after imlifidase administration | Imlifidase specifically cleaves all subclasses of human IgG rapidly and efficiently. The cleaving process involves two steps: (i) intact IgG to single cleaved IgG followed by (ii) single cleaved IgG to completely cleaved IgG (one F(ab')2- and one homodimeric Fc-fragment) The electroluminescence analysis method used measures the sum of intact and single cleaved IgG in serum. The efficacy of imlifidase is evaluated as remaining concentration of intact and single cleaved IgG in serum after treatment. |
| Anti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA) | Up to 6 months after dosing | Determination of anti-imlifidase antibody concentration |
| Renal Histology | Before administration of imlifidase (0-33 days) and after administration of imlifidase (3-6 days) | Kidney biopsies were classified according to the histopathologic classification for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis developed by Berden et al. 2010. This classification has previously been applied in a study of 123 anti-GBM disease patients (von Daalen et al 2018). Histopathologic class: * Focal (≤50% normal glomeruli) * Crescentic (≥50% glomeruli with cellular crescents) * Mixed (\<50% normal, \<50%crescentic, \<50% globally sclerotic glomeruli) * Sclerotic (≥50% globally sclerotic glomeruli) In addition information on the histological activity and kidney outcome was provided. Focal class is associated with favourable kidney outcome, whereas sclerotic carries a poor outcome. Crescentic/mixed class could have an intermediate outcome between focal and sclerotic. Immunofluorescence performed at the local hospitals was also used to assess linear IgG deposits which is a hallmark of anti-GBM antibody disease. |
| Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (AUC) | Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15 | Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) |
Countries
Austria, Czechia, Denmark, France, Sweden
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Imlifidase IdeS intravenous infusion 0.25 mg/kg body weight (BW) intravenous infusion
HMed-IdeS: One dose of 0.25 mg/kg BW HMed-IdeS on study day 1 | 15 |
| Total | 15 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Imlifidase | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 61 years | — |
| Anti-GBM concentration | 130 U/mL | — |
| Dialysis status at baseline Dialysis | 10 Participants | — |
| Dialysis status at baseline Not on dialysis but eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2 | 5 Participants | — |
| Double positive Anti-GBM and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) No | 9 Participants | — |
| Double positive Anti-GBM and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) Yes | 6 Participants | — |
| Occurrence of pulmonary symptom No | 3 Participants | — |
| Occurrence of pulmonary symptom Not reported | 3 Participants | — |
| Occurrence of pulmonary symptom Yes | 9 Participants | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Austria | 2 participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment Czechia | 1 participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment Denmark | 3 participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment France | 5 participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment Sweden | 4 participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 6 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 9 Participants | — |
| Time since anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) diagnosis | 2 days | — |
| Time since first pulmonary symptom | 32 days | — |
| Time since first renal symptom | 10 days | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 15 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 15 / 15 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 15 |
Outcome results
Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 6 Months
Number of patients without need for dialysis at 6 months. A patient with independent renal function is defined as a patient without need for dialysis.
Time frame: 6 months after dosing
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 6 Months | 5 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 6 Months | 5 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 6 Months | 10 Participants |
Anti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA)
Determination of anti-imlifidase antibody concentration
Time frame: Up to 6 months after dosing
Population: Some missing data at Day 50, Day 93 and Day 180
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Anti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA) | Day 7 | 4.32 mg/L | Standard Deviation 5.29 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Anti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA) | Day 15 | 752 mg/L | Standard Deviation 728 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Anti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA) | Pre-imlifidase | 9.00 mg/L | Standard Deviation 4.17 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Anti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA) | Day 22 | 744 mg/L | Standard Deviation 736 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Anti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA) | Day 29 | 609 mg/L | Standard Deviation 493 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Anti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA) | Day 50 | 547 mg/L | Standard Deviation 580 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Anti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA) | Day 93 | 327 mg/L | Standard Deviation 263 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Anti-imlifidase Antibodies (ADA) | Day 180 | 242 mg/L | Standard Deviation 280 |
Change in Proteinuria During the Study
Change in proteinuria measured as u-albumin/creatinine (g/mol) in morning void during the study .
Time frame: Pre-imlifidase, 3 and 6 months after imlifidase dosing
Population: Some patients had missing data at some visits
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Change in Proteinuria During the Study | 3 months | 220 g/mol | Standard Deviation 197 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Change in Proteinuria During the Study | Pre-imlifidase | 1117 g/mol | Standard Deviation 1544 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Change in Proteinuria During the Study | 6 months | 183 g/mol | Standard Deviation 231 |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Change in Proteinuria During the Study | 3 months | 153 g/mol | Standard Deviation 172 |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Change in Proteinuria During the Study | Pre-imlifidase | 199 g/mol | Standard Deviation 166 |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Change in Proteinuria During the Study | 6 months | 122 g/mol | Standard Deviation 133 |
| All Patients | Change in Proteinuria During the Study | Pre-imlifidase | 700 g/mol | Standard Deviation 1197 |
| All Patients | Change in Proteinuria During the Study | 6 months | 161 g/mol | Standard Deviation 198 |
| All Patients | Change in Proteinuria During the Study | 3 months | 190 g/mol | Standard Deviation 178 |
Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits
Anti-GBM antibodies above a toxic level defined as \>20 U/mL. The level of anti-GBM antibodies was measured centrally using the Phadia ELiA(TM) anti-GBM kit. The enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELiA) is a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay.
Time frame: Predose up to 6 months after dosing
Population: Number of study visits with a toxic level are presented instead of number of patient days with an anti-GBM level \>20 U/mL as was the original plan.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 1 visit | 3 participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 5 visits | 2 participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 3 visits | 1 participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 0 visits | 1 participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 9 visits | 1 participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 6 visits | 1 participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 2 visits | 1 participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 3 visits | 0 participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 0 visits | 1 participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 1 visit | 4 participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 2 visits | 0 participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 5 visits | 0 participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 6 visits | 0 participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 9 visits | 0 participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 5 visits | 2 participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 1 visit | 7 participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 9 visits | 1 participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 6 visits | 1 participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 3 visits | 1 participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 2 visits | 1 participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Anti-GBM Antibodies Above a Toxic Level Stratified by Number of Study Visits | 0 visits | 2 participants |
Number of Patients With Haematuria (Blood in Urine)
Haematuria was assessed using urine dipstick. The result was presented as: Negative/Trace/+1/+2/+3/+4. In the analysis results being +2 or above are considered as relevant. Haematuria was an inclusion criterion. All 15 patients had haematuria when included in the study.
Time frame: At 6 months after dosing
Population: Data was missing for 5 of the 15 patients at 6 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Haematuria (Blood in Urine) | 3 Patients with haematuria (+2 or above) |
Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 3 Months
Number of patients without need for dialysis at 3 months. A patient with independent renal function is defined as a patient without need for dialysis.
Time frame: 3 months after dosing
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 3 Months | 4 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 3 Months | 5 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Independent Renal Function at 3 Months | 9 Participants |
Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR
eGFR is a measure of kidney function. eGFR has been calculated based on p-creatinine according to the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. eGFR for a kidney with normal function is above 90 mL/min/1.73m\^2. Reduced kidney function is characterised by a decreased eGFR value. Number of patients per 4 different eGFR categories (0-15, 15-30, 30-60, ≥60 mL/min/1.73m\^2) are presented. A shift towards a higher category during the study indicates improved renal function over time.
Time frame: Pre-imlifidase, 1, 3 and 6 months after imlifidase dosing
Population: Only patients who were alive and dialysis independent at each specific analysis time are included in this analysis because eGFR is not applicable for patients in dialysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 1 | eGFR (0-15) | 1 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Pre-imlifidase | eGFR (15-30) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Pre-imlifidase | eGFR (30-60) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Pre-imlifidase | eGFR (≥60) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Pre-imlifidase | eGFR (0-15) | 1 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 1 | eGFR (15-30) | 1 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 1 | eGFR (30-60) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 1 | eGFR (≥60) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 3 | eGFR (0-15) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 3 | eGFR (15-30) | 3 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 3 | eGFR (30-60) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 3 | eGFR (≥60) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 6 | eGFR (0-15) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 6 | eGFR (15-30) | 4 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 6 | eGFR (30-60) | 1 Participants |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 6 | eGFR (≥60) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 1 | eGFR (15-30) | 2 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 1 | eGFR (30-60) | 2 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 1 | eGFR (≥60) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 6 | eGFR (15-30) | 2 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 3 | eGFR (0-15) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 3 | eGFR (15-30) | 3 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 6 | eGFR (≥60) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 3 | eGFR (30-60) | 1 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Pre-imlifidase | eGFR (0-15) | 5 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 6 | eGFR (30-60) | 3 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Pre-imlifidase | eGFR (15-30) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 3 | eGFR (≥60) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Pre-imlifidase | eGFR (30-60) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Pre-imlifidase | eGFR (≥60) | 0 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 1 | eGFR (0-15) | 1 Participants |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 6 | eGFR (0-15) | 0 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 3 | eGFR (30-60) | 1 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 1 | eGFR (15-30) | 3 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 6 | eGFR (0-15) | 0 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Pre-imlifidase | eGFR (30-60) | 0 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 1 | eGFR (30-60) | 2 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 6 | eGFR (≥60) | 0 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Pre-imlifidase | eGFR (0-15) | 6 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 1 | eGFR (≥60) | 0 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 3 | eGFR (≥60) | 0 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 1 | eGFR (0-15) | 2 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 3 | eGFR (0-15) | 0 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 6 | eGFR (15-30) | 6 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Pre-imlifidase | eGFR (15-30) | 0 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 3 | eGFR (15-30) | 6 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Pre-imlifidase | eGFR (≥60) | 0 Participants |
| All Patients | Number of Patients With Renal Function Over Time Stratified by Ranges of eGFR | Month 6 | eGFR (30-60) | 4 Participants |
Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time
Number of PLEXs needed before anti-GBM antibodies are below toxic levels. PLEX was initiated at the discretion of the investigator throughout the study.
Time frame: Pre-screening and up to Day 93 after imlifidase dosing
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 29 to Day 50 | 5 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 50 to Day 93 | 0 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Total (post-imlifidase to Day 93) | 70 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Pre-imlifidase to Day 3 | 0 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Total (pre-screening to Day 93) | 85 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 15 to Day 22 | 18 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 3 to Day 7 | 8 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Pre-Screening | 10 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 10 to Day 15 | 20 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 7 to Day 10 | 14 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Post-Screening to pre-imlifidase dose | 5 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 22 to Day 29 | 5 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 15 to Day 22 | 5 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 29 to Day 50 | 3 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Post-Screening to pre-imlifidase dose | 0 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 10 to Day 15 | 2 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 50 to Day 93 | 1 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 7 to Day 10 | 0 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 3 to Day 7 | 0 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 22 to Day 29 | 1 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Total (post-imlifidase to Day 93) | 13 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Pre-Screening | 23 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Total (pre-screening to Day 93) | 36 Number of PLEX performed |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Pre-imlifidase to Day 3 | 1 Number of PLEX performed |
| All Patients | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Total (pre-screening to Day 93) | 121 Number of PLEX performed |
| All Patients | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Pre-Screening | 33 Number of PLEX performed |
| All Patients | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Post-Screening to pre-imlifidase dose | 5 Number of PLEX performed |
| All Patients | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Pre-imlifidase to Day 3 | 1 Number of PLEX performed |
| All Patients | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 3 to Day 7 | 8 Number of PLEX performed |
| All Patients | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 7 to Day 10 | 14 Number of PLEX performed |
| All Patients | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 10 to Day 15 | 22 Number of PLEX performed |
| All Patients | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 15 to Day 22 | 23 Number of PLEX performed |
| All Patients | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 29 to Day 50 | 8 Number of PLEX performed |
| All Patients | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 50 to Day 93 | 1 Number of PLEX performed |
| All Patients | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Total (post-imlifidase to Day 93) | 83 Number of PLEX performed |
| All Patients | Number of PLEXs Needed Over Time | Day 22 to Day 29 | 6 Number of PLEX performed |
Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG)
Imlifidase specifically cleaves all subclasses of human IgG rapidly and efficiently. The cleaving process involves two steps: (i) intact IgG to single cleaved IgG followed by (ii) single cleaved IgG to completely cleaved IgG (one F(ab')2- and one homodimeric Fc-fragment) The electroluminescence analysis method used measures the sum of intact and single cleaved IgG in serum. The efficacy of imlifidase is evaluated as remaining concentration of intact and single cleaved IgG in serum after treatment.
Time frame: Pre-dose up to 6 months after imlifidase administration
Population: Some patients had missing data at some timepoints
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG) | Pre-dose | 6.66 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG) | 2 hours | 0.17 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG) | 6 hours | 0.08 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG) | 24 hours | 0.08 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG) | Day 3 | 0.09 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG) | Day 7 | 0.85 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 1.56 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG) | Day 10 | 1.58 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 1.69 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG) | Day 15 | 2.64 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.42 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG) | Day 22 | 2.94 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.34 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG) | Day 29 | 3.94 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.18 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG) | Day 50 | 4.29 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.05 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacodynamics (IgG Degradation Measured as Remaining Concentration of Intact and Single Cleaved IgG) | Day 180 | 6.76 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.49 |
Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (AUC)
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)
Time frame: Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (AUC) | 158 h*µg/mL |
Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (CL)
Clearance (CL) is a measure of the ability of the body to clear imlifidase from plasma
Time frame: Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (CL) | 1.6 mL/h/kg |
Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (Cmax)
Maximum observed plasma concentration of IdeS following dosing (Cmax)
Time frame: Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (Cmax) | 4.7 µg/mL |
Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (t1/2)
Half-life during distribution phase (Alpha-t1/2) Half-life during elimination phase (Beta-t1/2) The results refers to harmonic mean.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (t1/2) | Alpha-t1/2 | 2.6 h |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (t1/2) | Beta-t1/2 | 53 h |
Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (Vz)
Vz = Volume of distribution during the elimination phase
Time frame: Pre-dose, 45min, 2h, 6h, 24h, Day3, Day 7, Day 10, and Day15
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase (Vz) | 0.13 L/kg |
Renal Function at 3 and 6 Months
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a measure of kidney function. eGFR was calculated based on p-creatinine according to the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. eGFR for a kidney with normal function is above 90 mL/min/1.73m\^2. Reduced kidney function is characterised by a decreased eGFR value.
Time frame: 3 and 6 months after imlifidase dosing
Population: Only patients who were alive and dialysis independent at respective analysis time (3 and 6 months) were included in this analysis because assessment of eGFR is not considered meaningful for patients in dialysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Renal Function at 3 and 6 Months | eGFR at 3 months | 20.3 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Renal Function at 3 and 6 Months | eGFR at 6 months | 24.8 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Renal Function at 3 and 6 Months | eGFR at 3 months | 26.5 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 11 |
| Dialysis Independent at Baseline | Renal Function at 3 and 6 Months | eGFR at 6 months | 36.9 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 17.3 |
| All Patients | Renal Function at 3 and 6 Months | eGFR at 3 months | 23.8 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| All Patients | Renal Function at 3 and 6 Months | eGFR at 6 months | 30.9 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 13.9 |
Renal Histology
Kidney biopsies were classified according to the histopathologic classification for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis developed by Berden et al. 2010. This classification has previously been applied in a study of 123 anti-GBM disease patients (von Daalen et al 2018). Histopathologic class: * Focal (≤50% normal glomeruli) * Crescentic (≥50% glomeruli with cellular crescents) * Mixed (\<50% normal, \<50%crescentic, \<50% globally sclerotic glomeruli) * Sclerotic (≥50% globally sclerotic glomeruli) In addition information on the histological activity and kidney outcome was provided. Focal class is associated with favourable kidney outcome, whereas sclerotic carries a poor outcome. Crescentic/mixed class could have an intermediate outcome between focal and sclerotic. Immunofluorescence performed at the local hospitals was also used to assess linear IgG deposits which is a hallmark of anti-GBM antibody disease.
Time frame: Before administration of imlifidase (0-33 days) and after administration of imlifidase (3-6 days)
Population: During the study, 14 kidney biopsies were taken from 10 of the 15 included patients. 10 biopsies were taken before administration of imlifidase and 4 after administration of imlifidase.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Renal Histology | Crescentic | 9 Biopsies |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Renal Histology | Mixed | 4 Biopsies |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Renal Histology | Sclerotic | 1 Biopsies |
| Dialysis Dependent at Baseline | Renal Histology | Linear IgG deposits | 11 Biopsies |