Skip to content

Decremental Exercise: a New Training Approach?

Decremental Exercise Protocol as a Training Stimulus: More or Less Efficient Than Traditional High-intensity Interval Training?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03155152
Enrollment
55
Registered
2017-05-16
Start date
2017-06-01
Completion date
2019-12-11
Last updated
2020-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Exercise Performance of Fit Athletes

Brief summary

Different types of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions are used by athletes in order to improve their physical performance, but innovative approaches to training are lacking. Therefore, in Part A of this study the physiological response to a standard HIIT and a new decremental exercise training (DECT) will be compared in runners and cyclists. Next, in Part B the training effects of a 4-week block of the HIIT and DECT will be compared.

Interventions

OTHERDECT

The DECT program consists of a 4-week training intervention with three weekly sessions of high-intensity interval training, in which during each exercise bout the workload is imposed in a decremental fashion.

OTHERHIIT

The HIIT program consists of a 4-week training intervention with three weekly sessions of high-intensity interval training, in which during each exercise bout the workload is kept constant.

Sponsors

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 18-40 years * Healthy, i.e. normal physical and mental status (not taking any medication on a regular basis for more than a month, except contraceptive medication) * Normal Body-Mass-Index (BMI): 18.5-24.9 kg·m-2 * Well-trained athletes: V̇O2max \> 55.1 ml·min-1·kg-1 for men and \> 50.1 ml·min-1·kg-1 for women * Normal lung function * Non-smoking * Willing to adhere to the general study rules

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are pregnant or breast feeding * Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study * Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse * Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant * Previous enrolment into the same part (A or B) of the current study * Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons * Acute or chronic illness * Intake of medications affecting performance or the respiratory, cardiovascular or neuromuscular system * Insufficient training history (\<3 yrs of participation in competitive cycling/running) or training volume (\<40 km running/week or 150 km cycling/week) in the previous 6 months * Recent (\<3 months) history of orthopaedic injury or participation in structured high-intensity training blocks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in exercise performancemeasured before and after the 4-week training block, during a time-trial (40 km cycling or 10 km running)Time taken to cover a fixed distance, in minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in maximal oxygen uptakeMeasured during a maximal incremental exercise test before and after the 4-week training blockMeasured in ml/kg/min
Average oxygen uptakeThe two training session are performed within one weekAverage oxygen uptake measured during the four 4-min bouts of high-intensity exercise of a session of HIIT and DECT

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026