Skip to content

Relative Bioavailability Among Different Eutropin Formulations

A Randomized, Open Label, Single Subcutaneous Dose 6x3 Crossover Study to Investigate the Relative Bioavailability Among Different Eutropin Formulations in Healthy Male Volunteers

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03154840
Enrollment
24
Registered
2017-05-16
Start date
2017-05-31
Completion date
2017-11-30
Last updated
2017-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Relative Bioavailability

Brief summary

1. Compares and evaluates the relative bioavailability of single-dose subcutaneous administration of each of the Eutropin formulations to healthy male volunteers. 2. Ensure safety and tolerability of single, subcutaneous administration of Eutropin formulations to healthy male volunteers.

Interventions

DRUGEutropin 4IU, Eutropin AQ 12IU, Eutropin Pen 36IU

Investigate the Relative Bioavailability among Different Eutropin Formulations

Sponsors

LG Chem
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

6x3 Crossover Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
19 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. A healthy male who is at least 19 years old but under 40 years of age at screening visit 2. Those who weigh more than 50 kg at screening visit and whose body mass index (BMI) is greater than 19 kg / m2 but less than 28 kg / m2 3. The result of the vital signs in the screening period. 4. A person who is judged to be clinically insignificant in terms of physical or mental condition when the examinee medically judges the screening period physical examination 5. Those who are not clinically significant when the examiner has medically judged the results of examination other than the items described in 17) and 18) of the exclusion criterion in the diagnosis laboratory test results in the screening period 6. A person who consents to use a combination of effective contraceptive methods or medically appropriate contraceptive methods from the first administration of the clinical trial drug to the fourth administration (28 days) after the last administration of the drug for clinical trial and not to provide sperm 7. Those who voluntarily decide to participate in clinical trials and observe the test subjects' precautions and agree in writing

Exclusion criteria

1. Those who with a history or history of diabetes 2. Those who with a history or history of malignancy 3. Those who with a history or history of musculoskeletal disorders (including epiphyseal closure, scoliosis, etc.) 4. Those who with history or history of endocrine system (including hypothyroidism, panhypopituitarism, etc.) 5. Those who have a history of skin disease, including psoriasis and contact dermatitis, or who can not exclude the possibility of skin disease under the judgment of the examiner on physical examination conducted at the screening visit. 6.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AUClast of somatropinTotal three period at weekly intervals (Week 1, Week2, Week3)Pharmacokinetic assessment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of somatropinTotal three period at weekly intervals (Week 1, Week2, Week3)Pharmacokinetic assessment
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUCinf) of somatropinTotal three period at weekly intervals (Week 1, Week2, Week3)Pharmacokinetic assessment
Time at which the Cmax is observed (Tmax) of somatropinTotal three period at weekly intervals (Week 1, Week2, Week3)Pharmacokinetic assessment
Elimination half-life time (t1/2β) of somatropinTotal three period at weekly intervals (Week 1, Week2, Week3)Pharmacokinetic assessment
IGF-BP3Total three period at weekly intervals (Week 1, Week2, Week3)Pharmacodynamic assessment
IGF-1Total three period at weekly intervals (Week 1, Week2, Week3)Pharmacodynamic assessment
Physical examinationWeek -4(Screening), Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 5Weight, Height
Vital SignsWeek -4(Screening), Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 5Left-sided blood pressure (systolic / diastolic), pulse rate, tympanic temperature
ElectrocardiogramWeek -4(Screening), Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 5Ventricular rate, PR interval, QRS, QT/QTc
Laboratory testWeek -4(Screening), Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 5General blood test, general chemical test, clinical chemistry urinalysis, pancreas test
Injection site reaction and Pain scale evaluationWeek 1, Week 2, Week 3Ask the NRS about the degree of pain and evaluate it as 0-10
Monitoring of adverse reactionsWeek -4(Screening), Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 5Clinical significance is assessed by reviewing the general findings of individual subjects individually, and when there is a specific or tendency, analysis is conducted

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026