Skip to content

Efficacy of AposTherapy® in Knee OA

A Prospective, Randomized Double-Armed Efficacy Evaluation of AposTherapy® for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03153956
Enrollment
77
Registered
2017-05-15
Start date
2015-04-16
Completion date
2018-11-15
Last updated
2020-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

AposTherapy® System, Osteoarthritis, Total knee arthroplasties, Degenerative joint disease

Brief summary

A prospective, interventional, randomized, double-arm clinical evaluation study to examine the efficacy of AposTherapy® versus a control group, in the short-term at 6 months and in the long-term at 12 months post-treatment, with the primary efficacy assessment based on improvement in knee pain score and improvement in function in patients following diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Interventions

DEVICECalibrated AposTherapy®

a biomechanical device including 2 hemispheric biomechanical elements attached to a platform in a form of a shoe. the biomechanical device is calibrated to each patient by a physiotherapist specialized with the treatment methodology.

DEVICENon-Calibrated Sham Apos Therapy Device

The comparator group will receive a non-calibrated sham device.

Sponsors

NYU Langone Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Phase I - A prospective, interventional, randomized, double-arm clinical evaluation of patients who have been diagnosed with OA of the knee. The active treatment arm (personally calibrated biomechanical device) will be compared to a control arm (sham-placebo device) (similar shoes without biomechanical elements). Phase II - Open-label, cross-over study design. After the completion of phase one patients will be un-blinded to their group allocation. Patients that were allocated to the sham-placebo control group will cross to the active group and will receive the AposTherapy treatment. Patients that were allocated to the active group will continue with treatment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients suffering from symptomatic unilateral or bilateral knee OA at the medial compartment for at least six months; * Fulfilling the ACR clinical criteria; * Having radiographically assessed OA of the knee with a Kellgren-Lawrence grade more than or equal to grade 2; and, * Having VAS-Pain ≥ 3, on a scale between 0-10. * Patients who have a shoe size between US 4 and US 12

Exclusion criteria

* Patients suffering from acute septic arthritis. * Patients who received a corticosteroid injection within 3 months of the study. * Patients who received hyaluronic acid (HA) injections within 6 months of the study * Patients suffering from avascular necrosis of the knee. * Patients with a history of knee buckling or recent knee injury. * Patients who have had a joint replacement or other major surgery to the knee, hip or ankle (ipsilateral or contralateral side). * Patients suffering from neuropathic arthropathy. * Patients with an increased tendency to fall. * Patients exhibiting a lack of physical or mental ability to perform or comply with the study procedure. * Patients with a history of pathological osteoporotic fracture. * Patients suffering from symptomatic degenerative arthritis in lower limb joints other than the knees. * Patients with referred pain in the knees from primary back or hip joint pain. * Patients with neurological deficits to the lower extremity (ex. foot drop) * Patients whose shoe size is less than US 4 and greater than US 12 * Patients who have had arthroscopy within 6 months of the study * Patients with inflammatory arthropathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total Scorescreening, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 monthsWOMAC evaluates the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints. In this study, WOMAC scores were recomputed as the sum within sub-scales (pain score is the sum of questions 1-5; stiffness is the sum of questions 6-7; functional score is the sum of questions 8-24). The total score is reported as the sum of the pain, stiffness, and functional sub-scores for all participants. The total score range is 0-1292. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Score (VAS) Score12 MonthsThe visual analogue scale or visual analog scale (VAS) is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.
Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Total Scorescreening, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 monthsThe Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The survey consists eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0-100, with lower scores = more disability and higher scores = less disability. Therefore, higher scores represent better health.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Treatment Arm
Personally calibrated bio-mechanical device Calibrated AposTherapy®: a biomechanical device including 2 hemispheric biomechanical elements attached to a platform in a form of a shoe. the biomechanical device is calibrated to each patient by a physiotherapist specialized with the treatment methodology.
39
Control Arm
sham-placebo device (similar shoes without bio-mechanical elements). Non-Calibrated Sham Apos Therapy Device: The comparator group will receive a non-calibrated sham device.
38
Total77

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive Treatment ArmControl ArmTotal
Age, Continuous62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants27 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 390 / 38
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 390 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 390 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total Score

WOMAC evaluates the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints. In this study, WOMAC scores were recomputed as the sum within sub-scales (pain score is the sum of questions 1-5; stiffness is the sum of questions 6-7; functional score is the sum of questions 8-24). The total score is reported as the sum of the pain, stiffness, and functional sub-scores for all participants. The total score range is 0-1292. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

Time frame: screening, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

Population: Participants who scheduled visits beyond 4 days before or after the specified timeframes (3, 6, and 9 months from screening) were not included in the analysis. (Treatment participants did not have a 9 month visit)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Treatment ArmWestern Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total ScoreWOMAC Total score - screen1062.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 545.96
Active Treatment ArmWestern Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total ScoreWOMAC Total score - 3 months548.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 440.22
Active Treatment ArmWestern Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total ScoreWOMAC Total Score - 6 months420.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 391.7
Active Treatment ArmWestern Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total ScoreWOMAC Total Score - 12 months396.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 324.99
Control ArmWestern Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total ScoreWOMAC Total Score - 12 months433 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 352.32
Control ArmWestern Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total ScoreWOMAC Total Score - 6 months524.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 448.83
Control ArmWestern Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total ScoreWOMAC Total score - screen975.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 580.87
Control ArmWestern Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total ScoreWOMAC Total Score - 9 months280.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 194.84
Control ArmWestern Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total ScoreWOMAC Total score - 3 months601.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 467.39
Secondary

Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Total Score

The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The survey consists eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0-100, with lower scores = more disability and higher scores = less disability. Therefore, higher scores represent better health.

Time frame: screening, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

Population: Participants who scheduled visits beyond 4 days before or after the specified timeframes (3, 6, and 9 months from screening) were not included in the analysis. (Treatment participants did not have a 9 month visit)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Treatment ArmShort-Form 36 (SF-36) Total ScoreSF-36 total score - screening55.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.03
Active Treatment ArmShort-Form 36 (SF-36) Total ScoreSF-36 total score - 3 months64.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Active Treatment ArmShort-Form 36 (SF-36) Total ScoreSF-36 total score - 6 months69.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.8
Active Treatment ArmShort-Form 36 (SF-36) Total ScoreSF-36 total score - 12 month71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.77
Control ArmShort-Form 36 (SF-36) Total ScoreSF-36 total score - 12 month66.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.38
Control ArmShort-Form 36 (SF-36) Total ScoreSF-36 total score - 6 months68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.21
Control ArmShort-Form 36 (SF-36) Total ScoreSF-36 total score - screening56.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.77
Control ArmShort-Form 36 (SF-36) Total ScoreSF-36 total score - 9 months74.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.37
Control ArmShort-Form 36 (SF-36) Total ScoreSF-36 total score - 3 months63.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.09
Secondary

Visual Analog Score (VAS) Score

The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale (VAS) is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure due to study termination.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026