Skip to content

Eletric Stimulation for Hipossalivation Induced by Radiotherapy

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Treatment for Hipossalivation Induced by Radiotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03151889
Acronym
TENS_HIR
Enrollment
67
Registered
2017-05-12
Start date
2017-08-30
Completion date
2018-12-30
Last updated
2020-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Electric Stimulation Therapy, Head and Neck Neoplasm, Hyposalivation, Radiotherapy

Brief summary

Currently, cancer is a disease of high incidence, already considered a public health problem. Among the most prevalent are head and neck neoplasms, and depending on the location and extent of the lesion, the treatments are surgery, chemotherapy and / or radiotherapy that have a great impact on the quality of life. Radiation therapy is a frequently chosen treatment, and depending on the dose of radiation, causes changes such as hyposalivation. There are techniques for salivary flow stimulation, however, most of the options involve the use of medications, which limits administration to part of the patients. Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) is an alternative that has been used to stimulate salivary flow, however there is a limited number of studies that have tested this technique after radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to verify the effect of TENS in increasing the salivary flow of individuals receiving radiotherapy to treat tumors of the head and neck. The sample will have 80 patients randomly divided into two groups: TENS group and Control group. In both groups, a quality of life questionnaire (UW-QOL) will be applied and a speech-language assessment will be performed. The hypothesis of this research is that TENS is effective in increasing the amount of saliva. Secondary outcomes involve the evaluation of the effect of this technique on the quality of life, mainly in the questions: speech, chewing, saliva and deglutition.

Detailed description

The sample will have 80 patients randomly divided into two groups: 1) TENS group; 2) control group. A quality of life questionnaire (UW-QOL) will be applied and a speech-language assessment will be performed. The hypothesis of this research is that TENS increasing the amount of saliva. Secondary outcomes involve the evaluation of the effect of this technique on the quality of life, mainly in the questions: speech, chewing, saliva and deglutition.

Interventions

DEVICETENS

TENS Group: Pre-test evaluations (Clinic Conditions; Live Quality; Salivary Flux); TENS treatments (50Hz / pulse duration of 250 ms / high intensities tolerated / continuously for 20 minutes / 2 sessions a week / 4 weeks / total of the 8 TENS sessions) and Post-test evaluations.

Sponsors

Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre
CollaboratorOTHER
Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Starts radiotherapy treatment without previous hipossalivation The inclusion criteria according to information contained in electronic medical records and referred by the participants are: * Patients undergoing oncological follow-up for the treatment of head and neck cancer at Santa Rita Hospital through radiotherapy; * Have completed radiotherapy for at least 90 days; * Do not present a history of carcinogenic lesion in the salivary glands (sublingual, submandibular and parotid); * Do not present oral history of oral cancer; * Have not undergone cervical emptying level I;

Exclusion criteria

Intolerance to the TENS The

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Salivary Flowfive minutesSalivary flow per minute (ml)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact of the Quality of Life.30 daysQuestionarie University Washington

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026