Skip to content

A Study of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) Versus Adalimumab in Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis

A 52-Week Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel- Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab Versus Adalimumab in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Who Are Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Naive

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03151551
Acronym
SPIRIT-H2H
Enrollment
566
Registered
2017-05-12
Start date
2017-08-24
Completion date
2019-09-04
Last updated
2020-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriatic Arthritis

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab versus adalimumab in participants with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who are biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) naive.

Interventions

DRUGIxekizumab

Administered SC

DRUGAdalimumab

Administered SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of established diagnosis of active psoriatic arthritis for at least 6 months, and currently meets Classification for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria * Active PsA defined as the presence of at least 3 (out of 68) tender and at least 3 (out of 66) swollen joints * Presence of active plaque psoriasis with a BSA ≥3% * Men must agree to use a reliable method of birth control or remain abstinent during the study * Women must agree to use reliable birth control or remain abstinent during the study and for at least 12 weeks after stopping treatment * Have had an inadequate response when treated with 1 or more conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs)

Exclusion criteria

* Current or prior use of biologic agents for treatment of Ps or PsA * Evidence of active inflammatory arthritic syndromes or spondyloarthropathies other than PsA * Have participated in any study with interleukin 17 (IL-17) antagonists, including ixekizumab * Serious disorder or illness other than psoriatic arthritis * Serious infection within the last 3 months * Active Crohn's disease or active ulcerative colitis * Active vasculitis or uveitis * Diagnosis of or history of malignant disease \<5 years prior to randomization * Women who are breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Simultaneously Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100 (PASI100)Week 24ACR50 response is a ≥50% improvement from baseline for tender joint count(TJC)& swollen joint count (SJC)& in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's(pts) assessment of joint pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS),Pts Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PatGA)VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA)VAS, Pts assessment of physical function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index(HAQ-DI), or High Sensitivity(assay)C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP). PASI is an index combining assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in head, trunk, arms, legs, and severity of desquamation, erythema and plaque thickness in each region, yielding overall score of 0-no involvement, to 72-most severe involvement. Pts achieving PASI100 were defined as having 100% improvement in the PASI score compared to baseline. Pts with active plaque PsO with a BSA≥3% & PASI=0 at baseline were considered PASI100 responders if they had achieved PASI=0 & BSA=0 at week 24.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI100Week 24PASI is an index combining assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in head, trunk, arms, legs, and severity of desquamation, erythema and plaque thickness in each region, yielding overall score of 0-no involvement, to 72-most severe involvement. Participants achieving PASI100 were defined as having 100% improvement in the PASI score compared to baseline. Any participants with active plaque psoriasis (PsO) with a BSA ≥3% and PASI = 0 at baseline were considered PASI100 responders if & only if they had achieved PASI=0 & BSA=0 at week 24.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50Week 24ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of joint pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PatGA) VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) VAS, participant's assessment of physical function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), or High Sensitivity (assay) C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Baseline, Week 52The pain VAS is a participant-administered single-item scale designed to measure current joint pain from Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using a 100-millimeter(mm) horizontal VAS. Overall severity of participant's joint pain from PsA is indicated by marking a vertical tick on the horizontal 100-mm scale, where the left end from 0 mm (no pain) to right end 100 mm (worst possible joint pain). LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityBaseline, Week 52The patient's overall assessment of his or her PsA activity was recorded using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityBaseline, Week 52The investigator was asked to give an overall assessment of the severity of the participant's current PsA activity using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline, Week 52CRP is the ACR Core Set laboratory measure of acute-phase reactant. It was measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of ixekizumab on the participant's PsA. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DIBaseline, Week 52HAQ-DI is a participant reported questionnaire that measures disease-associated disability (physical function). It consists of 24 questions with 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other daily activities. The disability section scores the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do), covering the 8 domains. The reported use of special aids or devices and/or the need for assistance of another person to perform these activities is assessed. The HAQ-DI is a composite ranging from 0-3 with lower scores indicating less functional disability. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Percentage of Participants Simultaneously Achieving ACR50 and PASI100Week 52ACR50 response is a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of VAS, Pts Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PatGA) VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA)VAS, participant assessment of physical function using the HAQ-DI, or High Sensitivity(assay) C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP). PASI is an index combining assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in head, trunk, arms, legs, and severity of desquamation, erythema and plaque thickness in each region, yielding overall score of 0-no involvement, to 72-most severe involvement. Participant achieving PASI100 were defined as having 100% improvement in the PASI score compared to baseline. Pts achieving PASI100 were defined as having 100% improvement in the PASI score compared to baseline. Pts with active plaque PsO with a BSA≥3% & PASI=0 at baseline were considered PASI100 responders if they had achieved PASI=0 & BSA=0 at week 52.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP)Baseline, Week 52The DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity in 28 joints that consists of a composite numerical score with the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, hs-CRP (measured in milligrams per liter), and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity recorded by participants on a 0 to 100 VAS. For DAS28-CRP, the Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC28) are a subset of TJC and SJC, and include 14 joints on each side of the body: 2 shoulders, 2 elbows, 2 wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. DAS28 values range from 0 to 9.4. Higher values indicate more severe symptoms and greater functional impairment. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)Week 52MDA is a composite of 7 key outcome measures: TJC ≤1; SJC ≤1; psoriasis activity and severity index (PASI total score) ≤1 or BSA ≤3; participant pain VAS score of ≤15; participant global disease activity VAS score of ≤20; HAQ-DI score ≤0.5; and tender entheseal points ≤1. Participants are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfill 5 of 7 outcome measures.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC)Week 52The PsARC is a composite criteria reported in terms of the percentage of participants achieving response according to the following criterion: TJC, SJC, PGA, and PatGA. Overall response is defined by improvement from baseline assessment in 2 of 4 criteria, 1 of which must be a joint count; there must not be worsening in any of the 4 criteria: at least 30% reduction in TJC, at least 30% reduction in SJC, at least a 20 millimeter (mm) reduction in PGA and at least a 20 mm reduction in PatGA.
Change From Baseline in Modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI) ScoreBaseline, Week 52The CPDAI is a validated instrument intended to assess composite psoriatic disease activity and response to therapy. Domains include peripheral arthritis as assessed by the number of tender and swollen joints and the HAQ-DI, skin as assessed by the PASI and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), enthesitis as assessed by the number of sites with enthesitis and the HAQ-DI, and dactylitis as assessed by the number of digits affected. Each domain with the exception of spinal disease is scored from 0-3. Individual domain scores are summed to give an overall composite score (range 0-12) with a higher score indicating higher disease activity. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineBaseline, Week 52The SPARCC enthesitis index evaluates tenderness in a total of 16 entheseal sites: the greater trochanter (right/left \[R/L\]), quadriceps tendon insertion into the patella (R/L), patellar ligament insertion into the patella and tibial tuberosity (R/L), Achilles tendon insertion (R/L), plantar fascia insertion (R/L), medial epicondyles of humerus (R/L),Lateral epicondyle humerus (R/L) and the supraspinatus insertion (R/L). Tenderness at each site is quantified on a dichotomous basis: 0 = nontender and 1 = tender. The results from each site are then added to produce a total score (range 0 to 16) with the Higher scores indicating more severe enthesitis. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineBaseline, Week 52The LEI was developed specifically for use in PsA. It measures enthesitis at 6 sites (lateral epicondyle of humerus, right/left (R/L); medial femoral condyle,(R/L); Achilles tendon insertion, (R/L)). Each site is assigned a score of 0 (absent) or 1 (present); the results from each site are then added to produce a total score (range 0 to 6) with the higher scores indicating more severe enthesitis. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in the Leeds Dactylitis Index-Basic (LDI-B) in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineBaseline, Week 52The LDI-B measures the severity of dactylitis.In each digit,the ratio of the circumference(cf) of the affected digit to the cf of the digit on the opposite hand or foot measured in mm. Each dactylitic digit is defined by a minimum increase of 10% in cf over the contra-lateral digit.If the same digits on each hand or foot were thought to be involved,the clinician referred to a table of normative values for a value which was used to provide the comparison.If the ratio is \>1.1,then subtract 1 from the calculated ratio and multiply it by 100 and the tenderness score of 0(not tender) or 1(tender).Otherwise,if the ratio of the cf of the digit is ≤1.1,then the LDI-B score is set to 0.LDI-B score can be \>=0 with higher numbers indicating worse dactylitis.LS mean was calculated using MMRM model: treatment group,concomitant csDMARD use at baseline,moderate-to-severe Ps involvement,visit as fixed factors,baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Body Surface Area (BSA)Baseline, Week 52The investigator evaluates the percentage involvement of psoriasis on each participant's BSA on a continuous scale from 0% = no involvement to 100% = full involvement, where 1% corresponded to the size of the participant's handprint including the palm, fingers, and thumb. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Fingernails Score in the Subgroup of Participants With Fingernail Involvement at BaselineBaseline, Week 52The NAPSI scale is used to evaluate the severity of fingernail bed Ps and fingernail matrix Ps by area of involvement. The fingernail is divided into quadrants. Each fingernail is given a score for fingernail bed Ps 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the fingernail) and fingernail matrix Ps 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the matrix), depending on the presence (score of 1) or absence (score of 0) of any of the features of fingernail bed or matrix Ps in each quadrant. The sum of all fingernails equals the total NAPSI score range is from 0 (no effect) to 80 (more severe psoriasis). LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in the Itch NRSBaseline, Week 52The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no itch and 10 representing worst itch imaginable. Overall severity of a participant's itching from psoriasis is indicated by circling the number that best described the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity NRS (Fatigue NRS) ScoreBaseline, Week 52The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (weariness, tiredness) by circling the 1 number that described their worst level of fatigue during the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS)Baseline, Week 52The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Baseline, Week 52The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in Measures of Health Utility (EuroQol-5 Dimensions 5 Level [EQ-5D 5L]) United Kingdom(UK) Population-Based Index ScoreBaseline, Week 52The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 components: a descriptive system of the respondent's health and a rating of his/her current health state. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The descriptive part is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.The EQ-5D-5L health states were converted into a single summary index by applying a crosswalk using a UK Population value set to each of the levels in each dimension.This produced participant-level index scores between -0.594 and 1.0 (worse to better health). LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group,concomitant csDMARD use at baseline,moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in Measures of Health Utility (EuroQol-5 Dimensions 5 Level [EQ-5D 5L]) VAS ScoreBaseline, Week 52EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status used to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 components: a descriptive system of the respondent's health and a rating of his/her current health state using a 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100mm VAS (best health you can imagine). LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 52The DLQI is a simple, participant-administered, 10 question, validated, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. The recall period of this scale is over the last week. Response categories include not at all, a lot, and very much, with corresponding scores of 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and unanswered (not relevant) responses scored as 0. Scores range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment), and a 4-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Percentage of Participants Answering Mostly Satisfied to Each Question in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)Week 52The TSQ is a clinician-administered questionnaire that provides an assessment of the patient's opinion of the effectiveness, safety, and overall satisfaction of the study medication. Participants were asked to respond to questionnaire items using a 4-point Likert scale (from mostly satisfied to mostly dissatisfied).
Number of Participants Who Answered Yes to Any 10 Questions in Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Week 52The C-SSRS is a scale that captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related ideations and behaviors during the assessment period. 1. Wish to be dead 2. Non-specific active suicidal thoughts 3. Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act 4. Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan 5. Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent 6. Preparatory acts or behavior 7. Aborted attempt 8. Interrupted attempt 9. Non-fatal suicide attempt 10. Completed suicide
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC)Baseline, Week 52TJC is the number of tender and painful joints determined for each participant by examination of 68 joints. Joints were assessed by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Participants were asked for pain sensations on these manipulations and watched for spontaneous pain reactions. Any positive response on pressure, movement, or both was translated into a single tender-versus-nontender dichotomy. Least Square(LS) Mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model that included treatment group, concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC)Baseline, Week 52SJC is the number of swollen joints determined for each participant by examination of 66 joints. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen. Swelling was defined as palpable fluctuating synovitis of the joint. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Per protocol and statistical analysis plan (SAP), the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

Pre-assignment details

Open-Label Treatment Period from Week 0 to Week 52 inclusive followed by Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period of up to a minimum of 12 weeks.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ixekizumab
160 milligrams (mg) ixekizumab (IXE) given subcutaneously (SC) at baseline for all participants. 80 mg ixekizumab given once every 2 weeks (Q2W) SC from week 2 to week 12 and once every 4 weeks (Q4W) thereafter for participants with moderate-to-severe plaque Ps. 80 mg ixekizumab given SC Q4W starting week 4 for participants not meeting criteria for moderate-to-severe plaque Ps.
283
Adalimumab
80 mg adalimumab (ADA) given SC at baseline followed by 40 mg Q2W given SC starting week 1 for participants with moderate-to-severe plaque Ps. 40 mg adalimumab given Q2W SC at baseline followed by 40 mg Q2W starting at Week 2 given SC for participants not meeting criteria for moderate-to-severe plaque Ps.
283
Total566

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Open-Label Treatment PeriodAdverse Event02
Open-Label Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy11
Open-Label Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up11
Open-Label Treatment PeriodPhysician Decision30
Open-Label Treatment PeriodProtocol Deviation12
Open-Label Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject1218
Post-Treatment Follow-Up PeriodAdverse Event13
Post-Treatment Follow-Up PeriodLost to Follow-up42
Post-Treatment Follow-Up PeriodPhysician Decision01
Post-Treatment Follow-Up PeriodWithdrawal by Subject2022

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIxekizumabAdalimumabTotal
Age, Continuous47.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.02
48.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.15
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
63 Participants65 Participants128 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
198 Participants194 Participants392 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
22 Participants24 Participants46 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
27 Participants27 Participants54 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
29 Participants33 Participants62 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants11 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
222 Participants211 Participants433 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
31 Participants27 Participants58 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
12 Participants5 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
9 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
18 Participants16 Participants34 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
15 Participants18 Participants33 Participants
Region of Enrollment
India
20 Participants26 Participants46 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
14 Participants14 Participants28 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
14 Participants25 Participants39 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
32 Participants33 Participants65 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
24 Participants29 Participants53 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
15 Participants21 Participants36 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
24 Participants18 Participants42 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
15 Participants11 Participants26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
13 Participants7 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
121 Participants133 Participants254 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
162 Participants150 Participants312 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2830 / 2830 / 2650 / 260
other
Total, other adverse events
65 / 28344 / 2838 / 2655 / 260
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 28335 / 2837 / 2654 / 260

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Simultaneously Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100 (PASI100)

ACR50 response is a ≥50% improvement from baseline for tender joint count(TJC)& swollen joint count (SJC)& in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's(pts) assessment of joint pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS),Pts Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PatGA)VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA)VAS, Pts assessment of physical function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index(HAQ-DI), or High Sensitivity(assay)C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP). PASI is an index combining assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in head, trunk, arms, legs, and severity of desquamation, erythema and plaque thickness in each region, yielding overall score of 0-no involvement, to 72-most severe involvement. Pts achieving PASI100 were defined as having 100% improvement in the PASI score compared to baseline. Pts with active plaque PsO with a BSA≥3% & PASI=0 at baseline were considered PASI100 responders if they had achieved PASI=0 & BSA=0 at week 24.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Simultaneously Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100 (PASI100)36 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Simultaneously Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100 (PASI100)27.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: After data lock and initial analysis run, a medical inconsistency in baseline PASI data was identified (PASI=0 but BSA≥3%). The scenario was not anticipated or described in protocol or SAP. The inconsistency was resolved using medical judgment. The impacted participants had met baseline criteria for active psoriasis. Therefore, in the primary analysis, participants with baseline PASI=0 \& BSA≥3% were considered PASI100 responders if, and only if, PASI=0 \& BSA=0 achieved at week 24.p-value: 0.03695% CI: [0.5, 15.8]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50

ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of joint pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PatGA) VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) VAS, participant's assessment of physical function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), or High Sensitivity (assay) C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR5050.5 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR5046.6 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-4.3, 12.1]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI100

PASI is an index combining assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in head, trunk, arms, legs, and severity of desquamation, erythema and plaque thickness in each region, yielding overall score of 0-no involvement, to 72-most severe involvement. Participants achieving PASI100 were defined as having 100% improvement in the PASI score compared to baseline. Any participants with active plaque psoriasis (PsO) with a BSA ≥3% and PASI = 0 at baseline were considered PASI100 responders if & only if they had achieved PASI=0 & BSA=0 at week 24.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving PASI10060.1 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving PASI10046.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: After data lock and initial analysis run, a medical inconsistency in baseline PASI data was identified (PASI=0 but BSA≥3%). The scenario was not anticipated or described in protocol or SAP. The inconsistency was resolved using medical judgment. The impacted participants had met baseline criteria for active psoriasis. Therefore, in the primary analysis, participants with baseline PASI=0 \& BSA≥3% were considered PASI100 responders if, and only if, PASI=0 \& BSA=0 achieved at week 24.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [5.3, 21.6]Regression, Logistic
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

CRP is the ACR Core Set laboratory measure of acute-phase reactant. It was measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of ixekizumab on the participant's PsA. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline CRP value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-5.68 Milligram per Liter (mg/L)Standard Error 0.462
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-6.01 Milligram per Liter (mg/L)Standard Error 0.461
p-value: 0.59295% CI: [-0.86, 1.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score

The DLQI is a simple, participant-administered, 10 question, validated, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. The recall period of this scale is over the last week. Response categories include not at all, a lot, and very much, with corresponding scores of 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and unanswered (not relevant) responses scored as 0. Scores range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment), and a 4-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline DLQI value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score-8.03 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.273
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score-6.91 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.272
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.78, -0.46]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP)

The DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity in 28 joints that consists of a composite numerical score with the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, hs-CRP (measured in milligrams per liter), and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity recorded by participants on a 0 to 100 VAS. For DAS28-CRP, the Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC28) are a subset of TJC and SJC, and include 14 joints on each side of the body: 2 shoulders, 2 elbows, 2 wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. DAS28 values range from 0 to 9.4. Higher values indicate more severe symptoms and greater functional impairment. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline DAS28-CRP value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP)-2.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP)-2.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
p-value: 0.36895% CI: [-0.26, 0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity NRS (Fatigue NRS) Score

The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (weariness, tiredness) by circling the 1 number that described their worst level of fatigue during the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline Fatigue NRS value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Fatigue Severity NRS (Fatigue NRS) Score-3.03 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.161
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Fatigue Severity NRS (Fatigue NRS) Score-2.95 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.161
p-value: 0.71195% CI: [-0.49, 0.33]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI

HAQ-DI is a participant reported questionnaire that measures disease-associated disability (physical function). It consists of 24 questions with 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other daily activities. The disability section scores the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do), covering the 8 domains. The reported use of special aids or devices and/or the need for assistance of another person to perform these activities is assessed. The HAQ-DI is a composite ranging from 0-3 with lower scores indicating less functional disability. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline HAQ-DI value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in HAQ-DI-0.68 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.035
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in HAQ-DI-0.62 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.035
p-value: 0.17695% CI: [-0.15, 0.03]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Measures of Health Utility (EuroQol-5 Dimensions 5 Level [EQ-5D 5L]) United Kingdom(UK) Population-Based Index Score

The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 components: a descriptive system of the respondent's health and a rating of his/her current health state. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The descriptive part is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.The EQ-5D-5L health states were converted into a single summary index by applying a crosswalk using a UK Population value set to each of the levels in each dimension.This produced participant-level index scores between -0.594 and 1.0 (worse to better health). LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group,concomitant csDMARD use at baseline,moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline EQ-5D 5L value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Measures of Health Utility (EuroQol-5 Dimensions 5 Level [EQ-5D 5L]) United Kingdom(UK) Population-Based Index Score0.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.013
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Measures of Health Utility (EuroQol-5 Dimensions 5 Level [EQ-5D 5L]) United Kingdom(UK) Population-Based Index Score0.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.013
p-value: 0.97995% CI: [-0.03, 0.03]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Measures of Health Utility (EuroQol-5 Dimensions 5 Level [EQ-5D 5L]) VAS Score

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status used to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 components: a descriptive system of the respondent's health and a rating of his/her current health state using a 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100mm VAS (best health you can imagine). LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline EQ-5D 5L value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Measures of Health Utility (EuroQol-5 Dimensions 5 Level [EQ-5D 5L]) VAS Score22.26 millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.37
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Measures of Health Utility (EuroQol-5 Dimensions 5 Level [EQ-5D 5L]) VAS Score17.48 millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.36
p-value: 0.00895% CI: [1.28, 8.28]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS)

The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline PCS value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS)10.07 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.526
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS)9.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.524
p-value: 0.43995% CI: [-0.8, 1.85]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI) Score

The CPDAI is a validated instrument intended to assess composite psoriatic disease activity and response to therapy. Domains include peripheral arthritis as assessed by the number of tender and swollen joints and the HAQ-DI, skin as assessed by the PASI and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), enthesitis as assessed by the number of sites with enthesitis and the HAQ-DI, and dactylitis as assessed by the number of digits affected. Each domain with the exception of spinal disease is scored from 0-3. Individual domain scores are summed to give an overall composite score (range 0-12) with a higher score indicating higher disease activity. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline CPDAI value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI) Score-4.35 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.136
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI) Score-3.85 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.136
p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-0.83, -0.16]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS)

The pain VAS is a participant-administered single-item scale designed to measure current joint pain from Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using a 100-millimeter(mm) horizontal VAS. Overall severity of participant's joint pain from PsA is indicated by marking a vertical tick on the horizontal 100-mm scale, where the left end from 0 mm (no pain) to right end 100 mm (worst possible joint pain). LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline VAS value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS)-37.21 millimeters (mm)Standard Error 1.623
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS)-36.54 millimeters (mm)Standard Error 1.621
p-value: 0.75295% CI: [-4.8, 3.47]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity

The patient's overall assessment of his or her PsA activity was recorded using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline VAS value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-40.61 Millimeter (mm)Standard Error 1.594
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-37.82 Millimeter (mm)Standard Error 1.596
p-value: 0.17795% CI: [-6.83, 1.26]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity

The investigator was asked to give an overall assessment of the severity of the participant's current PsA activity using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline VAS value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-48.15 Millimeter (mm)Standard Error 1.113
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-46.79 Millimeter (mm)Standard Error 1.097
p-value: 0.33295% CI: [-4.08, 1.38]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Body Surface Area (BSA)

The investigator evaluates the percentage involvement of psoriasis on each participant's BSA on a continuous scale from 0% = no involvement to 100% = full involvement, where 1% corresponded to the size of the participant's handprint including the palm, fingers, and thumb. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline BSA value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Body Surface Area (BSA)-12.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.623
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Body Surface Area (BSA)-10.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.613
p-value: 0.05295% CI: [-3.09, 0.02]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)

The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline MCS value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)5.23 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)4.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.656
p-value: 0.59495% CI: [-1.23, 2.15]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC)

SJC is the number of swollen joints determined for each participant by examination of 66 joints. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen. Swelling was defined as palpable fluctuating synovitis of the joint. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline SJC value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC)-9.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.196
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC)-9.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.198
p-value: 0.82395% CI: [-0.54, 0.43]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC)

TJC is the number of tender and painful joints determined for each participant by examination of 68 joints. Joints were assessed by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Participants were asked for pain sensations on these manipulations and watched for spontaneous pain reactions. Any positive response on pressure, movement, or both was translated into a single tender-versus-nontender dichotomy. Least Square(LS) Mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model that included treatment group, concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline TJC value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC)-15.91 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.566
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC)-14.88 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.569
p-value: 0.15595% CI: [-2.46, 0.39]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in the Itch NRS

The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no itch and 10 representing worst itch imaginable. Overall severity of a participant's itching from psoriasis is indicated by circling the number that best described the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline NRS value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Itch NRS-3.83 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.159
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Itch NRS-3.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.159
p-value: 0.15895% CI: [-0.68, 0.11]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in the Leeds Dactylitis Index-Basic (LDI-B) in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline

The LDI-B measures the severity of dactylitis.In each digit,the ratio of the circumference(cf) of the affected digit to the cf of the digit on the opposite hand or foot measured in mm. Each dactylitic digit is defined by a minimum increase of 10% in cf over the contra-lateral digit.If the same digits on each hand or foot were thought to be involved,the clinician referred to a table of normative values for a value which was used to provide the comparison.If the ratio is \>1.1,then subtract 1 from the calculated ratio and multiply it by 100 and the tenderness score of 0(not tender) or 1(tender).Otherwise,if the ratio of the cf of the digit is ≤1.1,then the LDI-B score is set to 0.LDI-B score can be \>=0 with higher numbers indicating worse dactylitis.LS mean was calculated using MMRM model: treatment group,concomitant csDMARD use at baseline,moderate-to-severe Ps involvement,visit as fixed factors,baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline dactylitis (LDI-B \>0). Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Leeds Dactylitis Index-Basic (LDI-B) in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline-52.28 score on a scaleStandard Error 11.495
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Leeds Dactylitis Index-Basic (LDI-B) in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline-48.89 score on a scaleStandard Error 9.855
p-value: 0.8295% CI: [-32.78, 25.99]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline

The LEI was developed specifically for use in PsA. It measures enthesitis at 6 sites (lateral epicondyle of humerus, right/left (R/L); medial femoral condyle,(R/L); Achilles tendon insertion, (R/L)). Each site is assigned a score of 0 (absent) or 1 (present); the results from each site are then added to produce a total score (range 0 to 6) with the higher scores indicating more severe enthesitis. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline enthesitis (LEI \>0). Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline-1.93 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.113
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline-2.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.116
p-value: 0.50795% CI: [-0.19, 0.38]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Fingernails Score in the Subgroup of Participants With Fingernail Involvement at Baseline

The NAPSI scale is used to evaluate the severity of fingernail bed Ps and fingernail matrix Ps by area of involvement. The fingernail is divided into quadrants. Each fingernail is given a score for fingernail bed Ps 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the fingernail) and fingernail matrix Ps 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the matrix), depending on the presence (score of 1) or absence (score of 0) of any of the features of fingernail bed or matrix Ps in each quadrant. The sum of all fingernails equals the total NAPSI score range is from 0 (no effect) to 80 (more severe psoriasis). LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline fingernail involvement (NAPSI \>0). Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Fingernails Score in the Subgroup of Participants With Fingernail Involvement at Baseline-17.78 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.731
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Fingernails Score in the Subgroup of Participants With Fingernail Involvement at Baseline-15.08 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.742
p-value: 0.00595% CI: [-4.57, -0.84]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline

The SPARCC enthesitis index evaluates tenderness in a total of 16 entheseal sites: the greater trochanter (right/left \[R/L\]), quadriceps tendon insertion into the patella (R/L), patellar ligament insertion into the patella and tibial tuberosity (R/L), Achilles tendon insertion (R/L), plantar fascia insertion (R/L), medial epicondyles of humerus (R/L),Lateral epicondyle humerus (R/L) and the supraspinatus insertion (R/L). Tenderness at each site is quantified on a dichotomous basis: 0 = nontender and 1 = tender. The results from each site are then added to produce a total score (range 0 to 16) with the Higher scores indicating more severe enthesitis. LS mean was calculated using MMRM model that included treatment group, concomitant csDMARD use at baseline, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis involvement, visit as fixed factors, baseline value as covariate and baseline-by-visit and treatment-by-visit interactions terms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline SPARCC score \> 0. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IxekizumabChange From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline-3.93 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.234
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline-4.06 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.241
p-value: 0.68795% CI: [-0.48, 0.72]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Who Answered Yes to Any 10 Questions in Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

The C-SSRS is a scale that captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related ideations and behaviors during the assessment period. 1. Wish to be dead 2. Non-specific active suicidal thoughts 3. Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act 4. Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan 5. Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent 6. Preparatory acts or behavior 7. Aborted attempt 8. Interrupted attempt 9. Non-fatal suicide attempt 10. Completed suicide

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All randomized participants. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IxekizumabNumber of Participants Who Answered Yes to Any 10 Questions in Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)9 Participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants Who Answered Yes to Any 10 Questions in Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)7 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)

MDA is a composite of 7 key outcome measures: TJC ≤1; SJC ≤1; psoriasis activity and severity index (PASI total score) ≤1 or BSA ≤3; participant pain VAS score of ≤15; participant global disease activity VAS score of ≤20; HAQ-DI score ≤0.5; and tender entheseal points ≤1. Participants are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfill 5 of 7 outcome measures.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline MDA value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)MDA-6 Entheseal Points48.1 percentage of participants
IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)MDA-18 Entheseal Points47.3 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)MDA-6 Entheseal Points42.8 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)MDA-18 Entheseal Points41.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: MDA-18 Entheseal Pointsp-value: 0.10895% CI: [-1.8, 14.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: MDA-6 Entheseal Pointsp-value: 0.17995% CI: [-2.9, 13.5]Regression, Logistic
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC)

The PsARC is a composite criteria reported in terms of the percentage of participants achieving response according to the following criterion: TJC, SJC, PGA, and PatGA. Overall response is defined by improvement from baseline assessment in 2 of 4 criteria, 1 of which must be a joint count; there must not be worsening in any of the 4 criteria: at least 30% reduction in TJC, at least 30% reduction in SJC, at least a 20 millimeter (mm) reduction in PGA and at least a 20 mm reduction in PatGA.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline PsARC value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC)66.8 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC)65.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.84695% CI: [-8.9, 6.7]Regression, Logistic
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants Answering Mostly Satisfied to Each Question in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)

The TSQ is a clinician-administered questionnaire that provides an assessment of the patient's opinion of the effectiveness, safety, and overall satisfaction of the study medication. Participants were asked to respond to questionnaire items using a 4-point Likert scale (from mostly satisfied to mostly dissatisfied).

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline TSQ value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Answering Mostly Satisfied to Each Question in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)Effectiveness over Time of Medication62.9 percentage of participants
IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Answering Mostly Satisfied to Each Question in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)Overall Satisfaction with Medication64.0 percentage of participants
IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Answering Mostly Satisfied to Each Question in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)Long Term Safety of Medication63.3 percentage of participants
IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Answering Mostly Satisfied to Each Question in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)Mostly Satisfied to any Questions70.0 percentage of participants
IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Answering Mostly Satisfied to Each Question in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)Effectiveness of Medication64.3 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Answering Mostly Satisfied to Each Question in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)Mostly Satisfied to any Questions67.8 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Answering Mostly Satisfied to Each Question in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)Effectiveness of Medication58.7 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Answering Mostly Satisfied to Each Question in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)Effectiveness over Time of Medication56.2 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Answering Mostly Satisfied to Each Question in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)Long Term Safety of Medication58.7 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Answering Mostly Satisfied to Each Question in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)Overall Satisfaction with Medication59.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Effectiveness of Medicationp-value: 0.16595% CI: [-2.4, 13.7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Effectiveness over Time of Medicationp-value: 0.09895% CI: [-1.4, 14.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Long Term Safety of Medicationp-value: 0.24195% CI: [-3.4, 12.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Overall Satisfaction with Medicationp-value: 0.21595% CI: [-3.1, 13]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Mostly Satisfied to any Questionsp-value: 0.56195% CI: [-5.5, 9.7]Regression, Logistic
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants Simultaneously Achieving ACR50 and PASI100

ACR50 response is a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of VAS, Pts Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PatGA) VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA)VAS, participant assessment of physical function using the HAQ-DI, or High Sensitivity(assay) C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP). PASI is an index combining assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in head, trunk, arms, legs, and severity of desquamation, erythema and plaque thickness in each region, yielding overall score of 0-no involvement, to 72-most severe involvement. Participant achieving PASI100 were defined as having 100% improvement in the PASI score compared to baseline. Pts achieving PASI100 were defined as having 100% improvement in the PASI score compared to baseline. Pts with active plaque PsO with a BSA≥3% & PASI=0 at baseline were considered PASI100 responders if they had achieved PASI=0 & BSA=0 at week 52.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline ACR50 and PASI100 value. Per protocol and statistical analysis plan, the primary and secondary analysis were performed to compare all ixekizumab participants together versus all adalimumab participants together.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IxekizumabPercentage of Participants Simultaneously Achieving ACR50 and PASI10039.2 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Simultaneously Achieving ACR50 and PASI10026.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: After data lock and initial analysis run, a medical inconsistency in baseline PASI data was identified (PASI=0 but BSA≥3%). The scenario was not anticipated or described in protocol or SAP. The inconsistency was resolved using medical judgment. The impacted participants had met baseline criteria for active psoriasis. Therefore, in the primary analysis, participants with baseline PASI=0 \& BSA≥3% were considered PASI100 responders if, and only if, PASI=0 \& BSA=0 achieved at week 52.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [5.4, 20.7]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026