Skip to content

SGLT-2 Inhibitor and Myocardial Perfusion, Function and Metabolism in T2 DM Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk

Effects of SGLT-2 Inhibitor on Myocardial Perfusion, Function and Metabolism in Type 2 DM Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk: The SIMPle Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03151343
Acronym
SIMPLE
Enrollment
92
Registered
2017-05-12
Start date
2017-03-29
Completion date
2020-05-22
Last updated
2022-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type2 Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2 DM) have a markedly increased risk of heart disease and it is estimated that, in the danish population, up 80% percent of patients with type 2 diabetes die from heart disease. The sodium glucose cotransport-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors were developed as an anti-diabetic therapy reducing blood glucose and weight by decreasing glucose reabsorption in the kidneys, leading to glucose excretion via the urine. However, in 2015 the EMPA-REG study showed that treatment with the SGLT-2 inhibitor empagliflozin significantly reduced the cardiovascular mortality and risk of admission under the diagnosis of heart failure in a population of patients with type 2 diabetes in addition to other risk factors for heart disease. The mechanism behind this surprising result is unknown and warrants further study. The primary hypothesis of the present study is that treatment with empagliflozin improves the function and blood supply of the heart muscle cells in patients with type 2 diabetes and high risk of heart disease. The investigators will test this hypothesis by enrolling 92 participants with type 2 diabetes and other risk factors for heart disease, and treating them with either empagliflozin or a placebo. During the study period the investigators will monitor the effects of the treatment with various techniques such as heart scans using CT and ultrasound, measurements of the fluid pressures in the heart chambers, body composition measurements and a variety of relevant blood test.

Interventions

DRUGEmpagliflozin

Empagliflozin tablet

DRUGPlacebo Oral Tablet

Sugar pill, visually identical to active comparator

Sponsors

Danish Heart Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Caroline M Kistorp
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Participants will be treated with either empagliflozin or placebo

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus at least 3 months prior to baseline visit * For patients on background therapy: stable dose of anti-diabetics within 30 days prior to baseline * HbA1c of ≥6.5% and ≤10% at screening for patients on background therapy or HbA1c of ≥6.5 % and ≤ 9.0% at screening for drug-naïve patients. * BMI ≤ 45 kg/m2 at screening * Age ≥18 years * Negative pregnancy test (fertile women). Fertile women must use safe contraceptives (spiral, hormonal contraceptives) for the duration of the study * Able to understand the written patient information and to give informed consent * Patients must have high cardiovascular risk, defined as at least one of the following: * Albuminuria ( albumin/creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/g or plasma NT-proBNP ≥ 70 pg/ml) * Confirmed history of myocardial infarction (\>2 months prior to baseline) * Heart failure according to the Framingham Heart Failure Criteria * Or patient discharged from hospital with a documented diagnosis of unstable angina within 12 months prior to baseline * Evidence of coronary artery disease by CAG in 1 or more major coronary arteries OR at least one of the following: a positive noninvasive stress test, or A positive stress echocardiography showing regional systolic wall motion abnormalities, or A positive scintigraphic test showing stress-induced ischemia, * History of ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke (\>2 months prior to informed consent) * Presence of peripheral artery disease (symptomatic or not ) documented by either: previous limb angioplasty, stenting or bypass surgery; or previous limb or foot amputation due to circulatory insufficiency; or angiographic evidence of significant (\> 50%) peripheral artery stenosis in at least one limb; or evidence from a non-invasive measurement of significant (\>50% or as reported as hemodynamically significant) peripheral artery stenosis in at least one limb; or ankle brachial index of \< 0.9

Exclusion criteria

* Allergic to the study medication * Treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitor within 3 months prior to baseline * Impaired kidney function, eGFR ≤ 30 ml/min * Severe liver insufficiency (Child-Pugh class C) * ECG showing malign ventricular arrhythmia or prolonged QT-interval (\>500ms) * Untreated clinical significant heart valve disease * Planned cardiac surgery or angioplasty within 3 months. * Myocardial infarction (MI) ≤ 30 days prior to baseline * Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ≤ 4 weeks prior to baseline * History of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) ≤ 8 weeks prior to enrollment * Prior history of heart transplantation * Unstable angina, known severe left main coronary artery stenosis, severe heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmias, symptomatic hypotension or severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure \< 90 or \> 180 mmHg, respectively), sick sinus syndrome or \> 1st degree atrioventricular block in the absence of a functioning pacemaker * Requirement of emergent cardiac medical intervention or catheterization * Treatment with theophylline, or theophylline containing medications * History of known or suspected bronchoconstrictive or bronchospastic lung disease (e.g., asthma) * Pregnancy or desire hereof or breastfeeding. Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rb-82 PET13 weeksBetween group difference in the change in myocardial flow reserve (MFR) by Rb-82 PET. Measured as change in global perfusion from rest to adenosine-induced stress.
Invasive hemodynamics13 weeksSubstudy, performed on 38 participants from the main group. Using right heart catheterisation to measure between group difference in the change in pulmonary capillary weight pressure (PCWP) at 25 watts (supine bicycle ergometer)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
U-alb/crea13 weeksBetween group difference in the change urinary albumin/creatinine ratio
24 hour BP13 weeksBetween group difference in the change in 24 hour BP
Pulse wave analysis13 weeksBetween group difference in the change in pulse wave analysis
Insulin resistance13 weeksBetween group difference in the changes in insulin resistance by Matsuda index
Biomarkers13 weeksBetween group difference in the change in NT-proBNP, MR-proANP, MR-proADM, GAL-3, hsTNT, GDF-15, PIGF, sFlt-1, FFA, ADPN, leptin, TNF-α, IL-6, MCP-1, MAC-1, COLL-A1, FGF-21, beta-hydroxybutyrate, AGEs CML, sRAGE
Echocardiography13 weeksBetween group difference in the change in global left ventricular function assessed by echocardiography
Questionnaires, continued13 weeksBetween group difference in the change in Health status, assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire
DEXA13 weeksBetween group difference in the change in body composition by DEXA scan
Invasive hemodynamics - continued13 weeksBetween group difference in the change in CO at rest, 25 watts and peak exercise
Adipose tissue13 weeksBetween group difference in the changes in levels of adipocyte differentiation
Daily activity13 weeksBetween group difference in the change in daily activity levels measured by patient-worn accelerometers.
Questionnaires13 weeksBetween group difference in the change in Health status, assessed by the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
GFR13 weeksBetween group difference in the change in renal function assessed by Cr-51 EDTA

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026