Skip to content

Clinical Effects in Cervical Spinal Mobilization and Oscillation Mobilization in Neck Pain

Clinical Effects in Cervical Spinal Mobilization Versus Resonant Oscillation Mobilization (POLD) in Neck Pain. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03149614
Enrollment
50
Registered
2017-05-11
Start date
2017-05-10
Completion date
2018-10-25
Last updated
2018-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Manual Therapy, Neck Pain

Keywords

mobilization, resonant oscillation

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effects of spinal mobilization versus vertebral resonant oscillation (POLD) in patients with bilateral mechanical neck pain on pain sensitivity and neck pain intensity.

Detailed description

The clinical practice guidelines for manual therapy management the neck pain including the spine mobilization. The vertebral resonant oscillation using the POLD method is similar to spine mobilizations, but there are some differens; the oscillatory movement has a sinusoidal waveform, the frequency used between 1.2 and 2 Hz and the amplitude is similar to neutral zone to described by Panjabi 1992. The spinal mobilizations has a posterior-anterior vertebral movement for spinous process, described by Maitland 2000.

Interventions

Patients receive spinal mobilizations in grades II to III of central posterior-anterior from cervical and thoracic spine as described Maitland in 2000

OTHERVertebral Resonant Oscillation

The vertebral resonant oscillation using the POLD method is similar to spine mobilizations, but there are some differens ; the oscillatory movement has a sinusoidal waveform, the frequency used between 1.2 and 2 Hz and the amplitude is similar to neutral zone to described by Panjabi 1992.

Sponsors

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* neck pain symptoms of mechanical nature * age from 18 to 60 years * bilateral symptoms * symptoms for at least 3 month of duration

Exclusion criteria

* whiplash injury * previous spine surgery * diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy * having undergone any physical therapy intervention in the previous 6 month * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in pain intensity before and after the interventionBaseline, one week after the last session, 1 months and 3 months after the last session.A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of neck pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in disability before and after the interventionBaseline, one week after the last session, 1 months and 3 months after the last session.Neck Pain Disability Index (NDI)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026