Skip to content

Effects of Local Treatment With and Without Sensorimotor and Balance Exercises in Neck Pain

Effects of Local Neck Treatment With and Without Tailored Sensorimotor Control and Balance Exercises for Individuals With Chronic Neck Pain: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03149302
Enrollment
168
Registered
2017-05-11
Start date
2018-11-01
Completion date
2021-12-24
Last updated
2022-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Keywords

Manual therapy, Sensorimotor exercises, Balance exercises, Cervical mobilization, Specific neck muscle exercises

Brief summary

The sensorimotor disturbance and postural instability have been demonstrated to be associated with neck pain. Specific therapeutic exercise and manual therapy for the cervical spine are effective interventions for improving dizziness symptoms, neck impairments, functional ability and quality of life. However, the effects of these interventions on the actual impairment of joint position sense and balance remain uncertain. Adaptive changes in the sensorimotor and postural control systems may need to be specifically addressed.

Detailed description

The sensorimotor (joint position sense and oculomotor control) and postural stability (balance) disturbances have been demonstrated to be associated with neck pain. Specific therapeutic exercise directed to neuromuscular impairments and manual therapy for the cervical spine are effective interventions for improving dizziness symptoms, neck impairments, functional ability and quality of life. However, the effects of these interventions on the actual impairment of joint position sense and balance remain uncertain. Adaptive changes in the sensorimotor and postural control systems may need to be specifically addressed. Currently, it is not known whether the clinician has to train every impairment or can choose between sensorimotor training and balance training in the rehabilitation of neck pain. Different training approaches may have specific influences on the different outcomes and their outcomes will be important to inform the optimal and efficient management of persons with chronic neck pain.

Interventions

OTHERLocal neck treatment (LNT)

The local neck treatment consists of cervical mobilization and specific therapeutic exercises (30 minutes). The participants will attend 12 individual treatment sessions (2 visits per week for 6 weeks).

OTHERLNT plus sensorimotor exercises

The local neck treatment (30 minutes) plus the sensorimotor exercise program (15 minutes). The sensorimotor exercises include cervical joint position sense and oculomotor training. The participants will attend 12 individual treatment sessions (2 visits per week for 6 weeks).

OTHERLNT plus balance exercises

The local neck treatment (30 minutes) plus the balance exercise program (15 minutes).The balance program includes with static balance and progress to dynamic balance and gait. The participants will attend 12 individual treatment sessions (2 visits per week for 6 weeks).

OTHERLNT plus sensorimotor/balance exercises

The local neck treatment (30 minutes) plus the sensorimotor exercise program (15 minutes) and the balance exercises (15 minutes). The participants will attend 12 individual treatment sessions (2 visits per week for 6 weeks).

Sponsors

The University of Queensland
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland
CollaboratorOTHER
Chiang Mai University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

a 2 x 2 factorial blinded design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* insidious neck pain for at least 3 months * an average neck pain intensity over the past week ≥ 30 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) * a score of neck pain and disability ≥ 10/ 100 on the Neck Disability Index-Thai version * an absolute error of cervical joint position error \> 4.5° * an inability to stand in tandem stance with eyes closed for 30 seconds * cervical segmental joint dysfunction (pain provoked \>2/10 with abnormal tissue resistance)

Exclusion criteria

* a previous history of neck and head injury or surgery * known or suspected vestibular pathology * vertigo or dizziness caused by underlying pathology in the ear, brain, or sensory nerve pathways (e.g. benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and BPPV) * vascular disorders (e.g. a migraine and hypertension) * any musculoskeletal or neurological conditions that could affect a balance * inflammatory joint disease * systemic conditions * cognitive impairment * taking four or more medications * received physiotherapy treatment for their neck disorder in the past 12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postural sway areaChange from baseline at immediate, and 3, 6, 12 months follow-upsThe sway area during narrow stance on firm and soft surfaces with eyes open and eyes closed and during neck torsion maneuver (head turned 45 degrees to the left and right) on firm and soft surfaces, using a swaymeter device.
Postural sway displacementChange from baseline at immediate, and 3, 6, 12 months follow-upsThe sway displacement during narrow stance on firm and soft surfaces with eyes open and eyes closed and during neck torsion maneuver (head turned 45 degrees to the left and right) on firm and soft surfaces, using a swaymeter device.
Cervical joint position errorChange from baseline at immediate, and 3, 6, 12 months follow-upsThe ability to perform an active movement (extension and rotation to the left and right) and return to the starting head position as accurately as possible, using a target on the wall and a laser-pointer attached to a lightweight headband.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neck pain disabilityChange from baseline at immediate, and 3, 6, 12 months follow-upsHow neck pain affects a patient's daily life and to assess the self-rated disability, using NDI.
Pain extentChange from baseline at immediate, and 3, 6, 12 months follow-upsPain extent using a digital device (iPad Air 2) and sketching software (SketchBook Pro).
Pain locationChange from baseline at immediate, and 3, 6, 12 months follow-upsPain location using a digital device (iPad Air 2) and sketching software (SketchBook Pro).
Gait speedChange from baseline at immediate, and 3, 6, 12 months follow-upsWalk barefoot over 10 meters at a comfortable speed and then with head turns from side to side.
Functional ability statusChange from baseline at immediate, and 3, 6, 12 months follow-upsParticipants' functional status using the patient-specific functional scale (PSFS).
Health-related qualityChange from baseline at immediate, and 3, 6, 12 months follow-upsParticipants' health-related quality of life, using Short Form-36.
Global perceived benefit of treatmentChange from baseline at immediate, and 3, 6, 12 months follow-upsParticipant rated perceived benefit of treatment, using a six-point ordinal Likert scale.
Cervical range of motionChange from baseline at immediate, and 3, 6, 12 months follow-upsCervical range of motion in flexion, extension, left-right lateral flexion and left-right rotation, using CROM.
Dizziness intensityChange from baseline at immediate, and 3, 6, 12 months follow-upsan average dizziness intensity over the past week on VAS 0-10
Neck pain intensityChange from baseline at immediate, and 3, 6, 12 months follow-upsan average intensity of neck pain experienced in the past week on VAS 0-10.

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026