Skip to content

A Study of Talazoparib in Men With DNA Repair Defects and Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

TALAPRO-1: A PHASE 2, OPEN-LABEL, RESPONSE RATE STUDY OF TALAZOPARIB IN MEN WITH DNA REPAIR DEFECTS AND METASTATIC CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER WHO PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED TAXANE-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY AND PROGRESSED ON AT LEAST 1 NOVEL HORMONAL AGENT (ENZALUTAMIDE AND/OR ABIRATERONE ACETATE/PREDNISONE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03148795
Enrollment
128
Registered
2017-05-11
Start date
2017-07-04
Completion date
2023-03-31
Last updated
2024-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this international, phase 2, open-label, response rate study of talazoparib is to assess the efficacy and safety of talazoparib in men with DNA repair defects metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who previously received taxane-based chemotherapy and progressed on at least 1 novel hormonal agent (enzalutamide and/or abiraterone acetate/prednisone).

Interventions

DRUGTalazoparib

1 mg daily

Sponsors

Medivation, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. At least 18 years of age. 2. Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate without signet cell, or small cell features. 3. Patients must have measurable soft tissue disease per RECIST 1.1 4. DNA damage repair deficiency as assessed centrally by a gene mutation biomarker panel (testing of de novo or archival tumor tissue (via central laboratory) or prior historical testing (with Sponsor approval) using the Foundation Medicine, FoundationOne CDx™ NGS gene panel test. 5. Consent to a saliva sample collection for a germline comparator, unless prohibited by local regulations or ethics committee (EC) decision. 6. Serum testosterone ≤ 1.73 nmol/L (50 ng/dL) at screening. 7. Bilateral orchiectomy or ongoing androgen deprivation therapy with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist/antagonist (surgical or medical castration). 8. Progressive disease at study entry defined as 1 or more of the following 3 criteria: * A minimum of 3 rising PSA values with an interval of at least 1 week between determinations. The screening central laboratory PSA value must be ≥ 2 μg/L (2 ng/mL) if qualifying solely by PSA progression. * Soft tissue disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1. * Bone disease progression defined by PCWG3 with 2 or more new metastatic lesions on bone scan. 9. Metastatic disease. 10. Previous treatment with 1 or 2 chemotherapy regimens including at least 1 taxane-based regimen for metastatic (non castrate or castrate) prostate cancer. Patients may have received radium-223 and/or cabazitaxel, or were deemed unsuitable, declined, or did not have access to these therapies. 11. Documented disease progression (either radiographic or biochemical) on at least 1 novel hormonal therapy (enzalutamide and/or abiraterone acetate/prednisone) for the treatment of metastatic CRPC, irrespective of prior NHT treatment for non castrate prostate cancer or nonmetastatic (M0) CRPC. 12. Bisphosphonate or denosumab dosage must have been stable for at least 4 weeks before day 1 for patients receiving these therapies. 13. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2. 14. Estimated life expectancy of ≥ 6 months as assessed by the investigator. 15. Able to swallow the study drug, have no known intolerance to study drugs or excipients, and comply with study requirements. 16. Must use a condom when having sex from the time of the first dose of study drug through 4 months after last dose of study drug. A highly effective form of contraception must be used from the time of the first dose of study drug through 4 months after last dose of study drug when having sex with a non pregnant female partner of childbearing potential. 17. Must agree not to donate sperm from the first dose of study drug to 4 months after the last dose of study drug. 18. Patients must be willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

1. 1\. Use of systemic chemotherapeutic (including but not limited to taxanes), hormonal, biologic, or radionuclide therapy for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (other than approved bone targeting agents and GnRH agonist/antagonist) or any other investigational agent within 4 weeks before day 1. 2. Prior treatment with a PARP inhibitor, cyclophosphamide, or mitoxantrone chemotherapy. Patients who discontinued prior platinum based chemotherapy \<=6 months prior to screening or whose disease previously progressed on platinum based therapy at any time in the past are also excluded. 3. Treatment with any concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy or investigational drug(s) within 4 weeks or 5 half lives of the drug (whichever is longer) before Day 1 and/or during study participation 4. Radiation therapy within 3 weeks (within 2 weeks, if single fraction of radiotherapy) before day 1. 5. Major surgery within 2 weeks before day 1. 6. Clinically significant cardiovascular disease. 7. Significant renal, hepatic, or bone marrow organ dysfunction. 8. Known or suspected brain metastasis or active leptomeningeal disease. 9. Symptomatic or impending spinal cord compression or cauda equina syndrome. 10. Prior diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia 11. History of another cancer within 3 years before enrollment with the exception of nonmelanoma skin cancers, or American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 0 or stage 1 cancer that has a remote probability of recurrence in the opinion of the investigator and the sponsor. 12. Gastrointestinal disorder affecting absorption. 13. Current or anticipated use within 7 days prior to first dose of study drug or anticipated use during the study of the following P gp inhibitors (amiodarone, carvedilol, clarithromycin, cobicistat, darunavir, dronedarone, erythromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, ketoconazole, lapatinib, lopinavir, propafenone, quinidine, ranolazine, ritonavir, saquinavir, telaprevir, tipranavir, verapamil, and valspodar). 14. Any other acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition (concurrent disease, infection, or comorbidity) that interferes with ability to participate in the study, causes undue risk, or complicates the interpretation of data, in the opinion of the investigator or sponsor, including recent (within the past year) or active suicidal ideation or behavior or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study. 15. Investigator site staff members directly involved in the conduct of the study and their family members, site staff members otherwise supervised by the investigator, or patients who are Pfizer employees, including their family members, directly involved in the conduct of the study. 16. Fertile male subjects who are unwilling or unable to use a highly effective method of contraception as outlined in this protocol for the duration of the study and for at least 4 months after the last dose of investigational product.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best Objective Response Rate (ORR)From first dose of study drug to best overall soft tissue response CR or PR (maximum duration of 25 months)Best ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall soft tissue response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as per RECIST1.1 by an independent central review. RECIST 1.1 criteria, CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than 10 millimeter (mm). Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (less than 10 mm short axis); PR: at least 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Response (DOR)From the first objective evidence of soft tissue response (CR or PR, whichever is earlier) to radiographic progression or death due to any cause without evidence of radiographic progression, whichever occurs first (maximum duration of 25 months)DOR was defined as the time from the first objective evidence of soft tissue response (CR or PR, whichever is earlier) per RECIST 1.1 and no evidence of confirmed bone disease progression per PCWG3 to the date of first objective evidence of radiographic progression or death due to any cause without evidence of radiographic progression, whichever occurs first. RECIST 1.1 criteria, CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (less than 10 mm short axis); PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters.
Percentage of Participants With Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percentage (%)From the date of first dose of study treatment until confirmed PSA progression or start of new anticancer treatment given after the first dose of study treatment (maximum duration of 25 months)Percentage of participants with PSA response of \>= 50% was reported in this outcome measure. PSA response was calculated as a decline from baseline PSA (ng/mL) by at least 50% measured by central laboratory.
Percentage of Participants With Conversion of Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) CountBaseline to anytime on study during final analysis of the outcome measure, up to maximum duration of 25 monthsPercentage of participants with conversion of CTC count was defined as percentage of participants with a CTC count \>= 5 CTC per 7.5 milliliter (mL) of blood at baseline that decreased to \< 5 CTC per 7.5 mL of blood any time on study.
Percentage of Participants With a Null CTC CountBaseline to anytime on study during final analysis of the outcome measure, up to maximum duration of 25 monthsPercentage of participants with a null CTC count was defined as percentage of participants with CTC count \>=1 CTC per 7.5 mL of blood at baseline that decreased to CTC = 0 per 7.5 mL of blood any time on study.
Percentage of Participants With Baseline CTC Count <5 CTC Showed Increased CTC Counts at Any Time on StudyBaseline to anytime on study during final analysis of the outcome measure, up to maximum duration of 25 monthsPercentage of participants with CTC count \<5 CTC per 7.5 mL of blood at baseline those who showed an increased CTC count, compared to baseline, any time on study was reported in this study.
Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) ProgressionFrom the date of first dose of study treatment until confirmed PSA progression or start of new anticancer treatment given after the first dose of study treatment (maximum duration of 25 months)Time to PSA progression was defined as the time from first dose of study treatment to the date of PSA progression, which was subsequently confirmed. The time from first dose of talazoparib to the date that a \>=25% increase in PSA with an absolute increase of \>=2micogram per liter (2 nanogram per mL) above the nadir (or baseline for participants with no PSA decline) was documented, confirmed by a second consecutive PSA value obtained \>=3 weeks (21 days) later. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.
Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (PFS)From date of first dose of study drug to first objective evidence of radiographic progression or death without documented radiographic progression, whichever occurs first (maximum duration of 25 months)Radiographic PFS was defined as the time from date of first dose of talazoparib to first objective evidence of radiographic progression as assessed in soft tissue per modified RECIST 1.1 or confirmed progression in bone per PCWG3 guidelines by independent central review or death without documented radiographic progression, whichever occurs first.
Overall Survival (OS)From first dose of study treatment up to death due to any cause during study or date of last contact (approximately 36 months)OS was defined as the time from start date (the date of first dose of treatment) to the date of death due to any cause. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)First dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (study treatment was approximately for 36 months, safety follow up to approximately 37 months)An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AEs included both serious AEs and all non-serious AEs. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Number of Participants With Permanent Treatment Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDuring study treatment (approximately up to 36 months)Treatment discontinuation was defined as permanent cessation of study drug treatment administration.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDuring study treatment (approximately up to 36 months)Vital sign abnormalities criteria included: 1) Systolic blood pressure (SBP) in millimeters of mercury (mmHg): absolute result greater than (\>) 180 mmHg and increase from baseline greater than or equal to (\>=) 40 mmHg or absolute result \< 90 mmHg and decrease from baseline \> 30 mmHg; 2) Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mmHg): absolute result \> 110 mmHg and increase from baseline \>= 30 mmHg or absolute result \< 50 mmHg and decrease from baseline \> 20 mmHg or \>= 20 mmHg increase from baseline; 3) Heart rate in beats per minutes (bpm): absolute result \< 50 bpm and decrease from baseline \> 20 bpm or absolute result \> 120 bpm and increase from baseline \> 30 bpm; Weight in kilogram: \> 10% decrease from baseline.
Number of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Hematology) From Grade Less Than Equal to (<=) 2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineDuring study treatment (approximately up to 36 months)Hematology parameters included anemia, hemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, Leukocytosis and white blood cell decreased. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.
Time to Objective ResponseFrom first dose of study drug to first objective response (maximum duration of 25 months)Time to objective response was defined as the time from first dose of talazoparib to the first objective evidence of soft tissue response with no evidence of confirmed bone disease progression on bone scan per prostate cancer working Group 3 (PCWG3). Soft tissue response is defined as a best overall response of CR or PR per RECIST 1.1 by independent central review. RECIST 1.1 criteria, CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (less than 10 mm short axis); PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters.
Number of Participants With Dose ModificationDuring study treatment (approximately up to 36 months)Number of participants with dose modification due to adverse events was reported.
Time to Deterioration in Pain Symptom ScoresBaseline till final analysis of the outcome measure, up to maximum duration of 25 monthsTime deterioration is based on BPI-SF question 3: Please rate your pain by marking the box beside the number that best describes your pain at its worst in the last 24 hours. Pain intensity was to be answered on a range of 0 to 10, where 0 corresponded to no pain and 10 worst pain. Time to this event is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to onset of pain progression, where pain progression is defined as a 2-point or more increase from baseline in the question 3 score. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis. Average of all assessments visits is reported in this outcome measure.
Change From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Baseline, Week 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]BPI-SF is an 11-item self-report questionnaire that is designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on daily functions. BPI-SF have 4 questions that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now) and 7 questions that assess impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each question is answered on a scale ranging from 0 to 10; '0=No pain and 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine'. Measure can be scored by item, with lower scores being indicative of less pain or pain interference. BPI-SF question 3 was related to participant experiencing pain at its worst in last 24 hours, score range 0 to 10, where large values corresponded to worse outcomes.
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Baseline, Week 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]The EQ-5D VAS score was a participant rated questionnaire where participants rated how they felt at assessment visit on a vertical VAS that ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating a better health condition.
Number of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainBaseline, Week 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]EQ-5D-5L: participant rated assessed level of current health using 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety, and depression. EQ-5D mobility domain had 5 responses: no problem, slight problem, moderate problem, severe problem and extreme problem.
Number of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainBaseline, Week 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]EQ-5D-5L: participant rated assessed level of current health using 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety, and depression. EQ-5D self-care domain had 5 responses: no problem, slight problem, moderate problem, severe problem and extreme problem.
Number of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainBaseline, Week 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]EQ-5D-5L: participant rated assessed level of current health using 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety, and depression. EQ-5D usual activities domain had 5 responses: no problem, slight problem, moderate problem, severe problem and extreme problem.
Number of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainBaseline, Week 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]EQ-5D-5L: participant rated assessed level of current health using 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety, and depression. EQ-5D pain and discomfort domain had 5 responses: no problem, slight problem, moderate problem, severe problem and extreme problem.
Number of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainBaseline, Week 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]EQ-5D-5L: participant rated assessed level of current health using 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety, and depression. EQ-5D anxiety and depression domain had 5 responses: no problem, slight problem, moderate problem, severe problem and extreme problem.
Pre-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of TalazoparibPre-dose at Week 1, 5, 9 and 13Ctrough was defined as pre-dose plasma concentration during dosing and observed directly from data.
Post-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Talazoparib2 hours post-dose at Week 1 and 5Plasma concentration was measured 2 hours after dosing and observed directly from data.
Number of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineDuring study treatment (approximately up to 36 months)Chemistry parameters:alanine aminotransferase increased(inc), alkaline phosphatase inc, aspartate aminotransferase inc, blood bilirubin inc, chronic kidney disease, creatinine inc, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) inc, hypercalcemia, Hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypocalcemia, Hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hypernatremia, Hypoalbuminemia and hypophosphatemia. Severity was graded as Grade(G)1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G2:moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G3:severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; G4:life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; G5: death related to AEs.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants with measurable soft tissue disease as per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage repair deficiencies, who previously received 1 to 2 taxane-based chemotherapy, and progressed on at least 1 line of novel hormonal therapy (enzalutamide and/or abiraterone acetate/prednisone) were enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Talazoparib
Participants received talazoparib 1 milligram per day (mg/day) orally until radiographic progression that was determined by independent central review, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. Talazoparib was continued upon disease progression only if, in the opinion of the investigator the participant was clinically benefitting, no new concurrent systemic therapy was initiated, and the sponsor was notified. Maximum duration of treatment was approximately 36 months.
127
Total127

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyProgressive Disease1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTalazoparib
Age, Continuous
Mean
68.16 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.02
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
106 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
110 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
127 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
111 / 127
other
Total, other adverse events
124 / 127
serious
Total, serious adverse events
51 / 127

Outcome results

Primary

Best Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Best ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall soft tissue response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as per RECIST1.1 by an independent central review. RECIST 1.1 criteria, CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than 10 millimeter (mm). Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (less than 10 mm short axis); PR: at least 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to best overall soft tissue response CR or PR (maximum duration of 25 months)

Population: DDR deficient measurable disease population included all enrolled participants who had measurable soft tissue disease at screening by investigator assessment, had DDR deficiencies likely to sensitize to PARP inhibitor therapy, and received at least 1 dose of talazoparib.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TalazoparibBest Objective Response Rate (ORR)29.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)

The EQ-5D VAS score was a participant rated questionnaire where participants rated how they felt at assessment visit on a vertical VAS that ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating a better health condition.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]

Population: All participants from the DDR deficient measurable disease population with a baseline PRO assessment and at least 1 post-baseline PRO assessment prior to the end of treatment. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Follow-up-2.87 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.55
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 34.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.25
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 54.44 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.26
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 76.61 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 96.18 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.21
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 137.68 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.85
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 177.84 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 216.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.26
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 255.34 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 374.65 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.01
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 498.96 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.55
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 6112.75 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.02
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 731.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.89
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 8511.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.01
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 9717.00 Units on a scale
UnknownChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Domain 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scores (VAS)Change at Week 1 Units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3

BPI-SF is an 11-item self-report questionnaire that is designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on daily functions. BPI-SF have 4 questions that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now) and 7 questions that assess impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each question is answered on a scale ranging from 0 to 10; '0=No pain and 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine'. Measure can be scored by item, with lower scores being indicative of less pain or pain interference. BPI-SF question 3 was related to participant experiencing pain at its worst in last 24 hours, score range 0 to 10, where large values corresponded to worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]

Population: All participants from the DDR deficient measurable disease population with a baseline PRO assessment and at least 1 post-baseline PRO assessment prior to the end of treatment. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Follow-up-0.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 3-0.51 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 5-1.39 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 7-1.20 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 9-1.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 13-0.85 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.51
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 17-1.06 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.73
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 21-0.89 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 25-1.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.14
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 37-1.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 49-1.53 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 61-2.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.42
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 73-2.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.17
TalazoparibChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 85-5.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.54
UnknownChange From Baseline in Participant Reported Pain Scores Per BPI-SF Question 3Change at Week 1 Units on a scale
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the time from the first objective evidence of soft tissue response (CR or PR, whichever is earlier) per RECIST 1.1 and no evidence of confirmed bone disease progression per PCWG3 to the date of first objective evidence of radiographic progression or death due to any cause without evidence of radiographic progression, whichever occurs first. RECIST 1.1 criteria, CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (less than 10 mm short axis); PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters.

Time frame: From the first objective evidence of soft tissue response (CR or PR, whichever is earlier) to radiographic progression or death due to any cause without evidence of radiographic progression, whichever occurs first (maximum duration of 25 months)

Population: DDR deficient measurable disease population included all enrolled participants who had measurable soft tissue disease at screening by investigator assessment, had DDR deficiencies likely to sensitize to PARP inhibitor therapy, and received at least 1 dose of talazoparib and participants who achieved a confirmed CR or PR without documentation of confirmed bone progression.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TalazoparibDuration of Response (DOR)12.8 Months
Secondary

Number of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression Domain

EQ-5D-5L: participant rated assessed level of current health using 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety, and depression. EQ-5D anxiety and depression domain had 5 responses: no problem, slight problem, moderate problem, severe problem and extreme problem.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]

Population: All participants from the DDR deficient measurable disease population with a baseline PRO assessment and at least 1 post-baseline PRO assessment prior to the end of treatment. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainFollow-upSevere Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 1No Problem48 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 1Slight Problem30 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 1Moderate Problem18 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 1Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 1Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 3No Problem45 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 3Slight Problem27 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 3Moderate Problem17 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 3Severe Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 3Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 5No Problem43 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 5Slight Problem35 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 5Moderate Problem16 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 5Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 5Extreme Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 7No Problem45 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 7Slight Problem30 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 7Moderate Problem7 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 7Severe Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 7Extreme Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 9No Problem49 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 9Slight Problem27 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 9Moderate Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 9Severe Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 9Extreme Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 13No Problem40 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 13Slight Problem23 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 13Moderate Problem6 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 13Severe Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 13Extreme Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 17No Problem40 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 17Slight Problem21 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 17Moderate Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 17Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 17Extreme Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 21No Problem41 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 21Slight Problem15 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 21Moderate Problem7 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 21Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 21Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 25No Problem29 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 25Slight Problem24 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 25Moderate Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 25Severe Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 25Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 37No Problem20 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 37Slight Problem14 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 37Moderate Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 37Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 37Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 49No Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 49Slight Problem9 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 49Moderate Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 49Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 49Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 61No Problem8 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 61Slight Problem8 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 61Moderate Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 61Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 61Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 73No Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 73Slight Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 73Moderate Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 73Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 73Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 85No Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 85Slight Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 85Moderate Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 85Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 85Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 97No Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 97Slight Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 97Moderate Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 97Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainWeek 97Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainFollow-upNo Problem16 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainFollow-upSlight Problem6 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainFollow-upModerate Problem5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Anxiety and Depression DomainFollow-upExtreme Problem0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility Domain

EQ-5D-5L: participant rated assessed level of current health using 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety, and depression. EQ-5D mobility domain had 5 responses: no problem, slight problem, moderate problem, severe problem and extreme problem.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]

Population: All participants from the DDR deficient measurable disease population with a baseline PRO assessment and at least 1 post-baseline PRO assessment prior to the end of treatment. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 7Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 9No Problem38 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 9Slight Problem26 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 9Moderate Problem20 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 13Severe Problem5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 13Extreme Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 17No Problem30 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 17Slight Problem28 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 17Moderate Problem14 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 17Severe Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 17Extreme Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 21No Problem30 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 49Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 61No Problem7 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 85Slight Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 85Moderate Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 85Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainFollow-upExtreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 1No Problem30 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 1Slight Problem29 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 1Moderate Problem25 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 1Severe Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 1Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 3No Problem36 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 3Slight Problem23 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 3Moderate Problem20 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 3Severe Problem10 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 3Extreme Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 5No Problem36 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 5Slight Problem29 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 5Moderate Problem23 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 5Severe Problem6 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 5Extreme Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 7No Problem37 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 7Slight Problem24 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 7Moderate Problem22 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 7Severe Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 9Severe Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 9Extreme Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 13No Problem28 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 13Slight Problem26 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 13Moderate Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 21Slight Problem15 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 21Moderate Problem15 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 21Severe Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 21Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 25No Problem29 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 25Slight Problem14 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 25Moderate Problem13 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 25Severe Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 25Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 37No Problem16 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 37Slight Problem14 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 37Moderate Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 37Severe Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 37Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 49No Problem10 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 49Slight Problem7 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 49Moderate Problem5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 49Severe Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 61Slight Problem5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 61Moderate Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 61Severe Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 61Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 73No Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 73Slight Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 73Moderate Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 73Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 73Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 85No Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 85Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 97No Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 97Slight Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 97Moderate Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 97Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainWeek 97Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainFollow-upNo Problem11 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainFollow-upSlight Problem8 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainFollow-upModerate Problem6 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Mobility DomainFollow-upSevere Problem5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort Domain

EQ-5D-5L: participant rated assessed level of current health using 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety, and depression. EQ-5D pain and discomfort domain had 5 responses: no problem, slight problem, moderate problem, severe problem and extreme problem.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]

Population: All participants from the DDR deficient measurable disease population with a baseline PRO assessment and at least 1 post-baseline PRO assessment prior to the end of treatment. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 3Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 9Severe Problem6 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 9Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 21Moderate Problem17 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 21Severe Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 21Extreme Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 37Severe Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 37Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 49No Problem11 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 49Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 61No Problem6 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainFollow-upModerate Problem9 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 1No Problem15 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 1Slight Problem35 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 1Moderate Problem30 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 1Severe Problem16 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 1Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 3No Problem25 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 3Slight Problem25 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 3Moderate Problem32 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 3Severe Problem8 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 5No Problem30 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 5Slight Problem27 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 5Moderate Problem29 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 5Severe Problem9 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 5Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 7No Problem26 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 7Slight Problem32 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 7Moderate Problem23 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 7Severe Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 7Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 9No Problem34 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 9Slight Problem29 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 9Moderate Problem21 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 13No Problem23 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 13Slight Problem33 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 13Moderate Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 13Severe Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 13Extreme Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 17No Problem27 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 17Slight Problem25 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 17Moderate Problem17 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 17Severe Problem5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 17Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 21No Problem24 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 21Slight Problem19 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 25No Problem22 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 25Slight Problem17 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 25Moderate Problem17 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 25Severe Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 25Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 37No Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 37Slight Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 37Moderate Problem10 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 49Slight Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 49Moderate Problem7 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 49Severe Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 61Slight Problem5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 61Moderate Problem5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 61Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 61Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 73No Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 73Slight Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 73Moderate Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 73Severe Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 73Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 85No Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 85Slight Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 85Moderate Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 85Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 85Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 97No Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 97Slight Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 97Moderate Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 97Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainWeek 97Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainFollow-upNo Problem9 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainFollow-upSlight Problem8 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainFollow-upSevere Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Pain and Discomfort DomainFollow-upExtreme Problem0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care Domain

EQ-5D-5L: participant rated assessed level of current health using 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety, and depression. EQ-5D self-care domain had 5 responses: no problem, slight problem, moderate problem, severe problem and extreme problem.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]

Population: All participants from the DDR deficient measurable disease population with a baseline PRO assessment and at least 1 post-baseline PRO assessment prior to the end of treatment. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 1No Problem65 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 1Slight Problem18 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 1Moderate Problem9 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 3Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 1Severe Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 1Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 3No Problem63 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 3Slight Problem17 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 3Moderate Problem8 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 3Severe Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 5No Problem62 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 5Slight Problem20 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 5Moderate Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 5Severe Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 5Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 7No Problem59 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 7Slight Problem14 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 7Moderate Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 7Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 7Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 9No Problem64 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 9Slight Problem15 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 9Moderate Problem8 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 9Severe Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 9Extreme Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 13No Problem51 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 13Slight Problem14 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 13Moderate Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 13Severe Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 13Extreme Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 17No Problem55 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 17Slight Problem13 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 17Moderate Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 17Severe Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 17Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 21No Problem44 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 21Slight Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 21Moderate Problem5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 21Severe Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 21Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 25No Problem39 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 25Slight Problem13 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 25Moderate Problem7 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 25Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 25Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 37No Problem25 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 37Slight Problem10 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 37Moderate Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 37Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 37Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 49No Problem18 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 49Slight Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 49Moderate Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 49Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 49Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 61No Problem11 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 61Slight Problem5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 61Moderate Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 61Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 61Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 73No Problem7 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 73Slight Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 73Moderate Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 73Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 73Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 85No Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 85Slight Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 85Moderate Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 85Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 85Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 97No Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 97Slight Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 97Moderate Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 97Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainWeek 97Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainFollow-upNo Problem19 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainFollow-upSlight Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainFollow-upModerate Problem7 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainFollow-upSevere Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Self-Care DomainFollow-upExtreme Problem0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity Domain

EQ-5D-5L: participant rated assessed level of current health using 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety, and depression. EQ-5D usual activities domain had 5 responses: no problem, slight problem, moderate problem, severe problem and extreme problem.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 3, 5,7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, Follow-up Visit (28 days after last dose) [maximum duration of 25 months]

Population: All participants from the DDR deficient measurable disease population with a baseline PRO assessment and at least 1 post-baseline PRO assessment prior to the end of treatment. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 17No Problem36 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 17Slight Problem21 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 17Moderate Problem14 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 17Severe Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 17Extreme Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 21No Problem35 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 49Severe Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 49Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 73No Problem6 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 73Slight Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 73Moderate Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 73Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 73Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 85No Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 97No Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 1No Problem33 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 1Slight Problem30 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 1Moderate Problem19 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 1Severe Problem10 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 1Extreme Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 3No Problem33 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 3Slight Problem26 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 3Moderate Problem22 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 3Severe Problem8 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 3Extreme Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 5No Problem36 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 5Slight Problem30 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 5Moderate Problem21 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 5Severe Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 5Extreme Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 7No Problem34 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 7Slight Problem24 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 7Moderate Problem22 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 7Severe Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 7Extreme Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 9No Problem41 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 9Slight Problem26 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 9Moderate Problem15 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 9Severe Problem5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 9Extreme Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 13No Problem36 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 13Slight Problem22 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 13Moderate Problem10 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 13Severe Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 13Extreme Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 21Slight Problem13 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 21Moderate Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 21Severe Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 21Extreme Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 25No Problem29 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 25Slight Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 25Moderate Problem12 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 25Severe Problem6 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 25Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 37No Problem17 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 37Slight Problem10 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 37Moderate Problem7 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 37Severe Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 37Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 49No Problem11 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 49Slight Problem5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 49Moderate Problem6 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 61No Problem8 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 61Slight Problem4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 61Moderate Problem3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 61Severe Problem1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 61Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 85Slight Problem2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 85Moderate Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 85Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 85Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 97Slight Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 97Moderate Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 97Severe Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainWeek 97Extreme Problem0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainFollow-upNo Problem10 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainFollow-upSlight Problem10 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainFollow-upModerate Problem5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainFollow-upSevere Problem5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With 5 Response Levels for EQ-5D-5L Usual Activity DomainFollow-upExtreme Problem0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs

Vital sign abnormalities criteria included: 1) Systolic blood pressure (SBP) in millimeters of mercury (mmHg): absolute result greater than (\>) 180 mmHg and increase from baseline greater than or equal to (\>=) 40 mmHg or absolute result \< 90 mmHg and decrease from baseline \> 30 mmHg; 2) Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mmHg): absolute result \> 110 mmHg and increase from baseline \>= 30 mmHg or absolute result \< 50 mmHg and decrease from baseline \> 20 mmHg or \>= 20 mmHg increase from baseline; 3) Heart rate in beats per minutes (bpm): absolute result \< 50 bpm and decrease from baseline \> 20 bpm or absolute result \> 120 bpm and increase from baseline \> 30 bpm; Weight in kilogram: \> 10% decrease from baseline.

Time frame: During study treatment (approximately up to 36 months)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of talazoparib including participants enrolled prior to amendment 3 with non-measurable disease and/or with DDR deficiencies, which may sensitize the tumor to PARP inhibition as assessed using an expanded DDR gene panel. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP: Absolute result > 180 mm Hg and increase from baseline >= 40 mm Hg0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP: Absolute result < 90 mm Hg and decrease from baseline > 30 mm Hg0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP: Absolute result > 110 mm Hg and increase from baseline >= 30 mm Hg0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP: Absolute result < 50 mm Hg and decrease from baseline > 20 mm Hg0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP: >= 20 mm Hg increase from baseline17 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsHeart rate: Absolute result < 50 bpm and decrease from baseline > 20 bpm0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsHeart rate: Absolute result > 120 bpm and increase from baseline > 30 bpm2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsWeight: > 10% decrease from baseline0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Dose Modification

Number of participants with dose modification due to adverse events was reported.

Time frame: During study treatment (approximately up to 36 months)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of talazoparib including participants enrolled prior to amendment 3 with non-measurable disease and/or with DDR deficiencies, which may sensitize the tumor to PARP inhibition as assessed using an expanded DDR gene panel.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Dose Modification37 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Permanent Treatment Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events

Treatment discontinuation was defined as permanent cessation of study drug treatment administration.

Time frame: During study treatment (approximately up to 36 months)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of talazoparib including participants enrolled prior to amendment 3 with non-measurable disease and/or with DDR deficiencies, which may sensitize the tumor to PARP inhibition as assessed using an expanded DDR gene panel.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Permanent Treatment Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events21 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline

Chemistry parameters:alanine aminotransferase increased(inc), alkaline phosphatase inc, aspartate aminotransferase inc, blood bilirubin inc, chronic kidney disease, creatinine inc, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) inc, hypercalcemia, Hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypocalcemia, Hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hypernatremia, Hypoalbuminemia and hypophosphatemia. Severity was graded as Grade(G)1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G2:moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G3:severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; G4:life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; G5: death related to AEs.

Time frame: During study treatment (approximately up to 36 months)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of talazoparib including participants enrolled prior to amendment 3 with non-measurable disease and/or with DDR deficiencies, which may sensitize the tumor to PARP inhibition as assessed using an expanded DDR gene panel. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineAlanine aminotransferase increased0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineAlkaline phosphatase increased9 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineAspartate aminotransferase increased0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineBlood bilirubin increased0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineChronic kidney disease2 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineCreatinine increased1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineGGT increased3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineHypercalcemia0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineHyperglycemia5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineHyperkalemia4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineHypermagnesemia1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineHypernatremia0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineHypoalbuminemia0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineHypocalcemia4 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineHypoglycemia0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineHypokalemia0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineHypomagnesemia1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineHyponatremia3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Chemistry) From Grade <=2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineHypophosphatemia2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Hematology) From Grade Less Than Equal to (<=) 2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baseline

Hematology parameters included anemia, hemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, Leukocytosis and white blood cell decreased. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.

Time frame: During study treatment (approximately up to 36 months)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of talazoparib including participants enrolled prior to amendment 3 with non-measurable disease and/or with DDR deficiencies, which may sensitize the tumor to PARP inhibition as assessed using an expanded DDR gene panel. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Hematology) From Grade Less Than Equal to (<=) 2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineAnemia30 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Hematology) From Grade Less Than Equal to (<=) 2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineHemoglobin increased1 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Hematology) From Grade Less Than Equal to (<=) 2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineLymphocyte count decreased23 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Hematology) From Grade Less Than Equal to (<=) 2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineLymphocyte count increased0 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Hematology) From Grade Less Than Equal to (<=) 2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineNeutrophil count decreased11 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Hematology) From Grade Less Than Equal to (<=) 2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselinePlatelet count decreased3 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Hematology) From Grade Less Than Equal to (<=) 2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineWhite blood cell decreased5 Participants
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Shift in Laboratory Parameter Values (Hematology) From Grade Less Than Equal to (<=) 2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Post-baselineLeukocytosis0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AEs included both serious AEs and all non-serious AEs. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Time frame: First dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (study treatment was approximately for 36 months, safety follow up to approximately 37 months)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of talazoparib including participants enrolled prior to amendment 3 with non-measurable disease and/or with DDR deficiencies, which may sensitize the tumor to PARP inhibition as assessed using an expanded DDR gene panel.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TalazoparibNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)125 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from start date (the date of first dose of treatment) to the date of death due to any cause. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to death due to any cause during study or date of last contact (approximately 36 months)

Population: DDR deficient measurable disease population included all enrolled participants who had measurable soft tissue disease at screening by investigator assessment, had DDR deficiencies likely to sensitize to PARP inhibitor therapy, and received at least 1 dose of talazoparib.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TalazoparibOverall Survival (OS)16.9 Months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Null CTC Count

Percentage of participants with a null CTC count was defined as percentage of participants with CTC count \>=1 CTC per 7.5 mL of blood at baseline that decreased to CTC = 0 per 7.5 mL of blood any time on study.

Time frame: Baseline to anytime on study during final analysis of the outcome measure, up to maximum duration of 25 months

Population: All participants with a baseline CTC assessment and at least 1 post-baseline CTC assessment from the DDR deficient measurable disease population. Participants with a CTC count 0 per 7.5 mL of blood at baseline were not analyzed for this outcome measure.Here, Number of participants analyzed'' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TalazoparibPercentage of Participants With a Null CTC Count53.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Baseline CTC Count <5 CTC Showed Increased CTC Counts at Any Time on Study

Percentage of participants with CTC count \<5 CTC per 7.5 mL of blood at baseline those who showed an increased CTC count, compared to baseline, any time on study was reported in this study.

Time frame: Baseline to anytime on study during final analysis of the outcome measure, up to maximum duration of 25 months

Population: All participants with a baseline CTC assessment and at least 1 post-baseline CTC assessment from the DDR deficient measurable disease population. Here, Number of participants analyzed'' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TalazoparibPercentage of Participants With Baseline CTC Count <5 CTC Showed Increased CTC Counts at Any Time on Study37.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Conversion of Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Count

Percentage of participants with conversion of CTC count was defined as percentage of participants with a CTC count \>= 5 CTC per 7.5 milliliter (mL) of blood at baseline that decreased to \< 5 CTC per 7.5 mL of blood any time on study.

Time frame: Baseline to anytime on study during final analysis of the outcome measure, up to maximum duration of 25 months

Population: All participants with a baseline CTC assessment and at least 1 post-baseline CTC assessment from the DDR deficient measurable disease population. Participants with a CTC count \<5 per 7.5 mL of blood at baseline were not analyzed for this conversion outcome measure. Here, Number of participants analyzed'' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TalazoparibPercentage of Participants With Conversion of Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Count63.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percentage (%)

Percentage of participants with PSA response of \>= 50% was reported in this outcome measure. PSA response was calculated as a decline from baseline PSA (ng/mL) by at least 50% measured by central laboratory.

Time frame: From the date of first dose of study treatment until confirmed PSA progression or start of new anticancer treatment given after the first dose of study treatment (maximum duration of 25 months)

Population: DDR deficient measurable disease population included all enrolled participants who had measurable soft tissue disease at screening by investigator assessment, had DDR deficiencies likely to sensitize to PARP inhibitor therapy, and received at least 1 dose of talazoparib. Here ''Number of participants analyzed'' signifies number of participants evaluable data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TalazoparibPercentage of Participants With Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percentage (%)45.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Post-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Talazoparib

Plasma concentration was measured 2 hours after dosing and observed directly from data.

Time frame: 2 hours post-dose at Week 1 and 5

Population: PK population included all participants from the safety population who had at least 1 reportable drug concentration data point. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
TalazoparibPost-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of TalazoparibAt week 12289.540 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 51.0724
TalazoparibPost-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of TalazoparibAt Week 510713.918 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49.4248
Secondary

Pre-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Talazoparib

Ctrough was defined as pre-dose plasma concentration during dosing and observed directly from data.

Time frame: Pre-dose at Week 1, 5, 9 and 13

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants from the safety population who had at least 1 reportable drug concentration data point. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
TalazoparibPre-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of TalazoparibAt Week 12631.898 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.2043
TalazoparibPre-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of TalazoparibAt Week 54748.147 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 63.2488
TalazoparibPre-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of TalazoparibAt Week 94213.250 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 52.8028
TalazoparibPre-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of TalazoparibAt Week 134378.123 nanograms per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 47.536
Secondary

Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Radiographic PFS was defined as the time from date of first dose of talazoparib to first objective evidence of radiographic progression as assessed in soft tissue per modified RECIST 1.1 or confirmed progression in bone per PCWG3 guidelines by independent central review or death without documented radiographic progression, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: From date of first dose of study drug to first objective evidence of radiographic progression or death without documented radiographic progression, whichever occurs first (maximum duration of 25 months)

Population: DDR deficient measurable disease population included all enrolled participants who had measurable soft tissue disease at screening by investigator assessment, had DDR deficiencies likely to sensitize to PARP inhibitor therapy, and received at least 1 dose of talazoparib.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TalazoparibRadiographic Progression-Free Survival (PFS)5.6 Months
Secondary

Time to Deterioration in Pain Symptom Scores

Time deterioration is based on BPI-SF question 3: Please rate your pain by marking the box beside the number that best describes your pain at its worst in the last 24 hours. Pain intensity was to be answered on a range of 0 to 10, where 0 corresponded to no pain and 10 worst pain. Time to this event is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to onset of pain progression, where pain progression is defined as a 2-point or more increase from baseline in the question 3 score. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis. Average of all assessments visits is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline till final analysis of the outcome measure, up to maximum duration of 25 months

Population: All participants from the DDR deficient measurable disease population with a baseline PRO assessment and at least 1 post-baseline PRO assessment prior to the end of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TalazoparibTime to Deterioration in Pain Symptom ScoresNA Months
Secondary

Time to Objective Response

Time to objective response was defined as the time from first dose of talazoparib to the first objective evidence of soft tissue response with no evidence of confirmed bone disease progression on bone scan per prostate cancer working Group 3 (PCWG3). Soft tissue response is defined as a best overall response of CR or PR per RECIST 1.1 by independent central review. RECIST 1.1 criteria, CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (less than 10 mm short axis); PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to first objective response (maximum duration of 25 months)

Population: DDR deficient measurable disease population included all enrolled participants who had measurable soft tissue disease at screening by investigator assessment, had DDR deficiencies likely to sensitize to PARP inhibitor therapy, and received at least 1 dose of talazoparib and participants who achieved a confirmed CR or PR without documentation of confirmed bone progression.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TalazoparibTime to Objective Response3.4 Months
Secondary

Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

Time to PSA progression was defined as the time from first dose of study treatment to the date of PSA progression, which was subsequently confirmed. The time from first dose of talazoparib to the date that a \>=25% increase in PSA with an absolute increase of \>=2micogram per liter (2 nanogram per mL) above the nadir (or baseline for participants with no PSA decline) was documented, confirmed by a second consecutive PSA value obtained \>=3 weeks (21 days) later. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.

Time frame: From the date of first dose of study treatment until confirmed PSA progression or start of new anticancer treatment given after the first dose of study treatment (maximum duration of 25 months)

Population: DDR deficient measurable disease population included all enrolled participants who had measurable soft tissue disease at screening by investigator assessment, had DDR deficiencies likely to sensitize to PARP inhibitor therapy, and received at least 1 dose of talazoparib.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TalazoparibTime to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression9.2 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026