Skip to content

Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System Performance, Human Factors, and Usability Assessment Conducted in a Single Visit

Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS) Performance, Human Factors, and Usability Assessment in a Single Visit

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03148613
Enrollment
70
Registered
2017-05-11
Start date
2017-02-02
Completion date
2017-08-30
Last updated
2022-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Smoking, Tobacco

Brief summary

Prospective, open label, single center clinical study enrolling 70 subjects to study Performance, Human Factors, and Usability for the Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBBS)

Detailed description

Performance: * Non-invasively measure carbon monoxide (CO) levels in the exhaled breath of study subjects using two different types of measurement devices. * Assess the correlation between the measured CO levels (in parts per million, or ppm) of the study CO breath sensor (Carrot Sense) and the predicate CO breath sensor (Bedfont). Human Factors and Usability: * Ensure that representative intended users are able to operate the COBSS independently. * Validate appropriate mitigations of use related hazards identified in risk management documentation. * Uncover previously unforeseen use errors. NOTES: * The study design allows for the assessment of a performance endpoint and human factors endpoint in a single study. * Each participant will complete the study in a single visit which will include the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.

Interventions

DEVICECarbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS)

Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS): Device to measure carbon monoxide levels in one's breath and inform the user.

DEVICEBedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®

Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer® : Predicate Device to measure carbon monoxide levels in one's breath.

Sponsors

UserWise, LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
David Utley, MD
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

All subjects experience device use compared to a control device (predicate).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Subject who self-report smoking 2 or more cigarettes each day Inclusion Criteria: * 18-80 years of age * English speaking * Owns and uses a smartphone * Willing to sign the Informed Consent Form

Exclusion criteria

• Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Performance Variable - Correlation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Measurements Between COBSS and Predicate Devices1 minuteCO concentrations in parts per million (ppm) in exhaled breath from subjects at a single visit will be assessed and reported in order to compare the CO measurements from COBSS to a control (predicate) device. The correlation will be reported as an R value. For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes. COBSS breath sample will take approximately 1 minute. Breath sample with the control device will take approximately 1 minute. The breath samples will be collected within 5-10 minutes of each other.
Human Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratings1 minute for each question; up to 90 minutes for study sessionUser performance of participants in intended use scenarios will be assessed at a single visit. Participants will be observed if they can set up the device, use the device and interpret results. Observer ratings include 'Successful' and 'Unsuccessful'. Specific attention will be given to assess if any harms can occur from observed use errors. Outcome measure data table is tally of participants who were 'Successful' in each use scenario. For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes. Observations are made throughout the study session. Assessments for individual tasks will take approximately 1 minute and assessments will be made over the study session which can last up to 90 minutes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
User Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer RatingsUp to 90 minutesParticipant understanding of user documentation will be assessed at single visit. User documentation includes packaging information, quick start guide, reference card, and user manual. Observer ratings include 'Successful' and 'Unsuccessful'. For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes. Observations are made throughout the study session. Assessments for individual tasks will take approximately 1 minute each. The User documentation assessment portion of the study session will last up to 30 minutes. The 5-Point Likert Scale for Clarity has the following answer options: 5 - Very Clear; 4 - Clear; 3 - Neither Clear nor Unclear; 2 - Unclear; and 1 - Very Unclear. Higher values of this scale represent a better outcome, which is greater clarity/understanding.
Number of Participants Answering No for the Subjective Feedback With QuestionnaireUp to 90 minutesSubjective feedback focusing on any concerns (i.e. 'yes', 'no') on using device will be assessed at single visit. For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes. \*Row title truncated due to character limit. Actual question asked: Were there any points during this portion of the study that you experienced difficulty or had concerns about the product? Subjective feedback focusing on any concerns prior to the conclusion of the study session. Subjective feedback questions will take approximately 1-3 minutes each. The Subjective feedback portion of the study session will last up to 5 to 15 minutes.
Participant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesUp to 90 minutesParticipant will be asked to provide ratings on the following: * How would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app? 5 - Very Clear; 4 - Clear; 3 - Neither Clear nor Unclear; 2 - Unclear; 1 - Very Unclear * How easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results? For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes. Participant will provide the ratings prior to the conclusion of the study session. Participant assessment with questionnaire rating scales will take approximately 1-2 minutes each. The Subjective feedback portion of the study session will last up to 5 minutes.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
18-49 Year Old Smokers Using COBSS
Younger smokers - Assessment of intended user performance in use scenarios, user documentation assessment, subjective feedback and rating scales. NOTE: 18-49 year Age Arm intended to evaluate human factors and usability of COBSS in younger smokers Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS): Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS): Device to measure carbon monoxide levels in one's breath and inform the user. Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®: Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer® : Predicate Device to measure carbon monoxide levels in one's breath.
39
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSS
Older smokers- Assessment of intended user performance in use scenarios, user documentation assessment, subjective feedback and rating scales. NOTE:≥50 year Age Arm intended to evaluate human factors and usability of COBSS in younger smokers Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS): Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS): Device to measure carbon monoxide levels in one's breath and inform the user. Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®: Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer® : Predicate Device to measure carbon monoxide levels in one's breath.
31
Total70

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic18-49 Year Old Smokers Using COBSS≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
39 Participants30 Participants69 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants9 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
11 Participants3 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants16 Participants32 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
39 participants31 participants70 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants14 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants17 Participants38 Participants
smoke frequency
1 per day
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
smoke frequency
2 - 7 per day
21 Participants10 Participants31 Participants
smoke frequency
8 or more per day
16 Participants21 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 390 / 310 / 70
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 390 / 310 / 70
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 390 / 310 / 70

Outcome results

Primary

Human Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratings

User performance of participants in intended use scenarios will be assessed at a single visit. Participants will be observed if they can set up the device, use the device and interpret results. Observer ratings include 'Successful' and 'Unsuccessful'. Specific attention will be given to assess if any harms can occur from observed use errors. Outcome measure data table is tally of participants who were 'Successful' in each use scenario. For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes. Observations are made throughout the study session. Assessments for individual tasks will take approximately 1 minute and assessments will be made over the study session which can last up to 90 minutes.

Time frame: 1 minute for each question; up to 90 minutes for study session

Population: Outcome measure data table is tally of participants who were 'Successful' in each use scenario.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsHuman Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratingsuse the device - submit a breath sample37 Participants
All ParticipantsHuman Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratingsset up the device- Pair Breath Sensor34 Participants
All ParticipantsHuman Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratingsinterpret results38 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSHuman Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratingsuse the device - submit a breath sample29 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSHuman Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratingsset up the device- Pair Breath Sensor25 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSHuman Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratingsinterpret results31 Participants
All ParticipantsHuman Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratingsset up the device- Pair Breath Sensor59 Participants
All ParticipantsHuman Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratingsinterpret results69 Participants
All ParticipantsHuman Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratingsuse the device - submit a breath sample66 Participants
Primary

Performance Variable - Correlation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Measurements Between COBSS and Predicate Devices

CO concentrations in parts per million (ppm) in exhaled breath from subjects at a single visit will be assessed and reported in order to compare the CO measurements from COBSS to a control (predicate) device. The correlation will be reported as an R value. For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes. COBSS breath sample will take approximately 1 minute. Breath sample with the control device will take approximately 1 minute. The breath samples will be collected within 5-10 minutes of each other.

Time frame: 1 minute

Population: The performance outcome was designed to evaluate all the participants together, thus the cohorts (arms/groups) were not evaluated separately for this outcome. The cohorts were used for the human factors and usability portion of the study, but are not applicable for this outcome.~The R value reported is the correlation coefficient between 70 paired CO measurement values taken with the COBSS and predicate devices, by the 70 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPerformance Variable - Correlation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Measurements Between COBSS and Predicate Devices0.9878 Correlation coefficient (R-value)
Secondary

Number of Participants Answering No for the Subjective Feedback With Questionnaire

Subjective feedback focusing on any concerns (i.e. 'yes', 'no') on using device will be assessed at single visit. For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes. \*Row title truncated due to character limit. Actual question asked: Were there any points during this portion of the study that you experienced difficulty or had concerns about the product? Subjective feedback focusing on any concerns prior to the conclusion of the study session. Subjective feedback questions will take approximately 1-3 minutes each. The Subjective feedback portion of the study session will last up to 5 to 15 minutes.

Time frame: Up to 90 minutes

Population: Outcome measure data table is tally of participants answering No.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Answering No for the Subjective Feedback With QuestionnaireWere there any points during ... that you experienced difficulty or had concerns about the product?*30 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Answering No for the Subjective Feedback With QuestionnaireDid you have any safety concerns regarding the product or labeling?35 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Answering No for the Subjective Feedback With QuestionnaireDid you experience any moments of hesitation while using the product?33 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSNumber of Participants Answering No for the Subjective Feedback With QuestionnaireDid you experience any moments of hesitation while using the product?27 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSNumber of Participants Answering No for the Subjective Feedback With QuestionnaireDid you have any safety concerns regarding the product or labeling?26 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSNumber of Participants Answering No for the Subjective Feedback With QuestionnaireWere there any points during ... that you experienced difficulty or had concerns about the product?*23 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Answering No for the Subjective Feedback With QuestionnaireDid you experience any moments of hesitation while using the product?60 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Answering No for the Subjective Feedback With QuestionnaireDid you have any safety concerns regarding the product or labeling?61 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Answering No for the Subjective Feedback With QuestionnaireWere there any points during ... that you experienced difficulty or had concerns about the product?*53 Participants
Secondary

Participant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating Scales

Participant will be asked to provide ratings on the following: * How would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app? 5 - Very Clear; 4 - Clear; 3 - Neither Clear nor Unclear; 2 - Unclear; 1 - Very Unclear * How easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results? For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes. Participant will provide the ratings prior to the conclusion of the study session. Participant assessment with questionnaire rating scales will take approximately 1-2 minutes each. The Subjective feedback portion of the study session will last up to 5 minutes.

Time frame: Up to 90 minutes

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?3 - Neither easy nor difficult1 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?1 - Very difficult0 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?1 - Very difficult0 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?4 - Easy8 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?5 - Very Easy29 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?3 - Neither easy nor difficult3 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?5 - Very Easy26 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?2 - Difficult0 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?2 - Difficult0 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?4 - Easy9 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?2 - Difficult2 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?5 - Very Easy8 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?3 - Neither easy nor difficult2 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?2 - Difficult2 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?1 - Very difficult1 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?5 - Very Easy17 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?4 - Easy10 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?3 - Neither easy nor difficult2 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?1 - Very difficult0 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?4 - Easy18 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?5 - Very Easy34 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?3 - Neither easy nor difficult3 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?3 - Neither easy nor difficult5 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?2 - Difficult2 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?4 - Easy27 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?5 - Very Easy46 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?1 - Very difficult1 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?1 - Very difficult0 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?4 - Easy18 Participants
All ParticipantsParticipant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating ScalesHow would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app?2 - Difficult2 Participants
Secondary

User Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings

Participant understanding of user documentation will be assessed at single visit. User documentation includes packaging information, quick start guide, reference card, and user manual. Observer ratings include 'Successful' and 'Unsuccessful'. For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes. Observations are made throughout the study session. Assessments for individual tasks will take approximately 1 minute each. The User documentation assessment portion of the study session will last up to 30 minutes. The 5-Point Likert Scale for Clarity has the following answer options: 5 - Very Clear; 4 - Clear; 3 - Neither Clear nor Unclear; 2 - Unclear; and 1 - Very Unclear. Higher values of this scale represent a better outcome, which is greater clarity/understanding.

Time frame: Up to 90 minutes

Population: How clear or unclear were the User Manual Reference Card, and Quick Start Guide?

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings2 - Unclear0 Participants
All ParticipantsUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings3 - Neither Clear nor Unclear2 Participants
All ParticipantsUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings5 - Very Clear23 Participants
All ParticipantsUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings4 - Clear13 Participants
All ParticipantsUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings1 - Very Unclear0 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings3 - Neither Clear nor Unclear1 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings5 - Very Clear17 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings4 - Clear10 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings2 - Unclear2 Participants
≥50 Year Old Smokers Using COBSSUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings1 - Very Unclear1 Participants
All ParticipantsUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings2 - Unclear2 Participants
All ParticipantsUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings5 - Very Clear40 Participants
All ParticipantsUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings3 - Neither Clear nor Unclear3 Participants
All ParticipantsUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings4 - Clear23 Participants
All ParticipantsUser Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings1 - Very Unclear1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026