Skip to content

Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Comparing Efficacy and Complication According to Clavien-Dindo Classification Score Randomised Controlled Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03147950
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-05-10
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
2018-07-01
Last updated
2017-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complication of Surgical Procedure, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL), Prone-Flexed Position, Prone Position

Keywords

Prone-Flexed Position, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL), Clavien-Dindo Classification Score

Brief summary

compare the prone with the prone-flexed position accessibility of upper and middle calyceal approach by subcostal puncture and PCNL reporting complications using the Clavien-Dindo system with Categorisation of PCNL-specific complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification score

Interventions

PROCEDUREProne-Flexed PCNL

Prone-Flexed Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

PROCEDUREProne PCNL

Prone Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Large renal pelvic stone * Upper calyceal stone * Middle calyceal stone

Exclusion criteria

* lower calyceal stone * Bilateral simultaneous PCNL * Need for 3 percutaneous tracts intraoperative * Morbid obesity (BMI \>40) * Non opaque renal stones. * Refuse to complete study requirements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing the prone with the prone-flexed position for PCNL reporting complications1 yearOutcome measures by using the clavien dindo classification system

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of stone free rate (SFR) of the two groups1 yearOutcome measures by stone fragment residual ≤ 2 mm by computed tomography (CT)
Asses the easiness of accessibility of the targeted stone1 yearOutcome measures by counting number and site of puncture trial

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAbdelwahab R. Hashem, Msc
abdelwahab_hashem@yahoo.com01069678979

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026