Skip to content

The Hematologic Impact of Umbilical Cord Milking Versus Deferred Cord Clamping in Premature Neonates.

The Hematologic Impact of Umbilical Cord Milking Versus Deferred Cord Clamping in Premature Neonates. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03147846
Enrollment
200
Registered
2017-05-10
Start date
2017-06-08
Completion date
2019-09-01
Last updated
2020-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Delayed Cord Clamping, Preterm Neonates, Umbilical Cord Milking

Brief summary

Comparing the beneficial effect of cord milking versus deferred cord clamping in preterm neonates. A randomized controlled trial

Detailed description

Placental transfusion either by deferred cord clamping or umbilical cord milking became standard care and recommended management especially in preterm deliveries.1 In average, about 80 ml of blood was found to be transferred to the neoborn by one minute after birth.2 This additional blood can afford extra iron and blood volume giving the benefit of less iron deficiency anemia during the first year of life, less need for blood transfusion, less need for vasopressors and less intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) by 50%.3 Placental transfusion with different techniques proved safety with no significant risks regarding postpartum hemorrhage, polycythemia, jaundice, Apgar score or admission rates.4 Our study aims to compare delayed cord clamping with umbilical cord milking as the best way for placental transfusion for preterm neonates.

Interventions

PROCEDUREdelayed cord clamping

delay of cord clamping for 60 seconds

PROCEDUREcord milking

active cord milking 5 times

Sponsors

Armed Forces Hospitals, Southern Region, Saudi Arabia
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Zagazig University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

closed envelop method

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
24 Weeks to 35 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

• Gestational age 24 to 34+6 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* Category III CTG * Monochorionic twins * Significant antepartum hemorrhage * IUGR or Rh incompatibility

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
hematological parameters of the premature neonates12 monthsfirst draw and peak hematocrit value and hemoglobin percent, need for inotropes and blood transfusion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
composite neonatal morbidities12 monthincidence of intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy, jaundice, sepsis , patent ductus arteriosus, etc

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026