Skip to content

Evaluating the Effects of Traditional Chinese Medicine by N-of-1 Trials

The Study on the Effects of Traditional Chinese Medicine Through a Series of N-of-1 Trials Based on the Mathematical Model of Carryover Effect

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03147443
Enrollment
36
Registered
2017-05-10
Start date
2017-03-01
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2017-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchiectasis, Individuality, Quality of Life, Sputum, Symptoms, Traditional Chinese Medicine

Keywords

traditional Chinese medicine, Drugs, Chinese Herbal, N-of-1 trials, sputum, symptoms, individualized treatment, stable bronchiectasis

Brief summary

Treatment based on syndrome differentiation is the essence of traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM) and forms the individualized treatment. N-of-1 trials may be a good clinical effect evaluation method for the individualized treatment of TCM. This study aims to compare: (1) the efficacy of syndrome differentiation(individualized decoction) with placebo, (2)the efficacy of syndrome differentiation(individualized decoction) with the same prescription minus heat-clearing Chinese herbs, for patients with stable bronchiectasis through N-of-1 trials.

Detailed description

Traditional Chinese medicine is one of the important part of complementary and alternative medicine in the world, and it plays increasingly important role in the international medical practice. Treatment based on syndrome differentiation is the essence of traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and forms the individualized treatment. However, this individualized TCM intervention often makes it difficult for population-based RCTs to carry out a standard form. N-of-1 trials may be a good clinical effect evaluation method for the individualized treatment of TCM. The key hypothesis of this study is that: (1) the efficacy of syndrome differentiation(individualized decoction) will be better than placebo in patients with stable bronchiectasis through N-of-1 trials. (2) the efficacy of syndrome differentiation(individualized decoction) will be better than the same prescription minus heat-clearing Chinese herbs in patients with stable bronchiectasis through N-of-1 trials. The difference of efficacy may be various according to the individual severity of phlegm-heat. In this study, We will conduct a single center N-of-1 trials in 36 patients with stable bronchiectasis without hemoptysis and respiratory failure. These N-of-1 trials will be randomized, double-blind, crossover comparisons of individualized herbal decoction with control decoction within individual patients. Each n-of-1 trial has 3 pairs of treatment periods. The duration of each treatment period will be 4 weeks. We will compare :(1) the efficacy of syndrome differentiation(individualized decoction) with placebo, (2) the efficacy of syndrome differentiation(individualized decoction) with the same prescription minus heat-clearing Chinese herbs, in patients with stable bronchiectasis through N-of-1 trials. The primary outcome is patient self-reported symptoms(such as cough, expectoration, shortness of breath, chest pain, and fatigue) scores on a 7 point visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes are 24-hour sputum volume and CAT(The COPD Assessment Test) scores. We use paired t test for single case. Mixed effects model taking account of Carryover Effects and meta-analysis will be used for a series of N-of-1 trials as a group.

Interventions

Applied in the Tested Drug Observation Period. It is the highly individualized treatment of traditional Chinese medicine,the modification of Bronchiectasis Stabilization Decoction(Radix Lithospermi 15 g, Rhizoma Fagopyri Cymosi 30 g, Radix Ophiopogonis 15 g, Poria cocos 15 g, Radix Astragali 20 g, Rhizoma Bletillae 10 g, Platycodon grandiflorum 10 g, and Semen Coicis 30 g) based on syndrome differentiation. For example,for patients with qi and yin deficiency syndrome, we added Radix Adenophorae, and Radix Rehmanniae Recens. Besides, the herbs in a prescription could be changed according to different symptoms of individual patients.

DRUGplacebo

Applied in the placebo Observation Period. Placebo is made by dextrin, bitter agent, edible pigment etc and added 5% test drug. The test drug and control drug have no differences in dosage form, appearance, color, specification, label, and so forth.

It is the decoction of the Syndrome Differentiation Decoction(tested drug) minus heat-clearing herbs. For example, heat-clearing herbs such as Scutellaria baicalensis or Herba Violae will be removed from the Syndrome Differentiation Decoction.

Sponsors

Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Placebo is made by dextrin, bitter agent, edible pigment etc and added 5% test drug. The test drug and control drug have no differences in dosage form, appearance, color, specification, label, and so forth.

Intervention model description

randomized, double-blind, crossover comparisons of individualized herbal decoction with control decoction within individual patients. Each n-of-1 trial has 3 pairs of treatment periods. The duration of each treatment period will be 4 weeks.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* the diagnostic criteria based on the consensus of Chinese experts and the guidelines for noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis issued by the British Thoracic Society in 2010; * male or female, aged 18-70 years; * being in the stable stage, and no acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis within the past three weeks; * frequency of acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis ≤ 3 times every year; * signed informed consent for participation.

Exclusion criteria

* having developed respiratory failure with estimated survival time less than one year; * having hemoptysis as a comorbidity; * having complications by active tuberculosis; * being pregnant or with severe heart, liver,and kidney dysfunctions; * participating in other pharmacological clinical trials within the past 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Self-Rated Symptom Score4 weeksPatients rated the severity of the symptoms (such as cough, expectoration, shortness of breath, chest pain, and fatigue) on a 7 point visual analogue scales. The higher the score, the more severe the symptom.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
24 h Sputum Volume4 weeksWe measured the 24h sputum volume at the beginning and the end of each treatment period of the trial. To ensure the accuracy of the measurement, we asked the patients to spit sputum into a collector with scales from 8:00 am to the next 8:00 am. We used the mean value of the sputum volume for 3 consecutive days as the outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
COPD Assessment Test4 weeksCOPD Assessment Test questionnaire is composed of 8 items. Each item has a score ranging from 0 to 5, thereby making the total score range from 0 to 40. Score of 0 represents the best quality of life and 40 does the worst.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactHaiyin Huang, M.D.
haiyin_huang@126.com008602165161782

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026