Skip to content

TESE and Non Obstructive Azoospermia

Predictors for Successful Sperm Reterival by Testicular Sperm Extraxtion(TESE) in Patients With Non Obstructive Azospermia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03146260
Enrollment
148
Registered
2017-05-09
Start date
2017-09-30
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2017-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Azoospermia, Nonobstructive

Keywords

TESE, Sperm retreival, Azoospermia, FSH, LH

Brief summary

Azoospermia is complete absence of sperm in the ejaculate. It accounts for 10-15% of male infertility cases. It is classified as obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). NOA constitutes 60% of all cases of azoospermia. Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) for intracytoplas¬mic sperm injection (ICSI) was first introduced for treatment of obstructive azoospermia in 1993. Soon afterwards testicular sperm were retrieved successfully and used in ICSI in cases of NOA. In the NOA cases, TESE combined with ICSI has been proven to be an acceptable line of treatment. Microdissection TESE may have some theoretical benefits over conventional TESE, but uncertainty exists about its superiority. During a conventional TESE procedure, the testis is exposed through a small incision and one or multiple biopsies are taken blindly. Micro TESE was first introduced in 1999. In this technique, the tunica albuginea is widely opened and examination of the testicular tissue is carried out at 20-25× magnification under an operating microscope allowing visualization of whitish, larger and more opaque tubuli. The concept of this technique is that these tubuli are more likely to contain active spermatogenesis. also no secure clinical predictors of (SR) are demonstrated for both procedures.The recovery of spermatozoa is successful in only 50% of cases and therefore the ability to predict those patients with a high probability of achieving a successful sperm retrieval would be of great value in counselling the patient and his partner . There is no single clinical finding or investigation that can accurately predict the outcome of TESE.An unsuccessful sperm recovery has important emotional and financial implications so objective counselling based on predictive factors may offer realistic expectations for both the couple and physician.

Detailed description

In Assiut university

Interventions

usual procedure for sperm extraction

PROCEDUREMicrodissection TESE

Procedure of extraction is performed under the operating microscope

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
20 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All infertile males with non-obstructive azoospermia

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with obstructive azoospermia: * Normal FSH * Dilated seminal vesicle or ejaculatory duct

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
prediction model for success of sperm retrieval by TESE in non obstructive azospermic patientswithin one hour from the start of the procedure .Descriptive statistics for the studied sample will be used as needed. Evaluation of the predictors of sperm retrieval success will be done through a binary logistic regression analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complicationswithin three monthsComparison between conventional TESE and micro TESE as regard complications
sperm retreival ratewithin procedure by biological search for sperms in retrieved specimens.comparison between two procedures as regard retrieval rate.

Contacts

Primary ContactMohammad A Saad, Msc
dr.abas85@gmail.com01002438659

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026