Skip to content

Immunogenicity and Safety of a Purified Vero Rabies Vaccine

Immunogenicity and Safety of a Purified Vero Rabies Vaccine - Serum Free When Administered According to a Simulated Rabies Post-exposure Regimen in Healthy Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03145766
Enrollment
320
Registered
2017-05-09
Start date
2017-04-17
Completion date
2018-01-08
Last updated
2022-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rabies Virus

Keywords

Rabies virus

Brief summary

This multicenter, observer-blind, controlled, randomized, Phase II study was designed to evaluate different formulations of the Purified Vero Rabies Cell vaccine VRVg.

Detailed description

This study assessed different formulations of the modified formulation of VRVg (VRVg 2- formulations 1 \[low\], 2 \[medium\] and 3 \[high\]) tested in parallel to the initial VRVg formulation (VRVg-1) and Imovax Rabies. Immune responses were assessed at Day 14, Day 28, Day 42, and at Month 7. Safety events were also reported.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALVRVg 2

Modified formulation 1 (Low) of Purified Vero Rabies Vaccine Serum Free

BIOLOGICALVRVg 1

Initial formulation of Purified Vero Rabies Vaccine Serum Free

BIOLOGICALImovax Rabies

Purified inactivated rabies vaccine prepared on human diploid cell cultures

BIOLOGICALHuman Rabies Immunoglobulins (HRIG)

Commercialized formulation of HRIG

Sponsors

Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

An individual must fulfill all of the following criteria in order to be eligible for trial enrollment: 1. Aged 18 to less than 65 years on the day of inclusion. 2. Informed consent form had been signed and dated. 3. Able to attend all scheduled visits and to complied with all trial procedures. 4. Body Mass Index (BMI): 18.5 kilograms per meter square (Kg/m\^2) less than or equal to (\<=) BMI \<= 30 Kg/m\^2.

Exclusion criteria

An individual fulfilling any of the following criteria was to be excluded from trial enrollment: 1. Participant was pregnant, or lactating, or of childbearing potential and not using an effective method of contraception or abstinence from at least 4 weeks prior to the first vaccination until at least 4 weeks after the last vaccination. To be considered of non-childbearing potential, a female must be post-menopausal for at least 1 year, or surgically sterile. 2. Participation at the time of study enrollment or, planned participation during the present trial period in another clinical trial investigating a vaccine, drug, medical device, or medical procedure. 3. Receipt of any vaccine in the 4 weeks (28 days) preceding the first trial vaccination or planned receipt of any vaccine prior to Visit 6. 4. Previous vaccination against rabies (in pre- or post-exposure regimen) with either the trial vaccine or another vaccine. 5. Receipt of immune globulins, blood or blood-derived products in the past 3 months. 6. Known or suspected congenital or acquired immunodeficiency; or receipt of immunosuppressive therapy, such as anti-cancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy, within the preceding 6 months; or long-term systemic corticosteroid therapy (prednisone or equivalent for more than 2 consecutive weeks within the past 3 months). 7. At high risk for rabies infection during the trial (e.g., veterinarians and staff, animal handlers, rabies researchers, or any others whose activities may bring them into frequent contact with rabies virus or animals who had the rabies virus). 8. Known systemic hypersensitivity to any of the vaccine or human rabies immunoglobulins (HRIG) components, or history of a life-threatening reaction to the vaccines used in the trial or to a vaccine containing any of the same substances. 9. Self-reported thrombocytopenia, contraindicating IM vaccination. 10. Bleeding disorder, or receipt of anticoagulants in the 3 weeks preceding inclusion, contraindicating IM vaccination. 11. Deprived of freedom by an administrative or court order, or in an emergency setting, or hospitalized involuntarily. 12. Current alcohol abuse or drug addiction. 13. Chronic illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, was at a stage where it might interfere with trial conduct or completion (e.g., cardiac disorders, renal disorders, auto immune disorders, diabetes, psychiatric disorders or chronic infection). 14. Moderate or severe acute illness/infection (according to investigator judgment) on the day of vaccination or febrile illness (temperature greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 100.4 Fahrenheit \>=38.0 Celsius). A prospective participant should not be included in the study until the condition had resolved or the febrile event had subsided. 15. Identified as an Investigator or employee of the Investigator or study center with direct involvement in the proposed study, or identified as an immediate family member (i.e., parent, spouse, natural or adopted child) of the Investigator or employee with direct involvement in the proposed study. 16. History of Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 42Day 42RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method.
Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody (RVNA) Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) Against Rabies Virus at Day 0Day 0RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) assay method.
Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 14Day 14RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method.
Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 28Day 28RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method.
Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Month 7Month 7RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method.
Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titer Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 0Day 0RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>=0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.
Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 14Day 14RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>=0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.
Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 28Day 28RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>=0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.
Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 42Day 42RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>=0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.
Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Month 7Month 7RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>= 0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.
Geometric Mean Titer Ratio (GMTR) of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 7 Days Following Vaccination 3 (Day 14/Day 0)Day 0 (pre-dose) and Day 14 (7 days post-dose 3)RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. GMTRs were calculated as the ratio of GMTs 7 days post 3rd vaccination (i.e., on Day 14) and pre-vaccination on Day 0.
Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 4 (Day 28/Day 0)Day 0 (pre-dose) and Day 28 (14 days post-dose 4)RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. GMTRs were calculated as the ratio of GMTs 14 days post 4th vaccination (i.e., on Day 28) and pre-vaccination on Day 0.
Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 5 (Day 42/Day 0)Day 0 (Pre-dose) and Day 42 (14 days Post-dose 5)RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. GMTRs were calculated as the ratio of GMTs 14 days post 5th vaccination (i.e., on Day 42) and pre-vaccination on Day 0.
Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 6 Months Following Last Vaccination (Month 7/Day 0)Day 0 (Pre-dose) and Month 7 (6 Months Post Last Vaccination)RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. GMTRs were calculated as the ratio of GMTs 6 month post last vaccination on Month 7 and pre-vaccination on Day 0.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 0Day 0Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 14Day 14Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 28Day 28Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 42Day 42Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Month 7Month 7Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.
Number of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Adverse EventsWithin 30 Minutes After any VaccinationAn adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and does not necessary have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An unsolicited AE was an observed AE that did not fulfill the conditions prelisted in the case report form (CRF) in terms of diagnosis and/or onset post-vaccination. All participants were observed for 30 minutes after any vaccination, and any unsolicited AEs occurred during that time were recorded as immediate unsolicited AEs in the CRF. Immediate AEs considered as related to vaccination were recorded as immediate unsolicited adverse reactions (ARs).
Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsWithin 7 Days After any and each vaccination (Vaccination 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)A solicited reaction (SR) was an AR observed and reported under conditions (symptoms and onset) prelisted (i.e., solicited) in the CRF and considered as related to vaccination. An AR was all noxious and unintended responses to a medicinal product related to any dose. Solicited injection site reactions included pain, erythema and swelling at and around the injection site.
Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsWithin 7 Days After any and each vaccination (Vaccination 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)A solicited reaction was an AR observed and reported under the conditions (symptom and onset) prelisted (i.e., solicited) in the CRF and considered as related to vaccination. An AR was all noxious and unintended responses to a medicinal product related to any dose. Solicited systemic reactions included fever, headache, malaise and myalgia.
Number of Participants With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse EventsWithin 28 Days After any vaccinationAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and does not necessary have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An unsolicited AE was an observed AE that did not fulfill the conditions prelisted in the CRF in terms of diagnosis and/or onset post-vaccination.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From Day 0 up to Month 7An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and does not necessary have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death; life-threatening; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect or a medically important event.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 5 centers in the United States from 17 April 2017 to 08 January 2018.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 320 participants were enrolled and vaccinated in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1
VRVg-2 formulation 1 (Low), IM injection on Days 0, 3, 7, 14 and 28. Concomitant administration of HRIG on Day 0.
80
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2
VRVg-2 formulation 2 (Medium), IM injection on Days 0, 3, 7, 14 and 28. Concomitant administration of HRIG on Day 0.
80
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3
VRVg-2 formulation 3 (High), IM injection on Days 0, 3, 7, 14 and 28. Concomitant administration of HRIG on Day 0.
80
Group 4: VRVg-1
VRVg-1 initial formulation, IM injection on Days 0, 3, 7, 14 and 28. Concomitant administration of HRIG on Day 0.
40
Group 5: Imovax Rabies
Imovax Rabies, IM injection on Days 0, 3, 7, 14 and 28. Concomitant administration of HRIG on Day 0.
40
Total320

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Active Vaccination Phase (Day 0-Day 56)Lost to Follow-up11030
Active Vaccination Phase (Day 0-Day 56)Non-compliance with the Protocol00121
Active Vaccination Phase (Day 0-Day 56)Other Adverse Event (AE)11012
Active Vaccination Phase (Day 0-Day 56)Voluntary Withdrawal Not Due AE41110
Follow-up Phase (Day 56 Till Month 7)Lost to Follow-up41423
Follow-up Phase (Day 56 Till Month 7)Non-compliance with the Protocol20010
Follow-up Phase (Day 56 Till Month 7)Voluntary Withdrawal not due to AE11100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1TotalGroup 5: Imovax RabiesGroup 4: VRVg-1Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2
Age, Continuous41.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
38.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
41.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
41.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants6 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants7 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
18 Participants78 Participants7 Participants13 Participants22 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants8 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
56 Participants217 Participants28 Participants24 Participants55 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants158 Participants22 Participants16 Participants41 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants162 Participants18 Participants24 Participants39 Participants45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 800 / 800 / 800 / 390 / 41
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 8039 / 8045 / 8022 / 3928 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 800 / 801 / 800 / 390 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Geometric Mean Titer Ratio (GMTR) of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 7 Days Following Vaccination 3 (Day 14/Day 0)

RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. GMTRs were calculated as the ratio of GMTs 7 days post 3rd vaccination (i.e., on Day 14) and pre-vaccination on Day 0.

Time frame: Day 0 (pre-dose) and Day 14 (7 days post-dose 3)

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Geometric Mean Titer Ratio (GMTR) of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 7 Days Following Vaccination 3 (Day 14/Day 0)12.7 ratio
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Geometric Mean Titer Ratio (GMTR) of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 7 Days Following Vaccination 3 (Day 14/Day 0)17.9 ratio
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Geometric Mean Titer Ratio (GMTR) of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 7 Days Following Vaccination 3 (Day 14/Day 0)24.8 ratio
Group 4: VRVg-1Geometric Mean Titer Ratio (GMTR) of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 7 Days Following Vaccination 3 (Day 14/Day 0)13.7 ratio
Group 5: Imovax RabiesGeometric Mean Titer Ratio (GMTR) of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 7 Days Following Vaccination 3 (Day 14/Day 0)15.6 ratio
Primary

Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 4 (Day 28/Day 0)

RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. GMTRs were calculated as the ratio of GMTs 14 days post 4th vaccination (i.e., on Day 28) and pre-vaccination on Day 0.

Time frame: Day 0 (pre-dose) and Day 28 (14 days post-dose 4)

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 4 (Day 28/Day 0)31.9 ratio
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 4 (Day 28/Day 0)46.4 ratio
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 4 (Day 28/Day 0)67.0 ratio
Group 4: VRVg-1Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 4 (Day 28/Day 0)30.0 ratio
Group 5: Imovax RabiesGeometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 4 (Day 28/Day 0)48.6 ratio
Primary

Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 5 (Day 42/Day 0)

RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. GMTRs were calculated as the ratio of GMTs 14 days post 5th vaccination (i.e., on Day 42) and pre-vaccination on Day 0.

Time frame: Day 0 (Pre-dose) and Day 42 (14 days Post-dose 5)

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 5 (Day 42/Day 0)80.7 ratio
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 5 (Day 42/Day 0)96.8 ratio
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 5 (Day 42/Day 0)153 ratio
Group 4: VRVg-1Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 5 (Day 42/Day 0)69.0 ratio
Group 5: Imovax RabiesGeometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 14 Days Following Vaccination 5 (Day 42/Day 0)89.9 ratio
Primary

Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 6 Months Following Last Vaccination (Month 7/Day 0)

RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. GMTRs were calculated as the ratio of GMTs 6 month post last vaccination on Month 7 and pre-vaccination on Day 0.

Time frame: Day 0 (Pre-dose) and Month 7 (6 Months Post Last Vaccination)

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 6 Months Following Last Vaccination (Month 7/Day 0)8.86 ratio
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 6 Months Following Last Vaccination (Month 7/Day 0)9.71 ratio
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 6 Months Following Last Vaccination (Month 7/Day 0)15.5 ratio
Group 4: VRVg-1Geometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 6 Months Following Last Vaccination (Month 7/Day 0)9.27 ratio
Group 5: Imovax RabiesGeometric Mean Titer Ratio of Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody 6 Months Following Last Vaccination (Month 7/Day 0)10.1 ratio
Primary

Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site Reactions

A solicited reaction (SR) was an AR observed and reported under conditions (symptoms and onset) prelisted (i.e., solicited) in the CRF and considered as related to vaccination. An AR was all noxious and unintended responses to a medicinal product related to any dose. Solicited injection site reactions included pain, erythema and swelling at and around the injection site.

Time frame: Within 7 Days After any and each vaccination (Vaccination 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)

Population: Analysis performed on SafAS. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.1 participant of Group 4 received Imovax Rabies, and thus counted in Group 5 for safety analysis. At Vaccination 2, 1 participant of Group 1 received Group 2 vaccine and thus counted in Group 2 for post-vaccination 2 safety analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 10 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema post-any vaccination2 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 416 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 30 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 514 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 113 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 50 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 10 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling post-any vaccination0 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 212 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain post-any vaccination29 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 50 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 42 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 30 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 314 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 40 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 212 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain post-any vaccination32 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 120 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 310 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 411 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 57 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema post-any vaccination1 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 10 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 30 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 41 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 51 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling post-any vaccination1 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 11 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 30 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 40 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 50 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 50 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 218 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 514 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 50 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 30 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 126 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 10 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling post-any vaccination1 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 320 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain post-any vaccination38 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 30 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 11 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 417 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 21 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 41 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 42 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema post-any vaccination3 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 46 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 11 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain post-any vaccination14 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 50 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 30 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 26 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 40 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 40 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 50 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling post-any vaccination1 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 110 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 11 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 54 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 30 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema post-any vaccination1 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 34 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 51 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema post-any vaccination2 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain post-any vaccination24 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 41 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 30 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 411 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 30 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 210 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsErythema Post-vaccination 10 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 510 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling post-any vaccination2 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 41 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 39 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 10 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsPain Post-vaccination 116 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Injection Site ReactionsSwelling Post-vaccination 51 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic Reactions

A solicited reaction was an AR observed and reported under the conditions (symptom and onset) prelisted (i.e., solicited) in the CRF and considered as related to vaccination. An AR was all noxious and unintended responses to a medicinal product related to any dose. Solicited systemic reactions included fever, headache, malaise and myalgia.

Time frame: Within 7 Days After any and each vaccination (Vaccination 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)

Population: Analysis performed on SafAS. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.1 participant of Group 4 received Imovax Rabies, and thus counted in Group 5 for safety analysis. At Vaccination 2, 1 participant of Group 1 received Group 2 vaccine and thus counted in Group 2 for post-vaccination 2 safety analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-any Vaccination26 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 10 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 30 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 40 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 50 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-any Vaccination0 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 111 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 211 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 314 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 46 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 57 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-any Vaccination26 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 114 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 28 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 38 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 46 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 55 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-any Vaccination25 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 116 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 29 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 38 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 49 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 57 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-any Vaccination1 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 23 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 37 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 44 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 51 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-any Vaccination12 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 114 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 51 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 23 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-any Vaccination22 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 47 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 50 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-any Vaccination13 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 44 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 40 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 10 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 31 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 18 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 34 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 34 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 55 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 18 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 23 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 115 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 115 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 33 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 45 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 410 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-any Vaccination20 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 32 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 55 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 25 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 40 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 510 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 35 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 26 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 49 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 35 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 57 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-any Vaccination20 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 10 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-any Vaccination17 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 27 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 110 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 50 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-any Vaccination2 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 40 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 50 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-any Vaccination9 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 26 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 15 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 21 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 32 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 43 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 51 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 33 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-any Vaccination11 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 16 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 53 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 22 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 33 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 46 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 44 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 54 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-any Vaccination11 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-any Vaccination0 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 10 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 15 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 30 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 35 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 210 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 19 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 30 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-any Vaccination0 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 39 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-any Vaccination16 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 57 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 19 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 10 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-any Vaccination15 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 45 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 310 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 50 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 20 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 113 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsHeadache Post-vaccination 29 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 28 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 45 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 54 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMalaise Post-vaccination 46 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsFever Post-vaccination 40 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-any Vaccination19 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic ReactionsMyalgia Post-vaccination 59 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Events

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and does not necessary have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An unsolicited AE was an observed AE that did not fulfill the conditions prelisted in the CRF in terms of diagnosis and/or onset post-vaccination.

Time frame: Within 28 Days After any vaccination

Population: Analysis was performed on SafAS. 1 participant of Group 4 received Imovax Rabies vaccine, and thus counted in Group 5 for safety analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Events11 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Events11 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Events20 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Events10 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Events18 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Adverse Events

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and does not necessary have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An unsolicited AE was an observed AE that did not fulfill the conditions prelisted in the case report form (CRF) in terms of diagnosis and/or onset post-vaccination. All participants were observed for 30 minutes after any vaccination, and any unsolicited AEs occurred during that time were recorded as immediate unsolicited AEs in the CRF. Immediate AEs considered as related to vaccination were recorded as immediate unsolicited adverse reactions (ARs).

Time frame: Within 30 Minutes After any Vaccination

Population: Analysis was performed on safety analysis set (SafAS) that included participant who had received at least one least one dose of the study vaccine and were analyzed according to the actual treatment received. 1 participant of Group 4 received Imovax Rabies, and thus counted in Group 5 for safety analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Adverse EventsImmediate Unsolicited AE0 Participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Adverse EventsImmediate Unsolicited AR0 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Adverse EventsImmediate Unsolicited AE1 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Adverse EventsImmediate Unsolicited AR1 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Adverse EventsImmediate Unsolicited AE0 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Adverse EventsImmediate Unsolicited AR0 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Adverse EventsImmediate Unsolicited AR0 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Adverse EventsImmediate Unsolicited AE0 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Adverse EventsImmediate Unsolicited AE2 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Adverse EventsImmediate Unsolicited AR2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and does not necessary have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death; life-threatening; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect or a medically important event.

Time frame: From Day 0 up to Month 7

Population: Analysis was performed on SafAS. 1 participant of Group 4 received Imovax Rabies vaccine, and thus counted in Group 5 for safety analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)0 Participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)0 Participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1 Participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)0 Participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)0 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 0

Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.

Time frame: Day 0

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 00 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 00 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 00 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 00 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 00 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 14

Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 1479.2 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 1489.3 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 1493.0 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 1482.9 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 1485.3 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 28

Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.

Time frame: Day 28

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 2892.8 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 2894.6 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 2898.6 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 28100 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 2893.9 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 42

Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 4297.1 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 4293.2 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 4294.1 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 42100 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Day 4293.9 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Month 7

Complete virus neutralization was defined as absence of fluorescent cells at the participant/time point level at the starting dilution (1/5) of the RFFIT assay. Percentage of participants with complete virus neutralization were reported.

Time frame: Month 7

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Month 795.1 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Month 788.7 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Month 7100 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Month 785.2 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With Complete Virus Neutralization at Starting Dilution (1/5) of Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test Assay at Month 793.5 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titer Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 0

RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>=0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.

Time frame: Day 0

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titer Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 0RVNA titer >= 0.2 IU/mL0 percentage of participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titer Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 0RVNA titer >= 0.5 IU/mL0 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titer Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 0RVNA titer >= 0.2 IU/mL0 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titer Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 0RVNA titer >= 0.5 IU/mL0 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titer Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 0RVNA titer >= 0.2 IU/mL0 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titer Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 0RVNA titer >= 0.5 IU/mL0 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titer Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 0RVNA titer >= 0.5 IU/mL0 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titer Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 0RVNA titer >= 0.2 IU/mL0 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titer Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 0RVNA titer >= 0.2 IU/mL0 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titer Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 0RVNA titer >= 0.5 IU/mL0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 14

RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>=0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 14RVNA titer >= 0.2 IU/mL93.1 percentage of participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 14RVNA titer >= 0.5 IU/mL75.0 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 14RVNA titer >= 0.2 IU/mL96.0 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 14RVNA titer >= 0.5 IU/mL81.3 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 14RVNA titer >= 0.2 IU/mL97.2 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 14RVNA titer >= 0.5 IU/mL90.1 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 14RVNA titer >= 0.5 IU/mL80.0 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 14RVNA titer >= 0.2 IU/mL97.1 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 14RVNA titer >= 0.2 IU/mL97.1 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 14RVNA titer >= 0.5 IU/mL88.2 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 28

RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>=0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.

Time frame: Day 28

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 28RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL98.5 percentage of participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 28RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL93.9 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 28RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL98.6 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 28RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL95.9 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 28RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL100 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 28RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL100 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 28RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL86.2 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 28RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL96.6 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 28RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL100 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 28RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL100 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 42

RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>=0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 42RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL100 percentage of participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 42RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL100 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 42RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL98.6 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 42RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL98.6 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 42RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL100 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 42RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL100 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 42RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL96.7 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 42RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL96.7 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 42RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL100 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Day 42RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL100 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Month 7

RVNA titer against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method. Participants with RVNA titer \>= 0.2 IU/mL were considered as seropositive.

Time frame: Month 7

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Month 7RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL93.4 percentage of participants
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Month 7RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL70.5 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Month 7RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL93.0 percentage of participants
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Month 7RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL77.5 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Month 7RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL100 percentage of participants
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Month 7RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL92.2 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Month 7RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL74.1 percentage of participants
Group 4: VRVg-1Percentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Month 7RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL92.6 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Month 7RVNA titers >= 0.2 IU/mL87.1 percentage of participants
Group 5: Imovax RabiesPercentage of Participants With RVNA Titers >=0.2 IU/mL and >=0.5 IU/mL at Month 7RVNA titers >= 0.5 IU/mL74.2 percentage of participants
Primary

Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 14

RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 141.28 international units per milliliter
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 141.79 international units per milliliter
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 142.52 international units per milliliter
Group 4: VRVg-1Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 141.38 international units per milliliter
Group 5: Imovax RabiesRabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 141.56 international units per milliliter
Primary

Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 28

RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method.

Time frame: Day 28

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 283.22 international units per milliliter
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 284.64 international units per milliliter
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 286.81 international units per milliliter
Group 4: VRVg-1Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 283.04 international units per milliliter
Group 5: Imovax RabiesRabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 284.86 international units per milliliter
Primary

Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 42

RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 428.14 international units per milliliter
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 429.68 international units per milliliter
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 4215.6 international units per milliliter
Group 4: VRVg-1Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 426.98 international units per milliliter
Group 5: Imovax RabiesRabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Day 428.99 international units per milliliter
Primary

Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Month 7

RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the RFFIT assay method.

Time frame: Month 7

Population: Analysis was performed on PPAS. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Month 70.894 international units per milliliter
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Month 70.971 international units per milliliter
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Month 71.58 international units per milliliter
Group 4: VRVg-1Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Month 70.939 international units per milliliter
Group 5: Imovax RabiesRabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titers Against Rabies Virus at Month 71.01 international units per milliliter
Primary

Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody (RVNA) Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) Against Rabies Virus at Day 0

RVNA GMT against rabies virus was assessed using the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) assay method.

Time frame: Day 0

Population: Per-Protocol Analysis Set (PPAS): participants who received at least one dose of the study vaccine without protocol deviations before Day 14 (i.e., 7 days after the 3rd vaccine injection).

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Group 1: VRVg-2 Formulation 1Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody (RVNA) Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) Against Rabies Virus at Day 00.101 international units per milliliter
Group 2:VRVg-2 Formulation 2Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody (RVNA) Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) Against Rabies Virus at Day 00.100 international units per milliliter
Group 3: VRVg-2 Formulation 3Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody (RVNA) Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) Against Rabies Virus at Day 00.102 international units per milliliter
Group 4: VRVg-1Rabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody (RVNA) Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) Against Rabies Virus at Day 00.101 international units per milliliter
Group 5: Imovax RabiesRabies Virus Neutralizing Antibody (RVNA) Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) Against Rabies Virus at Day 00.100 international units per milliliter

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026