Skip to content

Comparison of Pudendal Nerve Block and Caudal Block for Hypospadias in Young Children

Comparison of Pudendal Nerve Block vs Caudal Block for Hypospadias Repair in Young Children: A Blinded Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03145415
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-05-09
Start date
2017-02-17
Completion date
2019-12-20
Last updated
2022-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypospadias and Epispadias

Keywords

pudendal nerve block, hypospadias, caudal block

Brief summary

The purpose of this randomized blinded prospective study is to compare the analgesic efficacy and duration of a Pudendal Nerve Block (PNB) to a Caudal Block (CB) for pediatric patients, ages 6 months to 2 years, undergoing hypospadias repair.

Detailed description

Hypospadias repair is one of the most common congenital malformations of the penis in the United States. It has an incidence of about 1 in 300 births. A combination of general anesthesia and a caudal block or general anesthesia combined with a pudendal nerve block are commonly used for hypospadias repair. In our institution, hypospadias repair is typically done in infants and children ages 6 months to age two. A comparison of the efficacy of pudendal block versus the caudal block has not been undertaken in this younger population.

Interventions

PROCEDURECaudal block

1 cc per kg of 0.2% ropivicaine in the caudal space given before the start of surgery.

PROCEDUREBilateral Pudendal block

0.5 cc per kg of 0.2% ropivicaine. Half of the volume given as a right pudendal block and the remaining volume given on the left pudendal nerve block given prior to the start of surgery

Sponsors

Nemours Children's Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

No other parties will be masked.

Intervention model description

All Children will be randomly assigned to one of 2 groups of 30 patients each using a computer generated number table.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
6 Months to 2 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Boys undergoing hypospadias repair

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opioid consumptionup to 24 hoursThe child's care giver will document the times that a rescue opioid was given to relieve pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraoperative block assessmentup to 3 hoursA heart rate increase above of 20 percent of baseline will be an indication of inadequate block that will be treated with a rescue opioid.
Post operative painup to 2 hoursThe FLACC scale scores greater than 6 will be an indication of inadequate pain relief needing a rescue dosages of opioid.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026