Analgesia, Epidural
Conditions
Brief summary
Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia plays a very vital role in patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy. It not only supports a stable perioperative hemodynamics but also helps in early return of bowel activity.
Detailed description
Intestinal perforation is one of the commonest surgical emergency that the investigators encounter in emergency. Perioperative management of most of such patients is a challenging task for the anesthesiologist, as patients are often hemodynamically unstable at the time of their presentation to emergency. Usual plan of anesthesia for these patients is general anesthesia with or without an epidural block. In routine practice the investigators often place an epidural catheter, primarily for postoperative analgesia, unless there is some contraindication to epidural analgesia. Most often lower thoracic epidural is preferred because of longer length of the laparotomy incision. Thoracic epidural analgesia with local anesthetic (LA) is not only effective in managing the post-operative pain; it is also helpful in supplementing intra-operative analgesia with reduced requirement of anesthetic, muscle relaxant and the analgesic (opioid) drugs. In addition, it has also been reported to be associated with early return of gut motility. It appears that absent / significantly reduced pain leads to lesser stress response, leading to less sympathetic activation and lesser catecholamine release. As catecholamines are inhibitory to gastrointestinal motility, earlier return of gastro intestinal (GI) motility can be achieved by reducing perioperative pain by continuous epidural analgesia. Moreover, an effective epidural analgesia with LA results in avoidance of opioid analgesics for optimal perioperative pain relief, which too may be helpful in achieving earlier return of gut motility. Thus the investigators aimed at determining the effect of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia on return of gut motility in patients undergoing emergency exploratory laparotomy following intestinal perforation and compare it with those in whom epidural analgesia was not used.
Interventions
PROCEDUREEpidural catheter placement
After explaining about the procedure an 18 Gauge epidural catheter was inserted into thoracic 11-12 inter vertebral space under strict asepsis. Before inserting the epidural needle same space was infiltrated with adequate amount of 2% Lignocaine with Adrenaline (1: 200,000) to make the procedure pain free. Epidural space was confirmed by loss of resistance technique.
Sponsors
Banaras Hindu University
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Both sexes * Age 20-60 years * Intestinal perforation posted for emergency exploratory laparotomy
Exclusion criteria
* Patient's refusal and uncooperativeness for epidural analgesia * Hemodynamically unstable patients * Patients with coagulation disorder * Infection at the site of epidural insertion * Spine deformity or spinal cord disease * Raised intracranial pressure * History of drug abuse * Other comorbid conditions like diabetes mellitus, hypertension, thyroid disease
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Return of bowel sound | Until 10th day after completion of surgery | Earlier return of bowel sounds in epidural group |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Passage of flatus | Until 10th day after completion of surgery | Earlier passage of flatus in epidural group |
| Feed tolerance | Until 10th day after completion of surgery | Earlier feed tolerance in epidural group |
| Hospital discharge | Until 10th day after completion of surgery | Earlier discharge from hospital in epidural group |
| Post operative pain | Until 10th day after completion of surgery | Lesser pain in epidural group |
Outcome results
None listed