Skip to content

Efficacy of Nasal Irrigation With Respimer® Netiflow® vs Saline Among Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Prospective, Randomized, Cross-over, Multicenter, Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Nasal Irrigation With Respimer® Netiflow® Mineral Salts Solution Versus Saline Among Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Suffering From Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03145051
Acronym
Respire
Enrollment
50
Registered
2017-05-09
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2017-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Rhinosinusitis, Cystic Fibrosis

Keywords

saline solution, minerals, cystic fibrosis, chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal irrigation

Brief summary

Prospective, randomized, cross-over, multicenter, trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of nasal irrigation with Respimer® mineral salts solution versus saline solution both administered with Respimer® Netiflow® medical device among patients aged ≥ 11 years and older with cystic fibrosis and suffering from chronic rhinosinusitis.

Interventions

OTHERSaline solution

a nasal irrigation care

OTHERRespimer Netiflow

a nasal irrigation care

Sponsors

Laboratoire de la Mer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Patient with Cystic Fibrosis with or without lung transplant; * Patients with allergic chronic rhino sinusitis or no allergic diagnosed by the clinical investigator on the basis of the following signs in variable combination: nasal congestion, headache, sneezing, itchy nose and eyes, runny nose, nosebleeds and nasal crusts, redness and eye discharge present more than 3 months per year. * Patient treated on an outpatient basis; * Patient agreeing not to take sea baths for the duration of the study; * Patient agreeing to respect the procedures for conducting the study, in particular the washout period and follow-up visits; * Patient capable of understanding and self-completing the questionnaires; * For juvenile patients, the holder (s) of parental authority have accepted the participation of the young person (by signing the informed consent after having taken note of the information note) * Member or beneficiary of a social security program

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with significant obstruction of the nasal passages due to: * a mucocele, * polyposis causing nasal obstruction\> 90% or * severe malformation of the septum causing a nasal obstruction\> 90% in whom surgical treatment is recommended; * Patients with signs of severity that may require hospitalization, such as: severe impairment of general health, dyspnoea with cyanosis, high fever (\> 40 ° C). * Patients requiring corticosteroid therapy during the study, with the exception of patients who received pulmonary transplant and were treated with oral corticosteroids at no more than 0.2 mg / kg / day. * Patients with known systemic immunodeficiency status with the exception of patients receiving pulmonary transplantation and immunosuppressed. * Patient pregnant (urine test) or without effective contraception (birth control pill, contraceptive patch, contraceptive implant, vaginal ring, intrauterine device or intrauterine device, male condom). * Nursing patient. * Patient with a contraindication to nasal irrigations as defined in the product leaflet.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in quality of life among subjects undergoing nasal irrigation with Respimer® Netiflow® mineral salts solution compared to saline solution between inclusion and the end of treatment period.over an 8 weeks periodQuality of life to be assessed over an 8 weeks period of nasal wash using SNOT-20 questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Endoscopic status evolution among subjects undergoing nasal irrigation with Respimer® Netiflow® mineral salts solution to saline solution between inclusion and the end of treatment period.over an 8 weeks periodEndoscopic status to be assessed after 4 and 8 weeks of nasal wash using Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Score (LKES)
Mucociliary transport change among subjects undergoing nasal irrigation with Respimer® Netiflow® mineral salts solution to saline solution between inclusion and the end of treatment period.over an 8 weeks periodMucociliary transport to be assessed after 4 and 8 weeks of nasal wash using saccharine test
Clinical status evolution among subjects undergoing nasal irrigation with Respimer® Netiflow® mineral salts solution to saline solution between inclusion and the end of treatment period.over an 8 weeks periodClinical status to be assessed after 4 and 8 weeks of nasal wash using Lund-Kennedy Symptomatic Score (LKSS)
Patient treatment acceptance of nasal irrigation with Respimer® Netiflow® medical deviceover an 8 weeks periodPatient treatment acceptance to be assessed by Morisky score after 4 and 8 weeks of nasal wash
Occurrence of adverse events : taste impairment, epistaxis, nasal irritations, nasal burningover an 8 weeks periodAdverse events to be assessed based on vigilance tracking during the whole study period
Evolution of nasal bacterial pathogens among subjects undergoing nasal irrigation with Respimer® Netiflow® mineral salts solution to saline solution between inclusion and the end of treatment period.over an 8 weeks periodEvolution of nasal bacterial pathogens to be assessed by bacteriologic swab within ethmoid nasal cavities after 4 and 8 weeks of nasal wash

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026