Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Memory Loss
Conditions
Keywords
Early-stage Dementia, Early-stage Alzheimer's disease, Care partner, Caregivers, Caregiving
Brief summary
EPIC II (Early-Stage Partners in Care) is a research project designed to assist people with early-stage memory loss and their care partners by providing early-stage related education and skill-training sessions, held via Zoom, designed to reduce stress, enhance well-being, manage challenges, and plan for the future. Researchers will gather feedback from individuals about their experience to continue to improve programs for early-stage memory loss.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to help early-stage individuals who have early-stage memory loss or early stage dementia and their current or future care partners by providing education and skill-training programs, held via Zoom, designed to reduce stress and distress, increase well-being and quality of life, and plan for the future. About 160 early-stage dyads (person with early-stage dementia and his/her care partner) will be enrolled across the United States through Arizona State University. People who decide to voluntarily participate in this program, will be asked to: * Meet others with memory loss and their care partners. * Attend six group sessions via Zoom (2 hours & 30 minutes each) to learn strategies to help handle new situations, reduce stress, improve mood, communicate better with each other, and plan for the future. * Participate in one 90-minute individualized session via Zoom to address specific issues that may be unique to each dyad's situation. * Participate in three 2-hour confidential interviews that involve questions about background, mood, and quality of life. * Participate in interviews at the start, and again about 3 and 6 months, via Zoom, to help us to continue to improve the program. * Attend several monthly booster sessions after completion of the seven EPIC sessions. Each person will receive up to $45 for completing all follow-up interviews, or $20- 25 for each interview completed. All participants are offered the EPIC sessions shortly after their first interview or shortly after their 3-month interview. Some participants will also attend an additional free education workshop within one month of the initial assessment.
Interventions
This protocol is a minimal risk care values clarification /care planning and psychoeducational skills training intervention, delivered as a workshop series plus one in-home session for people in the early stages of memory loss and their care partner together.
Sponsors
Arizona State University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Dyads will be randomized (assigned by chance) to one of two groups: 10 EPIC A or 2) EPIC B (Wait List Control - WLC. Randomization with stratification by language preference (English vs. Spanish) and geographic setting will occur in sets of 4 to 8 (average 6) eligible dyads. The RCT ends at T2 with comparison of changes in outcomes between EPIC and WLC participants from Assessment 1 (baseline) to Assessment 2 (3 months post baseline). T2-T3 assessments will be used for within-group and maintenance of gains analyses from about 3 months to 6 months post baseline.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
DYAD INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. All participants - Care Partners (CP) and Early-Stage People (EP) - will be at least 18 years of age and speak, read, and write English or Spanish. 2. Eligible dyad relationships include spouse, adult-child relationships (e.g., daughters), and other close friends and family members. 3. Care partners must self-identify as the person who currently has or who expects to have the most hands-on responsibility and ongoing involvement with the EP. 4. CPs must live with or have regular contact with the EP. 5. EPs and CPs must reside in a community setting. EP INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. Live at home rather than an institutional setting, 2. Have a confirmed diagnosis of OR symptoms consistent with early-stage dementia 3. Exhibit changes in memory as specified on the AD8 dementia screening tool. 4. Have a Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE)i score within a protocol-specified range. 5. Have a CP who is defined by the EP as being the unpaid family member who has or will have primary responsibility for providing assistance to the EP EP
Exclusion criteria
1. Denying or not reporting any trouble with memory, based on self-report 2. Normal cognition, based on score derived from screening tool 3. If yes to BOTH: 1. severe mental illness or developmental disability before the age of 45 2. memory problems due to past head injury
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| EP and CP Emotional well-being | Assessments T1-T3 to be conducted over span of six months | Examine the efficacy of the EPIC intervention as compared with a Wait List Comparison condition by looking at the change over time in the Positive and Negative Affect Scales (Dementia Quality of Life Instrument). |
| EP Quality of Life | Assessments T1-T3 to be conducted over span of six months | Assess EP Quality of life and CPs perception of EPs Quality of life by looking at the change over time in the Quality of Life Measure in Dementia. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge and Use of Services for People with Dementia and their Care Partners | Assessments T1-T3 to be conducted over span of six months | Assess the knowledge of, use of, and satisfaction with a variety of services (for example, respite, support groups, case management, referral services) relevant to people with dementia and their care partners by looking at the change over time. |
| Communication Skills and Support within the Dyad | Assessments T1-T3 to be conducted over span of six months | Assess communication by looking at the change over time in the Dyadic Relationship Scale and Emotional Intimacy Disruptive Behavior Scale. |
| EP and CP Care preparedness | Assessments T1-T3 to be conducted over span of six months | Assess EP and CP perceptions of how well prepared they feel for addressing future care needs by looking at the change over time in the Care Partners Preparedness Scale (modified). |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Initial incremental cost effectiveness of EPIC compared with Wait List Comparison condition | T1 - T2 Assessments (Baseline to 3 months) | Based on Quality of Life Adjusted Years for the EPs and hours providing care for CPs, conduct a cost benefit analysis to explicitly indicate whether benefits of the EPIC program outweigh costs by looking at the change over time. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed