Vaccination; Infection
Conditions
Keywords
Positive Affect, Positive Mood, Influenza Vaccination, Vaccination, Randomised Controlled Trial
Brief summary
This study is a 2-arm, parallel, randomised controlled feasibility trial of a brief video intervention designed to induce positive affect (mood) in older adults in primary care settings prior to the receipt of influenza vaccination. Participants will be randomised into two conditions: experimental and active control. In the experimental condition, participants will view the approximately 15 minute long intervention video immediately prior to vaccination. In the active control condition, participants will view a matched video that is designed to be mood neutral. Pre-and-post positive affect levels will be assessed by self-report questionnaires. Immune response to the intervention and vaccination responses will be assessed in saliva and serum samples respectively. The objectives of the study are to assess the impact of the intervention on mood, immune function, and antibody response to influenza vaccination in older adults. This feasibility trial will also allow data collection on exploring recruitment, attrition, intervention engagement, and practicality of collecting clinical data available through electronic records to inform the design of a future definitive trial.
Detailed description
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) describe vaccinations as among the 10 most significant health achievements ever documented; and for many conditions they have been an unmitigated success (e.g., smallpox). There are, however, several populations in whom vaccine effectiveness is far from optimal. These populations are typically contending with underlying immune impairment by virtue of their advancing age and/or the presence of co-existing diseases (e.g., cancer). As a consequence, vaccines are most likely to fail those whom they most seek to benefit: individuals at the greatest risk of ill health. This has prompted research into treatments that enhance immune function prior to vaccination, so called vaccine adjuvants. The aim of such treatments is to optimise the response the immune system makes to the vaccine antigens and, in so doing, increase the likelihood that the vaccine confers protection. One area in which there has been interest is in the potential for developing psycho-behavioural vaccine adjuvants. There is considerable evidence that psychological and behavioural factors can modulate immunity; with diet, physical activity, stress, affect, sleep and social support all associated with immune response. The investigators recently conducted a longitudinal observational cohort study of multiple psychological (positive affect, negative affect, stress) and behavioural (physical activity, sleep, diet) influences on short and long-term antibody responses to influenza vaccination in older adults. This identified positive affect as the most influential psycho-behavioural factor on influenza-specific antibody responses, independently predicting both short and long-term antibody responses in the weakest immunogenic strain above and beyond known demographic and clinical determinants. Intriguingly, the investigators also observed preliminary evidence that positive affect on the day of vaccination was more predictive of antibody responses following vaccination than mood measured over the longer period surrounding vaccination. As influenza-specific antibodies are a well-established correlate of protection from serologically and clinically diagnosed influenza incidence, these data suggest that increasing positive affect immediately prior to vaccination could be used as a non-pharmacological vaccine adjuvant. Through a series of systematic steps, including focus groups and interviews with older adults and health care professionals, the investigators have recently developed a brief, positive affect intervention - designed to improve short-term mood in older adults and be deliverable within primary care. It is hoped this could act as a psycho-behavioural adjuvant to enhance poor responses to influenza vaccination in older adults. Before performing a definitive trial of the intervention's effectiveness, a feasibility trial is needed for number of reasons: 1. To assess whether our intervention can enhance positive affect (mood) 2. To collect information regarding likely recruitment, effect sizes, and attrition rates for informing the necessary size of a larger definitive trial 3. To examine the practicality and acceptability of delivering the intervention in routine primary care settings 4. To explore the feasibility of obtaining outcome data on healthcare usage for a large scale trial (hospitalisation, GP visits for flu-like symptoms from medical records) In line with the above, the investigators will be conducting a 2-arm, parallel, randomised controlled feasibility trial of a brief video intervention designed to induce positive affect (mood) in older adults in primary care settings prior to the receipt of influenza vaccination. Participants will be randomised into two conditions: experimental and active control. In the experimental condition, participants will view the approximately 15 minute long intervention video immediately prior to vaccination. In the active control condition, participants will view a matched video that is designed to be mood neutral. Pre-and-post positive affect levels will be assessed by self-report questionnaires. Immune response to the intervention and vaccination responses will be assessed in saliva (pre/post intervention) and serum samples (pre/4 weeks post-vaccination/16weeks post-vaccination) respectively.
Interventions
See Previous Description
See Previous Description
Northern Hemisphere Influenza Vaccine 2017/18 (Delivered as part of Standard Care)
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Males and Females aged 65-85 years (inclusive) * Received influenza vaccination for the 2016/17 season * Eligible to receive 2017/18 influenza vaccination as part of usual care * Ability to give informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Males and Females aged less than 65 or over 85 years (exclusive) * Did not receive influenza vaccination for the 2016/17 season * Ineligible to receive 2017/18 influenza vaccination as part of usual care * Unable to provide informed consent Deemed by health care provider to be: * Too physically frail to participate * Diagnosed with dementia or other cognitive condition which would make participation difficult * Insufficient command of English language * Influenza vaccination contraindicated * Sufficiently impaired of hearing or vision that exposure to the intervention or control video content as intended would be compromised * Those for whom the collection of blood samples is contraindicated.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Baseline, Immediately Post Intervention (i.e, 15 minutes post-baseline). | Affective Slider (Betella & Verschure, 2016), consists of two single item visual analogue scales. Scores for each are presented as a value from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater pleasure (VAS-Valence) and arousal (VAS-Arousal). Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson et al., 1988). Positive and negative affect subscales were created by summing the scores of positive and negative adjectives respectively. For each sub scale, minimum score = 10, maximum score = 50 with higher scores indicating greater positive and negative affect respectively. Pictorial scale of positive affect (unvalidated, internally developed). Participants completed a single-item photo-based measure of positive affect tailored for older adults. Participants were presented with six groups of images depicting varying degrees of positive affect, and indicate which best reflected how they felt at that moment. Minumum score 1, maximum score 6, higher scores indicate greater positive affect. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment | Baseline | Recruitment rates to inform a future definitive trial |
| Attrition | 4 weeks (post-vaccination), 16 Weeks (post-vaccination) | Attrition - to inform a future definitive trial |
| Secretory IgA Response | Baseline, Immediately Post Intervention (i.e, 15 minutes post-baseline). | Secretory IgA levels measured in saliva samples via ELISA. This is a non-specific measure of immunological response |
| Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 4 weeks (post-vaccination), 16 Weeks (post-vaccination) | IgG levels against the 4 vaccine strains measured via ELISA. Values represent equivalent ug/ml based on diluted sample absorbance value interpolation against a standard IgG curve, multiplied by the serum dilution score (i.e., 4000). |
| Health Care Utilization | Baseline to 6 months post-vaccination | Via medical records, we assessed health care usage potentially attributable to flu-like symptoms (e.g., GP visits, hospitalisation, antibiotic prescription) during the 6 months post-vaccination |
Countries
United Kingdom
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Note: 3 Participants were not randomised to condition, as they did not attend primary session.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Experimental Participants in the experimental condition will view a video designed to induce positive affect. This includes 3 short comedy clips (fork handles sketch, the two Ronnie's; A room with a view - faulty towers; Tim Vine Live stand-up extract), uplifting music (Jailhouse Rock - Elvis Presley; Happy Together - The Turtles), jokes and positive imagery. The content of the intervention has been informed by patient and public involvement, focus groups with older adults, and pilot testing.
Positive Affect Intervention: See Previous Description
Northern Hemisphere Influenza Vaccine 2017/18 (Delivered as part of Standard Care): Northern Hemisphere Influenza Vaccine 2017/18 (Delivered as part of Standard Care) | 52 |
| Active Control Participants in the control condition will view a video of matched length to the experimental condition video, but not designed to induce mood change. This includes short documentary clips (a pride in pencils; model railways, lecture extract on hydration), neutral music and images.
Neutral Control Intervention: See Previous Description
Northern Hemisphere Influenza Vaccine 2017/18 (Delivered as part of Standard Care): Northern Hemisphere Influenza Vaccine 2017/18 (Delivered as part of Standard Care) | 51 |
| Total | 103 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Experimental | Active Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 72.95 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.87 | 72.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 | 73.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 |
| Current Smoker | 8 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Highest Ever Total Household Income ≥ £100,000 | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Highest Ever Total Household Income ≤ £14,999 | 33 Participants | 17 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Highest Ever Total Household Income £15,000-£24,999 | 33 Participants | 16 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Highest Ever Total Household Income £25,000-£34,999 | 12 Participants | 8 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Highest Ever Total Household Income £35,000-£49,000 | 12 Participants | 7 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Highest Ever Total Household Income £50,000-£74,999 | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Highest Ever Total Household Income £75,000-£99,000 | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Highest Ever Total Household Income Did Not Respond | 10 Participants | 3 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Highest Level of Education Did not respond | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Highest Level of Education Other | 16 Participants | 8 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Highest Level of Education Postgraduate | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Highest Level of Education School | 77 Participants | 37 Participants | 40 Participants |
| Highest Level of Education Undergraduate | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Independent Living No | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Independent Living Yes | 96 Participants | 47 Participants | 49 Participants |
| Marital Status Cohabiting | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Marital Status Did not Respond | 6 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Marital Status Married | 63 Participants | 34 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Marital Status Separated/divorced | 13 Participants | 9 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Marital Status Single, never married | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Marital Status Widowed | 12 Participants | 4 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Pre-Vaccination IgG A/Hong-Kong | 239.50 ug/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 139.42 | 238.0 ug/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 119.9 | 241.0 ug/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 158.1 |
| Pre-Vaccination IgG A/Michigan | 172.05 ug/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 108.47 | 187.2 ug/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 112.4 | 156.6 ug/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 103.1 |
| Pre-Vaccination IgG B/Brisbane | 112.90 ug/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 67.35 | 107.0 ug/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 54.1 | 118.9 ug/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 78.7 |
| Pre-Vaccination IgG B/Phuket | 163.61 ug/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 117.93 | 144.4 ug/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 85.1 | 183.2 ug/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 146.2 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Did not Respond | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 99 Participants | 51 Participants | 48 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 52 Participants | 22 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 51 Participants | 30 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Total Health Status | 555.41 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 171.62 | 555.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 175.1 | 555.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 169.9 |
| Trait Emotional Reactivity | 40.59 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.52 | 39.9 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2 | 41.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 |
| Trait Negative Affect | 15.35 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.52 | 15.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 | 15.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 |
| Trait Optimism | 15.68 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.61 | 16.0 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 | 15.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 |
| Trait Positive Affect | 33.65 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.33 | 33.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 | 33.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 52 | 0 / 51 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 52 | 0 / 51 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 52 | 0 / 51 |
Outcome results
Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple]
Affective Slider (Betella & Verschure, 2016), consists of two single item visual analogue scales. Scores for each are presented as a value from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater pleasure (VAS-Valence) and arousal (VAS-Arousal). Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson et al., 1988). Positive and negative affect subscales were created by summing the scores of positive and negative adjectives respectively. For each sub scale, minimum score = 10, maximum score = 50 with higher scores indicating greater positive and negative affect respectively. Pictorial scale of positive affect (unvalidated, internally developed). Participants completed a single-item photo-based measure of positive affect tailored for older adults. Participants were presented with six groups of images depicting varying degrees of positive affect, and indicate which best reflected how they felt at that moment. Minumum score 1, maximum score 6, higher scores indicate greater positive affect.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediately Post Intervention (i.e, 15 minutes post-baseline).
Population: Missing Data for some outcome measures - i.e., incomplete scale
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Post-Intervention VAS-Valence | 87.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.7 |
| Experimental | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Post-Intervention VAS-Arousal | 83.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
| Experimental | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Post-Intervention Pictorial Scale | 4.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Experimental | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Post-Intervention PANAS Positive Affect | 35.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.4 |
| Experimental | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Post-Intervention PANAS Negative Affect | 11.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Experimental | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Pre-Intervention VAS-Valence | 79.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.2 |
| Experimental | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Pre-Intervention VAS-Arousal | 79.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19 |
| Experimental | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Pre-Intervention Pictorial | 3.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Experimental | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Pre-Intervention PANAS Postive Affect | 34.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
| Experimental | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Pre-Intervention PANAS Negative Affect | 12.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Active Control | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Pre-Intervention Pictorial | 4.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Active Control | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Post-Intervention VAS-Valence | 79.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.8 |
| Active Control | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Pre-Intervention VAS-Valence | 80.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.1 |
| Active Control | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Post-Intervention VAS-Arousal | 79.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.3 |
| Active Control | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Pre-Intervention PANAS Negative Affect | 12.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Active Control | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Post-Intervention Pictorial Scale | 4.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Active Control | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Pre-Intervention VAS-Arousal | 80.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.1 |
| Active Control | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Post-Intervention PANAS Positive Affect | 35.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| Active Control | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Pre-Intervention PANAS Postive Affect | 34.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 35 |
| Active Control | Mood Outcome Scores [Multiple] | Post-Intervention PANAS Negative Affect | 11.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
Attrition
Attrition - to inform a future definitive trial
Time frame: 4 weeks (post-vaccination), 16 Weeks (post-vaccination)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Attrition | Attendance at 4 Week Follow-up | Yes | 51 Participants |
| Experimental | Attrition | Attendance at 16 Week Follow up | Yes | 49 Participants |
| Experimental | Attrition | Attendance at 4 Week Follow-up | No | 1 Participants |
| Experimental | Attrition | Attendance at 16 Week Follow up | No | 3 Participants |
| Active Control | Attrition | Attendance at 16 Week Follow up | No | 3 Participants |
| Active Control | Attrition | Attendance at 4 Week Follow-up | Yes | 51 Participants |
| Active Control | Attrition | Attendance at 4 Week Follow-up | No | 0 Participants |
| Active Control | Attrition | Attendance at 16 Week Follow up | Yes | 48 Participants |
Health Care Utilization
Via medical records, we assessed health care usage potentially attributable to flu-like symptoms (e.g., GP visits, hospitalisation, antibiotic prescription) during the 6 months post-vaccination
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-vaccination
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Health Care Utilization | GP Consultations | 14 Participants |
| Experimental | Health Care Utilization | Nurse Consultations | 1 Participants |
| Experimental | Health Care Utilization | Out of Hours/Telephone Conversations | 7 Participants |
| Experimental | Health Care Utilization | Emergency Department Consultations | 1 Participants |
| Experimental | Health Care Utilization | Antibiotic Prescriptions | 6 Participants |
| Experimental | Health Care Utilization | Additional Investigations (e.g., Xray) | 4 Participants |
| Active Control | Health Care Utilization | Antibiotic Prescriptions | 9 Participants |
| Active Control | Health Care Utilization | GP Consultations | 13 Participants |
| Active Control | Health Care Utilization | Emergency Department Consultations | 1 Participants |
| Active Control | Health Care Utilization | Nurse Consultations | 1 Participants |
| Active Control | Health Care Utilization | Additional Investigations (e.g., Xray) | 3 Participants |
| Active Control | Health Care Utilization | Out of Hours/Telephone Conversations | 3 Participants |
Recruitment
Recruitment rates to inform a future definitive trial
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Total Population that received study Invitation
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Recruitment | Expressed Interest, but not consented | 23 Participants |
| Experimental | Recruitment | Consented, but not randomised | 3 Participants |
| Experimental | Recruitment | Randomised | 103 Participants |
| Experimental | Recruitment | Did Not Express Interest | 1002 Participants |
Secretory IgA Response
Secretory IgA levels measured in saliva samples via ELISA. This is a non-specific measure of immunological response
Time frame: Baseline, Immediately Post Intervention (i.e, 15 minutes post-baseline).
Population: Missing Data Count n=15
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Secretory IgA Response | Pre-Intervention Flow Rate | 81.0 Flow Rate (ug/min) | Standard Deviation 76.4 |
| Experimental | Secretory IgA Response | Post-Intervention Flow Rate | 116.7 Flow Rate (ug/min) | Standard Deviation 107.5 |
| Active Control | Secretory IgA Response | Pre-Intervention Flow Rate | 94.1 Flow Rate (ug/min) | Standard Deviation 94.2 |
| Active Control | Secretory IgA Response | Post-Intervention Flow Rate | 144.7 Flow Rate (ug/min) | Standard Deviation 142.5 |
Vaccine Specific IgG Response
IgG levels against the 4 vaccine strains measured via ELISA. Values represent equivalent ug/ml based on diluted sample absorbance value interpolation against a standard IgG curve, multiplied by the serum dilution score (i.e., 4000).
Time frame: 4 weeks (post-vaccination), 16 Weeks (post-vaccination)
Population: Missing Data Count: n=1 for 4 weeks post-vaccination, n=5 for 16 weeks post-vaccination
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination A/Michigan | 243.28 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 134.52 |
| Experimental | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination A/Hong-Kind | 301.68 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 138.88 |
| Experimental | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination B/Brisbane | 126.30 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 56.36 |
| Experimental | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination B/Phuket | 210.30 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 123.96 |
| Experimental | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 16 Weeks Post-Vaccination A/Michigan | 221.69 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 131.9 |
| Experimental | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 16 Weeks Post-Vaccination A/Hong-Kong | 283.67 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 126.72 |
| Experimental | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 16 Weeks Post-Vaccination B/Brisbane | 139.49 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 56.4 |
| Experimental | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 16 Weeks Post-Vaccination B/Phuket | 249.10 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 124.9 |
| Active Control | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 16 Weeks Post-Vaccination B/Phuket | 271.70 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 176.16 |
| Active Control | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination A/Michigan | 208.81 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 122.42 |
| Active Control | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 16 Weeks Post-Vaccination A/Michigan | 203.03 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 119.41 |
| Active Control | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination A/Hong-Kind | 284.96 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 138.64 |
| Active Control | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 16 Weeks Post-Vaccination B/Brisbane | 144.47 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 76.77 |
| Active Control | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination B/Brisbane | 127.25 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 63.93 |
| Active Control | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 16 Weeks Post-Vaccination A/Hong-Kong | 288.75 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 180.18 |
| Active Control | Vaccine Specific IgG Response | 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination B/Phuket | 229.57 ug/ml | Standard Deviation 135.63 |