Skip to content

Reducing Breast Cancer-related Fatigue and Improving Cognition With Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation

Reducing Breast Cancer-related Fatigue and Improving Cognition With Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03143894
Enrollment
7
Registered
2017-05-08
Start date
2017-04-21
Completion date
2020-06-24
Last updated
2021-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Cognitive Dysfunction, Fatigue

Keywords

Breast Cancer, Cognition, Fatigue, Cancer-related Cognitive Impairment, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Brief summary

This study will test the preliminary efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve fatigue and cognition in women with a history of breast cancer and persistent fatigue.

Detailed description

Fatigue and cognitive dysfunction are commonly reported symptoms associated with impaired quality of life and productivity in breast cancer survivors. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve both fatigue and cognition. Here tDCS will be used in a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial in women who have finished treatment of breast cancer and who report persistent fatigue. Participants will complete measures of fatigue and cognition before and after five consecutive days of active or sham tDCS then complete questionnaires by phone one week later. Participants will return about one month later for another five days of participation, followed by another brief study phone call the following week.

Interventions

DEVICEtDCS

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe, portable, non-invasive form TDCS is a form of non-invasive electrical brain stimulation using low amplitude direct current to facilitate neuronal transmission beneath scalp electrodes.

OTHERSham tDCS

Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)..

Sponsors

Under Armour, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-blind

Intervention model description

Randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, cross-over

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women, 18 years of age or older * Stage I-III breast cancer * Treatment Status: At least 6 months and no more than 5 years after the conclusion of active breast cancer therapy, including surgery, radiation therapy and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, if administered. NOTE: Adjuvant HER2-targeted therapy and endocrine therapy may still be ongoing at the time of study enrollment. * Fatigue: Moderate fatigue on most days within the past week (i.e., at least 4 out of the last 7 days), rated as ≥ 4 on a 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (worst fatigue) scale. * Able and willing to complete study tasks as evidenced by at least the following: fluent English speaker; hearing and language comprehension; and, sufficient literacy to complete study forms and questionnaires. * Patient understands the study regimen, its requirements, risks, and discomforts, and is able and willing to sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of recurrent breast cancer at the time of enrollment. * Depression or anxiety as defined either by ongoing pharmacological treatment for depression or anxiety or a HADS score on initial screening. * Dementia as assessed by a MMSE score on initial screening. * Known pregnancy or nursing. * Any of the following: diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder made by a physician, seizure disorder, pacemaker, hearing aids, any metal implanted in the head, or the presence of other known current untreated causes of fatigue such as anemia or untreated hypothyroidism. * Use of stimulant medications, sleep medications, nicotine patch, and other drugs thought to interfere with tDCS efficacy for seven days prior to and during study participation. * Use of narcotic pain medication, benzodiazepines, or illicit drugs for seven days prior to and during study participation. * Consumption of \>14 alcoholic drinks per week or positive screening on the CAGE. * Skin conditions involving open sores on the scalp that would prevent proper application of the electrodes. * Hairstyles that obstruct placement of the electrodes including cornrows, dreadlocks, braids or other hair accessories that cannot be removed. * Other medical or other condition(s) that in the opinion of the investigators might compromise the objectives of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change on Paced Auditory Serial Attention Test (PASAT)Baseline and Day 5Change in auditory working memory as measured by the PASAT prior to and following the intervention. PASAT scores range from 0 to 120, with higher scores reflecting better working memory. Larger positive change scores reflect greater improvement in performance from baseline whereas greater negative change scores reflect declines in performance from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change on Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognitive Scale (FACT-Cog)Baseline and Day 5Change in subjective cognitive functioning as measured by the FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment scale prior to and following the intervention. Raw scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting better perceived cognitive functioning. Larger positive change scores reflect greater improvement in subjective cognitive functioning from baseline whereas greater negative change scores reflect declines in subjective cognitive functioning from baseline.
Change in Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory- SF (MFSI-SF)Baseline and Day 5Change in subjective fatigue as measured by the MFSI-SF prior to and following the intervention. Raw scores range from -36 to + 144, with higher scores reflecting greater levels of fatigue. Larger positive change scores reflect greater improvement in fatigue from baseline whereas greater negative change scores reflect declines in fatigue from baseline.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active tDCS First
2 mA of active tDCS applied over a 30-minute study session once per day for 5 consecutive days then sham tDCS after washout. tDCS: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe, portable, non-invasive form TDCS is a form of non-invasive electrical brain stimulation using low amplitude direct current to facilitate neuronal transmission beneath scalp electrodes. Sham tDCS: Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)..
3
Sham tDCS First
Stimulation mimicking the tDCS applied only briefly over a 30-minute study session once per day for 5 consecutive days then active tDCS after washout. tDCS: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe, portable, non-invasive form TDCS is a form of non-invasive electrical brain stimulation using low amplitude direct current to facilitate neuronal transmission beneath scalp electrodes. Sham tDCS: Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)..
4
Total7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham tDCS FirstTotalActive tDCS First
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Age, Continuous69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.22
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Change on Paced Auditory Serial Attention Test (PASAT)

Change in auditory working memory as measured by the PASAT prior to and following the intervention. PASAT scores range from 0 to 120, with higher scores reflecting better working memory. Larger positive change scores reflect greater improvement in performance from baseline whereas greater negative change scores reflect declines in performance from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 5

Population: Participants who completed both active and sham conditions, allowing for calculation and comparison of change by condition.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active tDCSChange on Paced Auditory Serial Attention Test (PASAT)-1.83 raw score change on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.04
Sham tDCSChange on Paced Auditory Serial Attention Test (PASAT)1.83 raw score change on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.52
p-value: 0.47t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory- SF (MFSI-SF)

Change in subjective fatigue as measured by the MFSI-SF prior to and following the intervention. Raw scores range from -36 to + 144, with higher scores reflecting greater levels of fatigue. Larger positive change scores reflect greater improvement in fatigue from baseline whereas greater negative change scores reflect declines in fatigue from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 5

Population: Participants who completed both active and sham conditions, allowing for calculation and comparison of change by condition.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active tDCSChange in Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory- SF (MFSI-SF)8.5 raw score change on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.02
Sham tDCSChange in Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory- SF (MFSI-SF)14.83 raw score change on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.69
p-value: 0.36t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change on Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognitive Scale (FACT-Cog)

Change in subjective cognitive functioning as measured by the FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment scale prior to and following the intervention. Raw scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting better perceived cognitive functioning. Larger positive change scores reflect greater improvement in subjective cognitive functioning from baseline whereas greater negative change scores reflect declines in subjective cognitive functioning from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 5

Population: Participants who completed both active and sham conditions, allowing for calculation and comparison of change by condition.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active tDCSChange on Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognitive Scale (FACT-Cog)7.17 raw score change on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.55
Sham tDCSChange on Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognitive Scale (FACT-Cog)8.67 raw score change on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.03
p-value: 0.69t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026