Skip to content

Promoting Cancer Symptom Management in Older Adults

Promoting Cancer Symptom Management in Older Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03143829
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-05-08
Start date
2016-08-11
Completion date
2018-08-31
Last updated
2021-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting, Neoplasms

Keywords

gerontology, symptom self-management, Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting

Brief summary

The purpose of the project is to estimate the effect size of a technology based intervention for older adults with cancer for nausea and vomiting. Participants will be randomized to either an intervention or a wait control group. Outcomes such as symptom severity, quality of life and resource use will be examined.

Detailed description

The goal of this study is to increase the self-management behaviors for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and reduce treatment-related negative outcomes in older adults with cancer. CINV is a common reason for unplanned emergency department and/or hospital admissions in older adults with cancer. Early reinforcement of standard education and reframing preconceived beliefs about the potential serious consequences of CINV and the symptoms ability to be successfully managed will increase effective self-management behaviors and improve patient outcomes

Interventions

This intervention is an educational intervention, a serious game, which allows older adults under treatment for cancer to practice making self-care decisions for an avatar who is being sent home after their first chemotherapy treatment. This serious game is coupled with a discussion with a nurse about choices related to managing nausea and vomiting at home.

Sponsors

University of South Florida
CollaboratorOTHER
Orlando Health, Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Central Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants are randomly assigned to either an intervention or wait control group. The intervention group receives an educational intervention at the start of the study. The wait control group receives the intervention at the end.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women age 65 and older * newly diagnosed with any cancer * treatment with any chemotherapeutic agent with a moderate to severe emetic potential (on a 3- or 4- week cycle) * proficient in English * have a telephone.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with previous diagnosis and treatment for cancer * advanced or end stage disease with a palliative intent * visually or hearing impaired.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptom Severity Change Over Timeassessed at baseline (week 1), week 4,week 7, week 10. differences between groups at week 10 are being reportedSymptom Representation Questionnaire (SRQ)\[20\] , a 24-item self-report measure will be used to identify presence and severity of common treatment-related symptoms (0-10 Likert scale), including nausea and vomiting (N/V). This measure asks respondents to think about their symptoms over the past week. Higher values indicate a worse outcome
Self-management Behaviors Over Timedata was assessed at weeks 4,7, 10, the mean number of behaviors (behaviors) combined at each time point is reportedAn investigator-developed Symptom Management Checklist (SMC) will measure CINV self-management prevention behaviors. Participants will complete this daily at home between chemotherapy cycles. Higher numbers indicate more frequent management.
Health-related Quality of Life Change Over Timeassessed at baseline (week 1), week 4, week 7, week 10. the difference between groups at week 10 is being reportedThe EORTC-30\[21\] will measure QOL at each treatment cycle. 0-10 scale, higher scores mean better outcome
Resource Use Over Timeassessed at weeks 4,7,10. the total number of admissions was summed across all time points and participantsAny unplanned Emergency Department or hospital admission will be recorded via participant report. Higher number indicate higher resource use.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment took place from June 2016 through August 2018 at the outpatient treatment center at the cancer center

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention Group
electronic Symptom Self-Management Training- CINV (eSSET-CINV) is an educational intervention administered once at the start of treatment eSSET-CINV: This intervention is an educational intervention, a serious game, which allows older adults under treatment for cancer to practice making self-care decisions for an avatar who is being sent home after their first chemotherapy treatment. This serious game is coupled with a discussion with a nurse about choices related to managing nausea and vomiting at home.
38
Wait Control Group
The Wait control group receives the electronic Symptom Self-Management Training- CINV (eSSET-CINV) at the last study visit. Outcomes will be compared to the Intervention group at the end of the study. eSSET-CINV: This intervention is an educational intervention, a serious game, which allows older adults under treatment for cancer to practice making self-care decisions for an avatar who is being sent home after their first chemotherapy treatment. This serious game is coupled with a discussion with a nurse about choices related to managing nausea and vomiting at home.
42
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studychanged treatment, no longer eligible22
Overall StudyDeath11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention GroupTotalWait Control Group
Age, Continuous69.11 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.311
69.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.684
70.26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.012
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
38 Participants77 Participants39 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
35 Participants69 Participants34 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
38 participants80 participants42 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants59 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants21 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 381 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 380 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 380 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Health-related Quality of Life Change Over Time

The EORTC-30\[21\] will measure QOL at each treatment cycle. 0-10 scale, higher scores mean better outcome

Time frame: assessed at baseline (week 1), week 4, week 7, week 10. the difference between groups at week 10 is being reported

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention GroupHealth-related Quality of Life Change Over Time5.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.046
Wait Control GroupHealth-related Quality of Life Change Over Time5.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.893
Comparison: comparison at time 4p-value: 0.558t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Resource Use Over Time

Any unplanned Emergency Department or hospital admission will be recorded via participant report. Higher number indicate higher resource use.

Time frame: assessed at weeks 4,7,10. the total number of admissions was summed across all time points and participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intervention GroupResource Use Over Time19 admissions
Wait Control GroupResource Use Over Time11 admissions
Comparison: descriptive comparison of resource usep-value: 0.153Chi-squared
Primary

Self-management Behaviors Over Time

An investigator-developed Symptom Management Checklist (SMC) will measure CINV self-management prevention behaviors. Participants will complete this daily at home between chemotherapy cycles. Higher numbers indicate more frequent management.

Time frame: data was assessed at weeks 4,7, 10, the mean number of behaviors (behaviors) combined at each time point is reported

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention GroupSelf-management Behaviors Over Time3.68 BehaviorsStandard Deviation 7.59
Wait Control GroupSelf-management Behaviors Over Time1.38 BehaviorsStandard Deviation 4.48
Comparison: Descriptive comparisonp-value: 0.099t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Symptom Severity Change Over Time

Symptom Representation Questionnaire (SRQ)\[20\] , a 24-item self-report measure will be used to identify presence and severity of common treatment-related symptoms (0-10 Likert scale), including nausea and vomiting (N/V). This measure asks respondents to think about their symptoms over the past week. Higher values indicate a worse outcome

Time frame: assessed at baseline (week 1), week 4,week 7, week 10. differences between groups at week 10 are being reported

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention GroupSymptom Severity Change Over Time4.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.24
Wait Control GroupSymptom Severity Change Over Time3.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.293
Comparison: Differences at week 10p-value: 0.083t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026